Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to compare the perceived subjective exertion (PSE) and total load lifted in resistance exercises performed on stable platforms (SP) and unstable platforms (UP). Participants were 20 men (24.6 ± 3.4 years, 179 ± 0.1 cm, 80.6 ± 9.1 kg and 11.8 ± 3.4% fat). Each subject performed a 15 maximum repetition test in half squat exercises (soil and balance discs), pronated barbell row (soil and bosu) and biceps curl (soil and balance discs) in both conditions. PSE was measured using the OMNI-RES scale and the load lifted value (kg). To verify the normality of data, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used. Possible differences related to loads and PSE on the platforms were performed by the paired t test. Significance level of p <0.05 was adopted. No significant differences between PSE values on SP and UP were respectively observed in the half squat (8.2 and 8.5 / p = 0.8), pronated barbell row (8.4 and 8.4 / p = 0.7) and biceps curl (8.6 and 8.7 / p = 1.0). Higher load values on SP and UP were respectively found in half squat (83.9kg and 70.3kg / p <0.001) and pronated barbell row exercises (53.2kg and 48.6kg / p = 0.01) on SP. However, biceps curl showed dissimilar behavior (48.2kg and 47.4kg / p = 0.5). It was concluded that UP does not promote differences in PSE responses even working with smaller load or similar load |
id |
UFSC-16_39bc14dcfe2f16c32f62ad03b12f41f3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/36055 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platformsComparação da resposta da percepção subjetiva do esforço e da carga total levantada nos exercícios resistidos em plataforma estável e instávelThis study aimed to compare the perceived subjective exertion (PSE) and total load lifted in resistance exercises performed on stable platforms (SP) and unstable platforms (UP). Participants were 20 men (24.6 ± 3.4 years, 179 ± 0.1 cm, 80.6 ± 9.1 kg and 11.8 ± 3.4% fat). Each subject performed a 15 maximum repetition test in half squat exercises (soil and balance discs), pronated barbell row (soil and bosu) and biceps curl (soil and balance discs) in both conditions. PSE was measured using the OMNI-RES scale and the load lifted value (kg). To verify the normality of data, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used. Possible differences related to loads and PSE on the platforms were performed by the paired t test. Significance level of p <0.05 was adopted. No significant differences between PSE values on SP and UP were respectively observed in the half squat (8.2 and 8.5 / p = 0.8), pronated barbell row (8.4 and 8.4 / p = 0.7) and biceps curl (8.6 and 8.7 / p = 1.0). Higher load values on SP and UP were respectively found in half squat (83.9kg and 70.3kg / p <0.001) and pronated barbell row exercises (53.2kg and 48.6kg / p = 0.01) on SP. However, biceps curl showed dissimilar behavior (48.2kg and 47.4kg / p = 0.5). It was concluded that UP does not promote differences in PSE responses even working with smaller load or similar load Objetivou-se comparar a percepção subjetiva do esforço (PSE) e a carga total levantada nos exercícios resistidos em plataformas estáveis (PE) e plataformas instáveis (PI). Participaram do estudo 20 homens (24,6 ± 3,4 anos, 179 ± 0,1 cm, 80,6 ± 9,1 Kg e 11,8 ± 3,4 % de gordura). Cada voluntário realizou um teste de 15 repetições máximas nos exercícios meio agachamento (solo e discos de equilíbrio), remada curvada pronada (solo e bosu) e rosca bíceps (solo e discos de equilíbrio) em ambas as condições. Foram medidas a PSE através da escala de OMNI-RES e o valor da carga levantada (kg). Para verificar a normalidade dos dados, utilizou-se o teste Shapiro-Wilk. As possíveis diferenças relacionadas às cargas e à PSE nas plataformas foram realizadas pelo teste t pareado. Adotou-se um nível de significância de p<0,05. Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre os valores da PSE em PE e PI respectivamente, no meio agachamento (8,2 e 8,5 / p=0,8), remada curvada pronada (8,4 e 8,4 / p=0,7) e rosca bíceps (8,6 e 8,7 / p=1,0). Foram encontrados maiores valores de carga em PE e PI respectivamente, nos exercícios de meio agachamento (83,9kg e 70,3kg / p<0,001) e remada curvada pronada (53,2kg e 48,6kg / p=0,01) na PE. Em contrapartida, para a rosca bíceps não ocorreu o mesmo (48,2kg e 47,4kg / p=0,5). É possível concluir que as PI não promovem diferenças nas respostas da PSE mesmo sendo trabalhadas com uma menor carga ou com uma carga semelhante.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2015-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Original paperAvaliado por ParesArtigos Originaisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2015v17n3p30010.1590/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2015); 300-308Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 17 n. 3 (2015); 300-3081980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCengporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300/29314https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300/29315Aranda, Liliane CunhaMancini, MarcellyCampos, Yuri Almeida CostaSousa, Elder DutraVianna, Jeferson MacedoDa Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edirinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-05T08:47:25Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/36055Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2018-12-05T08:47:25Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms Comparação da resposta da percepção subjetiva do esforço e da carga total levantada nos exercícios resistidos em plataforma estável e instável |
title |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms Aranda, Liliane Cunha |
title_short |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms |
title_full |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms |
title_sort |
Comparison of the perceived subjective exertion and total load lifted response in resistance exercises performed on stable and unstable platforms |
author |
Aranda, Liliane Cunha |
author_facet |
Aranda, Liliane Cunha Mancini, Marcelly Campos, Yuri Almeida Costa Sousa, Elder Dutra Vianna, Jeferson Macedo Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edir |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mancini, Marcelly Campos, Yuri Almeida Costa Sousa, Elder Dutra Vianna, Jeferson Macedo Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edir |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aranda, Liliane Cunha Mancini, Marcelly Campos, Yuri Almeida Costa Sousa, Elder Dutra Vianna, Jeferson Macedo Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edir |
description |
This study aimed to compare the perceived subjective exertion (PSE) and total load lifted in resistance exercises performed on stable platforms (SP) and unstable platforms (UP). Participants were 20 men (24.6 ± 3.4 years, 179 ± 0.1 cm, 80.6 ± 9.1 kg and 11.8 ± 3.4% fat). Each subject performed a 15 maximum repetition test in half squat exercises (soil and balance discs), pronated barbell row (soil and bosu) and biceps curl (soil and balance discs) in both conditions. PSE was measured using the OMNI-RES scale and the load lifted value (kg). To verify the normality of data, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used. Possible differences related to loads and PSE on the platforms were performed by the paired t test. Significance level of p <0.05 was adopted. No significant differences between PSE values on SP and UP were respectively observed in the half squat (8.2 and 8.5 / p = 0.8), pronated barbell row (8.4 and 8.4 / p = 0.7) and biceps curl (8.6 and 8.7 / p = 1.0). Higher load values on SP and UP were respectively found in half squat (83.9kg and 70.3kg / p <0.001) and pronated barbell row exercises (53.2kg and 48.6kg / p = 0.01) on SP. However, biceps curl showed dissimilar behavior (48.2kg and 47.4kg / p = 0.5). It was concluded that UP does not promote differences in PSE responses even working with smaller load or similar load |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-05-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares", Original paper Avaliado por Pares Artigos Originais |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300 10.1590/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300/29314 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2015v17n3p300/29315 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2015); 300-308 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 17 n. 3 (2015); 300-308 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435124018839552 |