Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antoniol Fontes, José Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Inocencio Junior, Morais, Ronaldo Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Agro@mbiente on-line
Texto Completo: https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/5414
Resumo: Weeds negatively affect cowpea plants, causing reduced growth, delayed development and yield loss. The aim of this study was to assay selectivity and effectiveness of weed control herbicides in cowpea cropping field conditions. For selectivity evaluation, the herbicide S-metolachlor, was used pre-emergence (PRE), and carfentrazone-ethyl, clethodim, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl post-emergence (POST). In effectiveness evaluation, S-metolachlor (PRE), and carfentrazone-ethyl (POST), S-metolachlor in PRE and fluazifop-p-butyl (POST), clethodim, carfentrazone-ethyl and clethodim, fenoxapropp-ethyl, carfentrazone-ethyl and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, carfentrazone-ethyl and fluazifop-pbutyl, quizalofop-p-ethyl and carfentrazone-ethyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl (POST). Two controls were included, one with weeding at 15 and 35 days after sowing (DAS) and the other without weed control. Carfentrazone-ethyl caused mild phytotoxicity in plants seven days after application, but did not reduce yield (2337 kg ha-1). The levels of weed control and productivity obtained with S-metolachlor alone or in association with carfentrazoneethyl or fluazifop-p-butyl, associated or not with carfentrazone-ethyl, were similar to those obtained with weeds. Spraying with carfentrazone-ethyl alone resulted in low control effectiveness and reduced yield (1511 kg ha-1). Weed interference during the crop cycle reduced yield by 77% (531 kg ha-1). The selectivity and effectiveness obtained with the herbicides should be considered as an agronomic and economically-viable.
id UFRR-4_8c989d7b7c73243428feb766f88d158c
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/5414
network_acronym_str UFRR-4
network_name_str Agro@mbiente on-line
repository_id_str
spelling Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpeaVigna unguiculata. Weeds. Chemical control. Phytotoxicity.Weeds negatively affect cowpea plants, causing reduced growth, delayed development and yield loss. The aim of this study was to assay selectivity and effectiveness of weed control herbicides in cowpea cropping field conditions. For selectivity evaluation, the herbicide S-metolachlor, was used pre-emergence (PRE), and carfentrazone-ethyl, clethodim, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl post-emergence (POST). In effectiveness evaluation, S-metolachlor (PRE), and carfentrazone-ethyl (POST), S-metolachlor in PRE and fluazifop-p-butyl (POST), clethodim, carfentrazone-ethyl and clethodim, fenoxapropp-ethyl, carfentrazone-ethyl and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, carfentrazone-ethyl and fluazifop-pbutyl, quizalofop-p-ethyl and carfentrazone-ethyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl (POST). Two controls were included, one with weeding at 15 and 35 days after sowing (DAS) and the other without weed control. Carfentrazone-ethyl caused mild phytotoxicity in plants seven days after application, but did not reduce yield (2337 kg ha-1). The levels of weed control and productivity obtained with S-metolachlor alone or in association with carfentrazoneethyl or fluazifop-p-butyl, associated or not with carfentrazone-ethyl, were similar to those obtained with weeds. Spraying with carfentrazone-ethyl alone resulted in low control effectiveness and reduced yield (1511 kg ha-1). Weed interference during the crop cycle reduced yield by 77% (531 kg ha-1). The selectivity and effectiveness obtained with the herbicides should be considered as an agronomic and economically-viable.UFRR2019-07-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/541410.18227/1982-8470ragro.v13i0.5414AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 13 (2019): Edição Continuada; 101-114REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 13 (2019): Edição Continuada; 101-114REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 13 (2019): Edição Continuada; 101-1141982-8470reponame:Agro@mbiente on-lineinstname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)instacron:UFRRporhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/5414/2672Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntoniol Fontes, José RobertoOliveira, Inocencio JuniorMorais, Ronaldo Ribeiro2019-12-06T15:37:15Zoai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/5414Revistahttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambientePUBhttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/oai||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br1982-84701982-8470opendoar:2019-12-06T15:37:15Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
title Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
spellingShingle Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
Antoniol Fontes, José Roberto
Vigna unguiculata. Weeds. Chemical control. Phytotoxicity.
title_short Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
title_full Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
title_fullStr Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
title_full_unstemmed Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
title_sort Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
author Antoniol Fontes, José Roberto
author_facet Antoniol Fontes, José Roberto
Oliveira, Inocencio Junior
Morais, Ronaldo Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Inocencio Junior
Morais, Ronaldo Ribeiro
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antoniol Fontes, José Roberto
Oliveira, Inocencio Junior
Morais, Ronaldo Ribeiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vigna unguiculata. Weeds. Chemical control. Phytotoxicity.
topic Vigna unguiculata. Weeds. Chemical control. Phytotoxicity.
description Weeds negatively affect cowpea plants, causing reduced growth, delayed development and yield loss. The aim of this study was to assay selectivity and effectiveness of weed control herbicides in cowpea cropping field conditions. For selectivity evaluation, the herbicide S-metolachlor, was used pre-emergence (PRE), and carfentrazone-ethyl, clethodim, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl post-emergence (POST). In effectiveness evaluation, S-metolachlor (PRE), and carfentrazone-ethyl (POST), S-metolachlor in PRE and fluazifop-p-butyl (POST), clethodim, carfentrazone-ethyl and clethodim, fenoxapropp-ethyl, carfentrazone-ethyl and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, carfentrazone-ethyl and fluazifop-pbutyl, quizalofop-p-ethyl and carfentrazone-ethyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl (POST). Two controls were included, one with weeding at 15 and 35 days after sowing (DAS) and the other without weed control. Carfentrazone-ethyl caused mild phytotoxicity in plants seven days after application, but did not reduce yield (2337 kg ha-1). The levels of weed control and productivity obtained with S-metolachlor alone or in association with carfentrazoneethyl or fluazifop-p-butyl, associated or not with carfentrazone-ethyl, were similar to those obtained with weeds. Spraying with carfentrazone-ethyl alone resulted in low control effectiveness and reduced yield (1511 kg ha-1). Weed interference during the crop cycle reduced yield by 77% (531 kg ha-1). The selectivity and effectiveness obtained with the herbicides should be considered as an agronomic and economically-viable.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/5414
10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v13i0.5414
url https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/5414
identifier_str_mv 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v13i0.5414
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/5414/2672
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 13 (2019): Edição Continuada; 101-114
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 13 (2019): Edição Continuada; 101-114
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 13 (2019): Edição Continuada; 101-114
1982-8470
reponame:Agro@mbiente on-line
instname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron:UFRR
instname_str Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron_str UFRR
institution UFRR
reponame_str Agro@mbiente on-line
collection Agro@mbiente on-line
repository.name.fl_str_mv Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br
_version_ 1799770041493749760