Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruna, Monquero, Patricia Andrea
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Agro@mbiente on-line
Texto Completo: https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310
Resumo: Soil cover has a physical, chemical, and biological effect on weed suppression. Although it depends on factors such as location and weed pressure, vegetation cover can even eliminate the need for herbicide application. Considering that the weeds popularly known as pigweed (Amaranthus sp.) have been expanding in agricultural areas and the use of only one form of management is not recommended for their control, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of using cover crop phytomass to control species of the genus Amaranthus. Soil vegetation cover at different percentage levels was evaluated in the control of the following weed species: Amaranthus hybridus, Amaranthus deflexus, and Amaranthus viridis, previously sown. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (9x4), with four replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of nine cover crops with Crotalaria species (Crotalaria juncea, Crotalaria breviflora, and Crotalaria spectabilis), black oats (Avena strigosa), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis), pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), and pencilflower (Stylosanthes macrocephala), and four percentage levels of phytomass (control – no phytomass; 50%, 100%, and 200% of the total mean production, identified as CONTROL, T50%, T100%, and T200%, respectively), with four replications. Black oats, pencilflower, and jack bean showed higher potential for controlling Amaranthus hybridus and Amaranthus deflexus, while sorghum and jack bean were more efficient in controlling Amaranthus viridis. Regarding the amount of green mass, the amounts T100% and T200% were the most promising in suppressing weeds.
id UFRR-4_715f1d6a4409b12c76f117df118b4917
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/7310
network_acronym_str UFRR-4
network_name_str Agro@mbiente on-line
repository_id_str
spelling Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus AmaranthusPigweed. Germination. Integrated management.Soil cover has a physical, chemical, and biological effect on weed suppression. Although it depends on factors such as location and weed pressure, vegetation cover can even eliminate the need for herbicide application. Considering that the weeds popularly known as pigweed (Amaranthus sp.) have been expanding in agricultural areas and the use of only one form of management is not recommended for their control, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of using cover crop phytomass to control species of the genus Amaranthus. Soil vegetation cover at different percentage levels was evaluated in the control of the following weed species: Amaranthus hybridus, Amaranthus deflexus, and Amaranthus viridis, previously sown. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (9x4), with four replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of nine cover crops with Crotalaria species (Crotalaria juncea, Crotalaria breviflora, and Crotalaria spectabilis), black oats (Avena strigosa), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis), pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), and pencilflower (Stylosanthes macrocephala), and four percentage levels of phytomass (control – no phytomass; 50%, 100%, and 200% of the total mean production, identified as CONTROL, T50%, T100%, and T200%, respectively), with four replications. Black oats, pencilflower, and jack bean showed higher potential for controlling Amaranthus hybridus and Amaranthus deflexus, while sorghum and jack bean were more efficient in controlling Amaranthus viridis. Regarding the amount of green mass, the amounts T100% and T200% were the most promising in suppressing weeds.UFRR2023-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/731010.18227/1982-8470ragro.v17i00.7310AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 17 (2023); 1-15REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 17 (2023); 1-15REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 17 (2023); 1-151982-8470reponame:Agro@mbiente on-lineinstname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)instacron:UFRRporhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310/3808Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINEhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo Ferrari Schedenffeldt, BrunaMonquero, Patricia Andrea2023-11-29T18:23:03Zoai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/7310Revistahttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambientePUBhttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/oai||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br1982-84701982-8470opendoar:2023-11-29T18:23:03Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
title Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
spellingShingle Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo
Pigweed. Germination. Integrated management.
title_short Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
title_full Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
title_fullStr Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
title_full_unstemmed Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
title_sort Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
author Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo
author_facet Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo
Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruna
Monquero, Patricia Andrea
author_role author
author2 Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruna
Monquero, Patricia Andrea
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo
Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruna
Monquero, Patricia Andrea
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pigweed. Germination. Integrated management.
topic Pigweed. Germination. Integrated management.
description Soil cover has a physical, chemical, and biological effect on weed suppression. Although it depends on factors such as location and weed pressure, vegetation cover can even eliminate the need for herbicide application. Considering that the weeds popularly known as pigweed (Amaranthus sp.) have been expanding in agricultural areas and the use of only one form of management is not recommended for their control, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of using cover crop phytomass to control species of the genus Amaranthus. Soil vegetation cover at different percentage levels was evaluated in the control of the following weed species: Amaranthus hybridus, Amaranthus deflexus, and Amaranthus viridis, previously sown. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (9x4), with four replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of nine cover crops with Crotalaria species (Crotalaria juncea, Crotalaria breviflora, and Crotalaria spectabilis), black oats (Avena strigosa), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis), pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), and pencilflower (Stylosanthes macrocephala), and four percentage levels of phytomass (control – no phytomass; 50%, 100%, and 200% of the total mean production, identified as CONTROL, T50%, T100%, and T200%, respectively), with four replications. Black oats, pencilflower, and jack bean showed higher potential for controlling Amaranthus hybridus and Amaranthus deflexus, while sorghum and jack bean were more efficient in controlling Amaranthus viridis. Regarding the amount of green mass, the amounts T100% and T200% were the most promising in suppressing weeds.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310
10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v17i00.7310
url https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310
identifier_str_mv 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v17i00.7310
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310/3808
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 17 (2023); 1-15
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 17 (2023); 1-15
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 17 (2023); 1-15
1982-8470
reponame:Agro@mbiente on-line
instname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron:UFRR
instname_str Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron_str UFRR
institution UFRR
reponame_str Agro@mbiente on-line
collection Agro@mbiente on-line
repository.name.fl_str_mv Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br
_version_ 1799770041728630784