Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
Texto Completo: https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3444
Resumo: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence the level of of population challenge of Ctenocephalides felis felis on the efficacy of fipronil 10% ?topspot? in dogs. For this, 24 Beagles were used, divided into four groups of six dogs each. The dogs on the control groups I and II were not treated, while the dogs on the treated group I e II were treated with the formulation of 10% fipronil ??topspot??. The dogs in the control group I and treated group I were infested with 50 pairs of C. felis felis and dogs in groups control II and treated II were infested with 150 pairs of C. felis felis each. Infestations were performed on days 2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and +40 and on days +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 and +42 fleas were mechanical removed and counted for evaluation. Pulicide efficacy for treated group I on days +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 and +42, were respectively 99.36%, 99.73%, 99.48%, 99.00%, 74.00%, 99.75%, 95.06% and 67.62%. The pulicide efficacy for the treated group II, evaluated on the same days, were respectively 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 99.91, 95.60% and 68.55%. Fipronil was effective in eliminating fleas on dogs until day +35. The statistical comparisons between the mean living fleas between groups control I and treated I showed significant differences (p ? 0.05) for the challenges in all experimental days after treatment. Groups control II and treated II also showed significant differences (p ? 0.05) for the challenges in all experimental days after treatment. Statistical analysis between treated groups I and II showed no significant difference (p ? 0.05) between the challenges in all experimental days. The challenges were finished on day 42, when the effectiveness of fipronil in treated groups I and II were lower than 70%. The tested product was effective in eliminating fleas on dogs until day + 35 with no more residual effect of protection when the animals were reinfested. Different level of exposure of populations of C. felis felis, 100 and 300 exemplary, through weekly infestations were not able to determine different fipronil efficacy responses, when used in dogs.
id UFRRJ-1_58f74aeabdde034bc906050eb2f71c5b
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:jspui/3444
network_acronym_str UFRRJ-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
repository_id_str
spelling Scott, Fabio Barbour001.382.167-97http://lattes.cnpq.br/1217253540572819Azevedo, Tha?s Ribeiro CorreiaMelo, Raquel Moreira Pires dos SantosBorja, Gonzalo Efraim Moya092.580.397-93http://lattes.cnpq.br/3552807826270599Rocha, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da2020-04-21T14:47:54Z2013-11-19ROCHA, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da. Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.. 2013. 33 f. Disserta??o (Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica.https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3444The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence the level of of population challenge of Ctenocephalides felis felis on the efficacy of fipronil 10% ?topspot? in dogs. For this, 24 Beagles were used, divided into four groups of six dogs each. The dogs on the control groups I and II were not treated, while the dogs on the treated group I e II were treated with the formulation of 10% fipronil ??topspot??. The dogs in the control group I and treated group I were infested with 50 pairs of C. felis felis and dogs in groups control II and treated II were infested with 150 pairs of C. felis felis each. Infestations were performed on days 2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and +40 and on days +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 and +42 fleas were mechanical removed and counted for evaluation. Pulicide efficacy for treated group I on days +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 and +42, were respectively 99.36%, 99.73%, 99.48%, 99.00%, 74.00%, 99.75%, 95.06% and 67.62%. The pulicide efficacy for the treated group II, evaluated on the same days, were respectively 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 99.91, 95.60% and 68.55%. Fipronil was effective in eliminating fleas on dogs until day +35. The statistical comparisons between the mean living fleas between groups control I and treated I showed significant differences (p ? 0.05) for the challenges in all experimental days after treatment. Groups control II and treated II also showed significant differences (p ? 0.05) for the challenges in all experimental days after treatment. Statistical analysis between treated groups I and II showed no significant difference (p ? 0.05) between the challenges in all experimental days. The challenges were finished on day 42, when the effectiveness of fipronil in treated groups I and II were lower than 70%. The tested product was effective in eliminating fleas on dogs until day + 35 with no more residual effect of protection when the animals were reinfested. Different level of exposure of populations of C. felis felis, 100 and 300 exemplary, through weekly infestations were not able to determine different fipronil efficacy responses, when used in dogs.O objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar a influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil 10% ?topspot? em c?es. Foram utilizados 24 c?es da ra?a Beagle, compondo seis animais por grupo. Os c?es foram divididos em quatro grupos. Os c?es dos grupos controles I e II n?o receberam tratamento, enquanto que os c?es dos grupos tratados I e II receberam tratamento com formula??o de fipronil 10% ??topspot??. Os c?es dos grupos controle I e tratado I foram infestados com 50 casais de C. felis felis e os c?es dos grupos controle II e tratado II foram infestados com 150 casais de C. felis felis cada. As infesta??es foram realizadas nos dias, 2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 e +40 e nos dias +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 e +42 foi realizada retirada mec?nica e contagem de pulgas para avalia??o. As efic?cias pulguicidas, para o grupo tratado I, nos dias +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 e +42, foram respectivamente 99,36%; 99,73%; 99,48%; 99,74%; 99,75%; 95,06% e 67,62%. As efic?cias pulguicidas, para o grupo tratado II, avaliadas nos mesmos dias, foram respectivamente 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 99,91%; 95,60% e 68,55%. O fipronil mostrou se eficaz na elimina??o das pulgas em c?es at? o dia +35. A an?lise estat?stica comparativa entre as m?dias de pulgas vivas, entre os grupos controle I e tratado I, demonstrou que ocorreu diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) para os desafios em todos os dias experimentais, ap?s o tratamento. Os grupos controle II e tratado II tamb?m apresentaram diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) para os desafios em todos os dias experimentais, ap?s o tratamento. A an?lise estat?stica entre os grupos tratados I e II demonstrou que n?o ocorreu diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) para os desafios em todos os dias experimentais. O desafio foi encerrado no dia +42 j? que a efic?cia do fipronil nos grupos tratados I e II foram inferiores 70%. O produto em teste mostrou se eficaz na elimina??o das pulgas em c?es at? o dia + 35, n?o apresentando mais efeito residual de prote??o quando os animais foram reinfestados. Diferentes n?veis de exposi??o de popula??es de C. felis felis, 100 e 300 exemplares, atrav?s de infesta??es semanais, n?o foram capazes de determinar diferentes respostas de efic?cia do fipronil quando empregados em c?es.Submitted by Sandra Pereira (srpereira@ufrrj.br) on 2020-04-21T14:47:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2013 - Cristiane Nunes Coelho da Rocha.pdf: 1228397 bytes, checksum: 0e459defe950ce7942c567489c17b3c1 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-04-21T14:47:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2013 - Cristiane Nunes Coelho da Rocha.pdf: 1228397 bytes, checksum: 0e459defe950ce7942c567489c17b3c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-11-19Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior, CAPES, Brasil.application/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/14222/2013%20-%20Cristiane%20Nunes%20Coelho%20da%20Rocha.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/15260/2013%20-%20Cristiane%20Nunes%20Coelho%20da%20Rocha.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/21530/2013%20-%20Cristiane%20Nunes%20Coelho%20da%20Rocha.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/27862/2013%20-%20Cristiane%20Nunes%20Coelho%20da%20Rocha.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/34230/2013%20-%20Cristiane%20Nunes%20Coelho%20da%20Rocha.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/40606/2013%20-%20Cristiane%20Nunes%20Coelho%20da%20Rocha.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/46976/2013%20-%20Cristiane%20Nunes%20Coelho%20da%20Rocha.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/53390/2013%20-%20Cristiane%20Nunes%20Coelho%20da%20Rocha.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Veterin?riasUFRRJBrasilInstituto de Veterin?riaALVES, S. B. Controle Microbiano de Insetos. 2. ed. Piracicaba: FEALQ, 1998. 1163p. BITAM, I.; DITTMAR, K.; PAROLA, P.; WHITING, M. F.; RAOULT, D. Fleas and flea borne diseases. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, v. 14, n. 8, p. 667 676, 2010. BLAGBURN, B. L.; DRYDEN, M. W. Biology, treatment and control of flea and tick infestations. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 39, n. 06, p. 1173 1200, 2009. BONNEAU, S.; FOURIER, J. J.; ROUSSEAU, C.; CADIERGUES, M. C. Comparative efficacy of two fipronil spot on formulations against experimental flea infestations (Ctenocephalides felis) in dogs. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, v. 8, n. 1, p. 16 20, 2010. CARLOTTI, D.N.; JACOBS, D.E. Therapy, control and prevention of flea allergy dermatitis in dogs and cats. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 83 98, 2000. COLE, L. M.; NICHOLSON, R. A.; CASIDA, J. E. Action of phenylpyrazole insecticides at the GABA gated chloride channel. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v. 46, n. 1, p. 47 54, 1993. COOP, R. L.; TAYLOR, M. A.; JACOBS, D. E; JACKSON, F. Ectoparasites: recent advances in control. Trens in Parasitology, v. 18, n. 2, p. 55 56, 2002. COOPER, P. R.; PENALIGGON, E. J. Use of fipronil to eliminate recurrent infestation by Trichodectes canis in a pack of bloodhounds. Veterinary Record, v. 139, n. 4, p. 95 95, 1996. COUTINHO, C. F. B.; GALLI, A.; GARBELLINI, G. S.; TAKAAMA, M.; TANIMOTO, S. T.; AMARAL, R. B.; MAZO, L. H.; AVACA, L. A.; MACHADO, S. A. S. Pesticidas: Mecanismo de a??o, degrada??o e toxidez. Pesticidas (UFPR), v. 15, n. 1, p. 65-72, 2005. CORREIA, T. R.; MELO, R. M. P. S.; FERNANDES, J. I.; FREITAS, I. F.; VIEIRA, V. P. C.; RIBEIRO, F. A. R.; VEROCAI, G. G.; SCOTT, F. B. Efic?cia de uma formula??o para aplica??o ambiental contendo o piretr?ide ciflutrina e o regulador de crescimento de insetos piriproxifen no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis (Bouch?, 1835) (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae). Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterin?ria, v. 32 (Supl. 1), p. 17-20, 2010. CRUTHERS, L., SLONE, R.L., GUERRERO, J., ROBERTSON-PLOUGH, C. Evaluation of the speed of kill of fleas and ticks with Frontline Top Spot in dogs. Veterinary Therapeutics, v. 2, n. 2, p. 170-174, 2001. CUNNINGHAM, J. R.; RYAN, W. G. Compara??o entre Fipronil (Top Spot) e Imidacloriprid (Spot On) no controle de infesta??es por pulgas quando aplicados logo ap?s banho com xampu. A HoraVeterin?ria, v. 19, n. 109, p. 15-18, 1999. CURTIS, C. F. Use of 0,25 per cent fipronil sprayto treat sarcoptic mange in a litter of five week old puppies. Veterinary Record, v. 139, p. 43-44, 1996. 29 DEFRA. Evaluation on: fipronil use as a public hygiene insecticide. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 116 p., 1999. DRYDEN, M. W; NEAL, J. J.; BENNETT, G. W. Concepts of Flea Control. Companion Animal Practice. v. 19, n. 4, p. 11--20, 1989. DRYDEN, M. W.; RUST, M. K. The cat flea: biology, ecology and control. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 52, n. 1, p. 1--19, 1994. DRYDEN, M. W.; DENENBERG, T. M.; BUNCH, S. Control of fleas on naturally infested dogs and cats and in private residences with topical spot applications of fipronil or imidacloprid. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 93, n. 1, p. 69-75, 2000. DRYDEN, M. W.; BROCE, A. B. El Control Integral de las Pulgas en el Siglo 21. Suplemento del Compendio Sobre Educaci?n Continua para el Veterinario em Pr?ctica, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2003. DRYDEN, M. W.; PAYNE, P. A.; VICKI, S.; RIGGS, B.; DAVENPORT, J.; KOBUSZEWSKI, D. Efficacy of dinotefuran?pyriproxyfen, dinotefuran?pyriproxyfen?permethrin and fipronil?(S)-methoprenetopical spot-on formulations to control flea populations in naturally infested pets and private residences in Tampa, FL. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 182, n. 2, p. 281-286, 2011. DRYDEN, M. W.; PAYNE, P. A.; SMITH, V.; BERG, T. C.; LANE, M. Efficacy of selamectin, spinosad, and spinosad/milbemycin oxime against the KS1 Ctenocephalides felis flea strain infesting dogs. Parasites & Vectors, v. 6, n. 80, 2013. DRYDEN, M. W.; PAYNE, P. A.; SMITH, V.; HEANEY, K.; S., FANGSHI. Efficacy of indoxacarb applied to cats against the adult cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis, flea eggs and adult flea emergence. Parasites & Vectors, v. 6, n. 126, p. 1-6, 2013. FOURIE, L. J.; KOK, D. J.; PETER, R. J. Control of immature stages of the flea Ctenocephalides felis (Bouch?) in carpets exposed to cats treated with imidacloprid. Journal of South African Veterinary Association, v. 71, n. 4, p. 219--221, 2000. HAINZL, D.; CASIDA, J. E. Fipronil insecticide: Novel photochemical desulfinylation with retention of neurotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 93, n. 23, p. 12764--12767, 1996. HOGSETTE, J. A. Management of ectoparasites with biological control. International Journal for Parasitology, v. 29, n. 1, p. 147--151, 1999. HOSKING, B.; SMITH, B. K.; SCHUELE, G.; STREHLAU, G.; JUNQUERA, P. Efficacy of a 12.5% pyriprole spot--on solution against natural flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestations on dogs. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, v. 7, n. 1, p. 32--35, 2009. HOVDA, L. R.; HOOSER, S. B. Toxicology of newer pesticides for use in dogs and cats. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 32, n. 2, p. 455--467, 2002. 30 KRASNOV, B. R. Functional and Evolutionary Ecology of Fleas: a model for ecological parasitology. Cambridge University Press, 593 p., 2008. KU?NER, J.; TURK, S.; GRACE, S.; SONI--GUPTA, J.; FOURIE, J. J.; MARCHIONDO, A. A.; RUGG, D. Confirmation of the efficacy of a novel fipronil spot--on for the treatment and control of fleas, ticks and chewing lice on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 112, n. 1, p. 365--372, 2013. LINARDI, P. M.; GUIMAR?ES, L. R. Sifon?pteros do Brasil. S?o Paulo: Editora MZUSP/FAPESP, 1? edi??o, S?o Paulo, 291 p., 2000. LINARDI, P. Checklist de Siphonaptera (Insecta) do Estado de S?o Paulo. Biota Neotropica, v. 11, 2011. LINARDI, P. M.; SANTOS, J. L. C. Ctenocephalides felis felis vs. Ctenocephalides canis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae): some issues in correctly identify these species. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterin?ria, v. 21, n. 4, p. 345--354, 2012. MARCHIONDO, A. A.; HOLDSWORTH, P. A.; FOURIE, L. J.; RUGG, D.; HELLMANN, K.; SNYDER, D. E.; DRYDEN, M, W. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) second edition: Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides for the treatment, prevention and control of flea and tick infestations on dogs and cats. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 194, n. 1, p. 84-97, 2013. MELO, I. S.; AZEVEDO, J. L. Controle Biol?gico. Jaguari?na, SP: EMBRAPA, 1998. v. 1: 262 p. MELO, D. R. A??o de Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff, 1879) Sorokin, 1883 e Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuilllemin, 1912 sobre C. felis felis (Bouch?, 1806) (Siphonaptera: Pulicidade). 2006. 38 p. Tese (Doutorado). Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica--RJ. 2006. MELO, D. R., CRUZ, G. B.; BITTENCOURT, V. R. E. P. Desenvolvimento dos fungos Metahizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff, 1879) Sorokin, 1883 e Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin, 1912 sobre Ctenocephalides felis felis (Bouch?, 1835). Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterin?ria, v. 16, n. 3, p. 166--170, 2007. MELO, R. M. P. S.; VIEIRA, V. P. C.; TAVARES, P. V.; BATISTA, L. C. S. O.; CARNEIRO, M. B.; CORREIA, T. R.; CID, Y. P.; COUMENDOUROS, K.; SCOTT, F. B. Efic?cia do fipronil oral no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis (Siphonaptera : Pulicidae) e Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acari : Ixodidae) em c?es. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterin?ria, v. 34, Supl. 1, p. 15--20, 2012. MOFFAT, A. S. New chemicals seek to outwit insect pests. Science, v. 26, n. 5121, p. 550--551, 1993. NARAHASHI, T.; ZHAO, X.; IKEDA, T.; SALGADO, V. L.; YEH, J. Z. Glutamate--activated chloride channels: unique fipronil targets present in insects but not in mammals. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v. 97, n. 2, p. 149--152, 2010. 31 PAYNE, P. A.; DRYDEN, W. W.; SMITH, V.; RIDLEY, R. K. Effect of 0.29% w/w fipronil spray on adult flea mortality and egg production of three different cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouch?), strains infesting cats. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 102, n. 4, p. 331--340, 2001. POSTAL, J. M.; JEANNIN, P. C.; CONSAVI, P. J. Field efficacy of a mechanical pump spray formulation containing 0,25% fipronil in the treatment and control of flea infestation and associated dermalogical signs in dogs and cats. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 6, n. 3, p. 153--158, 1995. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (The R Foundation). R version 2.4.1 (2006--12--18). Copyright ?.ISBN 3--900051--07--0, 2006. Dispon?vel em:<http://www. (http://rstudio.org/)>.Acesso em: 10/03/2012. RUGG, D.; HAIR, J. A. Dose determination of a novel formulation of metaflumizone plus amitraz for control of cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis felis) and brown dog ticks (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 150, n. 3, p. 203-208, 2007. RUST, M. K.; DRYDEN, M. W. The Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Cat Flea. Annual Review of Entomology, v. 42, n. 1, p. 451--473, 1997. RUST, M. K. Advances in the control of Ctenocephalides felis felis (cat flea) on cats and dogs. Trends in Parasitology, v. 21, n. 5, p. 232--236, 2005. SABNIS, S.; ZUPAN, J.; GLIDDON, M. Topical formulations of metaflumizone plus amitrazto treat flea and tick infestations on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 150, n. 3, p. 196-202, 2007. SCHUELE, G.; BARNETT, S.; BAPST, B.; CAVALIERO, T.; LUEMPERT, L.; STREHLAU, G.; YOUNG, D. R.; MORAN, C.; JUNQUERA, P. The effect of water and shampooing on the efficacy of a pyriprole 12.5% topical solution against brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) and cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestations on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 151, n. 2--4, p. 300--311, 2008. SCOTT, F. B.; MARTINS, I. V. F.; SOUZA, C. P.; CORREIA, T. R. Aspectos gerais do controle da pulga Ctenocephalides felis felis em c?es. A HoraVeterin?ria, v. 21, n. 125, p. 13--18, 2002. SHANKS, D. J.; ROWAN, T. G.; JONES, R. L.; WATSON, P.; MURPHY, M. G.; SMITH, D. G.; JERNIGAN, A. D. Efficacy of selamectin in the treatment and prevention of flea (Ctenocephalides felis felis) infestations on dogs and cats housed in simulated home environments. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 91, n. 3, p. 213-222, 2000. SIAK, M.; BURROWS, M. Flea control in cats: new concepts and the current armoury. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, v. 15, n. 1, p. 31--40, 2013. SILVERMAN, J.; RUST, M. K. Extended longevity of preemerged adult cat flea (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) and factors stimulating emergence from the pupal cocoon. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, v. 78, n. 6, p. 763--768, 1985. 32 TANCREDI, M. G. F. Efic?cia e seguran?a cl?nica comparativa de duas formula??es de aplica??o t?pica contendo 10 % de fipronil no controle de ectoparasitos em c?es e gatos. 2009. 65 f. (Doutorado). Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2009. TAYLOR, M. A. Recent developments in ectoparasiticides.The Veterinary Journal, v. 161, n. 3, p. 253-268. 2001. THE PESTICIDE MANUAL, 12? Edi??o, Editora C. D. S. Tomlin, The British Crop Protection Council. Surrey, U. K. p. 413-415, 2000. Dispon?vel em: < http://bcpcdata.com/pesticide-manual.html>. Acesso em 21/04/2013. TINGLE, C. C. D.; ROTHER, J. A.; DEWHURST, C. F.; LAUER, S.; KING, W. J. Health and environmental effects of fipronil, 2000. Dispon?vel em:<http://www.pan-uk.org/archive/Publications/Briefing/fipronil.pdf>. Acesso em: 04/04/2013. USEPA. New pesticide fact sheet -- fipronil (Washington, DC, US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticide and Toxic Substances), 1996. Dispon?vel em: <http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe>. Acesso em: 04/04/2013. USEPA. Environmental fate of fipronil. California Environmental Protection Agency, California, 2001. Dispon?vel em: <http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/emon/pubs/fatememo/fipronilrev.pdf>. Acesso em: 13/04/2013. VALADARES-INGLIS, M. C. C.; SHILER, W.; SOUZA, M. T. Engenharia gen?tica de microrganismos agentes de controle biol?gico. In: MELO, I. S.; AZEVEDO, J. L. Controle Biol?gico. Jaguari?na: Embrapa-CNPMA, 1998. v. 1, p. 201-230. VIEGAS--J?NIOR, C. Terpenos com atividade inseticida: uma alternativa para o controle qu?mico de insetos. Qu?mica Nova, v. 26, n. 3, p. 390--400, 2003. WARE, G. W. The Pesticide Book. 5? ed. Thomson Publications. Fresno, C.A. 2000, 69 p. YOUNG, D. R.; JEANNIN, P. C.; BOECKH, A. Efficacy of fipronil/(s)--methoprene combination spot--on for dogs against shed eggs, emerging and existing adult cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis, Bouch?). Veterinary Parasitology, v. 125, n. 3, p. 397--407, 2004.fenilpirazolcontrole qu?micopulgasphenylpyrazolchemical controlfleasMedicina Veterin?riaInflu?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.Influence of the level of population challenge of Ctenocephalides felis felis on the efficacy of fipronil in dogs. 2013.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJTHUMBNAIL2013 - Cristiane Nunes Coelho da Rocha.pdf.jpg2013 - Cristiane Nunes Coelho da Rocha.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3415http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3444/18/2013+-+Cristiane+Nunes+Coelho+da+Rocha.pdf.jpgc391cf210f199c71c161bdf9916579c7MD518TEXT2013 - Cristiane Nunes Coelho da Rocha.pdf.txt2013 - Cristiane Nunes Coelho da Rocha.pdf.txttext/plain82400http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3444/17/2013+-+Cristiane+Nunes+Coelho+da+Rocha.pdf.txt67e140792c2b4b30578b0d74b5780bc4MD517ORIGINAL2013 - Cristiane Nunes Coelho da Rocha.pdf2013 - Cristiane Nunes Coelho da Rocha.pdfapplication/pdf1228397http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3444/2/2013+-+Cristiane+Nunes+Coelho+da+Rocha.pdf0e459defe950ce7942c567489c17b3c1MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3444/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51jspui/34442022-10-04 11:22:25.237oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2022-10-04T14:22:25Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Influence of the level of population challenge of Ctenocephalides felis felis on the efficacy of fipronil in dogs. 2013.
title Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.
spellingShingle Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.
Rocha, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da
fenilpirazol
controle qu?mico
pulgas
phenylpyrazol
chemical control
fleas
Medicina Veterin?ria
title_short Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.
title_full Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.
title_fullStr Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.
title_full_unstemmed Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.
title_sort Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.
author Rocha, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da
author_facet Rocha, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Scott, Fabio Barbour
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 001.382.167-97
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1217253540572819
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Azevedo, Tha?s Ribeiro Correia
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Melo, Raquel Moreira Pires dos Santos
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Borja, Gonzalo Efraim Moya
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 092.580.397-93
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3552807826270599
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da
contributor_str_mv Scott, Fabio Barbour
Azevedo, Tha?s Ribeiro Correia
Melo, Raquel Moreira Pires dos Santos
Borja, Gonzalo Efraim Moya
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv fenilpirazol
controle qu?mico
pulgas
topic fenilpirazol
controle qu?mico
pulgas
phenylpyrazol
chemical control
fleas
Medicina Veterin?ria
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv phenylpyrazol
chemical control
fleas
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Medicina Veterin?ria
description The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence the level of of population challenge of Ctenocephalides felis felis on the efficacy of fipronil 10% ?topspot? in dogs. For this, 24 Beagles were used, divided into four groups of six dogs each. The dogs on the control groups I and II were not treated, while the dogs on the treated group I e II were treated with the formulation of 10% fipronil ??topspot??. The dogs in the control group I and treated group I were infested with 50 pairs of C. felis felis and dogs in groups control II and treated II were infested with 150 pairs of C. felis felis each. Infestations were performed on days 2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and +40 and on days +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 and +42 fleas were mechanical removed and counted for evaluation. Pulicide efficacy for treated group I on days +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 and +42, were respectively 99.36%, 99.73%, 99.48%, 99.00%, 74.00%, 99.75%, 95.06% and 67.62%. The pulicide efficacy for the treated group II, evaluated on the same days, were respectively 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 99.91, 95.60% and 68.55%. Fipronil was effective in eliminating fleas on dogs until day +35. The statistical comparisons between the mean living fleas between groups control I and treated I showed significant differences (p ? 0.05) for the challenges in all experimental days after treatment. Groups control II and treated II also showed significant differences (p ? 0.05) for the challenges in all experimental days after treatment. Statistical analysis between treated groups I and II showed no significant difference (p ? 0.05) between the challenges in all experimental days. The challenges were finished on day 42, when the effectiveness of fipronil in treated groups I and II were lower than 70%. The tested product was effective in eliminating fleas on dogs until day + 35 with no more residual effect of protection when the animals were reinfested. Different level of exposure of populations of C. felis felis, 100 and 300 exemplary, through weekly infestations were not able to determine different fipronil efficacy responses, when used in dogs.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013-11-19
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-04-21T14:47:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ROCHA, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da. Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.. 2013. 33 f. Disserta??o (Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3444
identifier_str_mv ROCHA, Cristiane Nunes Coelho da. Influ?ncia do n?vel de desafio populacional de Ctenocephalides felis felis sobre a efic?cia do fipronil em C?es. 2013.. 2013. 33 f. Disserta??o (Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica.
url https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3444
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.references.por.fl_str_mv ALVES, S. B. Controle Microbiano de Insetos. 2. ed. Piracicaba: FEALQ, 1998. 1163p. BITAM, I.; DITTMAR, K.; PAROLA, P.; WHITING, M. F.; RAOULT, D. Fleas and flea borne diseases. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, v. 14, n. 8, p. 667 676, 2010. BLAGBURN, B. L.; DRYDEN, M. W. Biology, treatment and control of flea and tick infestations. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 39, n. 06, p. 1173 1200, 2009. BONNEAU, S.; FOURIER, J. J.; ROUSSEAU, C.; CADIERGUES, M. C. Comparative efficacy of two fipronil spot on formulations against experimental flea infestations (Ctenocephalides felis) in dogs. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, v. 8, n. 1, p. 16 20, 2010. CARLOTTI, D.N.; JACOBS, D.E. Therapy, control and prevention of flea allergy dermatitis in dogs and cats. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 83 98, 2000. COLE, L. M.; NICHOLSON, R. A.; CASIDA, J. E. Action of phenylpyrazole insecticides at the GABA gated chloride channel. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v. 46, n. 1, p. 47 54, 1993. COOP, R. L.; TAYLOR, M. A.; JACOBS, D. E; JACKSON, F. Ectoparasites: recent advances in control. Trens in Parasitology, v. 18, n. 2, p. 55 56, 2002. COOPER, P. R.; PENALIGGON, E. J. Use of fipronil to eliminate recurrent infestation by Trichodectes canis in a pack of bloodhounds. Veterinary Record, v. 139, n. 4, p. 95 95, 1996. COUTINHO, C. F. B.; GALLI, A.; GARBELLINI, G. S.; TAKAAMA, M.; TANIMOTO, S. T.; AMARAL, R. B.; MAZO, L. H.; AVACA, L. A.; MACHADO, S. A. S. Pesticidas: Mecanismo de a??o, degrada??o e toxidez. Pesticidas (UFPR), v. 15, n. 1, p. 65-72, 2005. CORREIA, T. R.; MELO, R. M. P. S.; FERNANDES, J. I.; FREITAS, I. F.; VIEIRA, V. P. C.; RIBEIRO, F. A. R.; VEROCAI, G. G.; SCOTT, F. B. Efic?cia de uma formula??o para aplica??o ambiental contendo o piretr?ide ciflutrina e o regulador de crescimento de insetos piriproxifen no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis (Bouch?, 1835) (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae). Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterin?ria, v. 32 (Supl. 1), p. 17-20, 2010. CRUTHERS, L., SLONE, R.L., GUERRERO, J., ROBERTSON-PLOUGH, C. Evaluation of the speed of kill of fleas and ticks with Frontline Top Spot in dogs. Veterinary Therapeutics, v. 2, n. 2, p. 170-174, 2001. CUNNINGHAM, J. R.; RYAN, W. G. Compara??o entre Fipronil (Top Spot) e Imidacloriprid (Spot On) no controle de infesta??es por pulgas quando aplicados logo ap?s banho com xampu. A HoraVeterin?ria, v. 19, n. 109, p. 15-18, 1999. CURTIS, C. F. Use of 0,25 per cent fipronil sprayto treat sarcoptic mange in a litter of five week old puppies. Veterinary Record, v. 139, p. 43-44, 1996. 29 DEFRA. Evaluation on: fipronil use as a public hygiene insecticide. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 116 p., 1999. DRYDEN, M. W; NEAL, J. J.; BENNETT, G. W. Concepts of Flea Control. Companion Animal Practice. v. 19, n. 4, p. 11--20, 1989. DRYDEN, M. W.; RUST, M. K. The cat flea: biology, ecology and control. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 52, n. 1, p. 1--19, 1994. DRYDEN, M. W.; DENENBERG, T. M.; BUNCH, S. Control of fleas on naturally infested dogs and cats and in private residences with topical spot applications of fipronil or imidacloprid. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 93, n. 1, p. 69-75, 2000. DRYDEN, M. W.; BROCE, A. B. El Control Integral de las Pulgas en el Siglo 21. Suplemento del Compendio Sobre Educaci?n Continua para el Veterinario em Pr?ctica, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2003. DRYDEN, M. W.; PAYNE, P. A.; VICKI, S.; RIGGS, B.; DAVENPORT, J.; KOBUSZEWSKI, D. Efficacy of dinotefuran?pyriproxyfen, dinotefuran?pyriproxyfen?permethrin and fipronil?(S)-methoprenetopical spot-on formulations to control flea populations in naturally infested pets and private residences in Tampa, FL. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 182, n. 2, p. 281-286, 2011. DRYDEN, M. W.; PAYNE, P. A.; SMITH, V.; BERG, T. C.; LANE, M. Efficacy of selamectin, spinosad, and spinosad/milbemycin oxime against the KS1 Ctenocephalides felis flea strain infesting dogs. Parasites & Vectors, v. 6, n. 80, 2013. DRYDEN, M. W.; PAYNE, P. A.; SMITH, V.; HEANEY, K.; S., FANGSHI. Efficacy of indoxacarb applied to cats against the adult cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis, flea eggs and adult flea emergence. Parasites & Vectors, v. 6, n. 126, p. 1-6, 2013. FOURIE, L. J.; KOK, D. J.; PETER, R. J. Control of immature stages of the flea Ctenocephalides felis (Bouch?) in carpets exposed to cats treated with imidacloprid. Journal of South African Veterinary Association, v. 71, n. 4, p. 219--221, 2000. HAINZL, D.; CASIDA, J. E. Fipronil insecticide: Novel photochemical desulfinylation with retention of neurotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 93, n. 23, p. 12764--12767, 1996. HOGSETTE, J. A. Management of ectoparasites with biological control. International Journal for Parasitology, v. 29, n. 1, p. 147--151, 1999. HOSKING, B.; SMITH, B. K.; SCHUELE, G.; STREHLAU, G.; JUNQUERA, P. Efficacy of a 12.5% pyriprole spot--on solution against natural flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestations on dogs. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, v. 7, n. 1, p. 32--35, 2009. HOVDA, L. R.; HOOSER, S. B. Toxicology of newer pesticides for use in dogs and cats. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 32, n. 2, p. 455--467, 2002. 30 KRASNOV, B. R. Functional and Evolutionary Ecology of Fleas: a model for ecological parasitology. Cambridge University Press, 593 p., 2008. KU?NER, J.; TURK, S.; GRACE, S.; SONI--GUPTA, J.; FOURIE, J. J.; MARCHIONDO, A. A.; RUGG, D. Confirmation of the efficacy of a novel fipronil spot--on for the treatment and control of fleas, ticks and chewing lice on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 112, n. 1, p. 365--372, 2013. LINARDI, P. M.; GUIMAR?ES, L. R. Sifon?pteros do Brasil. S?o Paulo: Editora MZUSP/FAPESP, 1? edi??o, S?o Paulo, 291 p., 2000. LINARDI, P. Checklist de Siphonaptera (Insecta) do Estado de S?o Paulo. Biota Neotropica, v. 11, 2011. LINARDI, P. M.; SANTOS, J. L. C. Ctenocephalides felis felis vs. Ctenocephalides canis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae): some issues in correctly identify these species. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterin?ria, v. 21, n. 4, p. 345--354, 2012. MARCHIONDO, A. A.; HOLDSWORTH, P. A.; FOURIE, L. J.; RUGG, D.; HELLMANN, K.; SNYDER, D. E.; DRYDEN, M, W. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) second edition: Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides for the treatment, prevention and control of flea and tick infestations on dogs and cats. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 194, n. 1, p. 84-97, 2013. MELO, I. S.; AZEVEDO, J. L. Controle Biol?gico. Jaguari?na, SP: EMBRAPA, 1998. v. 1: 262 p. MELO, D. R. A??o de Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff, 1879) Sorokin, 1883 e Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuilllemin, 1912 sobre C. felis felis (Bouch?, 1806) (Siphonaptera: Pulicidade). 2006. 38 p. Tese (Doutorado). Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica--RJ. 2006. MELO, D. R., CRUZ, G. B.; BITTENCOURT, V. R. E. P. Desenvolvimento dos fungos Metahizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff, 1879) Sorokin, 1883 e Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin, 1912 sobre Ctenocephalides felis felis (Bouch?, 1835). Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterin?ria, v. 16, n. 3, p. 166--170, 2007. MELO, R. M. P. S.; VIEIRA, V. P. C.; TAVARES, P. V.; BATISTA, L. C. S. O.; CARNEIRO, M. B.; CORREIA, T. R.; CID, Y. P.; COUMENDOUROS, K.; SCOTT, F. B. Efic?cia do fipronil oral no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis (Siphonaptera : Pulicidae) e Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acari : Ixodidae) em c?es. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterin?ria, v. 34, Supl. 1, p. 15--20, 2012. MOFFAT, A. S. New chemicals seek to outwit insect pests. Science, v. 26, n. 5121, p. 550--551, 1993. NARAHASHI, T.; ZHAO, X.; IKEDA, T.; SALGADO, V. L.; YEH, J. Z. Glutamate--activated chloride channels: unique fipronil targets present in insects but not in mammals. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v. 97, n. 2, p. 149--152, 2010. 31 PAYNE, P. A.; DRYDEN, W. W.; SMITH, V.; RIDLEY, R. K. Effect of 0.29% w/w fipronil spray on adult flea mortality and egg production of three different cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouch?), strains infesting cats. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 102, n. 4, p. 331--340, 2001. POSTAL, J. M.; JEANNIN, P. C.; CONSAVI, P. J. Field efficacy of a mechanical pump spray formulation containing 0,25% fipronil in the treatment and control of flea infestation and associated dermalogical signs in dogs and cats. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 6, n. 3, p. 153--158, 1995. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (The R Foundation). R version 2.4.1 (2006--12--18). Copyright ?.ISBN 3--900051--07--0, 2006. Dispon?vel em:<http://www. (http://rstudio.org/)>.Acesso em: 10/03/2012. RUGG, D.; HAIR, J. A. Dose determination of a novel formulation of metaflumizone plus amitraz for control of cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis felis) and brown dog ticks (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 150, n. 3, p. 203-208, 2007. RUST, M. K.; DRYDEN, M. W. The Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Cat Flea. Annual Review of Entomology, v. 42, n. 1, p. 451--473, 1997. RUST, M. K. Advances in the control of Ctenocephalides felis felis (cat flea) on cats and dogs. Trends in Parasitology, v. 21, n. 5, p. 232--236, 2005. SABNIS, S.; ZUPAN, J.; GLIDDON, M. Topical formulations of metaflumizone plus amitrazto treat flea and tick infestations on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 150, n. 3, p. 196-202, 2007. SCHUELE, G.; BARNETT, S.; BAPST, B.; CAVALIERO, T.; LUEMPERT, L.; STREHLAU, G.; YOUNG, D. R.; MORAN, C.; JUNQUERA, P. The effect of water and shampooing on the efficacy of a pyriprole 12.5% topical solution against brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) and cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestations on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 151, n. 2--4, p. 300--311, 2008. SCOTT, F. B.; MARTINS, I. V. F.; SOUZA, C. P.; CORREIA, T. R. Aspectos gerais do controle da pulga Ctenocephalides felis felis em c?es. A HoraVeterin?ria, v. 21, n. 125, p. 13--18, 2002. SHANKS, D. J.; ROWAN, T. G.; JONES, R. L.; WATSON, P.; MURPHY, M. G.; SMITH, D. G.; JERNIGAN, A. D. Efficacy of selamectin in the treatment and prevention of flea (Ctenocephalides felis felis) infestations on dogs and cats housed in simulated home environments. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 91, n. 3, p. 213-222, 2000. SIAK, M.; BURROWS, M. Flea control in cats: new concepts and the current armoury. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, v. 15, n. 1, p. 31--40, 2013. SILVERMAN, J.; RUST, M. K. Extended longevity of preemerged adult cat flea (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) and factors stimulating emergence from the pupal cocoon. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, v. 78, n. 6, p. 763--768, 1985. 32 TANCREDI, M. G. F. Efic?cia e seguran?a cl?nica comparativa de duas formula??es de aplica??o t?pica contendo 10 % de fipronil no controle de ectoparasitos em c?es e gatos. 2009. 65 f. (Doutorado). Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2009. TAYLOR, M. A. Recent developments in ectoparasiticides.The Veterinary Journal, v. 161, n. 3, p. 253-268. 2001. THE PESTICIDE MANUAL, 12? Edi??o, Editora C. D. S. Tomlin, The British Crop Protection Council. Surrey, U. K. p. 413-415, 2000. Dispon?vel em: < http://bcpcdata.com/pesticide-manual.html>. Acesso em 21/04/2013. TINGLE, C. C. D.; ROTHER, J. A.; DEWHURST, C. F.; LAUER, S.; KING, W. J. Health and environmental effects of fipronil, 2000. Dispon?vel em:<http://www.pan-uk.org/archive/Publications/Briefing/fipronil.pdf>. Acesso em: 04/04/2013. USEPA. New pesticide fact sheet -- fipronil (Washington, DC, US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticide and Toxic Substances), 1996. Dispon?vel em: <http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe>. Acesso em: 04/04/2013. USEPA. Environmental fate of fipronil. California Environmental Protection Agency, California, 2001. Dispon?vel em: <http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/emon/pubs/fatememo/fipronilrev.pdf>. Acesso em: 13/04/2013. VALADARES-INGLIS, M. C. C.; SHILER, W.; SOUZA, M. T. Engenharia gen?tica de microrganismos agentes de controle biol?gico. In: MELO, I. S.; AZEVEDO, J. L. Controle Biol?gico. Jaguari?na: Embrapa-CNPMA, 1998. v. 1, p. 201-230. VIEGAS--J?NIOR, C. Terpenos com atividade inseticida: uma alternativa para o controle qu?mico de insetos. Qu?mica Nova, v. 26, n. 3, p. 390--400, 2003. WARE, G. W. The Pesticide Book. 5? ed. Thomson Publications. Fresno, C.A. 2000, 69 p. YOUNG, D. R.; JEANNIN, P. C.; BOECKH, A. Efficacy of fipronil/(s)--methoprene combination spot--on for dogs against shed eggs, emerging and existing adult cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis, Bouch?). Veterinary Parasitology, v. 125, n. 3, p. 397--407, 2004.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRRJ
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Instituto de Veterin?ria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3444/18/2013+-+Cristiane+Nunes+Coelho+da+Rocha.pdf.jpg
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3444/17/2013+-+Cristiane+Nunes+Coelho+da+Rocha.pdf.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3444/2/2013+-+Cristiane+Nunes+Coelho+da+Rocha.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3444/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c391cf210f199c71c161bdf9916579c7
67e140792c2b4b30578b0d74b5780bc4
0e459defe950ce7942c567489c17b3c1
7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br
_version_ 1800313499842248704

Registros relacionados