Evid?ncias de validade entre instrumentos de Avalia??o da Consci?ncia Fonol?gica

• Autor(a) principal: Mesquita, Fernanda de Carvalho
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
• Texto Completo: https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/5038
• topic: Consci?ncia Fonol?gica; Instrumentos de Avalia??o; Validade; Phonological Awareness; Evaluation Instruments; Validity; Psicologia

The objective of this study was to obtain evidence of validity of criterion and convergent validity between three phonological awareness instruments, namely, the Roteiro de Avalia??o da Consci?ncia Fonol?gica (RACF), the Prova de Consci?ncia Fonol?gica por Produ??o Oral (PCFO) and Consci?ncia Fonol?gica: Instrumento de Avalia??o Sequencial (CONFIAS). Alongside this, we tried to highlight the instruments in which the children presented better and worse results; to identify any differences between the children assessed in terms of gender, school year and age; to verify the intensity of the correlation of TDE ? Leitura, the instruments of evaluation of the Phonological Consciousness and its subtests; and to verify if the children that present good results in the instruments of evaluation of the Phonological Consciousness also present good results in the TDE - Leitura. Although phonological awareness is pointed out in several researches as one of the precursor abilities to acquire reading and writing, and a successful evaluation of this ability can indicate to the teachers and professionals of the area any difficulties of the students in this learning, it is verified that Brazil lacks a reflection on the instruments that already exist, above all, a work that presents evidence of validity and the convergence indexes between instruments. There are studies that indicate evidence of validity between the RACF and the PCFO, however these analyzes do not contemplate the CONFIAS. This is where the present study is inserted, since we add to the validity analyzes already existing between the two instruments (RACF and PCFO) the evidence of validity of the CONFIAS, and verify if there is validity of criterion in the three instruments and of convergence between the instruments ( RACF, PCFO and CONFIAS). A total of 131 children, both sexes, between 6 and 8 years of age, attending the 1st to 3rd year of elementary school in a municipal school in Serop?dica - RJ participated in the study. The results showed that there is validity of concurrent criterion in the three instruments, both for school year, both for reading ability, and convergent validity among them, being the relationship of greater intensity between the PCFO and the CONFIAS. We verified that the easiest and most difficult instrument for our sample, respectively, was the RACF, which proved to be a screening tool, and PCFO, which proved to be an instrument that discriminates only skilled readers. There were differences between the sexes only in the RACF and in the sub-test of rhyme identification of the CONFIAS, in which the girls presented better results and all the instruments discriminated the children by school year and by age. In addition, the phonological awareness instrument that obtained the best correlation with the reading was PCFO and the subtests that best correlated with reading were the phonemes. Finally, the children who presented the best performance in the instruments of evaluation of phonological awareness are the same ones that presented the best performance in the TDE - Leitura.