Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589 |
Resumo: | The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effect of J-Synch protocol on pregnancy rate (PR) of heifers artificially inseminated after detected estrus (DEAI) or at fixed-time (FTAI). Two hundred ninety-three Braford heifers were used. On day 0, all animals received 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate administered intramuscularly (IM) and an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (DIB, 0.5 g). Heifers were assigned to the following group: 1) J-Synch: on day 6, DIB devices were removed and 500 µg of d-Cloprostenol sodium (d-CS) was administered IM and paint was applied on tail base (tail-paint). On day 9 (60 h after DIB removal), heifers with ? 40% of the tail-paint rubbed off were inseminated. Those not showing estrus by 72 h after DIB removal received 100 µg of GnRH at that time and were FTAI. 2) Conventional: on day 7, DIB devices were removed, and 500 µg of d-CS and 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate were administered IM and tail-paint. Forty-eight hours after DIB removal, heifers with the tail-paint rubbed off were DEAI. Those not showing estrus by 54 h after DIB removal were FTAI. Pregnancy rate was diagnosed by ultrasonography 30 days after FTAI in all heifers and did not differ between protocols (44.28% and 42.48%, P = 0.673). In both protocols, higher PR was observed in DEAI heifers (P = 0.047). In conclusion, the use of the J-Synch protocol generated similar PR to the Conventional protocol, allowing its use with the same efficiency. Furthermore, the DEAI generated better PR than the FTAI, regardless of the protocol used. |
id |
UFRPE-2_a201ee6ea53beb3d7653fbab73d982f7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.10.0.7.8:article/3589 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRPE-2 |
network_name_str |
Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocolestrussynchronization protocolsGnRHtail-paint.The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effect of J-Synch protocol on pregnancy rate (PR) of heifers artificially inseminated after detected estrus (DEAI) or at fixed-time (FTAI). Two hundred ninety-three Braford heifers were used. On day 0, all animals received 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate administered intramuscularly (IM) and an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (DIB, 0.5 g). Heifers were assigned to the following group: 1) J-Synch: on day 6, DIB devices were removed and 500 µg of d-Cloprostenol sodium (d-CS) was administered IM and paint was applied on tail base (tail-paint). On day 9 (60 h after DIB removal), heifers with ? 40% of the tail-paint rubbed off were inseminated. Those not showing estrus by 72 h after DIB removal received 100 µg of GnRH at that time and were FTAI. 2) Conventional: on day 7, DIB devices were removed, and 500 µg of d-CS and 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate were administered IM and tail-paint. Forty-eight hours after DIB removal, heifers with the tail-paint rubbed off were DEAI. Those not showing estrus by 54 h after DIB removal were FTAI. Pregnancy rate was diagnosed by ultrasonography 30 days after FTAI in all heifers and did not differ between protocols (44.28% and 42.48%, P = 0.673). In both protocols, higher PR was observed in DEAI heifers (P = 0.047). In conclusion, the use of the J-Synch protocol generated similar PR to the Conventional protocol, allowing its use with the same efficiency. Furthermore, the DEAI generated better PR than the FTAI, regardless of the protocol used.MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA2020-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/358910.26605/medvet-v14n4-3589Medicina Veterinária; v. 14 n. 4 (2020); 328-3332675-66171809-4678reponame:Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEenghttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589/482483815Copyright (c) 2020 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReineri, Pablo SebastiánCoria, Maria SumampaPrincipi, SantiagoPunta Perez, RodrigoPalma, Gustavo Adolfo2020-11-26T11:36:08Zoai:ojs.10.0.7.8:article/3589Revistahttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/PUBhttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/oairevmedvet@ufrpe.br1809-46782675-6617opendoar:2020-11-26T11:36:08Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol |
title |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol |
spellingShingle |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol Reineri, Pablo Sebastián estrus synchronization protocols GnRH tail-paint. |
title_short |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol |
title_full |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol |
title_fullStr |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol |
title_sort |
Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol |
author |
Reineri, Pablo Sebastián |
author_facet |
Reineri, Pablo Sebastián Coria, Maria Sumampa Principi, Santiago Punta Perez, Rodrigo Palma, Gustavo Adolfo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coria, Maria Sumampa Principi, Santiago Punta Perez, Rodrigo Palma, Gustavo Adolfo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reineri, Pablo Sebastián Coria, Maria Sumampa Principi, Santiago Punta Perez, Rodrigo Palma, Gustavo Adolfo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
estrus synchronization protocols GnRH tail-paint. |
topic |
estrus synchronization protocols GnRH tail-paint. |
description |
The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effect of J-Synch protocol on pregnancy rate (PR) of heifers artificially inseminated after detected estrus (DEAI) or at fixed-time (FTAI). Two hundred ninety-three Braford heifers were used. On day 0, all animals received 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate administered intramuscularly (IM) and an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (DIB, 0.5 g). Heifers were assigned to the following group: 1) J-Synch: on day 6, DIB devices were removed and 500 µg of d-Cloprostenol sodium (d-CS) was administered IM and paint was applied on tail base (tail-paint). On day 9 (60 h after DIB removal), heifers with ? 40% of the tail-paint rubbed off were inseminated. Those not showing estrus by 72 h after DIB removal received 100 µg of GnRH at that time and were FTAI. 2) Conventional: on day 7, DIB devices were removed, and 500 µg of d-CS and 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate were administered IM and tail-paint. Forty-eight hours after DIB removal, heifers with the tail-paint rubbed off were DEAI. Those not showing estrus by 54 h after DIB removal were FTAI. Pregnancy rate was diagnosed by ultrasonography 30 days after FTAI in all heifers and did not differ between protocols (44.28% and 42.48%, P = 0.673). In both protocols, higher PR was observed in DEAI heifers (P = 0.047). In conclusion, the use of the J-Synch protocol generated similar PR to the Conventional protocol, allowing its use with the same efficiency. Furthermore, the DEAI generated better PR than the FTAI, regardless of the protocol used. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589 10.26605/medvet-v14n4-3589 |
url |
https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26605/medvet-v14n4-3589 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589/482483815 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicina Veterinária; v. 14 n. 4 (2020); 328-333 2675-6617 1809-4678 reponame:Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) |
collection |
Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revmedvet@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1806552251873886208 |