Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Agro@mbiente on-line |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153 |
Resumo: | Mineral fertilization promotes good results for the components of production and quality of okra fruit; however, it raises the cost of production, making it, sometimes, unviable to the small producers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate organic and mineral fertilization in different forms, in the components of production, productivity, and quality of okra fruits. The experiment was carried out, under full sunlight, in a completely randomized design (CRD), with six replications. The treatments corresponded to the different forms of fertilization, being: MF = mineral fertilization with NPK (100% of the recommended dose); BF = fertilization with bovine biofertilizer (100% of the NPK contents); VA = fertilization with vegetable ash (100% of NPK contents); MFBF = mineral fertilizer (50%) + bovine biofertilizer (50%); MFVA = mineral fertilizer (50%) + vegetable ash (50%); C = control (without fertilization). The variables analyzed were as follows: number of fruits per plant (NFP), average fruit mass (AFM), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit skin thickness (FST), and yield (Y). Therefore, the use of bovine biofertilizer in isolation or supplemented with mineral fertilization enhances the production of okra and improves the quality of the fruits, reveling as promising alternatives for growing okra. |
id |
UFRR-4_6ab4c32c0142409d78a9e089553eeb9c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/6153 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRR-4 |
network_name_str |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okraAbelmoschus esculentus L. Organic input. NPK.Mineral fertilization promotes good results for the components of production and quality of okra fruit; however, it raises the cost of production, making it, sometimes, unviable to the small producers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate organic and mineral fertilization in different forms, in the components of production, productivity, and quality of okra fruits. The experiment was carried out, under full sunlight, in a completely randomized design (CRD), with six replications. The treatments corresponded to the different forms of fertilization, being: MF = mineral fertilization with NPK (100% of the recommended dose); BF = fertilization with bovine biofertilizer (100% of the NPK contents); VA = fertilization with vegetable ash (100% of NPK contents); MFBF = mineral fertilizer (50%) + bovine biofertilizer (50%); MFVA = mineral fertilizer (50%) + vegetable ash (50%); C = control (without fertilization). The variables analyzed were as follows: number of fruits per plant (NFP), average fruit mass (AFM), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit skin thickness (FST), and yield (Y). Therefore, the use of bovine biofertilizer in isolation or supplemented with mineral fertilization enhances the production of okra and improves the quality of the fruits, reveling as promising alternatives for growing okra.UFRR2020-05-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/615310.18227/1982-8470ragro.v14i0.6153AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 14 (2020)REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 14 (2020)REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 14 (2020)1982-8470reponame:Agro@mbiente on-lineinstname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)instacron:UFRRporhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153/2982Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richedsde Sousa, Geocleber GomesLima Rocha, Raimundo GleidisonRodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermesonda Cruz Filho, Elizeu MatosLeite, Kelly Nascimento2020-12-16T13:47:07Zoai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/6153Revistahttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambientePUBhttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/oai||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br1982-84701982-8470opendoar:2024-01-29T11:51:23.719516Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra |
title |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra |
spellingShingle |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds Abelmoschus esculentus L. Organic input. NPK. |
title_short |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra |
title_full |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra |
title_fullStr |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra |
title_sort |
Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra |
author |
da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds |
author_facet |
da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds de Sousa, Geocleber Gomes Lima Rocha, Raimundo Gleidison Rodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermeson da Cruz Filho, Elizeu Matos Leite, Kelly Nascimento |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Sousa, Geocleber Gomes Lima Rocha, Raimundo Gleidison Rodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermeson da Cruz Filho, Elizeu Matos Leite, Kelly Nascimento |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds de Sousa, Geocleber Gomes Lima Rocha, Raimundo Gleidison Rodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermeson da Cruz Filho, Elizeu Matos Leite, Kelly Nascimento |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abelmoschus esculentus L. Organic input. NPK. |
topic |
Abelmoschus esculentus L. Organic input. NPK. |
description |
Mineral fertilization promotes good results for the components of production and quality of okra fruit; however, it raises the cost of production, making it, sometimes, unviable to the small producers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate organic and mineral fertilization in different forms, in the components of production, productivity, and quality of okra fruits. The experiment was carried out, under full sunlight, in a completely randomized design (CRD), with six replications. The treatments corresponded to the different forms of fertilization, being: MF = mineral fertilization with NPK (100% of the recommended dose); BF = fertilization with bovine biofertilizer (100% of the NPK contents); VA = fertilization with vegetable ash (100% of NPK contents); MFBF = mineral fertilizer (50%) + bovine biofertilizer (50%); MFVA = mineral fertilizer (50%) + vegetable ash (50%); C = control (without fertilization). The variables analyzed were as follows: number of fruits per plant (NFP), average fruit mass (AFM), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit skin thickness (FST), and yield (Y). Therefore, the use of bovine biofertilizer in isolation or supplemented with mineral fertilization enhances the production of okra and improves the quality of the fruits, reveling as promising alternatives for growing okra. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v14i0.6153 |
url |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v14i0.6153 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153/2982 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRR |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 14 (2020) REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 14 (2020) REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 14 (2020) 1982-8470 reponame:Agro@mbiente on-line instname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) instacron:UFRR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) |
instacron_str |
UFRR |
institution |
UFRR |
reponame_str |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
collection |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br |
_version_ |
1824964590578958336 |