Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mota Porto, Antonio Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Lima Santos, Mariana de, Oliveira, Antonio Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Agro@mbiente on-line
Texto Completo: https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4247
Resumo: The Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus (CABMV) is one of the most important pathogenic agents in passionfruit culture, causing extensive loss throughout the national territory. Efficient quantification of disease symptoms is highly dependent on the methodology used, and is directly related to the quality of data generated for later manipulation and analysis. Thus, our objective was to evaluate different methods of using the data collected using a scale based on quality of the generated variables, using statistical parameters. Assumptions of additivity, homoscedasticity and normality of the errors in parametric analysis were tested. Experimental quality, for each phytopatometric variable (PV) was tested for calculated F (Fc), coefficient of determination (R²) and coefficient of variation (CV%). Four different PVs were generated through a ranking scale: AUDPC-III, AUDPC-GS, III and GS. All variables met the assumptions for analysis of variance, with AUDPC-III and III PVs having slightly higher values in terms of adherence to normality, and AUDPC-GS and GS PVs having slightly higher values in terms of significance for additivity and homoscedasticity. AUDPC-III and III had the highest calculated R² and F values, and the highest coefficients of variation. We recorded the inverse for AUDPC-GS and GS, with lower coefficients of variation and higher R² and F values. A lower correlation, though still significant, was observed between AUDPC-GS and AUDPC-III, while a higher correlation was recorded between III and GS. Overall the PVs III and AUDPC-III systems were the best for use in the analyzes of the studied pathosystem.
id UFRR-4_2be4a9c634dd28b2678d37ca2165d1a9
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/4247
network_acronym_str UFRR-4
network_name_str Agro@mbiente on-line
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystemAACPD. Biometria. Passiflora.The Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus (CABMV) is one of the most important pathogenic agents in passionfruit culture, causing extensive loss throughout the national territory. Efficient quantification of disease symptoms is highly dependent on the methodology used, and is directly related to the quality of data generated for later manipulation and analysis. Thus, our objective was to evaluate different methods of using the data collected using a scale based on quality of the generated variables, using statistical parameters. Assumptions of additivity, homoscedasticity and normality of the errors in parametric analysis were tested. Experimental quality, for each phytopatometric variable (PV) was tested for calculated F (Fc), coefficient of determination (R²) and coefficient of variation (CV%). Four different PVs were generated through a ranking scale: AUDPC-III, AUDPC-GS, III and GS. All variables met the assumptions for analysis of variance, with AUDPC-III and III PVs having slightly higher values in terms of adherence to normality, and AUDPC-GS and GS PVs having slightly higher values in terms of significance for additivity and homoscedasticity. AUDPC-III and III had the highest calculated R² and F values, and the highest coefficients of variation. We recorded the inverse for AUDPC-GS and GS, with lower coefficients of variation and higher R² and F values. A lower correlation, though still significant, was observed between AUDPC-GS and AUDPC-III, while a higher correlation was recorded between III and GS. Overall the PVs III and AUDPC-III systems were the best for use in the analyzes of the studied pathosystem.UFRR2017-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/424710.18227/1982-8470ragro.v12i1.4247AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): JANEIRO - MARÇO; 58-67REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2018): JANEIRO - MARÇO; 58-67REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 12 n. 1 (2018): JANEIRO - MARÇO; 58-671982-8470reponame:Agro@mbiente on-lineinstname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)instacron:UFRRporhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4247/2389Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota Porto, Antonio CarlosLima Santos, Mariana deOliveira, Antonio Carlos2018-05-05T08:59:58Zoai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/4247Revistahttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambientePUBhttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/oai||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br1982-84701982-8470opendoar:2018-05-05T08:59:58Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem
title Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem
spellingShingle Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem
Mota Porto, Antonio Carlos
AACPD. Biometria. Passiflora.
title_short Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem
title_full Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem
title_fullStr Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem
title_full_unstemmed Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem
title_sort Quality of phytopathometric variables generated from a ranking scale for the CABMV-passionfruit pathosystem
author Mota Porto, Antonio Carlos
author_facet Mota Porto, Antonio Carlos
Lima Santos, Mariana de
Oliveira, Antonio Carlos
author_role author
author2 Lima Santos, Mariana de
Oliveira, Antonio Carlos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota Porto, Antonio Carlos
Lima Santos, Mariana de
Oliveira, Antonio Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv AACPD. Biometria. Passiflora.
topic AACPD. Biometria. Passiflora.
description The Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus (CABMV) is one of the most important pathogenic agents in passionfruit culture, causing extensive loss throughout the national territory. Efficient quantification of disease symptoms is highly dependent on the methodology used, and is directly related to the quality of data generated for later manipulation and analysis. Thus, our objective was to evaluate different methods of using the data collected using a scale based on quality of the generated variables, using statistical parameters. Assumptions of additivity, homoscedasticity and normality of the errors in parametric analysis were tested. Experimental quality, for each phytopatometric variable (PV) was tested for calculated F (Fc), coefficient of determination (R²) and coefficient of variation (CV%). Four different PVs were generated through a ranking scale: AUDPC-III, AUDPC-GS, III and GS. All variables met the assumptions for analysis of variance, with AUDPC-III and III PVs having slightly higher values in terms of adherence to normality, and AUDPC-GS and GS PVs having slightly higher values in terms of significance for additivity and homoscedasticity. AUDPC-III and III had the highest calculated R² and F values, and the highest coefficients of variation. We recorded the inverse for AUDPC-GS and GS, with lower coefficients of variation and higher R² and F values. A lower correlation, though still significant, was observed between AUDPC-GS and AUDPC-III, while a higher correlation was recorded between III and GS. Overall the PVs III and AUDPC-III systems were the best for use in the analyzes of the studied pathosystem.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4247
10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v12i1.4247
url https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4247
identifier_str_mv 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v12i1.4247
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4247/2389
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): JANEIRO - MARÇO; 58-67
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2018): JANEIRO - MARÇO; 58-67
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 12 n. 1 (2018): JANEIRO - MARÇO; 58-67
1982-8470
reponame:Agro@mbiente on-line
instname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron:UFRR
instname_str Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron_str UFRR
institution UFRR
reponame_str Agro@mbiente on-line
collection Agro@mbiente on-line
repository.name.fl_str_mv Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br
_version_ 1799770041414057984