Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crozara, Luciano Fernandes
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Sponton, Amanda Christine da Silva, Jarrete, Aline Pincerato, Araujo, Hygor Nunes, Huamaní, Oscar Gutiérrez, Fernandes, Rômulo Araújo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p514
Resumo: The mistaken use of biostatistics in scientific research involves methodological errors both in the research itself as in its analyses. Among these, the lack of sample size calculation, considered essential for validation and credibility of results, is often found. The aim of the study was to determine how often sample size calculation is used in articles published in Physical Education national journals. The study included only national scientific journals ranked as A1 and B2 by the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), which analyzed only articles available in full and published in the period from 2010 to 2012. Review articles, letter to the editor, points of view and original articles that did not perform any statistical analysis were excluded. Approximately 15 % of articles analyzed performed sample size calculation and no difference between these proportions over the years were identified. Differences between Physical Education subareas (education, health and sport) were observed, being lower in sport (p = 0.001) compared to other subareas. Journals classified as B2 showed higher use of sample size calculation in relation to those classified as B1 (p = 0.013) and A2 (p = 0.007). The use of sample size calculation in scientific research published in Physical Education national journals in the period from 2010 to 2012 was not satisfactory, especially in sport subarea. Moreover, no evolution on the use of sample size calculation over the years analyzed was observed.
id UFSC-16_252645723370002078418aa1196d016d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/31071
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journalsEmprego do cálculo amostral em pesquisas científicas de periódicos nacionais de Educação FísicaThe mistaken use of biostatistics in scientific research involves methodological errors both in the research itself as in its analyses. Among these, the lack of sample size calculation, considered essential for validation and credibility of results, is often found. The aim of the study was to determine how often sample size calculation is used in articles published in Physical Education national journals. The study included only national scientific journals ranked as A1 and B2 by the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), which analyzed only articles available in full and published in the period from 2010 to 2012. Review articles, letter to the editor, points of view and original articles that did not perform any statistical analysis were excluded. Approximately 15 % of articles analyzed performed sample size calculation and no difference between these proportions over the years were identified. Differences between Physical Education subareas (education, health and sport) were observed, being lower in sport (p = 0.001) compared to other subareas. Journals classified as B2 showed higher use of sample size calculation in relation to those classified as B1 (p = 0.013) and A2 (p = 0.007). The use of sample size calculation in scientific research published in Physical Education national journals in the period from 2010 to 2012 was not satisfactory, especially in sport subarea. Moreover, no evolution on the use of sample size calculation over the years analyzed was observed.O emprego equivocado da bioestatística nas pesquisas científicas implica em erros metodológicos tanto na condução quanto nas análises das mesmas. Dentre estes, a ausência do cálculo amostral, considerado primordial para validação e credibilidade dos resultados, é frequentemente encontrado. O objetivo do estudo foi verificar com que frequência o cálculo amostral é empregado nos artigos publicados em periódicos nacionais de Educação Física. Foram incluídos no estudo somente periódicos científicos nacionais classificados entre A1 e B2 pela Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), dos quais foram analisados somente artigos originais disponíveis na íntegra e publicados no período de 2010 a 2012. Foram excluídos do estudo artigos de revisão, carta ao editor, ponto de vista e artigos originais que não realizaram nenhum tipo de análise estatística. Aproximadamente 15% dos artigos analisados realizaram cálculo amostral; não houve diferença entre as proporções destes ao longo dos anos. Observou-se diferença entre as subáreas da Educação Física (educação, saúde e esporte), sendo menor na subárea esporte (p=0,001) em relação às demais. Os periódicos classificados como B2 apresentaram maior uso do cálculo amostral em relação àqueles classificados como B1 (p=0,013) e A2 (p=0,007). O emprego do cálculo amostral em pesquisas científicas publicadas em periódicos nacionais de Educação Física no período de 2010 a 2012 não foi satisfatório, especialmente na subárea esporte. Além disso, não foi observada uma evolução do uso do cálculo amostral ao longo dos anos analisados.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2014-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Descriptive; ComparativeAvaliado por ParesDescritiva; Comparativaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p51410.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n5p514Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 16 No. 5 (2014); 514-521Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 16 n. 5 (2014); 514-5211980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p514/27555Crozara, Luciano FernandesSponton, Amanda Christine da SilvaJarrete, Aline PinceratoAraujo, Hygor NunesHuamaní, Oscar GutiérrezFernandes, Rômulo Araújoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-05T08:23:32Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/31071Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2018-12-05T08:23:32Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals
Emprego do cálculo amostral em pesquisas científicas de periódicos nacionais de Educação Física
title Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals
spellingShingle Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals
Crozara, Luciano Fernandes
title_short Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals
title_full Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals
title_fullStr Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals
title_full_unstemmed Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals
title_sort Use of sample size calculation in scientific research in Brazilian Physical Education journals
author Crozara, Luciano Fernandes
author_facet Crozara, Luciano Fernandes
Sponton, Amanda Christine da Silva
Jarrete, Aline Pincerato
Araujo, Hygor Nunes
Huamaní, Oscar Gutiérrez
Fernandes, Rômulo Araújo
author_role author
author2 Sponton, Amanda Christine da Silva
Jarrete, Aline Pincerato
Araujo, Hygor Nunes
Huamaní, Oscar Gutiérrez
Fernandes, Rômulo Araújo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crozara, Luciano Fernandes
Sponton, Amanda Christine da Silva
Jarrete, Aline Pincerato
Araujo, Hygor Nunes
Huamaní, Oscar Gutiérrez
Fernandes, Rômulo Araújo
description The mistaken use of biostatistics in scientific research involves methodological errors both in the research itself as in its analyses. Among these, the lack of sample size calculation, considered essential for validation and credibility of results, is often found. The aim of the study was to determine how often sample size calculation is used in articles published in Physical Education national journals. The study included only national scientific journals ranked as A1 and B2 by the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), which analyzed only articles available in full and published in the period from 2010 to 2012. Review articles, letter to the editor, points of view and original articles that did not perform any statistical analysis were excluded. Approximately 15 % of articles analyzed performed sample size calculation and no difference between these proportions over the years were identified. Differences between Physical Education subareas (education, health and sport) were observed, being lower in sport (p = 0.001) compared to other subareas. Journals classified as B2 showed higher use of sample size calculation in relation to those classified as B1 (p = 0.013) and A2 (p = 0.007). The use of sample size calculation in scientific research published in Physical Education national journals in the period from 2010 to 2012 was not satisfactory, especially in sport subarea. Moreover, no evolution on the use of sample size calculation over the years analyzed was observed.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-07-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares",
Descriptive; Comparative
Avaliado por Pares
Descritiva; Comparativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p514
10.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n5p514
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p514
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n5p514
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p514/27555
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 16 No. 5 (2014); 514-521
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 16 n. 5 (2014); 514-521
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435123567951872