Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bueno, Camila de C?ssia Silva
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
Texto Completo: https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3484
Resumo: The forest fragmentation is happens when a large and continuous nature habitat area is reduced and divided into two or more fragments. Birds composed the taxonomic group better studied in the research of effects of tropical fragmentation and plays an important role in the ecosystem of rainforests. The urban forest fragments are increasingly common, making necessary a better understanding of their guidelines for care and maintenance as a natural reserve. This study aimed to evaluate generally the differences between in bird communities between Atlantic Forest fragments with urban matrix, with different environmental variables. Specifically aimed to estimate the diversity of birdlife in fragments, analyze the similarity between components of the bird community between areas and check the influence of the size and shape of fragments and their environmental parameters on the richness of birds. The study area was in four forest fragments of Atlantic Forest. To survey the birdlife censuses was conducted through listening points. Vegetation Data were taken along transects of 100 meters. In relation to the density of understory were accounted individuals with height between 50 cm and two meters in plots of 5 x 5 meters. Data related to canopy openness and height were taken into 11 points 10 meters equidistant. As regards the assessment of the similarity of richness between the fragments was done Sorensen Similarity Index. In order to rank the areas studied in relation to the similarity in the structure of the bird community, a dendrogram was made. To evaluate the influence of the vegetation data on the local richness of each area a PCA was undertaken. In this study were cataloged 14 orders, 38 families and 129 species of birds. The fragment Fr4 presented the greatest richness of birds, with 104 species, and Fr2 fragment was the one with the lowest richness, with 49 species. The trophic guild most represented was the insectivores with 62 species followed by thef omnivorous with 37. The Venn diagram indicated that 31 species were common to all areas and that showed the highest number of exclusive species. It was observed that the areas wich had a higher Sorensen Similarity Index were Fr2 x Fr3. In PCA, the axis I was explained by the parameters: canopy openness and understory density. Axis II was explained by canopy height parameter. Analyzing the results we can conclude that all studied areas have a high degree of similarity between them, with a highlight for Fr4. Frugivorous and foraging ground insectivorous birds are the first to be lost in the forest fragmentation, implying that specialist species are the first to be locally extinct. Studies like this, in which is made an analyzes of the structure of the bird community in accordance with the environmental variables and structural fragment are still missing and would greatly help to understand the dynamics of populations in these fragments and the colonization-extinction relation.
id UFRRJ-1_9f53d8eebb9089a65ebe6393483a72f8
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:jspui/3484
network_acronym_str UFRRJ-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
repository_id_str
spelling Ferreira, Ildemar361.618.027-91http://lattes.cnpq.br/9716949971860244Freitas, Andre Felippe Nunes deRocha, Fl?via SouzaPiratelli, Augusto Jo?o057.864.427-48http://lattes.cnpq.br/6818419081349718Bueno, Camila de C?ssia Silva2020-05-01T01:13:15Z2013-06-05BUENO, Camila de C?ssia Silva. Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana. 2013. 105 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Biologia Animal) - Instituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas e da Sa?de, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2013.https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3484The forest fragmentation is happens when a large and continuous nature habitat area is reduced and divided into two or more fragments. Birds composed the taxonomic group better studied in the research of effects of tropical fragmentation and plays an important role in the ecosystem of rainforests. The urban forest fragments are increasingly common, making necessary a better understanding of their guidelines for care and maintenance as a natural reserve. This study aimed to evaluate generally the differences between in bird communities between Atlantic Forest fragments with urban matrix, with different environmental variables. Specifically aimed to estimate the diversity of birdlife in fragments, analyze the similarity between components of the bird community between areas and check the influence of the size and shape of fragments and their environmental parameters on the richness of birds. The study area was in four forest fragments of Atlantic Forest. To survey the birdlife censuses was conducted through listening points. Vegetation Data were taken along transects of 100 meters. In relation to the density of understory were accounted individuals with height between 50 cm and two meters in plots of 5 x 5 meters. Data related to canopy openness and height were taken into 11 points 10 meters equidistant. As regards the assessment of the similarity of richness between the fragments was done Sorensen Similarity Index. In order to rank the areas studied in relation to the similarity in the structure of the bird community, a dendrogram was made. To evaluate the influence of the vegetation data on the local richness of each area a PCA was undertaken. In this study were cataloged 14 orders, 38 families and 129 species of birds. The fragment Fr4 presented the greatest richness of birds, with 104 species, and Fr2 fragment was the one with the lowest richness, with 49 species. The trophic guild most represented was the insectivores with 62 species followed by thef omnivorous with 37. The Venn diagram indicated that 31 species were common to all areas and that showed the highest number of exclusive species. It was observed that the areas wich had a higher Sorensen Similarity Index were Fr2 x Fr3. In PCA, the axis I was explained by the parameters: canopy openness and understory density. Axis II was explained by canopy height parameter. Analyzing the results we can conclude that all studied areas have a high degree of similarity between them, with a highlight for Fr4. Frugivorous and foraging ground insectivorous birds are the first to be lost in the forest fragmentation, implying that specialist species are the first to be locally extinct. Studies like this, in which is made an analyzes of the structure of the bird community in accordance with the environmental variables and structural fragment are still missing and would greatly help to understand the dynamics of populations in these fragments and the colonization-extinction relation.A fragmenta??o florestal ? o processo pelo qual uma grande e cont?nua ?rea de habitat natural ? reduzida e dividida em dois ou mais fragmentos. As aves comp?em o grupo taxon?mico melhor estudado na investiga??o dos efeitos da fragmenta??o tropical e possuem papel importante no ecossistema de florestas tropicais. Os fragmentos florestais urbanos s?o cada vez mais comuns, fazendo-se necess?rio um melhor entendimento de suas diretrizes para conserva??o e manuten??o como reserva natural. Este estudo objetivou, de forma geral, avaliar a diferen?a na comunidade de aves entre fragmentos florestais de Mata Atl?ntica com uma matriz urbana, com diferentes vari?veis ambientais. Especificamente objetivou estimar a diversidade da avifauna nos fragmentos, analisar a similaridade entre componentes da comunidade de aves entre as ?reas e verificar influ?ncia do tamanho e forma dos fragmentos e de seus par?metros ambientais sobre a riqueza de aves. A ?rea de estudo se deu em quatro fragmentos florestais de Mata Atl?ntica. Para realizar o levantamento da avifauna foi efetuado censos atrav?s de pontos de escuta. Dados referentes ? vegeta??o foram tomados ao longo de transectos de 100 metros. Em rela??o ? densidade do sub-bosque foram contabilizados os indiv?duos entre 50 cm e dois metros de altura em parcelas de 5 x 5 metros. Os dados relacionados ? abertura e altura do dossel foram tomados em 11 pontos equidistantes 10 metros. No tocante ? avalia??o da similaridade da riqueza entre os fragmentos foi feito o ?ndice de Similaridade de Sorensen. Com o intuito de ordenar as ?reas estudadas em rela??o ? similaridade na estrutura da comunidade de aves, foi feito um dendrograma. Para avaliar a influ?ncia dos dados referentes ? vegeta??o sobre a riqueza local de cada ?rea foi realizado uma PCA. Nesse estudo foram catalogadas 14 ordens, 38 fam?lias e 129 esp?cies de aves. O fragmento Fr4 foi o que apresentou a maior riqueza de aves, com 104 esp?cies, e o fragmento Fr2 com a menor riqueza, com 49 esp?cies. A guilda tr?fica mais representativa foi a dos inset?voros com 62 esp?cies seguida dos on?voros com 37. O diagrama de Venn indicou que 31 esp?cies foram comuns a todas as ?reas e que Fr4 apresentou o maior n?mero de esp?cies exclusivas. Observou-se que as ?reas que apresentaram um maior ?ndice Similaridade de Sorensen foi Fr2 x Fr3. Na PCA, o eixo I foi explicado pelos par?metros: abertura do dossel e densidade do sub-bosque. O eixo II foi explicado pelo par?metro altura do dossel. Analisando os resultados encontrados podemos concluir que todas as ?reas estudadas possuem um alto grau de similaridade entre elas, havendo um destaque para Fr4. As aves frug?voras e inset?voros forrageadores de ch?o s?o os primeiros a serem perdidos na fragmenta??o florestal, inferindo que as esp?cies especialistas s?o as primeiras a serem extintas localmente. Estudos como este em que se analisa a estrutura da comunidade de aves de acordo com as vari?veis ambientais e estruturais do fragmento ainda est?o em falta e ajudariam muito a entender a din?mica das popula??es nestes fragmentos e as rela??es coloniza??o-extin??o.Submitted by Sandra Pereira (srpereira@ufrrj.br) on 2020-05-01T01:13:15Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2013 - Camila de C?ssia Silva Bueno.pdf: 5384805 bytes, checksum: 5e86d41eb2d0f3cf2caa40bdb6cf20d4 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-05-01T01:13:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2013 - Camila de C?ssia Silva Bueno.pdf: 5384805 bytes, checksum: 5e86d41eb2d0f3cf2caa40bdb6cf20d4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-06-05Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior, CAPES, Brasil.application/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/14526/2013%20-%20Camila%20de%20C%c3%a1ssia%20Silva%20Bueno.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/17480/2013%20-%20Camila%20de%20C%c3%a1ssia%20Silva%20Bueno.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/23822/2013%20-%20Camila%20de%20C%c3%a1ssia%20Silva%20Bueno.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/30110/2013%20-%20Camila%20de%20C%c3%a1ssia%20Silva%20Bueno.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/36558/2013%20-%20Camila%20de%20C%c3%a1ssia%20Silva%20Bueno.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/42864/2013%20-%20Camila%20de%20C%c3%a1ssia%20Silva%20Bueno.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/49306/2013%20-%20Camila%20de%20C%c3%a1ssia%20Silva%20Bueno.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/55732/2013%20-%20Camila%20de%20C%c3%a1ssia%20Silva%20Bueno.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Biologia AnimalUFRRJBrasilInstituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas e da Sa?deALEIXO, A. e VIELLIARD, J. M. E. 1995. Composi??o e din?mica da avifauna da mata de Santa Genebra, Campinas, S?o Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 12 (3): 493-511. ALVARENGA, H. M. F. 1990. Novos registros e expans?es geogr?ficas de aves no leste do estado de S?o Paulo. Ararajuba, 1: 115-117. ANDERSEN, M.; THORNHILL, A. e KOOPOWITZ, H. 1997. Understory birds and dynamic habitat mosaics in Amazonian Rainforests. In: Laurance, W.F. Jr. e Bierregaard, R.O. Jr. (Eds.), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 281-291. ANIMAL DIVERSITY WEB. University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu (Acessado em 21 de fevereiro de 2013 ?s 19:35 h). ANJOS, L.; KARL-L, SCHUCHMANN, K. e BERNDT, R 1997. Avifaunal composition, species richness, and status in the Tibagi river basin, Parana State, Southern Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical, 8: 145-173. ANJOS, L. e BO?ON, R. 1999. Bird communities in natural forest patches in southern Brazil. Wilson Bull., Lawrence, 111 (3): 397-414. 77 ANJOS, L. 2006. Bird Species Sensitivity in a Fragmented Landscape of the Atlantic Forest in Southern Brazil. Biotropica, 38 (2): 229?234. ANTONGIOVANNI, M. e METZGER, J. P. 2005. Influence of matrix habitats on the occurrence of insectivorous bird species in Amazonian forest fragments. Biological Conservation, 122: 441?451. ANTUNES, A. Z. 2005. Altera??es na composi??o da comunidade de aves ao longo do tempo em um fragmento florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Ararajuba, 13 (1): 47-61. ANTUNES, A. Z. 2007. Riqueza e din?mica de aves end?micas da Mata Atl?ntica em um fragmento de floresta estacional semidecidual no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 15 (1): 61-68. BANKS-LEITE, C.; EWERS, R. M. e METZGER, J. P. 2010. Edge effects as the principal cause of area effects on birds in fragmented secondary forest. Oikos, 119: 918?926. BAKKER, K. K., NAUGLE, D.E. e HIGGINS, K. F. 2002. Incorporating landscape attributes into models for migratory grassland bird conservation. Conservation Biology, 16: 1638- 1646. BAYBATES, J. M. 2000. Allozymic genetic structure e natural habitat fragmentation: data for five species of Amazonian forest birds. Condor, 102 (4), 770-783. BAYL?O JUNIOR, H. F 2010. Esp?cies com voca??o para facilitar processos de restaura??o 78 espont?nea de ecossistemas perturbados na vertente atl?ntica da Serra do Mar, Pira? ? RJ. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Ci?ncias ambientais e florestais, UFFRJ, 73 p. BAYL?O JUNIOR, H. F.; VALCARCEL, R.; ROPPA, C.; NETTESHEIM, F. C. 2011. Levantamento de esp?cies r?sticas em ?rea de pastagem e em remanescente florestal na Mata Atl?ntica, Pira?-RJ. Floresta e Ambiente, 18 (1): 50-59. BE?LISLE, M. 2005. Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology, 86: 1988?1995. BENCKE, G. A.; MAUR?CIO, G. N.; DEVELEY, P. F. e GOERCK, J. M. 2006. ?reas importantes para a conserva??o das aves no Brasil. Parte I ? Estados do Dom?nio da Mata Atl?ntica. SAVE Brasil, S?o Paulo. 494 p. BIERREGAARD JR., R. O. e STOUFFER, P. 1997. Understory birds and dynamic habitat mosaics in Amazonian rainforests. In: Laurance, W.F. Jr. e Bierregaard, R.O. Jr. (Eds.), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 138?155. BILDSTEIN, K. L.; SCHELSKY, W. e ZALLES, J. 1998. Conservation status of tropical raptors. Journal Raptor Reserch, 32 (1): 3-18. BIRDLIFE INTERNACIONAL. 2010. Birds on the IUCN Red List. www.birdlife.org. (acesso em 1 de maio de 2013 ?s 19:20 h). 79 BOITANI, L. e CIUCCI, P. 1995. Comparative social ecology of feral dogs and wolves. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, Firenze, 7 (1), 49-72. BORGES, S. e STOUFFER, P. C. 1999. Bird communities in two types of anthropogenic successional vegetation in central Amazonia. Condor, 101: 529?536. BOSCOLO, D. e METZGER, J. P. 2011. Isolation determines patterns of species presence in highly fragmented landscapes. Ecography, 34: 1018-1029. BROOKER, M. e BROOKER, L. 2001. Breeding biology, reproductive success and survival of blue-breasted fairy-wrens in fragmented habitat in the western Australian wheatbelt. Wildlife Resources, 28: 205?214. BROOKS, T.; TOBIAS, J. e BALMFORD, A. 1999. Deforestation and bird extinctions in the Atlantic forest. Animal Conservation, 2: 211-222. CAVARZERE, V.; MORAES, G. P. e DONATELLI, R. J. 2009. Diversidade de aves em uma mata estacional da regi?o centro-oeste de S?o Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Bioci?ncias, Porto Alegre, 7 (4): 368-371. CINTRA, R. 1997. Spatial distribution and foraging tactics of tyrant flycatchers in two habitats in the Brazilian Amazon. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 32: 17- 27. 80 CORDEIRO, N. J. e HOWE, H. F. 2001. Low recruitment of trees dispersed by animals in African forest fragments. Conservation Biology, 15: 1733-1741. COSTA, R. 2006. Impactos sobre remanescentes de florestas de Mata Atl?ntica na zona oeste da grande S?o Paulo: um estudo de caso da mata da Fazenda Tizo. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Geografia F?sica, Universidade de S?o Paulo, S?o Paulo, 211 p. CPEF (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund). 2001. Perfil do ecossistema: Mata Atl?ntica hotspot de biodiversidade. 29 p. CROOKS, K. R. e SANJAYAN, M. 2006. Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature. 1-19 p. In: K.R. Crooks e M. Sanjayan (eds.). Connectivity Conservation. Cambrige Universal Press, Cambridge, NY, 448 p. DANTAS, M. E. 2001. Mapa geomorfol?gico do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Bras?lia: CPRM, 63 p. D?RIO, F. R e ALMEIDA, A. F. 2000. Estrutura tr?fica da avifauna na Reserva Estadual de Gurja?, Zona da Mata Sul, Pernambuco, Brasil. Scientia Forestalis, Piracicaba, 58: 99-109. D?RIO, F. R.; VINCENZO, M. C. V. e ALMEIDA, A. F. 2002. Avifauna em fragmentos da Mata Atl?ntica. Ci?ncia Rural, 32 (6): 989-996. 81 DE PAULA, M. G.; VIEIRA, A. L. M.; RESENDE, A. S.; CAMPELLO, E. F. C. 2009. Flor?stica do Sistema Agroflorestal implantado com a fun??o de corredor ecol?gico em Serop?dica, RJ. VII Congresso Brasileiro de Sistemas Agroflorestais. Luzi?nia, GO. DEVELEY, P. F. e METZGER, J. P. 2006. Emerging threats to birds in Brazilian Atlantic forests: the roles of forest loss and configuration in a severely fragmented ecosystem. In: Laurance, W. F.; Peres, C. A. (Eds) Emerging threats to tropical forests. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 269?290. DEVELEY, P. F. e STOUFFER, P.C. 2001. Effects of roads on movements by understory birds in mixed-species flocks in Central Amazonian Brazil. Conservation Biology, 15: 1416? 1422. DONATELLI, R. J.; FERREIRA, C. D.; DALBETO, A. C. e POSSO, S. R. 2007. An?lise comparativa da assembl?ia de aves em dois remanescentes florestais no interior do Estado de S?o Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 24: 362-375. FAHRIG, L. 2001. How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation, 100: 65?74. FAHRIG, L. 2003. The Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 34: 487?515. FARIA, C. M. A.; RODRIGUES, M.; AMARAL, F. Q.; M?DENA, E. e FERNANDES, A. . 2006. Aves de um fragmento de Mata Atl?ntica no alto Rio Doce, Minas Gerais: coloniza??o e extin??o. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 23 (4): 1217-1230. 82 FEIBER, S. D. 2004. ?reas verdes urbanas imagem e uso: o caso do passeio p?blico de Curitiba, PR. Revista RA?E GA, Curitiba, 8: 93-105. FERNANDES, M. M.; PEREIRA, M. G.; MAGALH?ES, L. M. S.; CRUZ, A. R. e GI?COMO, R. G. 2006. Aporte e decomposi??o de serapilheira em ?reas de floresta secund?ria, plantio de sabi? (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia Benth.) e andiroba (Carapa guianensis Aubl.) na Flona M?rio Xavier, RJ. Ci?ncia Florestal, Santa Maria, 16 (2): 163- 175. FERRAZ, G.; NICHOLS, J. D.; HINES, J. E.; STOUFFER, P. C.; BIERREGARD Jr, R. O. e LOVEJOY, T. E. 2007. A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds. Science, 315: 238?241. FERREIRA, C. M. 2001. Diagn?stico da avifauna capturada ilegalmente no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Bioci?ncias, Faculdade de Bioci?ncias PUCRS, Porto Alegre, 70 p. FERREIRA, J. D. 2009. Aves e efeitos da fragmenta??o em um remanescente de Mata Atl?ntica do Quadril?tero Ferr?fero, MG. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Ecologia, Conserva??o e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 137 p. FERREIRA, I.; VENTURA, P. E. C. e LUZ, H. R. 2010. Aves no campus da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, EDUR, 259 p. 83 FORD, H. A.; BARRET, G.; SAUNDERS, D. e RECHER, H. 2001. Why have birds in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined? Biological Conservation, 97 (1): 71 - 88. FORMAN, R. T. T.; GALLI, A. E. e LECK, C. F. 1976. Forest size and avian diversity in New Jersey woodlots with some landuse implications. Oecologia, Berlin, 26: 1-8. FRANKHAM, R. 2006. Genetic and landscape connectivity. 72-96 p. In: Crooks, K.R. e Sanjayan, M. (Eds.). Connectivity Conservation. Cambrige Universal Press, Cambridge, NY, 448 p. FRANKHAM, R.; BALLOU, J. D. e BRISCOE, D. A. 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. United Kingdom, Cambrigde, 617 p. FRANZ, I.; CAPPELATTI, L. e BARROS, M. P. 2010. Bird community in a forest patch isolated by the urban matrix at the Sinos River basin, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, with comments on the possible local defaunation. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 70 (4): 1137- 1148. GABRIEL, V. A. e PIZO, M. A. Foraging behavior of tyrant flycatchers (Aves, Tyrannidae) in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22 (4): 1072-1077. GANDOLFI, S. e RODRIGUES, R. R. 2007. Metodologias de restaura??o florestal. In: CARGILL. Manejo ambiental e restaura??o de ?reas degradadas. Funda??o Cargill, 109- 143. 84 GALETTI, M. e SAZIMA, I. 2006. Impacto de c?es ferais em um fragmento urbano de Floresta Atl?ntica no sudeste do Brasil. Natureza & Conserva??o, Curitiba, 4 (1), 58-63. GIMENES, M. R. e ANJOS, L. 2003. Efeitos da fragmenta??o florestal sobre as comunidades de aves. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, Maring?, 25 (2), 391-402. GOOSEM, M. 1997. Internal fragmentation: the effects of roads, highways, and powerline clearings on movements and mortality of rainforest vertebrates. In: Laurance, W. F. and Bierregaard Jr, R.O. (Eds), Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, cap. 16, p. 241-255. GOTELLI, N. J. e ELLISON, A. M. 2011. Princ?pios de estat?stica em ecologia. Artmed, 528 p. HANSBAUER, M. M.; STORCH, I.; KNAUER, F. PILZ, S.; K?CHENHOFF, H.; V?GV?RI, Z.; PIMENTEL, R. G. e METZGER, J. P. 2010. Landscape perception by forest understory birds in the Atlantic Rainforest: black-and-white versus shades of grey. Landscape Ecology, 25: 407-417. HARRIS, G. M. e PIMM, S. L. 2004. Bird species? tolerance of secondary forest habitats and its effects on extinction. Conservation Biology, 18: 1607-1616. HAYES, F. E. 1995. Status, distribution and biogeography of the birds of Paraguay. Loma Linda: Loma Linda University. 85 HENRIQUES, O. K. 2003. Caracteriza??o da vegeta??o natural em Ribeir?o Preto, SP: Bases para conserva??o. Tese de doutorado, P?s-gradua??o em Ci?ncias, ?rea de Biologia Comparada, 255 p. HILL, J. e CURRAN, P. 2003. Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 1391?1403. IBGE (Funda??o Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat?stica), 1992. Manual T?cnico da vegeta??o brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. IBGE (Funda??o Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat?stica). 1983. Levantamento Explorat?rio e Solos das Folhas Sf. 23/24. Rio de Janeiro: Minist?rio das Minas e Energia, Projeto Radambrasil. IBGE (Funda??o Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat?stica). 2004. Mapa de Biomas do Brasil, primeira aproxima??o. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. IUCN (The International Union for Conservation of Nature), 2001. Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org (Acessado em 2 de abril de 2013 ?s 19:30 h). IUCN (The International Union for Conservation of Nature), 2010. Red List of Threatened Species. Vers?o 2010.4. http://www.iucnredlist.org (Acessado 20 de fevereiro de 2013 ?s 18:00 h). 86 KENT, M. e COKER, P. 1992. Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley, 363p. K?PPEN, W. 1948. Climatologia: con uno est?dio de los climas de la Tierra. M?xico: Fondo de Cultura Ec?nomica. 488 p. KR?GEL, M. M. e ANJOS, L. 2000. Birds communities in Forest remnants in the city of Maring?, Paran? State, southern Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical, Montreal, 11: 315-330. JORDANO, P.; GALETTI, M.; PIZO, M. A. e SILVA, W. R. 2006. Ligando frugivoria e dispers?o de sementes ? biologia da conserva??o. In: ROCHA, C.F.D., BERGALLO, H.G., ALVES, M.A.S. e SLUYS, M.V. Biologia da conserva??o: ess?ncias. S?o Paulo: Rima Ed., 411-436. LACERDA, D. R. 2004. Filogeografia comparada e filogenia de esp?cies de Thamnophilidae (Aves: Passeriformes) de Mata Atl?ntica de Minas Gerais. Tese de doutorado, P?sgradua??o em Ci?ncia Animal, ?rea de Gen?tica e Melhoramento Gen?tico, UFMG, 109 p. LAIOLO, P. 2002. Effects of habitat structure, floral composition and diversity on a forest bird community in north-western Italy. Folia Zoologica, 51 (2): 121?128. LAURANCE, W. F.; BIERREGAARD, R.O.; GASCON, C.; DIDHAM, R. K.; SMITH, A. P.; LYNAM, A. J.; VIANA, V. M.; LOVEJOY, T. E.; SIEVING, K. E.; SITES Jr, J. W.; ANDERSEN, M.; TOCHER, M. D.; KRAMER, E. A.; RESTREPO, C. e MORITZ, C. 1997. Tropical forest fragmentation: synthesis of a diverse and dynamic discipline. In: Laurance, W. 87 F. and Bierregaard Jr, R.O. (Eds), Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 502-514. LAURENCE, W. F.; LOVEJOY, T. E.; VASCONCELOS, H. L.; BRUNA, E. M. e DIDHAM, R. K.; STOUFFER, P. C.; GASCON, C.; BIERREGAARD, R. O.; LAURANCE, S. G. e SAMPAIO, E. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology, 16: 605?618. LAURENCE, W. F. e VASCONCELOS, H. L. 2009. Conseq??ncia ecol?gica da fragmenta??o florestal na Amaz?nia. Oecologia Brasiliensis, 13: 434-451. LEITE, L. O. 2006. An?lise de endemismo, varia??o geogr?fica e distribui??o potencial das esp?cies de aves end?micas do Cerrado. Disserta??o de Mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Biologia Animal, UNB, 181 p. LECK, C. F. 1979. Avian extinctions in an isolated tropical wet-forest preserve, Ecuador. Auk, 96: 343?352. LEVINS, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogenity for biological control. Bulletin of Entomological Society America, 15: 237- 240. LINDENMAYER, D. B. e FRANKLIN, J. F. 2002. Conserving Forest Biodiversity. A Comprehensive Multiscale Approach. Island Press, Washington. 88 MACARTHUR, R. H. e WILSON, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, New Jersey. MACARTHUR, R. H.; KAAR, J. R. e DIAMOND, J. M. 1972. Density compensation in island faunas. Ecology, 53: 330-342. MACHADO, A. B. M.; DRUMMOND, G. M. e PAGLIA, A. P. (Eds). 2008. Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira amea?ada de extin??o. Biodiversidade 19, Minist?rio do Meio Ambiente, Bras?lia, DF, 1420 p. MACHTANS, C. S.; VILLARD, M. A. e HANNON, S. J. 1996. Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conservation Biology, 10: 1366?1379. MARINI, M. A. 2000. Efeitos da fragmenta??o florestal sobre as aves em Minas Gerais. In: Alves, M. A. S.; Silva, J. M. C., Sluys, M. V., Bergallo, H. G. e Rocha, C. F. D. (Eds.), A Ornitologia no Brasil: pesquisa atual e perspectivas. Editora UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, 41-54. MARINI, M.A. e GARCIA, F.I. 2005. Bird Conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 19 (3): 665-671. MARRA, P. P. e REMSEN Jr., J. V. 1997. Insights into the maintenance of high species diversity in the Neotropics: habitat selection and foraging behavior in the understory birds of tropical and temperate forests. Ornithological Monographs, 48: 445?483. 89 MARSDEN, S. J.; WHIFFIN, M. e GALETTI, M. 2001. Bird diversity and abundance in forest fragments and Eucalyptus plantations around an Atlantic forest reserve, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10: 737-751. MARTENSEN, A. C.; PIMENTEL. R.G. e METZGER, J. P. 2008. Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic rain forest: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 141: 2184?2192. MARTENSEN, A. C; RIBEIRO, M. C.; BANKS-LEITE, C.; PRADO, P. I. e METZGER, J. P. 2012. Associations of Forest Cover, Fragment Area, and Connectivity with Neotropical Understory Bird Species Richness and Abundance. Conservation Biology, 26 (6): 1100? 1111. MARSHALL, A. R.; J?RGENSBYE, H. I. O.; ROVERO, F.; PLATTS, P. J.; WHITE, P. C. L. e LOVETT, J. C. 2010. The species area relationship and confounding variables in a threatened monkey community. American Journal of Primatology, 72: 325-336. MCGARIGAL, K. e MARKS, B. J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Techinal Report, Portland, OR, US Departamento f Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Station, 122 p. MELLO, A. G. C.; CARVALHO, D. A.; CASTRO, G. C. e MACHADO, E. L. M. 2011. Fragmentos florestais urbanos. Revista Cient?fica Eletr?nica de Engenharia Florestal, 17 (1): 58-79. 90 METZGER, J. P. 2001. O que ? ecologia de paisagens? Biota Neotropica, 1: 1-9. METZGER, J. P. 2003. Quantifica??o da estrutura da paisagem: o uso adequado de m?tricas. In: CULLEN J?NIOR, L.; RUDRAN, R. e VALLADARES-PADUA, C. (Org.). M?todos de estudo em biologia da conserva??o e manejo da vida silvestre. Curitiba: UFPR/Funda??o O Botic?rio de Prote??o ? Natureza, cap. 16, 423 ? 454. METZGER, J. P. 1999. Estrutura da paisagem e fragmenta??o: an?lise bibliogr?fica. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ci?ncias, 71: 445-463. METZGER, J. P. e DEC?MPS, H. 1997. The structural connectivity threshold: an hypothesis in conservation biology at the landscape scale. Acta Ecologica, 18: 1-12. MINIST?RIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. 2000a. Programa piloto para a prote??o das florestas tropicais brasileiras: subprograma Mata Atl?ntica (PPG7). Vers?o 1.1 setembro/2000. Bras?lia: MMA. MINIST?RIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Prote??o das Florestas tropicais do Brasil (PPG7). (http://www.mma.gov.br/port/sca/ppg7/mataatla/biodiver.html, acessado em 20 de fevereiro de 2013 ?s 16:20 h). MOILANEN, A. e HANSKI, I. 2006. Connectivity and metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes. In: K.R. Crooks e M. Sanjayan (eds.). Connectivity Conservation. Cambrige Universal Press, Cambridge, NY, 448 p. 91 MOLLER, A. P. 2008. Flight distance of urban birds, predation, and selection for urban life. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63: 63-75. MORELLATO, L. P. C. e LEIT?O FILHO, H. F. 1995. Ecologia e preserva??o de uma floresta tropical urbana. Campinas: Editora UNICAMP, 136 p. MORANTE FILHO, J. C. e SILVEIRA, R. V. 2012. Composi??o e estrutura tr?fica da comunidade de aves de uma ?rea antropizada no oeste do estado de S?o Paulo. Atualidades Ornitol?gicas On-line, 169: 33-40. MOTTA-JUNIOR, J. C. 1990. Estrutura tr?fica e composi??o das avifaunas de tr?s habitas terrestres na regi?o central do Estado de S?o Paulo. Ararajuba, 1: 65-71. MURCIA, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Amstersdam, 10 (2): 58-63. MYERS, N.; MITTERMEIER, R. A.; FONSECA, G. A. B.; KENT, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853?858. NEWMARK, W. D. 1987. A land-bridge island perspective on mammalian extinctions in western North American national parks. Nature, 325: 430?432. NOSSACK, F. A.; SARTORI, A. A. C.; SILVA, R. F. B.; MORAES, D. C. A. e ZIMBACK, C. R. L. 2011. Defini??o de ?reas priorit?rias para a recupera??o florestal visando 92 conectividade entre fragmentos: An?lise Multicriterial. Anais XV Simp?sio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto - SBSR, INPE, Curitiba, 4062-4069. NUCCI, J. C. 2001. Qualidade ambiental e adensamento urbano. FAPESP, 67 p. PARDINI, R.; SOUZA, S. M.; BRAGA-NETO, R. e METZGER, J. P. 2005. The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biological Conservation, 124: 253?266. PARKER, T. A.; STOTZ, D. e FITZPATRICK, J. W. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases. In: STOTZ, D.; FITZPATRICK, J. W.; PARKER, T. A. & MOSKOVITS, D. K. (Eds.) Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 118-436. PHILIPPSEN, J. S.; BENEDITO, E. e ZAWADZKI, C. H. 2010. Species composition and richness of avifauna in an urban area of southern Brazil. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, Maring?, 32 (1), 55-62. PIRES, A. S.; LIRA, P. K.; FERNADEZ, F. A. S.; SCHITTINI, G. M.; Oliveira, L. C. 2002. Frequency of movements of small mammals among Atlantic Coastal Forest fragments in Brazil. Biological Conservation, 108, 229-237. PORTAL BRASIL 500 P?SSAROS. 2000. Publica??o feita pela Eletrobr?s (Eletronorte). http://www.eln.gov.br/opencms/opencms/publicacoes/Pass500/BIRDS/1eye.htm. (Acessado em 21 de fevereiro de 2013 ?s 19:20 h). 93 PREFEITURA DE SEROP?DICA. http://seropedica.rj.gov.br (Acessado em 13 de julho de 2011 ?s 21:10 h). PRIMACK, R.B.; RODRIGUES, E. 2001. Biologia da conserva??o. Ed. Rodrigues, 328 p. RANDLER, C. 2008. Risk assessment by crow phenotype in a hybrid zone. Journal of Ethology, 26: 309-316. RENJIFO, L. M. 1999. Composition changes in a subandean avifauna after long-term forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology, 13: 1124-1139. RIBEIRO, M. C.; METZGER, J. P.; MARTENSEN, A. C.; PONZONI, F. J. e HIROTA, M. M. 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological conservation, 141: 1141-1153. RIBEIRO, A. L.; MANH?ES, M. A. DIAS, M. M.; COSTA-NETO, S. J.; SILVA, M. A. A.; RIBEIRO, H. M. e LIMA, N. F. 2011. Aves de sub-bosque de uma ?rea de Mata Atl?ntica de baixada do sudeste do Brasil. Ornithologia, 4 (2): 76-85. RIBON, R.; SIMON, J. E. e MATTOS, G. T. 2003. Bird extinctions in Atlantic forest fragments of the Vi?osa region, southeastern Brazil. Conservation Biology, 17: 1827-1839. RICKLEFS, R. E. 2009. A economia da natureza. Guanabara Koogan, 503 p. 94 RODRIGUES, R. M. M. e MAGALH?ES, L. M. S. 2011. Estrutura e Flor?stica de Fragmento de Floresta Secund?ria na Plan?cie Aluvionar do Rio Guandu, em Serop?dica-RJ. Floresta e Ambiente, 18 (3): 324-333. ROBINSON, S. K.; THOMPSON, F. R; DONOVAN, T. M.; WHITEHEAD, D. R. e FAABORG, J. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science, 267, 1987?1990. ROBBINS, C. S. Census techniques for forest birds. In: Workshop Management of Southern forest for nongame birds, 1978, Atlanta. Asheville: USDA Forest Service, 1978. p. 142-163. (General Technical Report, 14). ROGERS, D. A.; ROONEY, T. P.; HAWBAKER, T. J.; RADELOFF, V. C. e WALLER, D. M. 2009. Paying the extinction debt in southern Wisconsin forest understories. Conservation Biology, 23: 1497-1506. ROMPR?, G. W.; ROBINSON, D.; DESROCHERS, A. e ANGEHR, G. 2007. Environmental correlates of avian diversity in lowland Panama rain forest. Journal of Biogeografy. 34: 802 -815. ROSENBLATT, D. L.; HESKE, E. S.; NELSON, S. L.; BARBER, D. M.; MILLER, M. A. e MACALLISTER, B. 1999. Forest fragments in east-central Illinois: islands or habitat patches for mammals? American Midland Naturalist, 141: 115?123. 95 SANTIAGO, R. G. 2007. Guia Interativo de Aves Urbanas, 20 fev. http://www.ib.unicamp.br/lte/giau/visualizarMaterial.php?idMaterial=422. (Acessado em 11 de abril de 2013 ?s 16:00 h). SANTIN, D. A. 1999. A vegeta??o remanescente do munic?pio de Campinas (SP): mapeamento, caracteriza??o fision?mica e flor?stica, visando a conserva??o. Tese ? P?sgradua??o em Ci?ncias Biol?gicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 502 p. SANTOS, A. M. R. 2004. Comunidades de aves em remanescentes florestais secund?rios de uma ?rea rural no sudeste do Brasil. Ararajuba, 12: 43-51. SEKERCIOGLU, C. H.; EHRLICH, P.; DAILY, G. C.; AYGEN, D.; GOERHING, D. e SANDI, R. F. 2002. Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. PNAS, [S.l.], 99 (1): 263-267. SHAFER, C. L. 1990. Nature reserves: Island Theory and conservation practice. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. SHANAHAN, D. F. e POSSINGHAM, H. P. 2009. Predicting avian patch occupancy in a fragmented landscape: do we know more than we think? Journal of Applied Ecology, 46: 1026-1035. SICK, H. 1985. Ornitologia brasileira: Uma introdu??o. Editora UNB, Bras?lia. SICK, H. 1997. Ornitologia brasileira. Editora Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro, 912 p. 96 SILVEIRA, L. F.; OLMOS, F. e LONG, A. 2003. Birds in Atlantic Forest fragments in northeastern, Brazil. Cotinga, Bedfordshire, 20: 32-46. SIEVING, K. E. 1992. Nest predation and differential insular extinction among selected forest birds of Central Panama. Ecology, 73: 2310-2328. SIGRIST, T. 2006. Aves do Brasil: uma vis?o art?stica. Ed. Fosfertil, 672 p. SIGRIST, 2012. Iconografia das Aves do Brasil: Mata Atl?ntica, volume 2. Avis Brasilis Editora, 400 p. SILVA, J. C. M. e CONSTANTINO, R. 1988. Aves de um trecho de mata no baixo Rio Gam? ? uma rean?lise: riqueza, raridade, diversidade, similaridade e prefer?ncias ecol?gicas. Boletim do Museu Paraense Em?lio Goeldi, s?rie Zoologia, 4 (2): 201-210. SILVA, L.C. & CUNHA, H.C.S. 2001. CPRM ? Servi?o Geol?gico do Brasil / Uso e Cobertura do Solo. CPRM, Bras?lia. SOARES, M. P. 1998. Verdes urbanos e rurais: orienta??o para arboriza??o de cidades e s?tios campesinos. Porto Alegre: Cinco Continentes, 242 p. STOUFFER, P. C. e BIERREGAARD, R. O. 1995. Use of Amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. Ecology, 76: 2429?2445. 97 STRAUBE, F. C.; URBEN-FILHO, A.; DECONTO, L. R. e PATRIAL, E. W. 2007. Fluvicola nengeta (Linnaeus, 1766) nos estados do Paran? e Mato Grosso do Sul e sua expans?o de distribui??o geogr?fica pelo sul do Brasil. Atualidades Ornitol?gicas On-line, 137: 33-38. SWIFT, T. L. e HANNON, S. J. 2010. Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss: a review of the concepts, evidence, and applications. Biological Reviews, 85 (1): 35-53. TCE-RJ, 1994. http://www.tce.rj.gov.br/ (Acessado em 13 de julho de 2011 ?s 21:00 h). TCE-RJ, 2001. http://www.tce.rj.gov.br/ (Acessado em 13 de julho de 2011 ?s 21:00 h). TELINO-J?NIOR, W. R; DIAS, M. M.; AZEVEDO-J?NIOR, S. M.; LYRA-NEVES, R. M. e LARRAZ?BAL, M. E. L. 2005. Estrutura Tr?fica da avifauna na Reserva Estadual de Gurja?, Zona da Mata Sul, Pernambuco, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22 (4): 962? 973. TERBORGH, J. 1974. Preservation of natural diversity: the problem of extinction prone species. Bioscience, 24: 715?722. TISCHENDORF, L. e FAHRIG, L. 2000. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90: 7-19. 98 TRAYLOR, M. A. 1979. Subfamily Fluvicolinae. In: Traylor, M.A. (Ed.) Check-list of birds of the world: a continuation of the work of James L. Peters, Cambridge, Museum of Comparative Zoology, 112-186. TRAYLOR, M. A. e FITZPATRICK, J. 1982. Asurvey of tyrant flycatchers. Living Bird, 19: 7-50. TROIAN, L. C.; K?FFER, M. I.; M?LLER, S. C.; TROIAN, V. R. GUERRA, J. BORGES, M. G.; GUERRA, T.; RODRIGUES, G. G. e FORNECK, E. D. 2011. Flor?stica e padr?es estruturais de um fragmento florestal urbano, regi?o metropolitana de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Iheringia - S?rie Bot?nica, Porto Alegre, 66 (1): 5-16. TURNER, I. M. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 200?209. TURTON, S. M. e FREIBURGER, H. J. 1997. Edge and aspect effects on the microclimate of a small tropical forest remnant on the Atherton Tableland, northeastern Australia. In: Laurance, W.F.; Bierregaard, R.O. (Eds.) Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 4: 45-54. UEZU, A. 2006. Composi??o e estrutura da comunidade de aves na paisagem fragmentada do Pontal do Paranapanema. Tese de doutorado, P?s-gradua??o em Ci?ncias, ?rea de Ecologia, USP, 202 p. 99 UEZU, A. e METZGER, J. P. 2005. Efeito do tamanho, qualidade e isolamento de fragmentos florestais sobre a comunidade de avifauna, Pontal do Paranapanema, SP. Anais do VII Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil, Caxambu, MG. UEZU, A. e METZGER, J. P. 2011. Vanishing bird species in the Atlantic Forest: relative importance of landscape configuration, forest structure and species characteristics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20: 3627-3643. UMETSU, F.; METZGER, J. P. e PARDINI, R. 2008. Importance of estimating matrix quality for modeling species distribution in complex tropical landscapes: a test with Atlantic forest small mammals. Ecography, 31: 359-370. VALAD?O, R. M.; MAR?AL JUNIOR, O. e FRANCHIN, A. G. 2006. A avifauna no Parque Municipal Santa Luzia, zona urbana de Uberl?ndia, Minas Gerais. Bioscience Journal, Uberl?ndia, 22 (2): 97-108. VELOSO, H. P.; RANGEL-FILHO, A. L. R. e LIMA, J. C. A. 1991. Classifica??o da vegeta??o brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. IBGE, Departamento de Recursos Naturais e Estudos Ambientais, Rio de Janeiro, 124 p. VIANA, V. M. e PINHEIRO, L. A. F. V. 1998. Conserva??o da biodiversidade em fragmentos florestais. S?rie T?cnica IPEF, 12 (32): 25-42. VIANA, V. M.; TABANEZ, A. A. J. e BATISTA, J. L. F. 1997. Dynamics and restoration of forest fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic Moist Forest. In: Laurance, W.F.; Bierregaard, R.O. 100 (Eds.) Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 351- 365. VIANNA, A. L. P. 2001. An?lise da composi??o da avifauna associada ?s categorias alimentares na Esta??o Ecol?gica dos Caetetus, munic?pios de G?lia e Alvinl?ndia, S?o Paulo. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, 86 p. VIELLIARD, J. M. E. e SILVA, W. R. 1990. Nova metodologia Nova metodologia de levantamento quantitativo e primeiros resultados no interior do Estado de S?o Paulo. In: Encontro Nacional de Anilhadores de Aves, Recife. Anais do IV Enave, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 117-151. WARBURTON, N. H. 1997. Structure and conservation of forest avifauna in isolated rainforest remnants in tropical Australia. In: Laurance, W.F.; Bierregaard, R.O. (Eds.) Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 13: 190-206. WHITMORE, T. C. 1997. Tropical forest disturbance, disappearance, and species loss. In: Laurance, W.F.; Bierregaard, R.O. (Eds.), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 3-12. WILLIS, E. O. 1979. The composition of avian communities in remanescent woodlots in southern Brazil. Pap?is Avulsos de Zoologia, 33: 1-25. 101 WITH, K. A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 9: 25?36. WRIGHT, S.J.; FAABORG, J. e CAMPBELL, C. J. 1985. Birds form tightly structured communities in the Pearl Archipelago, Panam?. In: BUCKLEY, P.A. et al. Neotropical Ornithology. (Ed.) Washington: The American Ornithologists Union, cap. 14, 798-812. WYRGUN, B e ANTUNES, A. Z. 2009. Varia??o na composi??o da comunidade de aves florestais em rela??o ? riqueza e estrutura da vegeta??o no Parque Estadual Alberto L?fgren, S?o Paulo ? SP. IF S?rie Registros, S?o Paulo, 40, 167-173. ZAR, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 663 p. ZORZIN, G. 2011. Os efeitos da fragmenta??o da Mata Atl?ntica sobre a riqueza e abund?ncia de Accipitriformes e Falconiformes na Zona da Mata em Minas Gerais. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Biologia Animal, UFV, Vi?osa, 108 p.avifaunafloresta tropicalfragmento urbanofragmenta??operda de esp?ciesrainforesturban fragmentfragmentationspecies lossEcologiaDiversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbanaDiversity of birds in fragmented landscape of the Atlantic Rainforest in a matrix urbaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJTHUMBNAIL2013 - Camila de C?ssia Silva Bueno.pdf.jpg2013 - Camila de C?ssia Silva Bueno.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg1943http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3484/18/2013+-+Camila+de+C%C3%A1ssia+Silva+Bueno.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD518TEXT2013 - Camila de C?ssia Silva Bueno.pdf.txt2013 - Camila de C?ssia Silva Bueno.pdf.txttext/plain181023http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3484/17/2013+-+Camila+de+C%C3%A1ssia+Silva+Bueno.pdf.txtce228abdb91d2348ac077a38160dc52aMD517ORIGINAL2013 - Camila de C?ssia Silva Bueno.pdf2013 - Camila de C?ssia Silva Bueno.pdfapplication/pdf5384805http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3484/2/2013+-+Camila+de+C%C3%A1ssia+Silva+Bueno.pdf5e86d41eb2d0f3cf2caa40bdb6cf20d4MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3484/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51jspui/34842022-09-23 12:51:13.478oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2022-09-23T15:51:13Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Diversity of birds in fragmented landscape of the Atlantic Rainforest in a matrix urban
title Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana
spellingShingle Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana
Bueno, Camila de C?ssia Silva
avifauna
floresta tropical
fragmento urbano
fragmenta??o
perda de esp?cies
rainforest
urban fragment
fragmentation
species loss
Ecologia
title_short Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana
title_full Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana
title_fullStr Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana
title_full_unstemmed Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana
title_sort Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana
author Bueno, Camila de C?ssia Silva
author_facet Bueno, Camila de C?ssia Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Ildemar
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 361.618.027-91
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9716949971860244
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Freitas, Andre Felippe Nunes de
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Rocha, Fl?via Souza
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Piratelli, Augusto Jo?o
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 057.864.427-48
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6818419081349718
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bueno, Camila de C?ssia Silva
contributor_str_mv Ferreira, Ildemar
Freitas, Andre Felippe Nunes de
Rocha, Fl?via Souza
Piratelli, Augusto Jo?o
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv avifauna
floresta tropical
fragmento urbano
fragmenta??o
perda de esp?cies
topic avifauna
floresta tropical
fragmento urbano
fragmenta??o
perda de esp?cies
rainforest
urban fragment
fragmentation
species loss
Ecologia
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv rainforest
urban fragment
fragmentation
species loss
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Ecologia
description The forest fragmentation is happens when a large and continuous nature habitat area is reduced and divided into two or more fragments. Birds composed the taxonomic group better studied in the research of effects of tropical fragmentation and plays an important role in the ecosystem of rainforests. The urban forest fragments are increasingly common, making necessary a better understanding of their guidelines for care and maintenance as a natural reserve. This study aimed to evaluate generally the differences between in bird communities between Atlantic Forest fragments with urban matrix, with different environmental variables. Specifically aimed to estimate the diversity of birdlife in fragments, analyze the similarity between components of the bird community between areas and check the influence of the size and shape of fragments and their environmental parameters on the richness of birds. The study area was in four forest fragments of Atlantic Forest. To survey the birdlife censuses was conducted through listening points. Vegetation Data were taken along transects of 100 meters. In relation to the density of understory were accounted individuals with height between 50 cm and two meters in plots of 5 x 5 meters. Data related to canopy openness and height were taken into 11 points 10 meters equidistant. As regards the assessment of the similarity of richness between the fragments was done Sorensen Similarity Index. In order to rank the areas studied in relation to the similarity in the structure of the bird community, a dendrogram was made. To evaluate the influence of the vegetation data on the local richness of each area a PCA was undertaken. In this study were cataloged 14 orders, 38 families and 129 species of birds. The fragment Fr4 presented the greatest richness of birds, with 104 species, and Fr2 fragment was the one with the lowest richness, with 49 species. The trophic guild most represented was the insectivores with 62 species followed by thef omnivorous with 37. The Venn diagram indicated that 31 species were common to all areas and that showed the highest number of exclusive species. It was observed that the areas wich had a higher Sorensen Similarity Index were Fr2 x Fr3. In PCA, the axis I was explained by the parameters: canopy openness and understory density. Axis II was explained by canopy height parameter. Analyzing the results we can conclude that all studied areas have a high degree of similarity between them, with a highlight for Fr4. Frugivorous and foraging ground insectivorous birds are the first to be lost in the forest fragmentation, implying that specialist species are the first to be locally extinct. Studies like this, in which is made an analyzes of the structure of the bird community in accordance with the environmental variables and structural fragment are still missing and would greatly help to understand the dynamics of populations in these fragments and the colonization-extinction relation.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013-06-05
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-05-01T01:13:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv BUENO, Camila de C?ssia Silva. Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana. 2013. 105 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Biologia Animal) - Instituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas e da Sa?de, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2013.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3484
identifier_str_mv BUENO, Camila de C?ssia Silva. Diversidade de aves em paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atl?ntica inserida em uma matriz urbana. 2013. 105 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Biologia Animal) - Instituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas e da Sa?de, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2013.
url https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3484
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.references.por.fl_str_mv ALEIXO, A. e VIELLIARD, J. M. E. 1995. Composi??o e din?mica da avifauna da mata de Santa Genebra, Campinas, S?o Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 12 (3): 493-511. ALVARENGA, H. M. F. 1990. Novos registros e expans?es geogr?ficas de aves no leste do estado de S?o Paulo. Ararajuba, 1: 115-117. ANDERSEN, M.; THORNHILL, A. e KOOPOWITZ, H. 1997. Understory birds and dynamic habitat mosaics in Amazonian Rainforests. In: Laurance, W.F. Jr. e Bierregaard, R.O. Jr. (Eds.), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 281-291. ANIMAL DIVERSITY WEB. University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu (Acessado em 21 de fevereiro de 2013 ?s 19:35 h). ANJOS, L.; KARL-L, SCHUCHMANN, K. e BERNDT, R 1997. Avifaunal composition, species richness, and status in the Tibagi river basin, Parana State, Southern Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical, 8: 145-173. ANJOS, L. e BO?ON, R. 1999. Bird communities in natural forest patches in southern Brazil. Wilson Bull., Lawrence, 111 (3): 397-414. 77 ANJOS, L. 2006. Bird Species Sensitivity in a Fragmented Landscape of the Atlantic Forest in Southern Brazil. Biotropica, 38 (2): 229?234. ANTONGIOVANNI, M. e METZGER, J. P. 2005. Influence of matrix habitats on the occurrence of insectivorous bird species in Amazonian forest fragments. Biological Conservation, 122: 441?451. ANTUNES, A. Z. 2005. Altera??es na composi??o da comunidade de aves ao longo do tempo em um fragmento florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Ararajuba, 13 (1): 47-61. ANTUNES, A. Z. 2007. Riqueza e din?mica de aves end?micas da Mata Atl?ntica em um fragmento de floresta estacional semidecidual no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 15 (1): 61-68. BANKS-LEITE, C.; EWERS, R. M. e METZGER, J. P. 2010. Edge effects as the principal cause of area effects on birds in fragmented secondary forest. Oikos, 119: 918?926. BAKKER, K. K., NAUGLE, D.E. e HIGGINS, K. F. 2002. Incorporating landscape attributes into models for migratory grassland bird conservation. Conservation Biology, 16: 1638- 1646. BAYBATES, J. M. 2000. Allozymic genetic structure e natural habitat fragmentation: data for five species of Amazonian forest birds. Condor, 102 (4), 770-783. BAYL?O JUNIOR, H. F 2010. Esp?cies com voca??o para facilitar processos de restaura??o 78 espont?nea de ecossistemas perturbados na vertente atl?ntica da Serra do Mar, Pira? ? RJ. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Ci?ncias ambientais e florestais, UFFRJ, 73 p. BAYL?O JUNIOR, H. F.; VALCARCEL, R.; ROPPA, C.; NETTESHEIM, F. C. 2011. Levantamento de esp?cies r?sticas em ?rea de pastagem e em remanescente florestal na Mata Atl?ntica, Pira?-RJ. Floresta e Ambiente, 18 (1): 50-59. BE?LISLE, M. 2005. Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology, 86: 1988?1995. BENCKE, G. A.; MAUR?CIO, G. N.; DEVELEY, P. F. e GOERCK, J. M. 2006. ?reas importantes para a conserva??o das aves no Brasil. Parte I ? Estados do Dom?nio da Mata Atl?ntica. SAVE Brasil, S?o Paulo. 494 p. BIERREGAARD JR., R. O. e STOUFFER, P. 1997. Understory birds and dynamic habitat mosaics in Amazonian rainforests. In: Laurance, W.F. Jr. e Bierregaard, R.O. Jr. (Eds.), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 138?155. BILDSTEIN, K. L.; SCHELSKY, W. e ZALLES, J. 1998. Conservation status of tropical raptors. Journal Raptor Reserch, 32 (1): 3-18. BIRDLIFE INTERNACIONAL. 2010. Birds on the IUCN Red List. www.birdlife.org. (acesso em 1 de maio de 2013 ?s 19:20 h). 79 BOITANI, L. e CIUCCI, P. 1995. Comparative social ecology of feral dogs and wolves. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, Firenze, 7 (1), 49-72. BORGES, S. e STOUFFER, P. C. 1999. Bird communities in two types of anthropogenic successional vegetation in central Amazonia. Condor, 101: 529?536. BOSCOLO, D. e METZGER, J. P. 2011. Isolation determines patterns of species presence in highly fragmented landscapes. Ecography, 34: 1018-1029. BROOKER, M. e BROOKER, L. 2001. Breeding biology, reproductive success and survival of blue-breasted fairy-wrens in fragmented habitat in the western Australian wheatbelt. Wildlife Resources, 28: 205?214. BROOKS, T.; TOBIAS, J. e BALMFORD, A. 1999. Deforestation and bird extinctions in the Atlantic forest. Animal Conservation, 2: 211-222. CAVARZERE, V.; MORAES, G. P. e DONATELLI, R. J. 2009. Diversidade de aves em uma mata estacional da regi?o centro-oeste de S?o Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Bioci?ncias, Porto Alegre, 7 (4): 368-371. CINTRA, R. 1997. Spatial distribution and foraging tactics of tyrant flycatchers in two habitats in the Brazilian Amazon. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 32: 17- 27. 80 CORDEIRO, N. J. e HOWE, H. F. 2001. Low recruitment of trees dispersed by animals in African forest fragments. Conservation Biology, 15: 1733-1741. COSTA, R. 2006. Impactos sobre remanescentes de florestas de Mata Atl?ntica na zona oeste da grande S?o Paulo: um estudo de caso da mata da Fazenda Tizo. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Geografia F?sica, Universidade de S?o Paulo, S?o Paulo, 211 p. CPEF (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund). 2001. Perfil do ecossistema: Mata Atl?ntica hotspot de biodiversidade. 29 p. CROOKS, K. R. e SANJAYAN, M. 2006. Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature. 1-19 p. In: K.R. Crooks e M. Sanjayan (eds.). Connectivity Conservation. Cambrige Universal Press, Cambridge, NY, 448 p. DANTAS, M. E. 2001. Mapa geomorfol?gico do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Bras?lia: CPRM, 63 p. D?RIO, F. R e ALMEIDA, A. F. 2000. Estrutura tr?fica da avifauna na Reserva Estadual de Gurja?, Zona da Mata Sul, Pernambuco, Brasil. Scientia Forestalis, Piracicaba, 58: 99-109. D?RIO, F. R.; VINCENZO, M. C. V. e ALMEIDA, A. F. 2002. Avifauna em fragmentos da Mata Atl?ntica. Ci?ncia Rural, 32 (6): 989-996. 81 DE PAULA, M. G.; VIEIRA, A. L. M.; RESENDE, A. S.; CAMPELLO, E. F. C. 2009. Flor?stica do Sistema Agroflorestal implantado com a fun??o de corredor ecol?gico em Serop?dica, RJ. VII Congresso Brasileiro de Sistemas Agroflorestais. Luzi?nia, GO. DEVELEY, P. F. e METZGER, J. P. 2006. Emerging threats to birds in Brazilian Atlantic forests: the roles of forest loss and configuration in a severely fragmented ecosystem. In: Laurance, W. F.; Peres, C. A. (Eds) Emerging threats to tropical forests. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 269?290. DEVELEY, P. F. e STOUFFER, P.C. 2001. Effects of roads on movements by understory birds in mixed-species flocks in Central Amazonian Brazil. Conservation Biology, 15: 1416? 1422. DONATELLI, R. J.; FERREIRA, C. D.; DALBETO, A. C. e POSSO, S. R. 2007. An?lise comparativa da assembl?ia de aves em dois remanescentes florestais no interior do Estado de S?o Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 24: 362-375. FAHRIG, L. 2001. How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation, 100: 65?74. FAHRIG, L. 2003. The Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 34: 487?515. FARIA, C. M. A.; RODRIGUES, M.; AMARAL, F. Q.; M?DENA, E. e FERNANDES, A. . 2006. Aves de um fragmento de Mata Atl?ntica no alto Rio Doce, Minas Gerais: coloniza??o e extin??o. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 23 (4): 1217-1230. 82 FEIBER, S. D. 2004. ?reas verdes urbanas imagem e uso: o caso do passeio p?blico de Curitiba, PR. Revista RA?E GA, Curitiba, 8: 93-105. FERNANDES, M. M.; PEREIRA, M. G.; MAGALH?ES, L. M. S.; CRUZ, A. R. e GI?COMO, R. G. 2006. Aporte e decomposi??o de serapilheira em ?reas de floresta secund?ria, plantio de sabi? (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia Benth.) e andiroba (Carapa guianensis Aubl.) na Flona M?rio Xavier, RJ. Ci?ncia Florestal, Santa Maria, 16 (2): 163- 175. FERRAZ, G.; NICHOLS, J. D.; HINES, J. E.; STOUFFER, P. C.; BIERREGARD Jr, R. O. e LOVEJOY, T. E. 2007. A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds. Science, 315: 238?241. FERREIRA, C. M. 2001. Diagn?stico da avifauna capturada ilegalmente no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Bioci?ncias, Faculdade de Bioci?ncias PUCRS, Porto Alegre, 70 p. FERREIRA, J. D. 2009. Aves e efeitos da fragmenta??o em um remanescente de Mata Atl?ntica do Quadril?tero Ferr?fero, MG. Disserta??o de mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Ecologia, Conserva??o e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 137 p. FERREIRA, I.; VENTURA, P. E. C. e LUZ, H. R. 2010. Aves no campus da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, EDUR, 259 p. 83 FORD, H. A.; BARRET, G.; SAUNDERS, D. e RECHER, H. 2001. Why have birds in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined? Biological Conservation, 97 (1): 71 - 88. FORMAN, R. T. T.; GALLI, A. E. e LECK, C. F. 1976. Forest size and avian diversity in New Jersey woodlots with some landuse implications. Oecologia, Berlin, 26: 1-8. FRANKHAM, R. 2006. Genetic and landscape connectivity. 72-96 p. In: Crooks, K.R. e Sanjayan, M. (Eds.). Connectivity Conservation. Cambrige Universal Press, Cambridge, NY, 448 p. FRANKHAM, R.; BALLOU, J. D. e BRISCOE, D. A. 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. United Kingdom, Cambrigde, 617 p. FRANZ, I.; CAPPELATTI, L. e BARROS, M. P. 2010. Bird community in a forest patch isolated by the urban matrix at the Sinos River basin, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, with comments on the possible local defaunation. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 70 (4): 1137- 1148. GABRIEL, V. A. e PIZO, M. A. Foraging behavior of tyrant flycatchers (Aves, Tyrannidae) in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22 (4): 1072-1077. GANDOLFI, S. e RODRIGUES, R. R. 2007. Metodologias de restaura??o florestal. In: CARGILL. Manejo ambiental e restaura??o de ?reas degradadas. Funda??o Cargill, 109- 143. 84 GALETTI, M. e SAZIMA, I. 2006. Impacto de c?es ferais em um fragmento urbano de Floresta Atl?ntica no sudeste do Brasil. Natureza & Conserva??o, Curitiba, 4 (1), 58-63. GIMENES, M. R. e ANJOS, L. 2003. Efeitos da fragmenta??o florestal sobre as comunidades de aves. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, Maring?, 25 (2), 391-402. GOOSEM, M. 1997. Internal fragmentation: the effects of roads, highways, and powerline clearings on movements and mortality of rainforest vertebrates. In: Laurance, W. F. and Bierregaard Jr, R.O. (Eds), Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, cap. 16, p. 241-255. GOTELLI, N. J. e ELLISON, A. M. 2011. Princ?pios de estat?stica em ecologia. Artmed, 528 p. HANSBAUER, M. M.; STORCH, I.; KNAUER, F. PILZ, S.; K?CHENHOFF, H.; V?GV?RI, Z.; PIMENTEL, R. G. e METZGER, J. P. 2010. Landscape perception by forest understory birds in the Atlantic Rainforest: black-and-white versus shades of grey. Landscape Ecology, 25: 407-417. HARRIS, G. M. e PIMM, S. L. 2004. Bird species? tolerance of secondary forest habitats and its effects on extinction. Conservation Biology, 18: 1607-1616. HAYES, F. E. 1995. Status, distribution and biogeography of the birds of Paraguay. Loma Linda: Loma Linda University. 85 HENRIQUES, O. K. 2003. Caracteriza??o da vegeta??o natural em Ribeir?o Preto, SP: Bases para conserva??o. Tese de doutorado, P?s-gradua??o em Ci?ncias, ?rea de Biologia Comparada, 255 p. HILL, J. e CURRAN, P. 2003. Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 1391?1403. IBGE (Funda??o Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat?stica), 1992. Manual T?cnico da vegeta??o brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. IBGE (Funda??o Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat?stica). 1983. Levantamento Explorat?rio e Solos das Folhas Sf. 23/24. Rio de Janeiro: Minist?rio das Minas e Energia, Projeto Radambrasil. IBGE (Funda??o Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat?stica). 2004. Mapa de Biomas do Brasil, primeira aproxima??o. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. IUCN (The International Union for Conservation of Nature), 2001. Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org (Acessado em 2 de abril de 2013 ?s 19:30 h). IUCN (The International Union for Conservation of Nature), 2010. Red List of Threatened Species. Vers?o 2010.4. http://www.iucnredlist.org (Acessado 20 de fevereiro de 2013 ?s 18:00 h). 86 KENT, M. e COKER, P. 1992. Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley, 363p. K?PPEN, W. 1948. Climatologia: con uno est?dio de los climas de la Tierra. M?xico: Fondo de Cultura Ec?nomica. 488 p. KR?GEL, M. M. e ANJOS, L. 2000. Birds communities in Forest remnants in the city of Maring?, Paran? State, southern Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical, Montreal, 11: 315-330. JORDANO, P.; GALETTI, M.; PIZO, M. A. e SILVA, W. R. 2006. Ligando frugivoria e dispers?o de sementes ? biologia da conserva??o. In: ROCHA, C.F.D., BERGALLO, H.G., ALVES, M.A.S. e SLUYS, M.V. Biologia da conserva??o: ess?ncias. S?o Paulo: Rima Ed., 411-436. LACERDA, D. R. 2004. Filogeografia comparada e filogenia de esp?cies de Thamnophilidae (Aves: Passeriformes) de Mata Atl?ntica de Minas Gerais. Tese de doutorado, P?sgradua??o em Ci?ncia Animal, ?rea de Gen?tica e Melhoramento Gen?tico, UFMG, 109 p. LAIOLO, P. 2002. Effects of habitat structure, floral composition and diversity on a forest bird community in north-western Italy. Folia Zoologica, 51 (2): 121?128. LAURANCE, W. F.; BIERREGAARD, R.O.; GASCON, C.; DIDHAM, R. K.; SMITH, A. P.; LYNAM, A. J.; VIANA, V. M.; LOVEJOY, T. E.; SIEVING, K. E.; SITES Jr, J. W.; ANDERSEN, M.; TOCHER, M. D.; KRAMER, E. A.; RESTREPO, C. e MORITZ, C. 1997. Tropical forest fragmentation: synthesis of a diverse and dynamic discipline. In: Laurance, W. 87 F. and Bierregaard Jr, R.O. (Eds), Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 502-514. LAURENCE, W. F.; LOVEJOY, T. E.; VASCONCELOS, H. L.; BRUNA, E. M. e DIDHAM, R. K.; STOUFFER, P. C.; GASCON, C.; BIERREGAARD, R. O.; LAURANCE, S. G. e SAMPAIO, E. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology, 16: 605?618. LAURENCE, W. F. e VASCONCELOS, H. L. 2009. Conseq??ncia ecol?gica da fragmenta??o florestal na Amaz?nia. Oecologia Brasiliensis, 13: 434-451. LEITE, L. O. 2006. An?lise de endemismo, varia??o geogr?fica e distribui??o potencial das esp?cies de aves end?micas do Cerrado. Disserta??o de Mestrado, P?s-gradua??o em Biologia Animal, UNB, 181 p. LECK, C. F. 1979. Avian extinctions in an isolated tropical wet-forest preserve, Ecuador. Auk, 96: 343?352. LEVINS, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogenity for biological control. Bulletin of Entomological Society America, 15: 237- 240. LINDENMAYER, D. B. e FRANKLIN, J. F. 2002. Conserving Forest Biodiversity. A Comprehensive Multiscale Approach. Island Press, Washington. 88 MACARTHUR, R. H. e WILSON, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, New Jersey. MACARTHUR, R. H.; KAAR, J. R. e DIAMOND, J. M. 1972. Density compensation in island faunas. Ecology, 53: 330-342. MACHADO, A. B. M.; DRUMMOND, G. M. e PAGLIA, A. P. (Eds). 2008. Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira amea?ada de extin??o. Biodiversidade 19, Minist?rio do Meio Ambiente, Bras?lia, DF, 1420 p. MACHTANS, C. S.; VILLARD, M. A. e HANNON, S. J. 1996. Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conservation Biology, 10: 1366?1379. MARINI, M. A. 2000. Efeitos da fragmenta??o florestal sobre as aves em Minas Gerais. In: Alves, M. A. S.; Silva, J. M. C., Sluys, M. V., Bergallo, H. G. e Rocha, C. F. D. (Eds.), A Ornitologia no Brasil: pesquisa atual e perspectivas. Editora UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, 41-54. MARINI, M.A. e GARCIA, F.I. 2005. Bird Conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 19 (3): 665-671. MARRA, P. P. e REMSEN Jr., J. V. 1997. Insights into the maintenance of high species diversity in the Neotropics: habitat selection and foraging behavior in the understory birds of tropical and temperate forests. Ornithological Monographs, 48: 445?483. 89 MARSDEN, S. J.; WHIFFIN, M. e GALETTI, M. 2001. Bird diversity and abundance in forest fragments and Eucalyptus plantations around an Atlantic forest reserve, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10: 737-751. MARTENSEN, A. C.; PIMENTEL. R.G. e METZGER, J. P. 2008. Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic rain forest: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 141: 2184?2192. MARTENSEN, A. C; RIBEIRO, M. C.; BANKS-LEITE, C.; PRADO, P. I. e METZGER, J. P. 2012. Associations of Forest Cover, Fragment Area, and Connectivity with Neotropical Understory Bird Species Richness and Abundance. Conservation Biology, 26 (6): 1100? 1111. MARSHALL, A. R.; J?RGENSBYE, H. I. O.; ROVERO, F.; PLATTS, P. J.; WHITE, P. C. L. e LOVETT, J. C. 2010. The species area relationship and confounding variables in a threatened monkey community. American Journal of Primatology, 72: 325-336. MCGARIGAL, K. e MARKS, B. J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Techinal Report, Portland, OR, US Departamento f Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Station, 122 p. MELLO, A. G. C.; CARVALHO, D. A.; CASTRO, G. C. e MACHADO, E. L. M. 2011. Fragmentos florestais urbanos. Revista Cient?fica Eletr?nica de Engenharia Florestal, 17 (1): 58-79. 90 METZGER, J. P. 2001. O que ? ecologia de paisagens? Biota Neotropica, 1: 1-9. METZGER, J. P. 2003. Quantifica??o da estrutura da paisagem: o uso adequado de m?tricas. In: CULLEN J?NIOR, L.; RUDRAN, R. e VALLADARES-PADUA, C. (Org.). M?todos de estudo em biologia da conserva??o e manejo da vida silvestre. Curitiba: UFPR/Funda??o O Botic?rio de Prote??o ? Natureza, cap. 16, 423 ? 454. METZGER, J. P. 1999. Estrutura da paisagem e fragmenta??o: an?lise bibliogr?fica. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ci?ncias, 71: 445-463. METZGER, J. P. e DEC?MPS, H. 1997. The structural connectivity threshold: an hypothesis in conservation biology at the landscape scale. Acta Ecologica, 18: 1-12. MINIST?RIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. 2000a. Programa piloto para a prote??o das florestas tropicais brasileiras: subprograma Mata Atl?ntica (PPG7). Vers?o 1.1 setembro/2000. Bras?lia: MMA. MINIST?RIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Prote??o das Florestas tropicais do Brasil (PPG7). (http://www.mma.gov.br/port/sca/ppg7/mataatla/biodiver.html, acessado em 20 de fevereiro de 2013 ?s 16:20 h). MOILANEN, A. e HANSKI, I. 2006. Connectivity and metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes. In: K.R. Crooks e M. Sanjayan (eds.). Connectivity Conservation. Cambrige Universal Press, Cambridge, NY, 448 p. 91 MOLLER, A. P. 2008. Flight distance of urban birds, predation, and selection for urban life. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63: 63-75. MORELLATO, L. P. C. e LEIT?O FILHO, H. F. 1995. Ecologia e preserva??o de uma floresta tropical urbana. Campinas: Editora UNICAMP, 136 p. MORANTE FILHO, J. C. e SILVEIRA, R. V. 2012. Composi??o e estrutura tr?fica da comunidade de aves de uma ?rea antropizada no oeste do estado de S?o Paulo. Atualidades Ornitol?gicas On-line, 169: 33-40. MOTTA-JUNIOR, J. C. 1990. Estrutura tr?fica e composi??o das avifaunas de tr?s habitas terrestres na regi?o central do Estado de S?o Paulo. Ararajuba, 1: 65-71. MURCIA, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Amstersdam, 10 (2): 58-63. MYERS, N.; MITTERMEIER, R. A.; FONSECA, G. A. B.; KENT, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853?858. NEWMARK, W. D. 1987. A land-bridge island perspective on mammalian extinctions in western North American national parks. Nature, 325: 430?432. NOSSACK, F. A.; SARTORI, A. A. C.; SILVA, R. F. B.; MORAES, D. C. A. e ZIMBACK, C. R. L. 2011. Defini??o de ?reas priorit?rias para a recupera??o florestal visando 92 conectividade entre fragmentos: An?lise Multicriterial. Anais XV Simp?sio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto - SBSR, INPE, Curitiba, 4062-4069. NUCCI, J. C. 2001. Qualidade ambiental e adensamento urbano. FAPESP, 67 p. PARDINI, R.; SOUZA, S. M.; BRAGA-NETO, R. e METZGER, J. P. 2005. The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biological Conservation, 124: 253?266. PARKER, T. A.; STOTZ, D. e FITZPATRICK, J. W. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases. In: STOTZ, D.; FITZPATRICK, J. W.; PARKER, T. A. & MOSKOVITS, D. K. (Eds.) Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 118-436. PHILIPPSEN, J. S.; BENEDITO, E. e ZAWADZKI, C. H. 2010. Species composition and richness of avifauna in an urban area of southern Brazil. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, Maring?, 32 (1), 55-62. PIRES, A. S.; LIRA, P. K.; FERNADEZ, F. A. S.; SCHITTINI, G. M.; Oliveira, L. C. 2002. Frequency of movements of small mammals among Atlantic Coastal Forest fragments in Brazil. Biological Conservation, 108, 229-237. PORTAL BRASIL 500 P?SSAROS. 2000. Publica??o feita pela Eletrobr?s (Eletronorte). http://www.eln.gov.br/opencms/opencms/publicacoes/Pass500/BIRDS/1eye.htm. (Acessado em 21 de fevereiro de 2013 ?s 19:20 h). 93 PREFEITURA DE SEROP?DICA. http://seropedica.rj.gov.br (Acessado em 13 de julho de 2011 ?s 21:10 h). PRIMACK, R.B.; RODRIGUES, E. 2001. Biologia da conserva??o. Ed. Rodrigues, 328 p. RANDLER, C. 2008. Risk assessment by crow phenotype in a hybrid zone. Journal of Ethology, 26: 309-316. RENJIFO, L. M. 1999. Composition changes in a subandean avifauna after long-term forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology, 13: 1124-1139. RIBEIRO, M. C.; METZGER, J. P.; MARTENSEN, A. C.; PONZONI, F. J. e HIROTA, M. M. 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological conservation, 141: 1141-1153. RIBEIRO, A. L.; MANH?ES, M. A. DIAS, M. M.; COSTA-NETO, S. J.; SILVA, M. A. A.; RIBEIRO, H. M. e LIMA, N. F. 2011. Aves de sub-bosque de uma ?rea de Mata Atl?ntica de baixada do sudeste do Brasil. Ornithologia, 4 (2): 76-85. RIBON, R.; SIMON, J. E. e MATTOS, G. T. 2003. Bird extinctions in Atlantic forest fragments of the Vi?osa region, southeastern Brazil. Conservation Biology, 17: 1827-1839. RICKLEFS, R. E. 2009. A economia da natureza. Guanabara Koogan, 503 p. 94 RODRIGUES, R. M. M. e MAGALH?ES, L. M. S. 2011. Estrutura e Flor?stica de Fragmento de Floresta Secund?ria na Plan?cie Aluvionar do Rio Guandu, em Serop?dica-RJ. Floresta e Ambiente, 18 (3): 324-333. ROBINSON, S. K.; THOMPSON, F. R; DONOVAN, T. M.; WHITEHEAD, D. R. e FAABORG, J. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science, 267, 1987?1990. ROBBINS, C. S. Census techniques for forest birds. In: Workshop Management of Southern forest for nongame birds, 1978, Atlanta. Asheville: USDA Forest Service, 1978. p. 142-163. (General Technical Report, 14). ROGERS, D. A.; ROONEY, T. P.; HAWBAKER, T. J.; RADELOFF, V. C. e WALLER, D. M. 2009. Paying the extinction debt in southern Wisconsin forest understories. Conservation Biology, 23: 1497-1506. ROMPR?, G. W.; ROBINSON, D.; DESROCHERS, A. e ANGEHR, G. 2007. Environmental correlates of avian diversity in lowland Panama rain forest. Journal of Biogeografy. 34: 802 -815. ROSENBLATT, D. L.; HESKE, E. S.; NELSON, S. L.; BARBER, D. M.; MILLER, M. A. e MACALLISTER, B. 1999. Forest fragments in east-central Illinois: islands or habitat patches for mammals? American Midland Naturalist, 141: 115?123. 95 SANTIAGO, R. G. 2007. Guia Interativo de Aves Urbanas, 20 fev. http://www.ib.unicamp.br/lte/giau/visualizarMaterial.php?idMaterial=422. (Acessado em 11 de abril de 2013 ?s 16:00 h). SANTIN, D. A. 1999. A vegeta??o remanescente do munic?pio de Campinas (SP): mapeamento, caracteriza??o fision?mica e flor?stica, visando a conserva??o. Tese ? P?sgradua??o em Ci?ncias Biol?gicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 502 p. SANTOS, A. M. R. 2004. Comunidades de aves em remanescentes florestais secund?rios de uma ?rea rural no sudeste do Brasil. Ararajuba, 12: 43-51. SEKERCIOGLU, C. H.; EHRLICH, P.; DAILY, G. C.; AYGEN, D.; GOERHING, D. e SANDI, R. F. 2002. Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. PNAS, [S.l.], 99 (1): 263-267. SHAFER, C. L. 1990. Nature reserves: Island Theory and conservation practice. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. SHANAHAN, D. F. e POSSINGHAM, H. P. 2009. Predicting avian patch occupancy in a fragmented landscape: do we know more than we think? Journal of Applied Ecology, 46: 1026-1035. SICK, H. 1985. Ornitologia brasileira: Uma introdu??o. Editora UNB, Bras?lia. SICK, H. 1997. Ornitologia brasileira. Editora Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro, 912 p. 96 SILVEIRA, L. F.; OLMOS, F. e LONG, A. 2003. Birds in Atlantic Forest fragments in northeastern, Brazil. Cotinga, Bedfordshire, 20: 32-46. SIEVING, K. E. 1992. Nest predation and differential insular extinction among selected forest birds of Central Panama. Ecology, 73: 2310-2328. SIGRIST, T. 2006. Aves do Brasil: uma vis?o art?stica. Ed. Fosfertil, 672 p. SIGRIST, 2012. Iconografia das Aves do Brasil: Mata Atl?ntica, volume 2. Avis Brasilis Editora, 400 p. SILVA, J. C. M. e CONSTANTINO, R. 1988. Aves de um trecho de mata no baixo Rio Gam? ? uma rean?lise: riqueza, raridade, diversidade, similaridade e prefer?ncias ecol?gicas. Boletim do Museu Paraense Em?lio Goeldi, s?rie Zoologia, 4 (2): 201-210. SILVA, L.C. & CUNHA, H.C.S. 2001. CPRM ? Servi?o Geol?gico do Brasil / Uso e Cobertura do Solo. CPRM, Bras?lia. SOARES, M. P. 1998. Verdes urbanos e rurais: orienta??o para arboriza??o de cidades e s?tios campesinos. Porto Alegre: Cinco Continentes, 242 p. STOUFFER, P. C. e BIERREGAARD, R. O. 1995. Use of Amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. Ecology, 76: 2429?2445. 97 STRAUBE, F. C.; URBEN-FILHO, A.; DECONTO, L. R. e PATRIAL, E. W. 2007. Fluvicola nengeta (Linnaeus, 1766) nos estados do Paran? e Mato Grosso do Sul e sua expans?o de distribui??o geogr?fica pelo sul do Brasil. Atualidades Ornitol?gicas On-line, 137: 33-38. SWIFT, T. L. e HANNON, S. J. 2010. Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss: a review of the concepts, evidence, and applications. Biological Reviews, 85 (1): 35-53. TCE-RJ, 1994. http://www.tce.rj.gov.br/ (Acessado em 13 de julho de 2011 ?s 21:00 h). TCE-RJ, 2001. http://www.tce.rj.gov.br/ (Acessado em 13 de julho de 2011 ?s 21:00 h). TELINO-J?NIOR, W. R; DIAS, M. M.; AZEVEDO-J?NIOR, S. M.; LYRA-NEVES, R. M. e LARRAZ?BAL, M. E. L. 2005. Estrutura Tr?fica da avifauna na Reserva Estadual de Gurja?, Zona da Mata Sul, Pernambuco, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22 (4): 962? 973. TERBORGH, J. 1974. Preservation of natural diversity: the problem of extinction prone species. Bioscience, 24: 715?722. TISCHENDORF, L. e FAHRIG, L. 2000. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90: 7-19. 98 TRAYLOR, M. A. 1979. Subfamily Fluvicolinae. In: Traylor, M.A. (Ed.) Check-list of birds of the world: a continuation of the work of James L. Peters, Cambridge, Museum of Comparative Zoology, 112-186. TRAYLOR, M. A. e FITZPATRICK, J. 1982. Asurvey of tyrant flycatchers. Living Bird, 19: 7-50. TROIAN, L. C.; K?FFER, M. I.; M?LLER, S. C.; TROIAN, V. R. GUERRA, J. BORGES, M. G.; GUERRA, T.; RODRIGUES, G. G. e FORNECK, E. D. 2011. Flor?stica e padr?es estruturais de um fragmento florestal urbano, regi?o metropolitana de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Iheringia - S?rie Bot?nica, Porto Alegre, 66 (1): 5-16. TURNER, I. M. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 200?209. TURTON, S. M. e FREIBURGER, H. J. 1997. Edge and aspect effects on the microclimate of a small tropical forest remnant on the Atherton Tableland, northeastern Australia. In: Laurance, W.F.; Bierregaard, R.O. (Eds.) Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 4: 45-54. UEZU, A. 2006. Composi??o e estrutura da comunidade de aves na paisagem fragmentada do Pontal do Paranapanema. Tese de doutorado, P?s-gradua??o em Ci?ncias, ?rea de Ecologia, USP, 202 p. 99 UEZU, A. e METZGER, J. P. 2005. Efeito do tamanho, qualidade e isolamento de fragmentos florestais sobre a comunidade de avifauna, Pontal do Paranapanema, SP. Anais do VII Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil, Caxambu, MG. UEZU, A. e METZGER, J. P. 2011. Vanishing bird species in the Atlantic Forest: relative importance of landscape configuration, forest structure and species characteristics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20: 3627-3643. UMETSU, F.; METZGER, J. P. e PARDINI, R. 2008. Importance of estimating matrix quality for modeling species distribution in complex tropical landscapes: a test with Atlantic forest small mammals. Ecography, 31: 359-370. VALAD?O, R. M.; MAR?AL JUNIOR, O. e FRANCHIN, A. G. 2006. A avifauna no Parque Municipal Santa Luzia, zona urbana de Uberl?ndia, Minas Gerais. Bioscience Journal, Uberl?ndia, 22 (2): 97-108. VELOSO, H. P.; RANGEL-FILHO, A. L. R. e LIMA, J. C. A. 1991. Classifica??o da vegeta??o brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. IBGE, Departamento de Recursos Naturais e Estudos Ambientais, Rio de Janeiro, 124 p. VIANA, V. M. e PINHEIRO, L. A. F. V. 1998. Conserva??o da biodiversidade em fragmentos florestais. S?rie T?cnica IPEF, 12 (32): 25-42. VIANA, V. M.; TABANEZ, A. A. J. e BATISTA, J. L. F. 1997. Dynamics and restoration of forest fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic Moist Forest. In: Laurance, W.F.; Bierregaard, R.O. 100 (Eds.) Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragme
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Biologia Animal
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRRJ
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Instituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas e da Sa?de
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3484/18/2013+-+Camila+de+C%C3%A1ssia+Silva+Bueno.pdf.jpg
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3484/17/2013+-+Camila+de+C%C3%A1ssia+Silva+Bueno.pdf.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3484/2/2013+-+Camila+de+C%C3%A1ssia+Silva+Bueno.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3484/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
ce228abdb91d2348ac077a38160dc52a
5e86d41eb2d0f3cf2caa40bdb6cf20d4
7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br
_version_ 1800313501371072512