Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFS |
Texto Completo: | https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6296 |
Resumo: | The aim of this thesis is to analyze the effective possibilities of civilizing practices in the contemporary societies. For this, two fundamental hypotheses guided, so surreptitious but emphatic, the arguments of this analysis: the first would be the denial of the modern belief in the broad and inexorable powers of the rationality . both the rationality which pointed to their universally positive results, as that which was a scathing criticism of its inability to produce a civilly shared world; the second refers to the denial of a postmodern critical deconstruction of rationality, which resulted in the world of the relativism and the consequent configuration of the world without ethical appreciation. On occasion, we analyze the metaphysics that animated the modernity: the tireless attempt to separate the rationality from the negative influence of the irrationality data. However, not all thinkers surrendered to the rationalist project of the modernity. Freud, Arendt, Foucault, for example, realized that the combination of various disparate elements: it.s, simultaneously, rational and irrational; factual and evaluative; regular and contingent. It was these and other important authors who helped us to think about the second working hypothesis of this thesis, namely, that meaning of the terms modernity and civilization, as well as all the other terms relating to them, are constructed in their daily use, social practices, the collective shocks and political struggles. Thus, there is no meanings that precede their subscriptions in the world, i.e. the world is the result of the effect of each thing, each object, each process. With this, we are not saying that particular meaning of civilization cannot remain active in the orientation of collective conduct (of societies), as if we were denying the possibility of creating lasting consensus. We are not positioned in favor of the relativism; to the contrary, we have argued that, even in contemporary societies, can be viewed attempts to develop productive practices civilizing. Finally, what articulate such hypotheses is the understanding that the practices of any kind are studded end to end by relations of power, relation of force and interests, which provide the tone and texture of the scientific, social, political and cultural dynamics, which characterize, deeply, the development of the civilizing action. |
id |
UFS-2_ab67295353438596ad17da17f101c113 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ufs.br:riufs/6296 |
network_acronym_str |
UFS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Leal, Edilene Maria de CarvalhoBrüseke, Franz Josefhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/40041816101919142017-09-27T14:13:12Z2017-09-27T14:13:12Z2013-03-22https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6296The aim of this thesis is to analyze the effective possibilities of civilizing practices in the contemporary societies. For this, two fundamental hypotheses guided, so surreptitious but emphatic, the arguments of this analysis: the first would be the denial of the modern belief in the broad and inexorable powers of the rationality . both the rationality which pointed to their universally positive results, as that which was a scathing criticism of its inability to produce a civilly shared world; the second refers to the denial of a postmodern critical deconstruction of rationality, which resulted in the world of the relativism and the consequent configuration of the world without ethical appreciation. On occasion, we analyze the metaphysics that animated the modernity: the tireless attempt to separate the rationality from the negative influence of the irrationality data. However, not all thinkers surrendered to the rationalist project of the modernity. Freud, Arendt, Foucault, for example, realized that the combination of various disparate elements: it.s, simultaneously, rational and irrational; factual and evaluative; regular and contingent. It was these and other important authors who helped us to think about the second working hypothesis of this thesis, namely, that meaning of the terms modernity and civilization, as well as all the other terms relating to them, are constructed in their daily use, social practices, the collective shocks and political struggles. Thus, there is no meanings that precede their subscriptions in the world, i.e. the world is the result of the effect of each thing, each object, each process. With this, we are not saying that particular meaning of civilization cannot remain active in the orientation of collective conduct (of societies), as if we were denying the possibility of creating lasting consensus. We are not positioned in favor of the relativism; to the contrary, we have argued that, even in contemporary societies, can be viewed attempts to develop productive practices civilizing. Finally, what articulate such hypotheses is the understanding that the practices of any kind are studded end to end by relations of power, relation of force and interests, which provide the tone and texture of the scientific, social, political and cultural dynamics, which characterize, deeply, the development of the civilizing action.O objetivo central desta tese é analisar as possibilidades efetivas de práticas civilizatórias nas sociedades contemporâneas. Para isso, duas hipóteses fundamentais nortearam, de maneira sub-reptícia, mas enfática, as argumentações desta análise: a primeira seria a recusa da crença moderna nos poderes amplos e inexoráveis da racionalidade tanto daquela que apontava para seus resultados universalmente positivos, quanto da que consistia numa crítica mordaz à sua incapacidade de produzir um mundo civilizatoriamente compartilhado; a segunda refere-se à recusa de uma desconstrução crítica pós-moderna da racionalidade, que resultou no mundo do relativismo e da consequente configuração do mundo vazio de valoração ética. Na ocasião, analisamos a metafísica que animava a modernidade: a tentativa incansável de separar a racionalidade da influência negativa dos dados da irracionalidade. Entretanto, nem todos os pensadores se renderam ao projeto racionalista da modernidade. Freud, Arendt, Foucault, por exemplo, perceberam que o processo civilizatório é ontologicamente constituído pela mistura prática de vários elementos díspares: é, simultaneamente, racional e irracional; factual e valorativo; regular e contingente. Foram esses e outros importantes autores que nos ajudaram a pensar sobre a segunda hipótese de trabalho desta tese, ou seja, a de que o significado dos termos modernidade e civilização, bem como todos os outros termos que lhes são referentes, são construídos em seu uso cotidiano, nas práticas sociais, nos embates coletivos e nas lutas políticas. Sendo assim, não existem significados prévios às suas inscrições no mundo, ou seja, mundo é resultado do efeito de cada coisa, cada objeto, cada processo. Com isso, não se quer dizer que determinado significado de civilização não possa manter-se ativo na orientação de condutas coletivas (de sociedades), como se estivéssemos negando a possibilidade de constituição de consensos duradouros. Não nos posicionamos em favor do relativismo, ao contrário, temos defendido que, mesmo nas sociedades contemporâneas, podem ser visualizadas produtivas tentativas de elaboração de práticas civilizatórias. Por último, o que articula tais hipóteses é o entendimento de que as práticas, de qualquer natureza, são cravejadas de ponta a ponta por relações de poder, por relações de força e de interesses, que fornecem o tom e a textura das dinâmicas científicas, sociais, políticas e culturais, dinâmicas essas que caracterizam, sobremaneira, o desenvolvimento da ação civilizatória.application/pdfporCivilização modernaSociologia - TeoriaSistemas sociaisRazãoPráticas civilizatóriasModernidadeRelações de forçaRacionalidadeCivilization, ModernReasonSocial systemsSociologyCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIATeorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisPós-Graduação em Sociologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFSORIGINALEDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdfapplication/pdf2026727https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6296/1/EDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf18ac3d9744079df062e8d6d49d2d8a17MD51TEXTEDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf.txtEDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain987089https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6296/2/EDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf.txtb2cee1b1b98a182220e0df1068892ca4MD52THUMBNAILEDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf.jpgEDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1175https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6296/3/EDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf.jpg9f6320b9ac4ebf7177a23db144f84d78MD53riufs/62962019-07-30 21:01:08.85oai:ufs.br:riufs/6296Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://ri.ufs.br/oai/requestrepositorio@academico.ufs.bropendoar:2019-07-31T00:01:08Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas |
title |
Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas |
spellingShingle |
Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas Leal, Edilene Maria de Carvalho Civilização moderna Sociologia - Teoria Sistemas sociais Razão Práticas civilizatórias Modernidade Relações de força Racionalidade Civilization, Modern Reason Social systems Sociology CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
title_short |
Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas |
title_full |
Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas |
title_fullStr |
Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas |
title_sort |
Teorias sociológicas sobre a modernidade e práticas civilizatórias contemporâneas |
author |
Leal, Edilene Maria de Carvalho |
author_facet |
Leal, Edilene Maria de Carvalho |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal, Edilene Maria de Carvalho |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Brüseke, Franz Josef |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4004181610191914 |
contributor_str_mv |
Brüseke, Franz Josef |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Civilização moderna Sociologia - Teoria Sistemas sociais Razão Práticas civilizatórias Modernidade Relações de força Racionalidade |
topic |
Civilização moderna Sociologia - Teoria Sistemas sociais Razão Práticas civilizatórias Modernidade Relações de força Racionalidade Civilization, Modern Reason Social systems Sociology CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Civilization, Modern Reason Social systems Sociology |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
description |
The aim of this thesis is to analyze the effective possibilities of civilizing practices in the contemporary societies. For this, two fundamental hypotheses guided, so surreptitious but emphatic, the arguments of this analysis: the first would be the denial of the modern belief in the broad and inexorable powers of the rationality . both the rationality which pointed to their universally positive results, as that which was a scathing criticism of its inability to produce a civilly shared world; the second refers to the denial of a postmodern critical deconstruction of rationality, which resulted in the world of the relativism and the consequent configuration of the world without ethical appreciation. On occasion, we analyze the metaphysics that animated the modernity: the tireless attempt to separate the rationality from the negative influence of the irrationality data. However, not all thinkers surrendered to the rationalist project of the modernity. Freud, Arendt, Foucault, for example, realized that the combination of various disparate elements: it.s, simultaneously, rational and irrational; factual and evaluative; regular and contingent. It was these and other important authors who helped us to think about the second working hypothesis of this thesis, namely, that meaning of the terms modernity and civilization, as well as all the other terms relating to them, are constructed in their daily use, social practices, the collective shocks and political struggles. Thus, there is no meanings that precede their subscriptions in the world, i.e. the world is the result of the effect of each thing, each object, each process. With this, we are not saying that particular meaning of civilization cannot remain active in the orientation of collective conduct (of societies), as if we were denying the possibility of creating lasting consensus. We are not positioned in favor of the relativism; to the contrary, we have argued that, even in contemporary societies, can be viewed attempts to develop productive practices civilizing. Finally, what articulate such hypotheses is the understanding that the practices of any kind are studded end to end by relations of power, relation of force and interests, which provide the tone and texture of the scientific, social, political and cultural dynamics, which characterize, deeply, the development of the civilizing action. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2013-03-22 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-27T14:13:12Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-27T14:13:12Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6296 |
url |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6296 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Pós-Graduação em Sociologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFS instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) instacron:UFS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
instacron_str |
UFS |
institution |
UFS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6296/1/EDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6296/2/EDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf.txt https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/6296/3/EDILENE_M_CARVALHO_LEAL.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
18ac3d9744079df062e8d6d49d2d8a17 b2cee1b1b98a182220e0df1068892ca4 9f6320b9ac4ebf7177a23db144f84d78 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@academico.ufs.br |
_version_ |
1802110743719444480 |