Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reineri, Pablo Sebastián
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Coria, Maria Sumampa, Principi, Santiago, Punta Perez, Rodrigo, Palma, Gustavo Adolfo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589
Resumo: The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effect of J-Synch protocol on pregnancy rate (PR) of heifers artificially inseminated after detected estrus (DEAI) or at fixed-time (FTAI). Two hundred ninety-three Braford heifers were used. On day 0, all animals received 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate administered intramuscularly (IM) and an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (DIB, 0.5 g). Heifers were assigned to the following group: 1) J-Synch: on day 6, DIB devices were removed and 500 µg of d-Cloprostenol sodium (d-CS) was administered IM and paint was applied on tail base (tail-paint). On day 9 (60 h after DIB removal), heifers with ? 40% of the tail-paint rubbed off were inseminated. Those not showing estrus by 72 h after DIB removal received 100 µg of GnRH at that time and were FTAI. 2) Conventional: on day 7, DIB devices were removed, and 500 µg of d-CS and 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate were administered IM and tail-paint. Forty-eight hours after DIB removal, heifers with the tail-paint rubbed off were DEAI. Those not showing estrus by 54 h after DIB removal were FTAI. Pregnancy rate was diagnosed by ultrasonography 30 days after FTAI in all heifers and did not differ between protocols (44.28% and 42.48%, P = 0.673). In both protocols, higher PR was observed in DEAI heifers (P = 0.047). In conclusion, the use of the J-Synch protocol generated similar PR to the Conventional protocol, allowing its use with the same efficiency. Furthermore, the DEAI generated better PR than the FTAI, regardless of the protocol used.
id UFRPE-2_a201ee6ea53beb3d7653fbab73d982f7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.10.0.7.8:article/3589
network_acronym_str UFRPE-2
network_name_str Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocolestrussynchronization protocolsGnRHtail-paint.The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effect of J-Synch protocol on pregnancy rate (PR) of heifers artificially inseminated after detected estrus (DEAI) or at fixed-time (FTAI). Two hundred ninety-three Braford heifers were used. On day 0, all animals received 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate administered intramuscularly (IM) and an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (DIB, 0.5 g). Heifers were assigned to the following group: 1) J-Synch: on day 6, DIB devices were removed and 500 µg of d-Cloprostenol sodium (d-CS) was administered IM and paint was applied on tail base (tail-paint). On day 9 (60 h after DIB removal), heifers with ? 40% of the tail-paint rubbed off were inseminated. Those not showing estrus by 72 h after DIB removal received 100 µg of GnRH at that time and were FTAI. 2) Conventional: on day 7, DIB devices were removed, and 500 µg of d-CS and 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate were administered IM and tail-paint. Forty-eight hours after DIB removal, heifers with the tail-paint rubbed off were DEAI. Those not showing estrus by 54 h after DIB removal were FTAI. Pregnancy rate was diagnosed by ultrasonography 30 days after FTAI in all heifers and did not differ between protocols (44.28% and 42.48%, P = 0.673). In both protocols, higher PR was observed in DEAI heifers (P = 0.047). In conclusion, the use of the J-Synch protocol generated similar PR to the Conventional protocol, allowing its use with the same efficiency. Furthermore, the DEAI generated better PR than the FTAI, regardless of the protocol used.MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA2020-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/358910.26605/medvet-v14n4-3589Medicina Veterinária; v. 14 n. 4 (2020); 328-3332675-66171809-4678reponame:Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEenghttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589/482483815Copyright (c) 2020 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReineri, Pablo SebastiánCoria, Maria SumampaPrincipi, SantiagoPunta Perez, RodrigoPalma, Gustavo Adolfo2020-11-26T11:36:08Zoai:ojs.10.0.7.8:article/3589Revistahttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/PUBhttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/oairevmedvet@ufrpe.br1809-46782675-6617opendoar:2020-11-26T11:36:08Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
title Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
spellingShingle Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
Reineri, Pablo Sebastián
estrus
synchronization protocols
GnRH
tail-paint.
title_short Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
title_full Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
title_fullStr Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
title_sort Pregnancy rate to FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol
author Reineri, Pablo Sebastián
author_facet Reineri, Pablo Sebastián
Coria, Maria Sumampa
Principi, Santiago
Punta Perez, Rodrigo
Palma, Gustavo Adolfo
author_role author
author2 Coria, Maria Sumampa
Principi, Santiago
Punta Perez, Rodrigo
Palma, Gustavo Adolfo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reineri, Pablo Sebastián
Coria, Maria Sumampa
Principi, Santiago
Punta Perez, Rodrigo
Palma, Gustavo Adolfo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv estrus
synchronization protocols
GnRH
tail-paint.
topic estrus
synchronization protocols
GnRH
tail-paint.
description The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effect of J-Synch protocol on pregnancy rate (PR) of heifers artificially inseminated after detected estrus (DEAI) or at fixed-time (FTAI). Two hundred ninety-three Braford heifers were used. On day 0, all animals received 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate administered intramuscularly (IM) and an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (DIB, 0.5 g). Heifers were assigned to the following group: 1) J-Synch: on day 6, DIB devices were removed and 500 µg of d-Cloprostenol sodium (d-CS) was administered IM and paint was applied on tail base (tail-paint). On day 9 (60 h after DIB removal), heifers with ? 40% of the tail-paint rubbed off were inseminated. Those not showing estrus by 72 h after DIB removal received 100 µg of GnRH at that time and were FTAI. 2) Conventional: on day 7, DIB devices were removed, and 500 µg of d-CS and 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate were administered IM and tail-paint. Forty-eight hours after DIB removal, heifers with the tail-paint rubbed off were DEAI. Those not showing estrus by 54 h after DIB removal were FTAI. Pregnancy rate was diagnosed by ultrasonography 30 days after FTAI in all heifers and did not differ between protocols (44.28% and 42.48%, P = 0.673). In both protocols, higher PR was observed in DEAI heifers (P = 0.047). In conclusion, the use of the J-Synch protocol generated similar PR to the Conventional protocol, allowing its use with the same efficiency. Furthermore, the DEAI generated better PR than the FTAI, regardless of the protocol used.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589
10.26605/medvet-v14n4-3589
url https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589
identifier_str_mv 10.26605/medvet-v14n4-3589
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/3589/482483815
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Medicina Veterinária; v. 14 n. 4 (2020); 328-333
2675-6617
1809-4678
reponame:Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron:UFRPE
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron_str UFRPE
institution UFRPE
reponame_str Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online)
collection Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revmedvet@ufrpe.br
_version_ 1806552251873886208