Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: de Sousa, Geocleber Gomes, Lima Rocha, Raimundo Gleidison, Rodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermeson, da Cruz Filho, Elizeu Matos, Leite, Kelly Nascimento
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Agro@mbiente on-line
Texto Completo: https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153
Resumo: Mineral fertilization promotes good results for the components of production and quality of okra fruit; however, it raises the cost of production, making it, sometimes, unviable to the small producers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate organic and mineral fertilization in different forms, in the components of production, productivity, and quality of okra fruits. The experiment was carried out, under full sunlight, in a completely randomized design (CRD), with six replications. The treatments corresponded to the different forms of fertilization, being: MF = mineral fertilization with NPK (100% of the recommended dose); BF = fertilization with bovine biofertilizer (100% of the NPK contents); VA = fertilization with vegetable ash (100% of NPK contents); MFBF = mineral fertilizer (50%) + bovine biofertilizer (50%); MFVA = mineral fertilizer (50%) + vegetable ash (50%); C = control (without fertilization). The variables analyzed were as follows: number of fruits per plant (NFP), average fruit mass (AFM), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit skin thickness (FST), and yield (Y). Therefore, the use of bovine biofertilizer in isolation or supplemented with mineral fertilization enhances the production of okra and improves the quality of the fruits, reveling as promising alternatives for growing okra.
id UFRR-4_6ab4c32c0142409d78a9e089553eeb9c
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/6153
network_acronym_str UFRR-4
network_name_str Agro@mbiente on-line
repository_id_str
spelling Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okraAbelmoschus esculentus L. Organic input. NPK.Mineral fertilization promotes good results for the components of production and quality of okra fruit; however, it raises the cost of production, making it, sometimes, unviable to the small producers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate organic and mineral fertilization in different forms, in the components of production, productivity, and quality of okra fruits. The experiment was carried out, under full sunlight, in a completely randomized design (CRD), with six replications. The treatments corresponded to the different forms of fertilization, being: MF = mineral fertilization with NPK (100% of the recommended dose); BF = fertilization with bovine biofertilizer (100% of the NPK contents); VA = fertilization with vegetable ash (100% of NPK contents); MFBF = mineral fertilizer (50%) + bovine biofertilizer (50%); MFVA = mineral fertilizer (50%) + vegetable ash (50%); C = control (without fertilization). The variables analyzed were as follows: number of fruits per plant (NFP), average fruit mass (AFM), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit skin thickness (FST), and yield (Y). Therefore, the use of bovine biofertilizer in isolation or supplemented with mineral fertilization enhances the production of okra and improves the quality of the fruits, reveling as promising alternatives for growing okra.UFRR2020-05-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/615310.18227/1982-8470ragro.v14i0.6153AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 14 (2020)REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 14 (2020)REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 14 (2020)1982-8470reponame:Agro@mbiente on-lineinstname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)instacron:UFRRporhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153/2982Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richedsde Sousa, Geocleber GomesLima Rocha, Raimundo GleidisonRodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermesonda Cruz Filho, Elizeu MatosLeite, Kelly Nascimento2020-12-16T13:47:07Zoai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/6153Revistahttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambientePUBhttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/oai||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br1982-84701982-8470opendoar:2020-12-16T13:47:07Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
title Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
spellingShingle Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds
Abelmoschus esculentus L. Organic input. NPK.
title_short Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
title_full Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
title_fullStr Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
title_full_unstemmed Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
title_sort Organic and mineral fertilization on productivity and postharvest of okra
author da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds
author_facet da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds
de Sousa, Geocleber Gomes
Lima Rocha, Raimundo Gleidison
Rodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermeson
da Cruz Filho, Elizeu Matos
Leite, Kelly Nascimento
author_role author
author2 de Sousa, Geocleber Gomes
Lima Rocha, Raimundo Gleidison
Rodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermeson
da Cruz Filho, Elizeu Matos
Leite, Kelly Nascimento
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva Sales, Jonnathan Richeds
de Sousa, Geocleber Gomes
Lima Rocha, Raimundo Gleidison
Rodrigues Costa, Francisco Hermeson
da Cruz Filho, Elizeu Matos
Leite, Kelly Nascimento
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abelmoschus esculentus L. Organic input. NPK.
topic Abelmoschus esculentus L. Organic input. NPK.
description Mineral fertilization promotes good results for the components of production and quality of okra fruit; however, it raises the cost of production, making it, sometimes, unviable to the small producers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate organic and mineral fertilization in different forms, in the components of production, productivity, and quality of okra fruits. The experiment was carried out, under full sunlight, in a completely randomized design (CRD), with six replications. The treatments corresponded to the different forms of fertilization, being: MF = mineral fertilization with NPK (100% of the recommended dose); BF = fertilization with bovine biofertilizer (100% of the NPK contents); VA = fertilization with vegetable ash (100% of NPK contents); MFBF = mineral fertilizer (50%) + bovine biofertilizer (50%); MFVA = mineral fertilizer (50%) + vegetable ash (50%); C = control (without fertilization). The variables analyzed were as follows: number of fruits per plant (NFP), average fruit mass (AFM), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit skin thickness (FST), and yield (Y). Therefore, the use of bovine biofertilizer in isolation or supplemented with mineral fertilization enhances the production of okra and improves the quality of the fruits, reveling as promising alternatives for growing okra.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153
10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v14i0.6153
url https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153
identifier_str_mv 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v14i0.6153
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/6153/2982
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 14 (2020)
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 14 (2020)
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 14 (2020)
1982-8470
reponame:Agro@mbiente on-line
instname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron:UFRR
instname_str Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron_str UFRR
institution UFRR
reponame_str Agro@mbiente on-line
collection Agro@mbiente on-line
repository.name.fl_str_mv Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br
_version_ 1799770041551421440