Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Katálysis (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592017v20n3p390 |
Resumo: | This article problematizes the concepts and meanings of academic-scientific research and research in services or associated to professional work. Its relevance is inherent to the fact that current research for Brazilian social work is understood as a professional attribution that is expressed in education and work. The methodology uses an exploratory study and works with bibliographic analysis based on locating, compiling and summarizing materials organized in the two lines of the study: research and production of knowledge in the field of social work; research and professional work. Results point to the reduction of academic research, activities of systematization and the need to expand discussions about research to undergraduate studies in social work to allow breaking the marks of academicism and “unidisciplinarity”. |
id |
UFSC-10_b5a1b5d72c410bb61384ecb907870bca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/48773 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticismsPesquisa em Serviço Social: concepções e críticasThis article problematizes the concepts and meanings of academic-scientific research and research in services or associated to professional work. Its relevance is inherent to the fact that current research for Brazilian social work is understood as a professional attribution that is expressed in education and work. The methodology uses an exploratory study and works with bibliographic analysis based on locating, compiling and summarizing materials organized in the two lines of the study: research and production of knowledge in the field of social work; research and professional work. Results point to the reduction of academic research, activities of systematization and the need to expand discussions about research to undergraduate studies in social work to allow breaking the marks of academicism and “unidisciplinarity”.O artigo objetiva problematizar as concepções e os significados de pesquisa acadêmico-científica e pesquisa em serviços. Sua relevância é inerente ao fato de que a pesquisa para o Serviço Social brasileiro, na atualidade, é entendida como atribuição profissional que se expressa na formação e no trabalho. Metodologicamente recorreu-se a pesquisa bibliográfica realizada em livros, revistas acadêmicocientíficas, dissertações e teses na área de Serviço Social que abordam os seguintes eixos que também compõem o roteiro do estudo: pesquisa e produção de conhecimentos em Serviço Social; pesquisa e trabalho profissional. Os resultados apontam que o Serviço Social, enquanto área produtora de conhecimentos, insiste no questionamento e enfrentamento da cultura dominante, embora afetado pela realidade capitalista que dialeticamente o impulsiona em dados momentos a reduzir a pesquisa a sistematizações de levantamentos. Além disso, há necessidade de ampliar as discussões da pesquisa para graduação em Serviço Social como possibilidade de romper o academicismo e a unidisciplina.Revista KatálysisRevista KatálysisRevista Katálysis2017-10-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592017v20n3p39010.1590/1982-02592017v20n3p390Revista Katálysis; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2017): Ética e política; 390-399Revista Katálysis; Vol. 20 Núm. 3 (2017): Ética e política; 390-399Revista Katálysis; v. 20 n. 3 (2017): Ética e política; 390-3991982-02591414-4980reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592017v20n3p390/35092Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza2017-10-23T17:20:58Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/48773Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/oairevistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com1982-02591414-4980opendoar:2017-10-23T17:20:58Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms Pesquisa em Serviço Social: concepções e críticas |
title |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms |
spellingShingle |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza |
title_short |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms |
title_full |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms |
title_fullStr |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms |
title_sort |
Research in Social Work: Conceptions and criticisms |
author |
Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza |
author_facet |
Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes, Carlos Antonio de Souza |
description |
This article problematizes the concepts and meanings of academic-scientific research and research in services or associated to professional work. Its relevance is inherent to the fact that current research for Brazilian social work is understood as a professional attribution that is expressed in education and work. The methodology uses an exploratory study and works with bibliographic analysis based on locating, compiling and summarizing materials organized in the two lines of the study: research and production of knowledge in the field of social work; research and professional work. Results point to the reduction of academic research, activities of systematization and the need to expand discussions about research to undergraduate studies in social work to allow breaking the marks of academicism and “unidisciplinarity”. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592017v20n3p390 10.1590/1982-02592017v20n3p390 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592017v20n3p390 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-02592017v20n3p390 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592017v20n3p390/35092 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraes info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Antonio de Souza Moraes |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2017): Ética e política; 390-399 Revista Katálysis; Vol. 20 Núm. 3 (2017): Ética e política; 390-399 Revista Katálysis; v. 20 n. 3 (2017): Ética e política; 390-399 1982-0259 1414-4980 reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
collection |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1789434940758163456 |