Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Katálysis (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/6043 |
Resumo: | This article discusses the main aspects of social projects appraisal against the background of a review of the pertinent literature. From this review, the main concepts and perceptions in relation to the appraisal of social projects are formulated. The ways in which appraisers of non-governamental institutions evaluate social projects are identified. Difficulties concerning project appraisal in relation to the three Es (Efficiency, Efficacy and Effectiveness) are found to exist in social sciences, due to (i) lack of theoretical studies and conceptual clarity, and (ii) lack of specific methodological procedures and strategies on which to base the appraisal process. |
id |
UFSC-10_8d47e999af06a8c2ee3194c4026f3cae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/6043 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projectsCritérios adotados pelos avaliadores de instituições não-governamentais financiadoras de projetos sociaisThis article discusses the main aspects of social projects appraisal against the background of a review of the pertinent literature. From this review, the main concepts and perceptions in relation to the appraisal of social projects are formulated. The ways in which appraisers of non-governamental institutions evaluate social projects are identified. Difficulties concerning project appraisal in relation to the three Es (Efficiency, Efficacy and Effectiveness) are found to exist in social sciences, due to (i) lack of theoretical studies and conceptual clarity, and (ii) lack of specific methodological procedures and strategies on which to base the appraisal process.Discutem-se ao longo deste documento os principais aspectos da avaliação de projetos sociais. Procede-se um resgate na literatura, por meio do qual contextualiza-se a avaliação. A partir deste resgate, são levantados os principais conceitos e percepções em relação à avaliação de projetos sociais. Identifica-se a forma como os avaliadores de instituições não-governamentais financiadoras de projetos sociais vêm avaliando estes projetos. Depreende-se que no universo da avaliação de projetos sociais impera a dificuldade de avaliar se os projetos são executados com eficiência, eficácia e efetividade, diante da ausência de estudos teóricos e de clareza conceitual, como também de procedimentos metodológicos e de estratégias específicas para avaliar os projetos executados por organizações sociais.Revista KatálysisRevista KatálysisRevista Katálysis2002-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/6043Revista Katálysis; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2002): Organizações e gestão de políticas sociais; 125-132Revista Katálysis; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2002): Organizações e gestão de políticas sociais; 125-132Revista Katálysis; v. 5 n. 2 (2002): Organizações e gestão de políticas sociais; 125-1321982-02591414-4980reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/6043/5604Copyright (c) 2020 Ieda Frassoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrasson, Ieda2022-11-21T14:18:18Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/6043Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/oairevistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com1982-02591414-4980opendoar:2022-11-21T14:18:18Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects Critérios adotados pelos avaliadores de instituições não-governamentais financiadoras de projetos sociais |
title |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects |
spellingShingle |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects Frasson, Ieda |
title_short |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects |
title_full |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects |
title_fullStr |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects |
title_sort |
Criteria adopted by appraisers of not-governmental institutions financing social projects |
author |
Frasson, Ieda |
author_facet |
Frasson, Ieda |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Frasson, Ieda |
description |
This article discusses the main aspects of social projects appraisal against the background of a review of the pertinent literature. From this review, the main concepts and perceptions in relation to the appraisal of social projects are formulated. The ways in which appraisers of non-governamental institutions evaluate social projects are identified. Difficulties concerning project appraisal in relation to the three Es (Efficiency, Efficacy and Effectiveness) are found to exist in social sciences, due to (i) lack of theoretical studies and conceptual clarity, and (ii) lack of specific methodological procedures and strategies on which to base the appraisal process. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/6043 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/6043 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/6043/5604 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ieda Frasson info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ieda Frasson |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2002): Organizações e gestão de políticas sociais; 125-132 Revista Katálysis; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2002): Organizações e gestão de políticas sociais; 125-132 Revista Katálysis; v. 5 n. 2 (2002): Organizações e gestão de políticas sociais; 125-132 1982-0259 1414-4980 reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
collection |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1789434934803300352 |