Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Peixoto, Fernanda Maciel
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Amaral, Hudson Fernandes, Correia, Laise Ferraz, das Neves, João Carlos Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências da Administração
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n39p119
Resumo: This research investigated whether the corporate governance mechanisms, according to Agency Theory, can take on distinct amounts of significance in different economic cycles. The period studied was 2000-2009, segmenting it into: local crises (2000-2002), no crisis (2003-2007), and global crisis (2008-2009). The governance mechanisms studied were: ownership structure, board of directors, compensation to managers, transparency and protection of minority shareholders. The methodology involved: (a) principal component analysis, aggregating in an indicator a set of governance variables; (b) reorganization of components to verify the contribution of each governance dimensions in the index. It was found that ownership structure mechanism was less relevant for the whole period. In the period of local crises, the most important dimension of governance was the compensation to managers. In periods of non-crisis and global crisis, the most relevant mechanism was protection of shareholders. Transparency was less important during the study and board was less relevant than compensation and protection.
id UFSC-15_88323c08fc349f6a74694aae6c523fa0
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28308
network_acronym_str UFSC-15
network_name_str Revista de Ciências da Administração
repository_id_str
spelling Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cyclesGovernança Corporativa e Crises: mecanismos importantes durante ciclos econômicos distintosThis research investigated whether the corporate governance mechanisms, according to Agency Theory, can take on distinct amounts of significance in different economic cycles. The period studied was 2000-2009, segmenting it into: local crises (2000-2002), no crisis (2003-2007), and global crisis (2008-2009). The governance mechanisms studied were: ownership structure, board of directors, compensation to managers, transparency and protection of minority shareholders. The methodology involved: (a) principal component analysis, aggregating in an indicator a set of governance variables; (b) reorganization of components to verify the contribution of each governance dimensions in the index. It was found that ownership structure mechanism was less relevant for the whole period. In the period of local crises, the most important dimension of governance was the compensation to managers. In periods of non-crisis and global crisis, the most relevant mechanism was protection of shareholders. Transparency was less important during the study and board was less relevant than compensation and protection.Esta pesquisa investigou se os mecanismos de governança corporativa, segundo a Teoria da Agência, assumem importâncias distintas em diferentes ciclos econômicos. O período foi de   2000 a 2009, segmentado em: crises locais (2000-2002); não crise (2003-2007); e crise global (2008-2009). Os mecanismos de governança analisados foram: estrutura de propriedade, conselhos de administração, compensação aos gestores, transparência e proteção aos minoritários. A metodologia envolveu: (a) análise de componentes principais, agregando em um indicador um conjunto de variáveis de governança; (b) reorganização dos componentes para verificar a contribuição das dimensões de governança no índice. Constatou-se que estrutura de propriedade foi o mecanismo menos relevante no período. Durante as crises locais, a dimensão de governança mais importante foi compensação aos gestores. Nos períodos de não crise e de crise global, o mecanismo mais relevante foi proteção aos minoritários. Transparência se mostrou gradativamente menos importante e conselho foi menos relevante do que  compensação e  proteção.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2014-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Teórico-Empíricaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n39p11910.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n39p119Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.16 N.39 Agosto 2014; 119 - 1332175-80771516-3865reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n39p119/pdf_22Peixoto, Fernanda MacielAmaral, Hudson FernandesCorreia, Laise Ferrazdas Neves, João Carlos Carvalhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-20T19:08:34Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28308Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/admPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/oairevista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br2175-80771516-3865opendoar:2018-06-20T19:08:34Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles
Governança Corporativa e Crises: mecanismos importantes durante ciclos econômicos distintos
title Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles
spellingShingle Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles
Peixoto, Fernanda Maciel
title_short Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles
title_full Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles
title_fullStr Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles
title_full_unstemmed Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles
title_sort Corporate Governance and Crises: important mechanisms during different economic cycles
author Peixoto, Fernanda Maciel
author_facet Peixoto, Fernanda Maciel
Amaral, Hudson Fernandes
Correia, Laise Ferraz
das Neves, João Carlos Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Amaral, Hudson Fernandes
Correia, Laise Ferraz
das Neves, João Carlos Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Peixoto, Fernanda Maciel
Amaral, Hudson Fernandes
Correia, Laise Ferraz
das Neves, João Carlos Carvalho
description This research investigated whether the corporate governance mechanisms, according to Agency Theory, can take on distinct amounts of significance in different economic cycles. The period studied was 2000-2009, segmenting it into: local crises (2000-2002), no crisis (2003-2007), and global crisis (2008-2009). The governance mechanisms studied were: ownership structure, board of directors, compensation to managers, transparency and protection of minority shareholders. The methodology involved: (a) principal component analysis, aggregating in an indicator a set of governance variables; (b) reorganization of components to verify the contribution of each governance dimensions in the index. It was found that ownership structure mechanism was less relevant for the whole period. In the period of local crises, the most important dimension of governance was the compensation to managers. In periods of non-crisis and global crisis, the most relevant mechanism was protection of shareholders. Transparency was less important during the study and board was less relevant than compensation and protection.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Teórico-Empírica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n39p119
10.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n39p119
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n39p119
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n39p119
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n39p119/pdf_22
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.16 N.39 Agosto 2014; 119 - 133
2175-8077
1516-3865
reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administração
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências da Administração
collection Revista de Ciências da Administração
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435142116212736