Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Agro@mbiente on-line |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310 |
Resumo: | Soil cover has a physical, chemical, and biological effect on weed suppression. Although it depends on factors such as location and weed pressure, vegetation cover can even eliminate the need for herbicide application. Considering that the weeds popularly known as pigweed (Amaranthus sp.) have been expanding in agricultural areas and the use of only one form of management is not recommended for their control, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of using cover crop phytomass to control species of the genus Amaranthus. Soil vegetation cover at different percentage levels was evaluated in the control of the following weed species: Amaranthus hybridus, Amaranthus deflexus, and Amaranthus viridis, previously sown. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (9x4), with four replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of nine cover crops with Crotalaria species (Crotalaria juncea, Crotalaria breviflora, and Crotalaria spectabilis), black oats (Avena strigosa), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis), pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), and pencilflower (Stylosanthes macrocephala), and four percentage levels of phytomass (control – no phytomass; 50%, 100%, and 200% of the total mean production, identified as CONTROL, T50%, T100%, and T200%, respectively), with four replications. Black oats, pencilflower, and jack bean showed higher potential for controlling Amaranthus hybridus and Amaranthus deflexus, while sorghum and jack bean were more efficient in controlling Amaranthus viridis. Regarding the amount of green mass, the amounts T100% and T200% were the most promising in suppressing weeds. |
id |
UFRR-4_715f1d6a4409b12c76f117df118b4917 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/7310 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRR-4 |
network_name_str |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus AmaranthusPigweed. Germination. Integrated management.Soil cover has a physical, chemical, and biological effect on weed suppression. Although it depends on factors such as location and weed pressure, vegetation cover can even eliminate the need for herbicide application. Considering that the weeds popularly known as pigweed (Amaranthus sp.) have been expanding in agricultural areas and the use of only one form of management is not recommended for their control, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of using cover crop phytomass to control species of the genus Amaranthus. Soil vegetation cover at different percentage levels was evaluated in the control of the following weed species: Amaranthus hybridus, Amaranthus deflexus, and Amaranthus viridis, previously sown. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (9x4), with four replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of nine cover crops with Crotalaria species (Crotalaria juncea, Crotalaria breviflora, and Crotalaria spectabilis), black oats (Avena strigosa), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis), pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), and pencilflower (Stylosanthes macrocephala), and four percentage levels of phytomass (control – no phytomass; 50%, 100%, and 200% of the total mean production, identified as CONTROL, T50%, T100%, and T200%, respectively), with four replications. Black oats, pencilflower, and jack bean showed higher potential for controlling Amaranthus hybridus and Amaranthus deflexus, while sorghum and jack bean were more efficient in controlling Amaranthus viridis. Regarding the amount of green mass, the amounts T100% and T200% were the most promising in suppressing weeds.UFRR2023-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/731010.18227/1982-8470ragro.v17i00.7310AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 17 (2023); 1-15REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 17 (2023); 1-15REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 17 (2023); 1-151982-8470reponame:Agro@mbiente on-lineinstname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)instacron:UFRRporhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310/3808Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINEhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo Ferrari Schedenffeldt, BrunaMonquero, Patricia Andrea2023-11-29T18:23:03Zoai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/7310Revistahttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambientePUBhttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/oai||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br1982-84701982-8470opendoar:2023-11-29T18:23:03Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus |
title |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus |
spellingShingle |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo Pigweed. Germination. Integrated management. |
title_short |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus |
title_full |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus |
title_fullStr |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus |
title_sort |
Use of vegetation cover in the control of different species of the genus Amaranthus |
author |
Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo |
author_facet |
Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruna Monquero, Patricia Andrea |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruna Monquero, Patricia Andrea |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castro Guidette, Luiz Gustavo Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruna Monquero, Patricia Andrea |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pigweed. Germination. Integrated management. |
topic |
Pigweed. Germination. Integrated management. |
description |
Soil cover has a physical, chemical, and biological effect on weed suppression. Although it depends on factors such as location and weed pressure, vegetation cover can even eliminate the need for herbicide application. Considering that the weeds popularly known as pigweed (Amaranthus sp.) have been expanding in agricultural areas and the use of only one form of management is not recommended for their control, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of using cover crop phytomass to control species of the genus Amaranthus. Soil vegetation cover at different percentage levels was evaluated in the control of the following weed species: Amaranthus hybridus, Amaranthus deflexus, and Amaranthus viridis, previously sown. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (9x4), with four replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of nine cover crops with Crotalaria species (Crotalaria juncea, Crotalaria breviflora, and Crotalaria spectabilis), black oats (Avena strigosa), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis), pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), lablab bean (Dolichos lablab), and pencilflower (Stylosanthes macrocephala), and four percentage levels of phytomass (control – no phytomass; 50%, 100%, and 200% of the total mean production, identified as CONTROL, T50%, T100%, and T200%, respectively), with four replications. Black oats, pencilflower, and jack bean showed higher potential for controlling Amaranthus hybridus and Amaranthus deflexus, while sorghum and jack bean were more efficient in controlling Amaranthus viridis. Regarding the amount of green mass, the amounts T100% and T200% were the most promising in suppressing weeds. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v17i00.7310 |
url |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v17i00.7310 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/7310/3808 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRR |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 17 (2023); 1-15 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 17 (2023); 1-15 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 17 (2023); 1-15 1982-8470 reponame:Agro@mbiente on-line instname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) instacron:UFRR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) |
instacron_str |
UFRR |
institution |
UFRR |
reponame_str |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
collection |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br |
_version_ |
1799770041728630784 |