O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFS |
Texto Completo: | http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/10884 |
Resumo: | This work advances a reinterpretation of the history of the development of Law in Western civilization, considering some aspects that have resulted in a significant gap between common law and civil law legal traditions. This gap is approached from the perspective of the legal rationalities that each of those traditions began to value at some point. In the case of the common law, we highlight the predominance of a rationality that honors the empirical reality and the adoption of techniques which value inductive models of reasoning. In this sense, we consider that some of those aspects can be of special usefulness in the context of reforms in Brazil’s civil procedural system. To exemplify the mechanics of precedent in a concrete legal situation, we conduct a case study of the transcripts of the oral arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, awaiting deliberation by the United States Supreme Court. We consider, nevertheless, some obstacles to the applicability of those traits within the Brazilian legal system: the first one, which has an operational nature, concerns the individualistic attitude of the judge; the second, which has a technical nature, refers to the legal uncertainty that the method of ‘balance of interests’ can promote in legal systems that grant binding force to judicial precedents. In order to synthesize all the ideas discussed, we offer an instrument, in the form of a scale, to measure the potential of a given judicial decision to constitute a judicial precedent. Lastly, we apply the proposed scale to the decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court in the judgment of Complaint 4.335/AC, aiming to assess its practical feasibility. |
id |
UFS-2_b181bf13e29b7977523fbeaf8e53e8d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ufs.br:riufs/10884 |
network_acronym_str |
UFS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rocha, Vinícius Andrade de CarvalhoBarros Filho, Clóvis Marinho de2019-04-03T15:00:47Z2019-04-03T15:00:47Z2018-02-21ROCHA, Vinícius Andrade de Carvalho. O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil. 2018. 149 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, 2018.http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/10884This work advances a reinterpretation of the history of the development of Law in Western civilization, considering some aspects that have resulted in a significant gap between common law and civil law legal traditions. This gap is approached from the perspective of the legal rationalities that each of those traditions began to value at some point. In the case of the common law, we highlight the predominance of a rationality that honors the empirical reality and the adoption of techniques which value inductive models of reasoning. In this sense, we consider that some of those aspects can be of special usefulness in the context of reforms in Brazil’s civil procedural system. To exemplify the mechanics of precedent in a concrete legal situation, we conduct a case study of the transcripts of the oral arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, awaiting deliberation by the United States Supreme Court. We consider, nevertheless, some obstacles to the applicability of those traits within the Brazilian legal system: the first one, which has an operational nature, concerns the individualistic attitude of the judge; the second, which has a technical nature, refers to the legal uncertainty that the method of ‘balance of interests’ can promote in legal systems that grant binding force to judicial precedents. In order to synthesize all the ideas discussed, we offer an instrument, in the form of a scale, to measure the potential of a given judicial decision to constitute a judicial precedent. Lastly, we apply the proposed scale to the decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court in the judgment of Complaint 4.335/AC, aiming to assess its practical feasibility.Este trabalho propõe uma releitura da história do desenvolvimento do Direito ocidental, levando em consideração alguns aspectos que resultaram em um distanciamento significativo entre as tradições jurídicas de common law e de civil law. Esse distanciamento é abordado da perspectiva das racionalidades jurídicas que cada uma das tradições passou a privilegiar. No caso do common law, destacamos a prevalência de uma racionalidade que prestigia a realidade empírica e a adoção de técnicas que valorizam modelos de argumentação indutivos. Nesse sentido, consideramos que alguns aspectos dessa racionalidade podem ser de especial serventia no contexto de reformas na sistemática processual civil brasileira. A fim de exemplificar a mecânica do precedente em uma situação jurídica concreta, procedemos a um estudo de caso da audiência para sustentações orais em Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, que aguardava deliberação da Suprema Corte norte-americana. Consideramos, não obstante, alguns obstáculos à aplicação desses aspectos no âmbito do sistema jurídico brasileiro: o primeiro deles, de caráter operacional, diz respeito à postura individualista do juiz; o segundo, de caráter técnico, reporta-se à incerteza jurídica que a técnica de ponderação de interesses pode promover em sistemas que incentivam a valorização do precedente. Buscando sintetizar todas as ideias expostas, propomos um instrumento, na forma de escala, para a aferição do potencial de formação de precedente em uma determinada decisão judicial. Por fim, aplicamos a escala proposta à decisão do STF no julgamento da Reclamação 4.335/AC, com vistas a avaliar a sua viabilidade prática.São Cristóvão, SEporHistória do direitoEmpirismoRevisão judicialPrecedentes judiciaisEstudo de casosInduçãoPrecedenteSistema jurídicoTradição jurídicaEmpiricismInductionPrecedentLegal systemLegal traditionCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOO direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisPós-Graduação em DireitoUniversidade Federal de Sergipereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEXTVINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf.txtVINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain388591https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/10884/3/VINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf.txtdb3eaf3944e2ba340bd01a804eda8dc8MD53THUMBNAILVINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf.jpgVINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1365https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/10884/4/VINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf.jpg87943343a845d4887b2a7b7acaa6c4efMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81475https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/10884/1/license.txt098cbbf65c2c15e1fb2e49c5d306a44cMD51ORIGINALVINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdfVINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdfapplication/pdf962892https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/10884/2/VINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf246ced5a4ed8724f7ca3d38b794488c9MD52riufs/108842019-04-03 12:00:47.65oai:ufs.br:riufs/10884TElDRU7Dh0EgREUgRElTVFJJQlVJw4fDg08gTsODTy1FWENMVVNJVkEKCkNvbSBhIGFwcmVzZW50YcOnw6NvIGRlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCB2b2PDqiAobyBhdXRvcihlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgRmVkZXJhbCBkZSBTZXJnaXBlIG8gZGlyZWl0byBuw6NvLWV4Y2x1c2l2byBkZSByZXByb2R1emlyIHNldSB0cmFiYWxobyBubyBmb3JtYXRvIGVsZXRyw7RuaWNvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBGZWRlcmFsIGRlIFNlcmdpcGUgcG9kZSwgc2VtIGFsdGVyYXIgbyBjb250ZcO6ZG8sIHRyYW5zcG9yIHNldSB0cmFiYWxobyBwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIEZlZGVyYWwgZGUgU2VyZ2lwZSBwb2RlIG1hbnRlciBtYWlzIGRlIHVtYSBjw7NwaWEgZGUgc2V1IHRyYWJhbGhvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIHNldSB0cmFiYWxobyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyBuZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYS4gVm9jw6ogdGFtYsOpbSBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0bywgcXVlIHNlamEgZGUgc2V1IGNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgbsOjbyBpbmZyaW5nZSBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBkZSBuaW5ndcOpbS4KCkNhc28gbyB0cmFiYWxobyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBvYnRldmUgYSBwZXJtaXNzw6NvIGlycmVzdHJpdGEgZG8gZGV0ZW50b3IgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIHBhcmEgY29uY2VkZXIgw6AgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIEZlZGVyYWwgZGUgU2VyZ2lwZSBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhcHJlc2VudGFkb3MgbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIGUgcXVlIGVzc2UgbWF0ZXJpYWwgZGUgcHJvcHJpZWRhZGUgZGUgdGVyY2Vpcm9zIGVzdMOhIGNsYXJhbWVudGUgaWRlbnRpZmljYWRvIGUgcmVjb25oZWNpZG8gbm8gdGV4dG8gb3Ugbm8gY29udGXDumRvLgoKQSBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgRmVkZXJhbCBkZSBTZXJnaXBlIHNlIGNvbXByb21ldGUgYSBpZGVudGlmaWNhciBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIG8gc2V1IG5vbWUocykgb3UgbyhzKSBub21lKHMpIGRvKHMpIApkZXRlbnRvcihlcykgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRvIHRyYWJhbGhvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIGNvbmNlZGlkYXMgcG9yIGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIAo=Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://ri.ufs.br/oai/requestrepositorio@academico.ufs.bropendoar:2019-04-03T15:00:47Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil |
title |
O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil |
spellingShingle |
O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil Rocha, Vinícius Andrade de Carvalho História do direito Empirismo Revisão judicial Precedentes judiciais Estudo de casos Indução Precedente Sistema jurídico Tradição jurídica Empiricism Induction Precedent Legal system Legal tradition CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil |
title_full |
O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil |
title_fullStr |
O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil |
title_sort |
O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil |
author |
Rocha, Vinícius Andrade de Carvalho |
author_facet |
Rocha, Vinícius Andrade de Carvalho |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Vinícius Andrade de Carvalho |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Barros Filho, Clóvis Marinho de |
contributor_str_mv |
Barros Filho, Clóvis Marinho de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
História do direito Empirismo Revisão judicial Precedentes judiciais Estudo de casos Indução Precedente Sistema jurídico Tradição jurídica |
topic |
História do direito Empirismo Revisão judicial Precedentes judiciais Estudo de casos Indução Precedente Sistema jurídico Tradição jurídica Empiricism Induction Precedent Legal system Legal tradition CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Empiricism Induction Precedent Legal system Legal tradition |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
This work advances a reinterpretation of the history of the development of Law in Western civilization, considering some aspects that have resulted in a significant gap between common law and civil law legal traditions. This gap is approached from the perspective of the legal rationalities that each of those traditions began to value at some point. In the case of the common law, we highlight the predominance of a rationality that honors the empirical reality and the adoption of techniques which value inductive models of reasoning. In this sense, we consider that some of those aspects can be of special usefulness in the context of reforms in Brazil’s civil procedural system. To exemplify the mechanics of precedent in a concrete legal situation, we conduct a case study of the transcripts of the oral arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, awaiting deliberation by the United States Supreme Court. We consider, nevertheless, some obstacles to the applicability of those traits within the Brazilian legal system: the first one, which has an operational nature, concerns the individualistic attitude of the judge; the second, which has a technical nature, refers to the legal uncertainty that the method of ‘balance of interests’ can promote in legal systems that grant binding force to judicial precedents. In order to synthesize all the ideas discussed, we offer an instrument, in the form of a scale, to measure the potential of a given judicial decision to constitute a judicial precedent. Lastly, we apply the proposed scale to the decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court in the judgment of Complaint 4.335/AC, aiming to assess its practical feasibility. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-21 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-03T15:00:47Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-03T15:00:47Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
ROCHA, Vinícius Andrade de Carvalho. O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil. 2018. 149 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/10884 |
identifier_str_mv |
ROCHA, Vinícius Andrade de Carvalho. O direito e o caso : aportes para uma teoria do precedente judicial no Brasil. 2018. 149 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, 2018. |
url |
http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/10884 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Pós-Graduação em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFS instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) instacron:UFS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
instacron_str |
UFS |
institution |
UFS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/10884/3/VINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf.txt https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/10884/4/VINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf.jpg https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/10884/1/license.txt https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/10884/2/VINICIUS_ANDRADE_CARVALHO_ROCHA.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
db3eaf3944e2ba340bd01a804eda8dc8 87943343a845d4887b2a7b7acaa6c4ef 098cbbf65c2c15e1fb2e49c5d306a44c 246ced5a4ed8724f7ca3d38b794488c9 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@academico.ufs.br |
_version_ |
1802110781396877312 |