Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159 |
Resumo: | Different training levels, combined with experience in performing exhaustive exercise, may produce different sensations of fatigue. The objective of this study was to compare the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) between cyclists and non-cyclists during a maximal incremental test (ITMAX). Twenty-three subjects were recruited and divided into a cyclist group (CG) (n = 12; age: 26.5 ± 4.7 years, body weight: 68.2 ± 11kg, height: 176 ± 8.6 cm) and a non-cyclist group (NCG) (n = 11; 25.2 ± 4.0 years, body weight: 72.9 ± 9 kg, height: 175.1 ± 6.3 cm). All subjects performed an ITMAX until exhaustion on a cycling simulator, starting at 0 W and with increments of 20 W.min-1. RPE was measured at 30-second intervals during ITMAX and the maximal power output (PMAX) of each subject was also recorded. The total time of each test was normalized to the percentage of completed trial (10% to 100%, intervals of 10%), and the corresponding RPE was recorded. PMAX was 368 ± 12.7 W and 256 ± 11.2 W for CG and NCG, respectively (P < 0.01). No significant difference in median RPE was observed between groups at any time point. In conclusion, RPE responses did not differ between CG and NCG during ITMAX, suggesting that training level does not influence RPE. |
id |
UFSC-16_2cba7aabb782f6e97c96bae96f8d8117 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/12960 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental testO nível de treinamento não influencia a percepção subjetiva de esforço durante um teste incrementalDifferent training levels, combined with experience in performing exhaustive exercise, may produce different sensations of fatigue. The objective of this study was to compare the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) between cyclists and non-cyclists during a maximal incremental test (ITMAX). Twenty-three subjects were recruited and divided into a cyclist group (CG) (n = 12; age: 26.5 ± 4.7 years, body weight: 68.2 ± 11kg, height: 176 ± 8.6 cm) and a non-cyclist group (NCG) (n = 11; 25.2 ± 4.0 years, body weight: 72.9 ± 9 kg, height: 175.1 ± 6.3 cm). All subjects performed an ITMAX until exhaustion on a cycling simulator, starting at 0 W and with increments of 20 W.min-1. RPE was measured at 30-second intervals during ITMAX and the maximal power output (PMAX) of each subject was also recorded. The total time of each test was normalized to the percentage of completed trial (10% to 100%, intervals of 10%), and the corresponding RPE was recorded. PMAX was 368 ± 12.7 W and 256 ± 11.2 W for CG and NCG, respectively (P < 0.01). No significant difference in median RPE was observed between groups at any time point. In conclusion, RPE responses did not differ between CG and NCG during ITMAX, suggesting that training level does not influence RPE.Níveis de treinamento distintos, associados à experiência em realizar esforços exaustivos podem produzir diferentes sensações frente à fadiga. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a percepção subjetiva de esforço (PSE) entre ciclistas e não-ciclistas durante teste incremental máximo (TIMAX). Participaram do estudo 23 indivíduos que foram divididos em grupo ciclistas (GC) (n = 12; idade 26,5 ± 4,7 anos; massa corporal 68,2 ± 11kg; estatura 176 ± 8,6cm) e grupo não-ciclistas (GNC) (n=11; idade 25,2 ± 4,0 anos; massa corporal 72,9 ± 9kg; estatura 175,1 ± 6,3cm). Todos realizaram um TIMAX, até a exaustão, do tipo rampa em ciclossimulador, com início a 0 W e incrementos de 20 W.min-1. Durante TIMAX a PSE foi aferida e anotada a cada 30 segundos de teste e, ao final, a potência máxima (PMAX) atingida pelos indivíduos. O tempo total de cada teste foi normalizado em porcentagens (de 10% a 100%, intervalos de 10%), e foi anotada a respectiva PSE para cada intervalo. Os valores de PMAX para GC e GNC foram 368 ± 12,7W e 256 ± 11,2W, respectivamente (P < 0,01). Os valores das medianas das PSE para GC e GNC não apresentaram diferença significativa para nenhuma porcentagem de tempo. Conclui-se que as respostas de PSE não sofreram alterações entre GC e GNC durante TIMAX, sugerindo que o nível de treinamento não influencia a PSE.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Avaliado por ParesAssociaçãoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n3p15910.1590/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2010); 159-163Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 12 n. 3 (2010); 159-1631980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159/12112https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159/16908Smirmaul, Bruno de Paula CaraçaDantas, José LuizFontes, Eduardo BodnariucOkano, Alexandre Hidekide Moraes, Antonio Carlosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-19T08:21:44Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/12960Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2018-11-19T08:21:44Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test O nível de treinamento não influencia a percepção subjetiva de esforço durante um teste incremental |
title |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test |
spellingShingle |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test Smirmaul, Bruno de Paula Caraça |
title_short |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test |
title_full |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test |
title_fullStr |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test |
title_full_unstemmed |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test |
title_sort |
Training level does not influence the rating of perceived exertion during an incremental test |
author |
Smirmaul, Bruno de Paula Caraça |
author_facet |
Smirmaul, Bruno de Paula Caraça Dantas, José Luiz Fontes, Eduardo Bodnariuc Okano, Alexandre Hideki de Moraes, Antonio Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dantas, José Luiz Fontes, Eduardo Bodnariuc Okano, Alexandre Hideki de Moraes, Antonio Carlos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Smirmaul, Bruno de Paula Caraça Dantas, José Luiz Fontes, Eduardo Bodnariuc Okano, Alexandre Hideki de Moraes, Antonio Carlos |
description |
Different training levels, combined with experience in performing exhaustive exercise, may produce different sensations of fatigue. The objective of this study was to compare the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) between cyclists and non-cyclists during a maximal incremental test (ITMAX). Twenty-three subjects were recruited and divided into a cyclist group (CG) (n = 12; age: 26.5 ± 4.7 years, body weight: 68.2 ± 11kg, height: 176 ± 8.6 cm) and a non-cyclist group (NCG) (n = 11; 25.2 ± 4.0 years, body weight: 72.9 ± 9 kg, height: 175.1 ± 6.3 cm). All subjects performed an ITMAX until exhaustion on a cycling simulator, starting at 0 W and with increments of 20 W.min-1. RPE was measured at 30-second intervals during ITMAX and the maximal power output (PMAX) of each subject was also recorded. The total time of each test was normalized to the percentage of completed trial (10% to 100%, intervals of 10%), and the corresponding RPE was recorded. PMAX was 368 ± 12.7 W and 256 ± 11.2 W for CG and NCG, respectively (P < 0.01). No significant difference in median RPE was observed between groups at any time point. In conclusion, RPE responses did not differ between CG and NCG during ITMAX, suggesting that training level does not influence RPE. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares", Avaliado por Pares Associação |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159 10.1590/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159/12112 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n3p159/16908 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2010); 159-163 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 12 n. 3 (2010); 159-163 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435121905958912 |