Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
| Texto Completo: | https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/4433 |
Resumo: | The frequent use of the herbicide glyphosate in an agricultural production system has selected populations of sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) resistant to this herbicide. The control option of these biotypes has been made, almost exclusively, with ACCase inhibitor herbicides. In order to evaluate the efficiency of the herbicides cletodim and haloxyfop in control of D. insularis biotypes collected in the states of SP, GO, PR and RJ, and to propose control alternatives with pre and post emergent herbicides of soybean, three trials. In the first assay (EI) conducted in a greenhouse, increasing doses (0, 1, 2, 4 and 8 times from the highest leaflet dose) of the herbicides haloxifop (60 g ha-1of a.i.), clethodim (96 g ha-1 of a.i.) and glyphosate (1440 g ha-1 of a.e.) in plants of 9 biotypes of sourgrass with three to four leaves. The control response of the plants to the herbicides, the resistance factor to glyphosate through dose response curves, the evaluation of the chlorophyll parameters in addition to the biometric data of shoot length, root length and total dry biomass were evaluated. The second assay (EII) and the third assay (EIII) were performed under field conditions with 3-4 leaf stages, 3-4 tillers and full flowering stages where doses of 0, ? and dose were tested maximum of package leaflet. For EII, the herbicides quizalofop (120 g ha- 1 of a.i.), haloxifop (60 g ha-1 of a.i.), clethodim (96 g ha-1 of a.i.) and sethoxydim (184 g ha- 1 of i.a.) and For EIII the herbicides paraquat (600 g ha-1 of a.i.), paraquat + diuron (200 + 100 g ha-1 of i.a.) and glufosinate (600 g ha-1 of i.a.). EII and EIII evaluated the response of plants to herbicides at three stages of development as well as evaluation of chlorophyll a parameters and biometric data. In the first experiment, a variation in susceptibility to glyphosate was observed among the evaluated biotypes. In all evaluated biotypes the resistance factor was lower than 10. The evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence showed that the biotypes collected in Toledo1/PR and Cascavel/PR, treated with glyphosate, showed a recovery of the photosynthetic parameters evaluated, At 21 DAA, when compared to the control treatment. For all the biotypes the herbicide clethodim offered control superior to the 7 DAA when compared to the haloxifop. However, at 14 DAA the control of the biotypes exerted by the two herbicides was similar. For EII, the action of the systemic emergent powders showed high control efficiency (superior 80%) of the sourgrass. At the 3-4 leaf phenological stage, the control provided by the herbicides tested at 14 DAA, even at the lowest evaluated dose, was superior to 90%. At 21 DAA the control of 100% of the sourgrass plants was obtained. For EIII, the action of the contact herbicides provided severe damage to the aerial part of the sourgrass plants, especially those that were in the 3-4 leaf stage, when at the 7 DAA a 100% control was observed. In the other stages for the herbicides paraquat and the commercial mixture between paraquat + diuron the control above 95% was reached at 14 DAA and only for the herbicide glufosinate the recovery of the sourgrass plants was observed. |
| id |
UFRRJ-1_b50f7f9ded9d5d2790eca7e8ce91a9fe |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:jspui/4433 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFRRJ-1 |
| network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Pinho, Camila Ferreira de004.501.700-07http://lattes.cnpq.br/3934515090201644Adegas, Fernando Storniolo029.294.368-75http://lattes.cnpq.br/6440725338144443Rubin, Rogerio da Silva41279174072http://lattes.cnpq.br/9586797676816087Pinho, Camila Ferreira deMachado, Aroldo Ferreira LopesH?ther, Cristina Moll340.725.968-92http://lattes.cnpq.br/7591914867225444Silva, Felipe Cipriano da2021-03-05T12:00:57Z2017-02-16SILVA, Felipe Cipriano da. Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle. 2017. 79 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental) - Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica-RJ, 2017.https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/4433The frequent use of the herbicide glyphosate in an agricultural production system has selected populations of sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) resistant to this herbicide. The control option of these biotypes has been made, almost exclusively, with ACCase inhibitor herbicides. In order to evaluate the efficiency of the herbicides cletodim and haloxyfop in control of D. insularis biotypes collected in the states of SP, GO, PR and RJ, and to propose control alternatives with pre and post emergent herbicides of soybean, three trials. In the first assay (EI) conducted in a greenhouse, increasing doses (0, 1, 2, 4 and 8 times from the highest leaflet dose) of the herbicides haloxifop (60 g ha-1of a.i.), clethodim (96 g ha-1 of a.i.) and glyphosate (1440 g ha-1 of a.e.) in plants of 9 biotypes of sourgrass with three to four leaves. The control response of the plants to the herbicides, the resistance factor to glyphosate through dose response curves, the evaluation of the chlorophyll parameters in addition to the biometric data of shoot length, root length and total dry biomass were evaluated. The second assay (EII) and the third assay (EIII) were performed under field conditions with 3-4 leaf stages, 3-4 tillers and full flowering stages where doses of 0, ? and dose were tested maximum of package leaflet. For EII, the herbicides quizalofop (120 g ha- 1 of a.i.), haloxifop (60 g ha-1 of a.i.), clethodim (96 g ha-1 of a.i.) and sethoxydim (184 g ha- 1 of i.a.) and For EIII the herbicides paraquat (600 g ha-1 of a.i.), paraquat + diuron (200 + 100 g ha-1 of i.a.) and glufosinate (600 g ha-1 of i.a.). EII and EIII evaluated the response of plants to herbicides at three stages of development as well as evaluation of chlorophyll a parameters and biometric data. In the first experiment, a variation in susceptibility to glyphosate was observed among the evaluated biotypes. In all evaluated biotypes the resistance factor was lower than 10. The evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence showed that the biotypes collected in Toledo1/PR and Cascavel/PR, treated with glyphosate, showed a recovery of the photosynthetic parameters evaluated, At 21 DAA, when compared to the control treatment. For all the biotypes the herbicide clethodim offered control superior to the 7 DAA when compared to the haloxifop. However, at 14 DAA the control of the biotypes exerted by the two herbicides was similar. For EII, the action of the systemic emergent powders showed high control efficiency (superior 80%) of the sourgrass. At the 3-4 leaf phenological stage, the control provided by the herbicides tested at 14 DAA, even at the lowest evaluated dose, was superior to 90%. At 21 DAA the control of 100% of the sourgrass plants was obtained. For EIII, the action of the contact herbicides provided severe damage to the aerial part of the sourgrass plants, especially those that were in the 3-4 leaf stage, when at the 7 DAA a 100% control was observed. In the other stages for the herbicides paraquat and the commercial mixture between paraquat + diuron the control above 95% was reached at 14 DAA and only for the herbicide glufosinate the recovery of the sourgrass plants was observed.A frequente utiliza??o do herbicida glifosato em sistema de produ??o agr?cola tem selecionado popula??es de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) resistente a este herbicida. A op??o de controle desses bi?tipos tem sido feita, quase que exclusivamente, com herbicidas inibidores de ACCase. Com o objetivo de avaliar a efici?ncia dos herbicidas cletodim e haloxifope no controle de bi?tipos de D. insularis coletados nos estados de SP, GO, PR e RJ, e propor alternativas de controle com herbicidas p?s-emergentes sist?micos e de contato, foram conduzidos 3 ensaios. No primeiro ensaio (EI), conduzido em casa de vegeta??o, foram aplicadas doses crescentes (0, 1, 2, 4 e 8 vezes a partir da maior dose de bula) dos herbicidas haloxifope (60 g ha-1 de i.a.), cletodim (96 g ha-1 de i.a.) e glifosato (1440g ha-1 de e.a.) em plantas de 9 bi?tipos de capim-amargoso com tr?s a quatro folhas. Foi avaliado a resposta obtida pelo sintoma das plantas aos herbicidas, o fator de resist?ncia ao glifosato atrav?s de curvas de dose-resposta, a avalia??o dos par?metros da clorofila a al?m dos dados biom?tricos de comprimento da parte a?rea, comprimento de raiz e biomassa seca total. O segundo ensaio (EII) e o terceiro ensaio (EIII) foram realizados em condi??es de campo com plantas de capim-amargoso nos est?dios de 3-4 folhas, 3-4 perfilhos e pleno florescimento onde foram testados doses de 0, ? e dose m?xima de bula. Para EII foram utilizados os herbicidas quizalofope (120 g ha-1 de i.a.), haloxifope (60 g ha-1 de i.a.), cletodim (96 g ha-1 de i.a.) e setoxidim (184 g ha-1 de i.a.) e para EIII os herbicidas paraquat (600 g ha-1 de i.a.), paraquat+diuron (200+100 g ha-1 de i.a.) e glufosinato (600 g ha-1 de i.a.). No EII e EIII foi avaliado a resposta das plantas aos herbicidas nos tr?s est?dios de desenvolvimento assim como avalia??o dos par?metros da clorofila a e dados biom?tricos. No primeiro experimento foi verificado uma varia??o na suscetibilidade ao glifosato entre os bi?tipos avaliados. Em todos os bi?tipos avaliados o fator de resist?ncia foi inferior a 10. Atrav?s da avalia??o da fluoresc?ncia da clorofila a observou-se que os bi?tipos coletados em Toledo1/PR e Cascavel/PR, tratados com glifosato, sinalizaram uma recupera??o dos par?metros fotossint?ticos avaliados, aos 21 DAA, quando comparado ao tratamento testemunha. Para todos os bi?tipos o herbicida cletodim ofereceu controle superior aos 7 DAA quando comparado ao haloxifope. Entretanto aos 14 DAA os sintomas dos bi?tipos proporcionado pelos dois herbicidas foi semelhante. Para EII a a??o dos p?s-emergentes sist?micos mostraram elevado dano nas plantas (superior 80%) de capim-amargoso. No est?dio fenol?gico de 3-4 folhas o sintoma proporcionado pelos herbicidas testados aos 14 DAA, mesmo na menor dose avaliada, foi superior a 90%. Aos 21 DAA foi obtido o controle de 100% das plantas de capim-amargoso. Para EIII a a??o dos herbicidas de contato proporcionou severos danos a parte a?rea das plantas de capim amargoso, em especial as que se encontravam no est?dio de 3-4 folhas, quando aos 7 DAA foi observado controle de 100%. Nos demais est?dios para os herbicidas paraquate e a mistura comercial entre paraquate+diuron o sintoma de 95% foi alcan?ado aos 14 DAA e somente para o herbicida glufosinato foi observado a recupera??o das plantas de capim-amargosoSubmitted by Celso Magalhaes (celsomagalhaes@ufrrj.br) on 2021-03-05T12:00:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Felipe Cipriano da Silva.pdf: 11674025 bytes, checksum: c8bf0aa0b2dafdd4d2016736e4f450be (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-05T12:00:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Felipe Cipriano da Silva.pdf: 11674025 bytes, checksum: c8bf0aa0b2dafdd4d2016736e4f450be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-16Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPqapplication/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/64204/2017%20-%20Felipe%20Cipriano%20da%20Silva.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e AmbientalUFRRJBrasilInstituto de TecnologiaADEGAS, F. S.; GAZZIERO, D. L. P.; VOLL, E.; OSIRE, R. Alternativas de controle qu?mico de. D. insularis resistente.Brasileiro, XXVII Congresso Daninhas, Plantas, p. 756?760, 2010. AMARANTES JR, O. P.; DOS SANTOS, T. C. R.; BRITO, N. M. Glifosato: Propriedades, toxicidade, usos e legisla??o. Qu?mica Nova, v. 25, n. 4, p. 589?593, 2002. ASHRAF, M. & HARRIS, P.J.C. Photosynthesis Under Stressful Environments. Photosynthetica, v.51, n. 2,p.163-190, 2013. BARROSO, A.A.M.; ALBRECHT, A.J.P.; REIS, F.C.; FILHO R.V Intera??o entre herbicidas inibidores da ACCase e diferentes formula??es de glyphosate no controle de capim-amargoso. Planta Daninha, Vi?osa-MG, v. 32, n. 3, p. 619-627, 2014. BENTHIEN, P.F. Engenharia gen?tica nos s?culos XIX e XX e a transgenia agr?cola no s?culo XXI. Theomi Journal. n.13. 2006. D?spon?vel em: http://revistatheomai. unq.edu.ar/NUMERO13/ArtFaraco1.htm. Acesso em 05/09/2016. BUCHANAN, B. B.; GRUISSEM, W.; JONES, R. L. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. CARPEJANI, M. S.; OLIVEIRA JR. Manejo qu?mico de capim-amargoso resistente a glyphosate na pr?-semeadura da soja. Campo Digital: Rev. Ci?ncias Exatas e da Terra e Ci?ncias agr?rias, v. 8, n. 1, p. 26?23, 2013. CARVALHO, L. B. de; CRUZ-HIPOLITO, H.; GONZ?LEZ-TORRALVA, F.; DA COSTA AGUIAR ALVES, P. L.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J.; DE PRADO, R. ) Biotypes Resistant to Glyphosate in Brazil. Weed Science, v. 59, n. 2, p. 171?176, 2011. CARVALHO, L. B. De; LUIS, P.; ALVES, A.; GONZA, F.; CRUZ-HIPOLITO, H. E.; MAR, A.; GIL-HUMANES, J.; BARRO, F. Pool of Resistance Mechanisms to Glyphosate in Digitaria insularis. Journal Agriculture and Food Chemistry. v.60. p. 615-622. 2012. CORREIA, B. I. A. M.; DURIGAN, J. C. Manejo qu?mico de plantas adultas de Digitaria insularis com glyphosate isolado e em mistura com chlorimuron-ethyl ou quizalofop-ptefuril em ?rea de plantio direto. Bragantia, v.68, n.3, p. 689?697, 2009. CHRISTOFFOLETI, P.J. & NICOLAI, M. Aspectos da resist?ncia de planta daninha a herbicidas. 4 ed. Piracicaba. Esalq, 2016. 262 p. 2016. CHRISTOFFOLETI,P.J.; NICOLAI, M.; DIAS, A.C.R.; MELO, M.S.C.; L?PEZOVEJERO, R.F.; GALLI, A.J. Avalia??o de suspeita de resist?ncia de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) ao herbicida glyphosate em pomares c?tricos no Estado de S?o Paulo - Brasil. In: Congresso da sociedad espa?ola de maleherbologia, 22., Congresso da asociaci?n latinoamericana de malezas, 19.; Congresso iberoamericano de ci?ncia de las malezas,2., 2009. Lisboa. Resumos... Lisboa: Funda??o Calouste Glubenkian, p. 533-536. 2009. CHRISTOFFOLETI, P.J. Curvas de dose-resposta de bi?tipos resistentes e suscet?vel de Bidens pilosa L. aos herbicidas inibidores da ALS. Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v.59, n.3, p.513-519, 2002. CONAB Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Boletim. Dispon?vel em: <http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/16_08_09_09_00_07_boletim_gra os_agosto_2016_.pdf. 2016. Acesso em 12/08/2016. 75 CORREIA, N.M.; LEITE, G.J. e GARCIA, L.D. Resposta de diferentes popula??es de Digitaria insularis ao herbicida glyphosate. Planta Daninha, Vi?osa-MG, v. 28, n. 4, p. 769-776, 2010. CORREIA, N.M.; DURIGAN, J.C. Manejo qu?mico de plantas adultas de Digitaria insularis com glyphosate isolado e em mistura com chlorimuron-ethyl ou quizalofop-ptefuril em ?rea de plantio direto. Revista Bragantia, v.68, n.3, p.689-697, 2009. COSTA, R.C.; GELAIN, E. Um estudo comparado referente aos custos de produ??o no cultivo da soja do tipo RR em rela??o ao cultivo da soja simplificada. Rev. Cienc. Gerenc. v.18, n.28, p. 71-77, 2014. DAYAN, F. E.; ZACCARO, M. L. M. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a marker for herbicide mechanisms of action. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v. 102 p. 189?197, 2012. DUKE, S. O. Overview of herbicides mechanism of action. Env. Health Persp., v. 87, p. 263-271, 1990. DUKE, S.O.; POWLES, S.B. Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pesticide Managenement Science, v. 64, p.319?325, 2008. FORNAROLLI, D.A.; GAZZIERO, D.L.P.; BONOTTO, A.T.; SANTOS, B.C.; SEBASTIANI,R.; BANDEIRA, S.A.E. Manejo de biot?pos de Digitaria insularis resistente ao herbicida glifosato. In: III Simp?sio internacional sobre glyphosate, Botucatu, SP, 2011.Resumos... Botucatu: UNESP, 2011. GAZZIERO, D. L. P.et al. Crit?rios para relatos oficiais estat?sticos de bi?tipos de plantas daninhas resistentes a herbicidas. In: GAZZIERO, D. L. P.; GALLI, A. J. B.; KARAM, D. (Eds.). Sete Lagoas: Sociedade Brasileira da Ci?ncia das Plantas Daninhas; Campinas: Associa??o Brasileira de A??o ? Resist?ncia de Plantas aos Herbicidas no Brasil, 22 p. 2008. GEMELLI, A.; SILV?RIO, R.; JR, D. O.; CONSTANTIN, J.; BRAGA, G. Aspectos da biologia de Digitaria insularis resistente ao glyphosate e implica??es para seu controle. Revista Bras. de Herbicidas v. 11, n.2, p. 231?240, 2012. GEMELLI, A.; SILV?RIO, R.; JR, D. O.; CONSTANTIN, J.; BRAGA, G. Estrat?gias para o controle de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) resistente ao glyphosate na cultura milho safrinha.Revista Bras. de Herbicidas. v.12, n.2, p. 162?170, 2013. GILO, E. G.; MENDON?A, C. G.; SANTO, T. L. E.; TEODORO, P. E. Alternatives for Chemical Management of Sourgrass. Biosciense Journal, v. 32, n. 2012, p. 881?889, 2016. GOVINDJEE; KERN, J. F.; MESSINGER, J.; WHITMARSH, Journal Photosystem II. eLS. 2010. URL: www.els.net. HARWOOD, J. L. Graminicides which inhibit lipid synthesis. Pest. Outlook, v. 10, n. 4, p. 154-158, 1999. HEAP, I. International survey of resistant weeds. Dispon?vel em http://www.weedscience.org/Summary/Country.aspx?CountryID=5. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2016. HESS,F.D.; FALK, R.H. Herbicide deposition on leaf surfaces. Weed Science, v.38, n.3, p. 280-288, 1990. HRAC ? BR. Mecanismo de a??o dos herbicidas. Dispon?vel em: <http://www.hracbr. com.br. Acesso em 12/09/2016. 76 ISSA ? International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Aplications. Reporton Global Status of Biotech/GM Crops - Dispon?vel em: http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/49/pptslides/pdf/B49-Slides-English.pdf Acesso em: 18 de abril de 2015. KAUNDUN, S. Resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase-inhibiting herbicides. Pest Management Science. West Sussex, v. 70, p. 1405-1417, 2014. KNEZEVIC, S.Z.; STREIBIG, J.C.; RITZ, C. Utilizing R software package for doseresponse studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technology, v.21, n.3, p.840-848, 2007. KNISS, A. R. & STREIBIG, J. C. Statistical Analysis of Agricultural Experiments with R. http://rstats4ag.org/2015. KRUSE, N.D.; TREZZI, M.M.; VIDAL, R.A. Herbicidas inibidores da EPSPs: revis?o de literatura. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, v.l, n.2, p. 139-146. 2000. LEA, P.J. The inhibition of ammonia assimilation: a mechanism of herbicide action. In: Baker, N. R.; Percival, M. P. (eds.). Herbicides. New York/Amsterdan: Elsevier. p. 267- 297, 1991. LEE, L.J.; NGIM, J. A first report of glyphosate-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica(L) Gaertn) in Malaysia. Pesticide Management Science., v.56, n.4, p.336-339, 2000. LICORINI, L. R.; GANDOLFO, M. A.; SORACE, M. A.; COSSA, C. A.; OSIPE, J. B. Identifica??o e controle de bi?tipos resistentes de Digitaria insularis ( L .) Fedde. v. 394, p. 141?147, 2015. LINGENFELTER, D. D.; CURRAN, W.S. Effect ofglyphosate and several ACCaseinhibitor herbicides onWirestem Muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) control. Weed Technology, v. 21, n. 3, p. 732-738, 2007. L?PEZ-OVEJERO, R.F. Resist?ncia de popula??es da planta daninha Digitaria ciliares (Retz.) Koel. A herbicidas inibidores da acetil coenzima A carboxilase (ACCase). Universidade de S?o Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, p. 101, Piracicaba, 2006. MACHADO, A. A.; CONCEI??O, A. R. WinStat ? Sistema de An?lise Estat?stica para Windows vers?o 1.0. Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 2007. MACHADO, A.F.L.; MEIRA, R.M.S.; FERREIRA, L.R.; FERREIRA, F.A.; TUFFI SANTOS, L.D.; FIALHO, C.M.T.; MACHADO, M.S Caracteriza??o anat?mica de folha, colmo e rizoma de Digitaria insularis. Planta Daninha, Vi?osa-MG, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2008. MARSHALL, G.; KIRKWOOD, R. C.; LEACH, G. E.Comparative studies on graminicideresistant and susceptiblebiotypes of Eleusine indica. Weed Resistence, v.34, n.3, p.177-185, 1994. MARTINAZZO, E.G.; PERBONI, A.T.; OLIVEIRA, P.V.; BIANCHI, V.J.; BACARIN, M.A.Atividade fotossint?tica em plantas de ameixeira submetidas ao d?ficit h?drico e ao alagamento. Ci?ncia Rural, v.43, n.1, 2013. MARTINS, J. F. Aspectos ecofisiol?gicos e gen?ticos de bi?tipos de Digitaria insularis resistente e suscet?vel ao glyphosate. 2013. p. 73. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Agronomia) Faculdade de Ci?ncias Agr?rias e Veterin?rias. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal. 77 2013. MARTINS, T. Herbicida Paraquat: conceitos, modo de a??o e doen?as relacionadas. Semina: Ci?ncias Biol?gicas e da Sa?de, Londrina, v. 34, n. 2, p. 175-186, jul./dez. 2013. MEEK, T. D.; VILLAFRANCA, J. J. Kinect mechanism of Escherichia coli glutamine synthetase. Biochemistry, v. 19, p. 5513-5519, 1980. MELO M.S.C. Alternativas de controle, ac?mulo de chiquimato e curva de crescimento de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) suscet?vel e resistente ao glyphosate. p 17-70, 2012. Disserta??o (Mestrado em ci?ncias ? ?rea Fitotecnia) ? Universidade de S?o Paulo Escola Superior de Agricultura ?Luiz de Queiroz?, 2011. MEROTTO JR, A. M.; WAGNER, J.; MENEGUZZI, C. Efeitos do herbicida glifosato e da aplica??o foliar de micronutrientes em soja transg?nica. Biosci Journal v.31, n.2, p. 499? 508, 2015. MELO, M. S.; MELO, C. De; ROSA, L. E.; AUGUSTO, C.; GROSSI, D. C.; NICOLAI, M.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Alternativas para o controle qu?mico de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis ) resistente ao glyphosate. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas. v. 11, n.2, p. 195?203, 2012. MICHITTE, P.; DE PRADO, R.; ESPINOZA, N.; RUIZ-SANTAELLA, J.P.; GAUVRIT, C. Mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate in a ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) biotype from Chile. Weed Sci., v.55, n.5, p.435-440, 2007. MONQUERO, P. A. Aspectos da biologia e manejo das plantas daninhas. Organiza??o: MONQUERO, P.A., 1 ed. Rima. S?o Carlos, SP, Sociedade Brasileira da Ci?ncia das Plantas Daninhas, 430p., 2014. MONQUERO, P.A. Plantas transg?nicas resistentes aos herbicidas: situa??o e perspectivas. Revista Bragantia. v.64, n.4, p.517-531, 2005. MOREIRA, M. S.; NICOLAI, M.; CARVALHO, S.J.P.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Resist?ncia de C. canadenses e C. bonariensis ao herbicida glifosato. Planta Daninha, v.25, n.1, p.157, 164, 2007. NICOLAI, M. MELO, M.S.C.; L?PEZ-OVEJERO, R.F.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P.J. Monitoramento de infesta??es de popula??es de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) suspeitas de resist?ncia ao glifosato.In: Congresso Brasileiro da Ci?ncia das Plantas Daninhas, 27. Ribeir?o Preto, SP. 2010. Resumos. Ribeir?o Preto: SBCPD, 2010, p.943- 946, 2010. OSUNA, M.,GOULART, I.C.G.R.; VIDAL, R.A.; KALSING, A. RUIZ SANTAELLA, J.P.; DE PRADO, R.Resistance to ACCase inhibitors in Eleusine indica from Brazil involves a target site mutation. Planta Daninha. v. 30, p. 675-681, 2012. PARREIRA, M.C.; ESPANHOL, M.; DUARTE, D.J.; CORREIA, N.M. Manejo qu?mico de Digitaria insularis em ?rea de plantio direto. Revista Brasileira Ci?ncias Agr?rias, v.5, n.1, p.13-17, 2010. POWLES, S.B.; YU, Q. Evolution in Action: Plants Resistant to Herbicides. Annual Review of Plant Biology, v. 61, p. 317?47, 2010. POWLES, S. B. & PRESTON, C. Evolved glyphosate resistance in plants: Biochemical and genetic basis of resistance. Weed Technology v.20, p.282?289. 2006. 78 PROC?PIO, S. O.; PIRES, F.R.; MENEZES, C.C.E.; BARROSO, A.L.L. Efeitos de dessecantes no controle deplantas daninhas na cultura da soja. Planta Daninha, v. 24,n. 1, p. 193-197, 2006. REINERT, C. S.; BEATRIZ, A.; ALMEIDA, C.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Curvas de doseresposta comparativas entre os bi?tipos resistente e suscet?vel de capim-amargoso ( Digitaria insularis ) ao herbicida glyphosate.Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas v. 12, n.3, p. 260?267, 2013. ROBERTO, M.; GELAIN, E. Um Estudo Comparado Referente aos Custos de Produ??o no Cultivo da Soja do Tipo RR em Rela??o ao Cultivo da Soja Simplificada.Revista Ciencias Gerenciales, v. 18, n. 28, p. 71?77, 2014. ROESSING, A. C.; LAZZAROTTO, J. J. Soja Transg?nica no Brasil: Situa??o Atual e Perspectivas para os Pr?ximos Anos. Reuni?o de Pesquisa de Soja da Regi?o Central do Brasil, p. 31 ? 32, 2006. ROMAN, E.S. Como funcionam os herbicidas: da biologia ? aplica??o. Passo Fundo: Gr?fica Editora Berthier, 2007. 160p. ROSO, A.C. & VIDAL, R. A. A Modified Phosphate-Carrier Protein Theory is Proposed as a Non-Target Site Mechanism For Glyphosate Resistance in Weeds. Planta Daninha, v. 28, p. 1175?1185, 2010. GON?ALVES, J. F. C.; SANTOS JR., U. M. Utilization of the chlorophyll a fluorescence technique as a tool for selecting tolerant species to environments of high irradiance. Brazilian Journal Plant Physiology, v. 17, p. 307-313, 2005. SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DA CI?NCIA DAS PLANTAS DANINHAS ? SBCPD. Procedimentos para instala??o, avalia??o e an?lise de experimentos com herbicidas. Londrina: SBCPD, 42 p. 1995. SOUSA, C.P.; PINTO, J.J.O.; MARTINAZZO, E.G., PERBONI, A.T.; FARIAS, M.E.; BACARIN, M.A. Chlorophyll a fluorescencein rice plants exposed of herbicide of group imidazolinone. Planta Daninha, v. 32, n. 1, p. 141-150, 2014a. SOUSA, C.P.; FARIAS, M.E.; SCHOCK, A.A.; BACARIN, M.A.Photosynthesis of soybean under the action of a photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide. Acta Physiology Plant, v.33, n. 11, p. 3051-3062, 2014b. STIRBET, A.; GOVINDJEE. On the relation between the Kautsky effect (chlorophyll a fluorescence induction) and Photosystem II: Basics and applications of the OJIP fluorescence transient. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, v. 104, p. 236?257, 2011. STIRBET, A.; GOVINDJEE. Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction: a personal perspective of the thermal phase, the J?I?P rise. Photosynth Research, v. 113, p.15?61. 2012. STRASSER, B.J.; STRASSER, R.J. Measuring fast fluorescence transients to address environmental question: the JIP test. In: MATHIS, P. (Ed.), Photosynthesis: From Light to Biosphere. Kluwer Academic Publisher. v. 5 p. 977?980, 1995. STRASSER, R.J.; TSIMILLI-MICHAEL, M.; SRIVASTAVA, A. Analysis of the Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. In: Papageorgiou, C., Govindjee, (Eds.), Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. Springer, Netherlands, p. 321?362, 2004. TAIZ L, ZEIGER E. Fisiologia Vegetal. 5ed. Porto alegre: Artmed, 918p. 2013. 79 TAKANO, H.K. et al. Estudos dos efeitos da adi??o do 2,4-D ao glyphosate para o controle de esp?cies de plantas daninhas de dif?cil controle. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 2013 (no prelo). THACH, L. B.; SHAPCOTT, A.; SCHMIDT, S.; CRITCHLEY, C. The OJIP fast fluorescence rise characterizes Graptophyllum species and their stress responses. Photosynthesis Research, v. 94, p. 423-436, 2007. TSIMILLI-MICHAEL,M; P?CHEUX, M.; STRASSER, R.J. Vitality and stress adaptation ofthe symbionts of coral reef and temperate foraminifers probedin hospite bythe fluorescence kinetics OJIP, Archs. Science Gen?ve, v.51, p.205?240. 1998. TROPALDI, L., VELINI, E. D., CARBONARI, C. A., ARALDI, R., CORNIANI, N., GIROTTO, M., & DE FREITAS, I. P. S. Detection of crabgrass species tolerance to photosystem II inhibitor herbicides using fluorescence technique. Ciencia Rural, v.45, n.5, p.767-774, 2015. TUFFI SANTOS, L.D.; MEIRA, R.M.S.A.; SANTOS, I.C.; FEREIRA, F.A. Efeito do glyphosate sobre a morfoanatomia das folhas e do caule de C. diffusa e C. benghalensis. Planta Daninha, v. 22, n. 1, p. 101-108, 2004. VARGAS, L. et al. Dose-Response curves of Lolium multiflorum Biotypes Resistant and Susceptible to Clethodim. Planta Daninha. Vi?osa, v. 31, p. 887-892, 2013. VIDAL, R.A.; Portes, E.S.; Lamego, F.P.; Trezzi,M.M. Resist?ncia de Eleusine indica aos inibidores de ACCase. Planta Daninha. Vi?osa, v. 24, p. 163-171, 2006. VILA-AIUB, M.M.; BALBI, M.C.; GUNDEL, P.E.; GHERSA, C.M.; POWLES, S.B. Evolution of glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glyphosateresistant soybean. Weed Sciense., v.55, n.6, p.566-571, 2007. WSSA ? Weed Sciense Society of America. Dispon?vel em http://wssa.net/wssa/weed/resistance/. Acesso em: 30 set. 2016. YAMASHITA, O. M.; GUIMAR?ES, S. C. Resist?ncia de plantas daninhas ao herbicida glyphosate. Revista Scientia Agr?rias, v. 03, n.1, p. 189?215, 2013. YUSUF, M.A.; KUMAR, D.; RAJWANSHI, R.; STRASSER, R.J.; TSIMILLI-MICHAEL, M.; GOVINDJEE; SARIN, N.B. Overexpression of ?-tocopherol methyl transferase gene in transgenic Brassica juncea plants alleviates abiotic stress: Physiological and chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, v. 1797, p. 1428-1438, 2010. ZOBIOLE, L.H.S.; KRENCHINSKI, F. H.; ALBRECHT, A. J. P. Perennial sourgrass control in full flowering growth stage. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, v. 15, n.2, p. 157? 164, 2016.glifosatoresist?nciacurva dose-respostacapim-amargosoglyphosateresistancedose-response curvesourgrassEngenharia Agr?colaSuscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controleSusceptibility of Digitaria insularis to Inhibitors of EPSPs and ACCase and control alternativesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJTHUMBNAIL2017 - Felipe Cipriano da Silva.pdf.jpg2017 - Felipe Cipriano da Silva.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg1943http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/4433/4/2017+-+Felipe+Cipriano+da+Silva.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD54TEXT2017 - Felipe Cipriano da Silva.pdf.txt2017 - Felipe Cipriano da Silva.pdf.txttext/plain195443http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/4433/3/2017+-+Felipe+Cipriano+da+Silva.pdf.txt3da5f260993f0a969450891f5d159bcdMD53ORIGINAL2017 - Felipe Cipriano da Silva.pdf2017 - Felipe Cipriano da Silva.pdfapplication/pdf4125818http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/4433/5/2017+-+Felipe+Cipriano+da+Silva.pdff467fa7a2223ea7ca8c7540e02153cd4MD55LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/4433/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51jspui/44332022-06-06 12:48:23.576oai:localhost:jspui/4433Tk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSP1BSSUEgTElDRU4/QQpFc3RhIGxpY2VuP2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyA/IGZvcm5lY2lkYSBhcGVuYXMgcGFyYSBmaW5zIGluZm9ybWF0aXZvcy4KCkxJQ0VOP0EgREUgRElTVFJJQlVJPz9PIE4/Ty1FWENMVVNJVkEKCkNvbSBhIGFwcmVzZW50YT8/byBkZXN0YSBsaWNlbj9hLCB2b2M/IChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSA/IFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKWFhYIChTaWdsYSBkYSBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUpIG8gZGlyZWl0byBuP28tZXhjbHVzaXZvIGRlIHJlcHJvZHV6aXIsICB0cmFkdXppciAoY29uZm9ybWUgZGVmaW5pZG8gYWJhaXhvKSwgZS9vdSAKZGlzdHJpYnVpciBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhPz9vIChpbmNsdWluZG8gbyByZXN1bW8pIHBvciB0b2RvIG8gbXVuZG8gbm8gZm9ybWF0byBpbXByZXNzbyBlIGVsZXRyP25pY28gZSAKZW0gcXVhbHF1ZXIgbWVpbywgaW5jbHVpbmRvIG9zIGZvcm1hdG9zID91ZGlvIG91IHY/ZGVvLgoKVm9jPyBjb25jb3JkYSBxdWUgYSBTaWdsYSBkZSBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgcG9kZSwgc2VtIGFsdGVyYXIgbyBjb250ZT9kbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YT8/byAKcGFyYSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvIG91IGZvcm1hdG8gcGFyYSBmaW5zIGRlIHByZXNlcnZhPz9vLgoKVm9jPyB0YW1iP20gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGM/cGlhIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgCmRpc3NlcnRhPz9vIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuP2EsIGJhY2stdXAgZSBwcmVzZXJ2YT8/by4KClZvYz8gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YT8/byA/IG9yaWdpbmFsIGUgcXVlIHZvYz8gdGVtIG8gcG9kZXIgZGUgY29uY2VkZXIgb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgY29udGlkb3MgCm5lc3RhIGxpY2VuP2EuIFZvYz8gdGFtYj9tIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIG8gZGVwP3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGE/P28gbj9vLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3U/bS4KCkNhc28gYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YT8/byBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jPyBuP28gcG9zc3VpIGEgdGl0dWxhcmlkYWRlIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcywgdm9jPyAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzcz9vIGlycmVzdHJpdGEgZG8gZGV0ZW50b3IgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIHBhcmEgY29uY2VkZXIgPyBTaWdsYSBkZSBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgCm9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGFwcmVzZW50YWRvcyBuZXN0YSBsaWNlbj9hLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3Q/IGNsYXJhbWVudGUgCmlkZW50aWZpY2FkbyBlIHJlY29uaGVjaWRvIG5vIHRleHRvIG91IG5vIGNvbnRlP2RvIGRhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGE/P28gb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEuCgpDQVNPIEEgVEVTRSBPVSBESVNTRVJUQT8/TyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0M/TklPIE9VIApBUE9JTyBERSBVTUEgQUc/TkNJQSBERSBGT01FTlRPIE9VIE9VVFJPIE9SR0FOSVNNTyBRVUUgTj9PIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0M/IERFQ0xBUkEgUVVFIFJFU1BFSVRPVSBUT0RPUyBFIFFVQUlTUVVFUiBESVJFSVRPUyBERSBSRVZJUz9PIENPTU8gClRBTUI/TSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBPz9FUyBFWElHSURBUyBQT1IgQ09OVFJBVE8gT1UgQUNPUkRPLgoKQSBTaWdsYSBkZSBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgc2UgY29tcHJvbWV0ZSBhIGlkZW50aWZpY2FyIGNsYXJhbWVudGUgbyBzZXUgbm9tZSAocykgb3UgbyhzKSBub21lKHMpIGRvKHMpIApkZXRlbnRvcihlcykgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGE/P28sIGUgbj9vIGZhcj8gcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhPz9vLCBhbD9tIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2VuP2EuCg==Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2022-06-06T15:48:23Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false |
| dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle |
| dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Susceptibility of Digitaria insularis to Inhibitors of EPSPs and ACCase and control alternatives |
| title |
Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle |
| spellingShingle |
Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle Silva, Felipe Cipriano da glifosato resist?ncia curva dose-resposta capim-amargoso glyphosate resistance dose-response curve sourgrass Engenharia Agr?cola |
| title_short |
Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle |
| title_full |
Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle |
| title_fullStr |
Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle |
| title_sort |
Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle |
| author |
Silva, Felipe Cipriano da |
| author_facet |
Silva, Felipe Cipriano da |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Pinho, Camila Ferreira de |
| dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
004.501.700-07 |
| dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3934515090201644 |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Adegas, Fernando Storniolo |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID.fl_str_mv |
029.294.368-75 |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6440725338144443 |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co2.fl_str_mv |
Rubin, Rogerio da Silva |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co2ID.fl_str_mv |
41279174072 |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9586797676816087 |
| dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Pinho, Camila Ferreira de |
| dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Machado, Aroldo Ferreira Lopes |
| dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
H?ther, Cristina Moll |
| dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
340.725.968-92 |
| dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7591914867225444 |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Felipe Cipriano da |
| contributor_str_mv |
Pinho, Camila Ferreira de Adegas, Fernando Storniolo Rubin, Rogerio da Silva Pinho, Camila Ferreira de Machado, Aroldo Ferreira Lopes H?ther, Cristina Moll |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
glifosato resist?ncia curva dose-resposta capim-amargoso |
| topic |
glifosato resist?ncia curva dose-resposta capim-amargoso glyphosate resistance dose-response curve sourgrass Engenharia Agr?cola |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
glyphosate resistance dose-response curve sourgrass |
| dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agr?cola |
| description |
The frequent use of the herbicide glyphosate in an agricultural production system has selected populations of sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) resistant to this herbicide. The control option of these biotypes has been made, almost exclusively, with ACCase inhibitor herbicides. In order to evaluate the efficiency of the herbicides cletodim and haloxyfop in control of D. insularis biotypes collected in the states of SP, GO, PR and RJ, and to propose control alternatives with pre and post emergent herbicides of soybean, three trials. In the first assay (EI) conducted in a greenhouse, increasing doses (0, 1, 2, 4 and 8 times from the highest leaflet dose) of the herbicides haloxifop (60 g ha-1of a.i.), clethodim (96 g ha-1 of a.i.) and glyphosate (1440 g ha-1 of a.e.) in plants of 9 biotypes of sourgrass with three to four leaves. The control response of the plants to the herbicides, the resistance factor to glyphosate through dose response curves, the evaluation of the chlorophyll parameters in addition to the biometric data of shoot length, root length and total dry biomass were evaluated. The second assay (EII) and the third assay (EIII) were performed under field conditions with 3-4 leaf stages, 3-4 tillers and full flowering stages where doses of 0, ? and dose were tested maximum of package leaflet. For EII, the herbicides quizalofop (120 g ha- 1 of a.i.), haloxifop (60 g ha-1 of a.i.), clethodim (96 g ha-1 of a.i.) and sethoxydim (184 g ha- 1 of i.a.) and For EIII the herbicides paraquat (600 g ha-1 of a.i.), paraquat + diuron (200 + 100 g ha-1 of i.a.) and glufosinate (600 g ha-1 of i.a.). EII and EIII evaluated the response of plants to herbicides at three stages of development as well as evaluation of chlorophyll a parameters and biometric data. In the first experiment, a variation in susceptibility to glyphosate was observed among the evaluated biotypes. In all evaluated biotypes the resistance factor was lower than 10. The evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence showed that the biotypes collected in Toledo1/PR and Cascavel/PR, treated with glyphosate, showed a recovery of the photosynthetic parameters evaluated, At 21 DAA, when compared to the control treatment. For all the biotypes the herbicide clethodim offered control superior to the 7 DAA when compared to the haloxifop. However, at 14 DAA the control of the biotypes exerted by the two herbicides was similar. For EII, the action of the systemic emergent powders showed high control efficiency (superior 80%) of the sourgrass. At the 3-4 leaf phenological stage, the control provided by the herbicides tested at 14 DAA, even at the lowest evaluated dose, was superior to 90%. At 21 DAA the control of 100% of the sourgrass plants was obtained. For EIII, the action of the contact herbicides provided severe damage to the aerial part of the sourgrass plants, especially those that were in the 3-4 leaf stage, when at the 7 DAA a 100% control was observed. In the other stages for the herbicides paraquat and the commercial mixture between paraquat + diuron the control above 95% was reached at 14 DAA and only for the herbicide glufosinate the recovery of the sourgrass plants was observed. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-16 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-05T12:00:57Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Felipe Cipriano da. Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle. 2017. 79 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental) - Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica-RJ, 2017. |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/4433 |
| identifier_str_mv |
SILVA, Felipe Cipriano da. Suscetibilidade de Digitaria insularis a herbicidas inibidores de EPSPs e ACCase e alternativas de controle. 2017. 79 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental) - Instituto de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica-RJ, 2017. |
| url |
https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/4433 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.references.por.fl_str_mv |
ADEGAS, F. S.; GAZZIERO, D. L. P.; VOLL, E.; OSIRE, R. Alternativas de controle qu?mico de. D. insularis resistente.Brasileiro, XXVII Congresso Daninhas, Plantas, p. 756?760, 2010. AMARANTES JR, O. P.; DOS SANTOS, T. C. R.; BRITO, N. M. Glifosato: Propriedades, toxicidade, usos e legisla??o. Qu?mica Nova, v. 25, n. 4, p. 589?593, 2002. ASHRAF, M. & HARRIS, P.J.C. Photosynthesis Under Stressful Environments. Photosynthetica, v.51, n. 2,p.163-190, 2013. BARROSO, A.A.M.; ALBRECHT, A.J.P.; REIS, F.C.; FILHO R.V Intera??o entre herbicidas inibidores da ACCase e diferentes formula??es de glyphosate no controle de capim-amargoso. Planta Daninha, Vi?osa-MG, v. 32, n. 3, p. 619-627, 2014. BENTHIEN, P.F. Engenharia gen?tica nos s?culos XIX e XX e a transgenia agr?cola no s?culo XXI. Theomi Journal. n.13. 2006. D?spon?vel em: http://revistatheomai. unq.edu.ar/NUMERO13/ArtFaraco1.htm. Acesso em 05/09/2016. BUCHANAN, B. B.; GRUISSEM, W.; JONES, R. L. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. CARPEJANI, M. S.; OLIVEIRA JR. Manejo qu?mico de capim-amargoso resistente a glyphosate na pr?-semeadura da soja. Campo Digital: Rev. Ci?ncias Exatas e da Terra e Ci?ncias agr?rias, v. 8, n. 1, p. 26?23, 2013. CARVALHO, L. B. de; CRUZ-HIPOLITO, H.; GONZ?LEZ-TORRALVA, F.; DA COSTA AGUIAR ALVES, P. L.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J.; DE PRADO, R. ) Biotypes Resistant to Glyphosate in Brazil. Weed Science, v. 59, n. 2, p. 171?176, 2011. CARVALHO, L. B. De; LUIS, P.; ALVES, A.; GONZA, F.; CRUZ-HIPOLITO, H. E.; MAR, A.; GIL-HUMANES, J.; BARRO, F. Pool of Resistance Mechanisms to Glyphosate in Digitaria insularis. Journal Agriculture and Food Chemistry. v.60. p. 615-622. 2012. CORREIA, B. I. A. M.; DURIGAN, J. C. Manejo qu?mico de plantas adultas de Digitaria insularis com glyphosate isolado e em mistura com chlorimuron-ethyl ou quizalofop-ptefuril em ?rea de plantio direto. Bragantia, v.68, n.3, p. 689?697, 2009. CHRISTOFFOLETI, P.J. & NICOLAI, M. Aspectos da resist?ncia de planta daninha a herbicidas. 4 ed. Piracicaba. Esalq, 2016. 262 p. 2016. CHRISTOFFOLETI,P.J.; NICOLAI, M.; DIAS, A.C.R.; MELO, M.S.C.; L?PEZOVEJERO, R.F.; GALLI, A.J. Avalia??o de suspeita de resist?ncia de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) ao herbicida glyphosate em pomares c?tricos no Estado de S?o Paulo - Brasil. In: Congresso da sociedad espa?ola de maleherbologia, 22., Congresso da asociaci?n latinoamericana de malezas, 19.; Congresso iberoamericano de ci?ncia de las malezas,2., 2009. Lisboa. Resumos... Lisboa: Funda??o Calouste Glubenkian, p. 533-536. 2009. CHRISTOFFOLETI, P.J. Curvas de dose-resposta de bi?tipos resistentes e suscet?vel de Bidens pilosa L. aos herbicidas inibidores da ALS. Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v.59, n.3, p.513-519, 2002. CONAB Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Boletim. Dispon?vel em: <http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/16_08_09_09_00_07_boletim_gra os_agosto_2016_.pdf. 2016. Acesso em 12/08/2016. 75 CORREIA, N.M.; LEITE, G.J. e GARCIA, L.D. Resposta de diferentes popula??es de Digitaria insularis ao herbicida glyphosate. Planta Daninha, Vi?osa-MG, v. 28, n. 4, p. 769-776, 2010. CORREIA, N.M.; DURIGAN, J.C. Manejo qu?mico de plantas adultas de Digitaria insularis com glyphosate isolado e em mistura com chlorimuron-ethyl ou quizalofop-ptefuril em ?rea de plantio direto. Revista Bragantia, v.68, n.3, p.689-697, 2009. COSTA, R.C.; GELAIN, E. Um estudo comparado referente aos custos de produ??o no cultivo da soja do tipo RR em rela??o ao cultivo da soja simplificada. Rev. Cienc. Gerenc. v.18, n.28, p. 71-77, 2014. DAYAN, F. E.; ZACCARO, M. L. M. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a marker for herbicide mechanisms of action. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v. 102 p. 189?197, 2012. DUKE, S. O. Overview of herbicides mechanism of action. Env. Health Persp., v. 87, p. 263-271, 1990. DUKE, S.O.; POWLES, S.B. Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pesticide Managenement Science, v. 64, p.319?325, 2008. FORNAROLLI, D.A.; GAZZIERO, D.L.P.; BONOTTO, A.T.; SANTOS, B.C.; SEBASTIANI,R.; BANDEIRA, S.A.E. Manejo de biot?pos de Digitaria insularis resistente ao herbicida glifosato. In: III Simp?sio internacional sobre glyphosate, Botucatu, SP, 2011.Resumos... Botucatu: UNESP, 2011. GAZZIERO, D. L. P.et al. Crit?rios para relatos oficiais estat?sticos de bi?tipos de plantas daninhas resistentes a herbicidas. In: GAZZIERO, D. L. P.; GALLI, A. J. B.; KARAM, D. (Eds.). Sete Lagoas: Sociedade Brasileira da Ci?ncia das Plantas Daninhas; Campinas: Associa??o Brasileira de A??o ? Resist?ncia de Plantas aos Herbicidas no Brasil, 22 p. 2008. GEMELLI, A.; SILV?RIO, R.; JR, D. O.; CONSTANTIN, J.; BRAGA, G. Aspectos da biologia de Digitaria insularis resistente ao glyphosate e implica??es para seu controle. Revista Bras. de Herbicidas v. 11, n.2, p. 231?240, 2012. GEMELLI, A.; SILV?RIO, R.; JR, D. O.; CONSTANTIN, J.; BRAGA, G. Estrat?gias para o controle de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) resistente ao glyphosate na cultura milho safrinha.Revista Bras. de Herbicidas. v.12, n.2, p. 162?170, 2013. GILO, E. G.; MENDON?A, C. G.; SANTO, T. L. E.; TEODORO, P. E. Alternatives for Chemical Management of Sourgrass. Biosciense Journal, v. 32, n. 2012, p. 881?889, 2016. GOVINDJEE; KERN, J. F.; MESSINGER, J.; WHITMARSH, Journal Photosystem II. eLS. 2010. URL: www.els.net. HARWOOD, J. L. Graminicides which inhibit lipid synthesis. Pest. Outlook, v. 10, n. 4, p. 154-158, 1999. HEAP, I. International survey of resistant weeds. Dispon?vel em http://www.weedscience.org/Summary/Country.aspx?CountryID=5. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2016. HESS,F.D.; FALK, R.H. Herbicide deposition on leaf surfaces. Weed Science, v.38, n.3, p. 280-288, 1990. HRAC ? BR. Mecanismo de a??o dos herbicidas. Dispon?vel em: <http://www.hracbr. com.br. Acesso em 12/09/2016. 76 ISSA ? International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Aplications. Reporton Global Status of Biotech/GM Crops - Dispon?vel em: http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/49/pptslides/pdf/B49-Slides-English.pdf Acesso em: 18 de abril de 2015. KAUNDUN, S. Resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase-inhibiting herbicides. Pest Management Science. West Sussex, v. 70, p. 1405-1417, 2014. KNEZEVIC, S.Z.; STREIBIG, J.C.; RITZ, C. Utilizing R software package for doseresponse studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technology, v.21, n.3, p.840-848, 2007. KNISS, A. R. & STREIBIG, J. C. Statistical Analysis of Agricultural Experiments with R. http://rstats4ag.org/2015. KRUSE, N.D.; TREZZI, M.M.; VIDAL, R.A. Herbicidas inibidores da EPSPs: revis?o de literatura. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, v.l, n.2, p. 139-146. 2000. LEA, P.J. The inhibition of ammonia assimilation: a mechanism of herbicide action. In: Baker, N. R.; Percival, M. P. (eds.). Herbicides. New York/Amsterdan: Elsevier. p. 267- 297, 1991. LEE, L.J.; NGIM, J. A first report of glyphosate-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica(L) Gaertn) in Malaysia. Pesticide Management Science., v.56, n.4, p.336-339, 2000. LICORINI, L. R.; GANDOLFO, M. A.; SORACE, M. A.; COSSA, C. A.; OSIPE, J. B. Identifica??o e controle de bi?tipos resistentes de Digitaria insularis ( L .) Fedde. v. 394, p. 141?147, 2015. LINGENFELTER, D. D.; CURRAN, W.S. Effect ofglyphosate and several ACCaseinhibitor herbicides onWirestem Muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) control. Weed Technology, v. 21, n. 3, p. 732-738, 2007. L?PEZ-OVEJERO, R.F. Resist?ncia de popula??es da planta daninha Digitaria ciliares (Retz.) Koel. A herbicidas inibidores da acetil coenzima A carboxilase (ACCase). Universidade de S?o Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, p. 101, Piracicaba, 2006. MACHADO, A. A.; CONCEI??O, A. R. WinStat ? Sistema de An?lise Estat?stica para Windows vers?o 1.0. Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 2007. MACHADO, A.F.L.; MEIRA, R.M.S.; FERREIRA, L.R.; FERREIRA, F.A.; TUFFI SANTOS, L.D.; FIALHO, C.M.T.; MACHADO, M.S Caracteriza??o anat?mica de folha, colmo e rizoma de Digitaria insularis. Planta Daninha, Vi?osa-MG, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2008. MARSHALL, G.; KIRKWOOD, R. C.; LEACH, G. E.Comparative studies on graminicideresistant and susceptiblebiotypes of Eleusine indica. Weed Resistence, v.34, n.3, p.177-185, 1994. MARTINAZZO, E.G.; PERBONI, A.T.; OLIVEIRA, P.V.; BIANCHI, V.J.; BACARIN, M.A.Atividade fotossint?tica em plantas de ameixeira submetidas ao d?ficit h?drico e ao alagamento. Ci?ncia Rural, v.43, n.1, 2013. MARTINS, J. F. Aspectos ecofisiol?gicos e gen?ticos de bi?tipos de Digitaria insularis resistente e suscet?vel ao glyphosate. 2013. p. 73. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Agronomia) Faculdade de Ci?ncias Agr?rias e Veterin?rias. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal. 77 2013. MARTINS, T. Herbicida Paraquat: conceitos, modo de a??o e doen?as relacionadas. Semina: Ci?ncias Biol?gicas e da Sa?de, Londrina, v. 34, n. 2, p. 175-186, jul./dez. 2013. MEEK, T. D.; VILLAFRANCA, J. J. Kinect mechanism of Escherichia coli glutamine synthetase. Biochemistry, v. 19, p. 5513-5519, 1980. MELO M.S.C. Alternativas de controle, ac?mulo de chiquimato e curva de crescimento de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) suscet?vel e resistente ao glyphosate. p 17-70, 2012. Disserta??o (Mestrado em ci?ncias ? ?rea Fitotecnia) ? Universidade de S?o Paulo Escola Superior de Agricultura ?Luiz de Queiroz?, 2011. MEROTTO JR, A. M.; WAGNER, J.; MENEGUZZI, C. Efeitos do herbicida glifosato e da aplica??o foliar de micronutrientes em soja transg?nica. Biosci Journal v.31, n.2, p. 499? 508, 2015. MELO, M. S.; MELO, C. De; ROSA, L. E.; AUGUSTO, C.; GROSSI, D. C.; NICOLAI, M.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Alternativas para o controle qu?mico de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis ) resistente ao glyphosate. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas. v. 11, n.2, p. 195?203, 2012. MICHITTE, P.; DE PRADO, R.; ESPINOZA, N.; RUIZ-SANTAELLA, J.P.; GAUVRIT, C. Mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate in a ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) biotype from Chile. Weed Sci., v.55, n.5, p.435-440, 2007. MONQUERO, P. A. Aspectos da biologia e manejo das plantas daninhas. Organiza??o: MONQUERO, P.A., 1 ed. Rima. S?o Carlos, SP, Sociedade Brasileira da Ci?ncia das Plantas Daninhas, 430p., 2014. MONQUERO, P.A. Plantas transg?nicas resistentes aos herbicidas: situa??o e perspectivas. Revista Bragantia. v.64, n.4, p.517-531, 2005. MOREIRA, M. S.; NICOLAI, M.; CARVALHO, S.J.P.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Resist?ncia de C. canadenses e C. bonariensis ao herbicida glifosato. Planta Daninha, v.25, n.1, p.157, 164, 2007. NICOLAI, M. MELO, M.S.C.; L?PEZ-OVEJERO, R.F.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P.J. Monitoramento de infesta??es de popula??es de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) suspeitas de resist?ncia ao glifosato.In: Congresso Brasileiro da Ci?ncia das Plantas Daninhas, 27. Ribeir?o Preto, SP. 2010. Resumos. Ribeir?o Preto: SBCPD, 2010, p.943- 946, 2010. OSUNA, M.,GOULART, I.C.G.R.; VIDAL, R.A.; KALSING, A. RUIZ SANTAELLA, J.P.; DE PRADO, R.Resistance to ACCase inhibitors in Eleusine indica from Brazil involves a target site mutation. Planta Daninha. v. 30, p. 675-681, 2012. PARREIRA, M.C.; ESPANHOL, M.; DUARTE, D.J.; CORREIA, N.M. Manejo qu?mico de Digitaria insularis em ?rea de plantio direto. Revista Brasileira Ci?ncias Agr?rias, v.5, n.1, p.13-17, 2010. POWLES, S.B.; YU, Q. Evolution in Action: Plants Resistant to Herbicides. Annual Review of Plant Biology, v. 61, p. 317?47, 2010. POWLES, S. B. & PRESTON, C. Evolved glyphosate resistance in plants: Biochemical and genetic basis of resistance. Weed Technology v.20, p.282?289. 2006. 78 PROC?PIO, S. O.; PIRES, F.R.; MENEZES, C.C.E.; BARROSO, A.L.L. Efeitos de dessecantes no controle deplantas daninhas na cultura da soja. Planta Daninha, v. 24,n. 1, p. 193-197, 2006. REINERT, C. S.; BEATRIZ, A.; ALMEIDA, C.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P. J. Curvas de doseresposta comparativas entre os bi?tipos resistente e suscet?vel de capim-amargoso ( Digitaria insularis ) ao herbicida glyphosate.Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas v. 12, n.3, p. 260?267, 2013. ROBERTO, M.; GELAIN, E. Um Estudo Comparado Referente aos Custos de Produ??o no Cultivo da Soja do Tipo RR em Rela??o ao Cultivo da Soja Simplificada.Revista Ciencias Gerenciales, v. 18, n. 28, p. 71?77, 2014. ROESSING, A. C.; LAZZAROTTO, J. J. Soja Transg?nica no Brasil: Situa??o Atual e Perspectivas para os Pr?ximos Anos. Reuni?o de Pesquisa de Soja da Regi?o Central do Brasil, p. 31 ? 32, 2006. ROMAN, E.S. Como funcionam os herbicidas: da biologia ? aplica??o. Passo Fundo: Gr?fica Editora Berthier, 2007. 160p. ROSO, A.C. & VIDAL, R. A. A Modified Phosphate-Carrier Protein Theory is Proposed as a Non-Target Site Mechanism For Glyphosate Resistance in Weeds. Planta Daninha, v. 28, p. 1175?1185, 2010. GON?ALVES, J. F. C.; SANTOS JR., U. M. Utilization of the chlorophyll a fluorescence technique as a tool for selecting tolerant species to environments of high irradiance. Brazilian Journal Plant Physiology, v. 17, p. 307-313, 2005. SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DA CI?NCIA DAS PLANTAS DANINHAS ? SBCPD. Procedimentos para instala??o, avalia??o e an?lise de experimentos com herbicidas. Londrina: SBCPD, 42 p. 1995. SOUSA, C.P.; PINTO, J.J.O.; MARTINAZZO, E.G., PERBONI, A.T.; FARIAS, M.E.; BACARIN, M.A. Chlorophyll a fluorescencein rice plants exposed of herbicide of group imidazolinone. Planta Daninha, v. 32, n. 1, p. 141-150, 2014a. SOUSA, C.P.; FARIAS, M.E.; SCHOCK, A.A.; BACARIN, M.A.Photosynthesis of soybean under the action of a photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide. Acta Physiology Plant, v.33, n. 11, p. 3051-3062, 2014b. STIRBET, A.; GOVINDJEE. On the relation between the Kautsky effect (chlorophyll a fluorescence induction) and Photosystem II: Basics and applications of the OJIP fluorescence transient. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, v. 104, p. 236?257, 2011. STIRBET, A.; GOVINDJEE. Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction: a personal perspective of the thermal phase, the J?I?P rise. Photosynth Research, v. 113, p.15?61. 2012. STRASSER, B.J.; STRASSER, R.J. Measuring fast fluorescence transients to address environmental question: the JIP test. In: MATHIS, P. (Ed.), Photosynthesis: From Light to Biosphere. Kluwer Academic Publisher. v. 5 p. 977?980, 1995. STRASSER, R.J.; TSIMILLI-MICHAEL, M.; SRIVASTAVA, A. Analysis of the Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. In: Papageorgiou, C., Govindjee, (Eds.), Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. Springer, Netherlands, p. 321?362, 2004. TAIZ L, ZEIGER E. Fisiologia Vegetal. 5ed. Porto alegre: Artmed, 918p. 2013. 79 TAKANO, H.K. et al. Estudos dos efeitos da adi??o do 2,4-D ao glyphosate para o controle de esp?cies de plantas daninhas de dif?cil controle. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 2013 (no prelo). THACH, L. B.; SHAPCOTT, A.; SCHMIDT, S.; CRITCHLEY, C. The OJIP fast fluorescence rise characterizes Graptophyllum species and their stress responses. Photosynthesis Research, v. 94, p. 423-436, 2007. TSIMILLI-MICHAEL,M; P?CHEUX, M.; STRASSER, R.J. Vitality and stress adaptation ofthe symbionts of coral reef and temperate foraminifers probedin hospite bythe fluorescence kinetics OJIP, Archs. Science Gen?ve, v.51, p.205?240. 1998. TROPALDI, L., VELINI, E. D., CARBONARI, C. A., ARALDI, R., CORNIANI, N., GIROTTO, M., & DE FREITAS, I. P. S. Detection of crabgrass species tolerance to photosystem II inhibitor herbicides using fluorescence technique. Ciencia Rural, v.45, n.5, p.767-774, 2015. TUFFI SANTOS, L.D.; MEIRA, R.M.S.A.; SANTOS, I.C.; FEREIRA, F.A. Efeito do glyphosate sobre a morfoanatomia das folhas e do caule de C. diffusa e C. benghalensis. Planta Daninha, v. 22, n. 1, p. 101-108, 2004. VARGAS, L. et al. Dose-Response curves of Lolium multiflorum Biotypes Resistant and Susceptible to Clethodim. Planta Daninha. Vi?osa, v. 31, p. 887-892, 2013. VIDAL, R.A.; Portes, E.S.; Lamego, F.P.; Trezzi,M.M. Resist?ncia de Eleusine indica aos inibidores de ACCase. Planta Daninha. Vi?osa, v. 24, p. 163-171, 2006. VILA-AIUB, M.M.; BALBI, M.C.; GUNDEL, P.E.; GHERSA, C.M.; POWLES, S.B. Evolution of glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glyphosateresistant soybean. Weed Sciense., v.55, n.6, p.566-571, 2007. WSSA ? Weed Sciense Society of America. Dispon?vel em http://wssa.net/wssa/weed/resistance/. Acesso em: 30 set. 2016. YAMASHITA, O. M.; GUIMAR?ES, S. C. Resist?ncia de plantas daninhas ao herbicida glyphosate. Revista Scientia Agr?rias, v. 03, n.1, p. 189?215, 2013. YUSUF, M.A.; KUMAR, D.; RAJWANSHI, R.; STRASSER, R.J.; TSIMILLI-MICHAEL, M.; GOVINDJEE; SARIN, N.B. Overexpression of ?-tocopherol methyl transferase gene in transgenic Brassica juncea plants alleviates abiotic stress: Physiological and chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, v. 1797, p. 1428-1438, 2010. ZOBIOLE, L.H.S.; KRENCHINSKI, F. H.; ALBRECHT, A. J. P. Perennial sourgrass control in full flowering growth stage. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, v. 15, n.2, p. 157? 164, 2016. |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
| dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Engenharia Agr?cola e Ambiental |
| dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRRJ |
| dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
| dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) instacron:UFRRJ |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
| instacron_str |
UFRRJ |
| institution |
UFRRJ |
| reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
| collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/4433/4/2017+-+Felipe+Cipriano+da+Silva.pdf.jpg http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/4433/3/2017+-+Felipe+Cipriano+da+Silva.pdf.txt http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/4433/5/2017+-+Felipe+Cipriano+da+Silva.pdf http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/4433/1/license.txt |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 3da5f260993f0a969450891f5d159bcd f467fa7a2223ea7ca8c7540e02153cd4 7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br |
| _version_ |
1800313521425088512 |