Aparelho repressivo de Estado : memórias da ditadura em Sergipe

• Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Thayza Souza
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFS
• Texto Completo: https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/5707
• topic: Análise do discurso; Discursos parlamentares; Ditadura militar; Prisioneiros políticos; Resistência ao governo; Ideologia; História do Brasil; História de Sergipe; Aparelho Repressivo de Estado; Discursos políticos; Formações Discursivas (FD); Formações Ideológicas (FI); Resistência; Discourse analysis; State Repressive Apparatus; Political speeches; Military dictatorship; Discursive Formations (DF); Ideological Formations (IF); Resistance; LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES

The present work aims at a discursive analysis of testimonies of ex-political prisoners of the era of military dictatorship in Brazil, specifically the state of Sergipe, with the intention of exploring resistance brands. To compose the study analyzed in relation to Milton Coelho and Wellington Mangueira, since they were names of extreme representation of the fight against the military dictatorship in Sergipe, experiencing a terrible experience of the prison and torture. This study has the theoretical basis of French Speech Discourse Analysis (DA), starting from the postulates of Pêcheux (1988), Althusser (1980), Orlandi (1996, 2007, 2008, 2009) and Carvalho (2012) and the contributions of Other scholars, both from DA, and the history of Brazil and Sergipe, an example of Napolitano (2014) and Dantas (2004). We understand discourse as a social practice that has as its materiality a language and is influenced by history and ideology, producing effects of meaning. To carry out analyzes, we will use a qualitative methodology, apply theoretical categories of DA and use as corpus reports found on websites, blogs and documentaries. As a result, in the speeches of Milton Coelho and Wellington Mangueira it was possible to perceive a contradiction of what was presented by the military, of not practicing torture, and also a resistance of the ex-prisoners, which is the same of the persecutions and tortures did not surrender their Comrades and kept up the fight for ideals by publishing newspapers circulating inside the university, counting what was vetoed in the newspapers of external circulation, meetings in hiding places and small groups to demonstrate discontent with the system. As the Ideological Formations (IF) of the dominant and the dominated became evident through the regulation of the State Repressive Apparatus (SRA). Throughout the account as linguistic clues they reveal the combat to a system that used by numerous methods to stop a subversive action. Significant silence figures through discursive formations (FD) the manifestations of resistance during persecution and torture, making it clear that even so of coercion, they continue to mean; Since silence does not represent the annulment of the senses, since the subject always means through the symbolic.