The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381 |
Resumo: | The classic and cognitive “Timed Up and Go” tests (TUG) are used to identify old people prone to falls, but we were unable to find studies that prove their association in old people practicing physical exercise. The objective of this study was to analyze the classic and cognitive versions of TUG in forecasting and explaining the occurrence of falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Participants included 82 physically active old people. Data were collected on the occurrence of falls in the past 12 months among those who performed the classic and the cognitive TUG tests through the pronunciation of animals while performing the test. We used descriptive and inferential statistics with a significance level of 5%. A binary logistic regression was performed to associate the outcome (falls) and the performance in the tests. To identify the predictive values, the ROC Curve was used. The occurrence of falls in the sample was 19.5%. There was a significant difference between the values obtained in the TUG classic and cognitive tests (9.0 ± 1.9 and 10.0 ± 2.2 seconds, respectively). There was no difference between the old people with and without a history of falls in both tests, despite the averages being higher in old people with a history. In the logistic regression analysis, the performance of both versions did not explain the occurrence of falls. In the ROC curve, the TUG classic test showed an accuracy of 65.3% (p= 0.058) and the TUG cognitive test of 58.1% (p= 0.324). The TUG classic and cognitive tests did not correlate with the occurrence of falls and should be used with caution for predicting falls in old people practicing physical exercise. |
id |
UFSC-16_8ff4bea300d64c2001c74f24960d1386 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/29156 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old peopleO “Timed Up and Go” na previsão e explicação de quedas em idosos praticantes de exercícios físicosThe classic and cognitive “Timed Up and Go” tests (TUG) are used to identify old people prone to falls, but we were unable to find studies that prove their association in old people practicing physical exercise. The objective of this study was to analyze the classic and cognitive versions of TUG in forecasting and explaining the occurrence of falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Participants included 82 physically active old people. Data were collected on the occurrence of falls in the past 12 months among those who performed the classic and the cognitive TUG tests through the pronunciation of animals while performing the test. We used descriptive and inferential statistics with a significance level of 5%. A binary logistic regression was performed to associate the outcome (falls) and the performance in the tests. To identify the predictive values, the ROC Curve was used. The occurrence of falls in the sample was 19.5%. There was a significant difference between the values obtained in the TUG classic and cognitive tests (9.0 ± 1.9 and 10.0 ± 2.2 seconds, respectively). There was no difference between the old people with and without a history of falls in both tests, despite the averages being higher in old people with a history. In the logistic regression analysis, the performance of both versions did not explain the occurrence of falls. In the ROC curve, the TUG classic test showed an accuracy of 65.3% (p= 0.058) and the TUG cognitive test of 58.1% (p= 0.324). The TUG classic and cognitive tests did not correlate with the occurrence of falls and should be used with caution for predicting falls in old people practicing physical exercise.The classic and cognitive “Timed Up and Go” tests (TUG) are used to identify old people prone to falls, but we were unable to find studies that prove their association in old people practicing physical exercise. The objective of this study was to analyze the classic and cognitive versions of TUG in forecasting and explaining the occurrence of falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Participants included 82 physically active old people. Data were collected on the occurrence of falls in the past 12 months among those who performed the classic and the cognitive TUG tests through the pronunciation of animals while performing the test. We used descriptive and inferential statistics with a significance level of 5%. A binary logistic regression was performed to associate the outcome (falls) and the performance in the tests. To identify the predictive values, the ROC Curve was used. The occurrence of falls in the sample was 19.5%. There was a significant difference between the values obtained in the TUG classic and cognitive tests (9.0 ± 1.9 and 10.0 ± 2.2 seconds, respectively). There was no difference between the old people with and without a history of falls in both tests, despite the averages being higher in old people with a history. In the logistic regression analysis, the performance of both versions did not explain the occurrence of falls. In the ROC curve, the TUG classic test showed an accuracy of 65.3% (p= 0.058) and the TUG cognitive test of 58.1% (p= 0.324). The TUG classic and cognitive tests did not correlate with the occurrence of falls and should be used with caution for predicting falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2014-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",DescriptiveAvaliado por ParesDescritivaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p38110.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2014); 381-389Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 16 n. 4 (2014); 381-3891980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381/26767Virtuoso, Janeisa FranckPerdona Gregório, Luis Paulode Medeiros, Paulo AdãoMazo, Giovana Zarpelloninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-05T08:16:33Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/29156Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2018-12-05T08:16:33Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people O “Timed Up and Go” na previsão e explicação de quedas em idosos praticantes de exercícios físicos |
title |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people |
spellingShingle |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck |
title_short |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people |
title_full |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people |
title_fullStr |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people |
title_full_unstemmed |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people |
title_sort |
The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people |
author |
Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck |
author_facet |
Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck Perdona Gregório, Luis Paulo de Medeiros, Paulo Adão Mazo, Giovana Zarpellon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Perdona Gregório, Luis Paulo de Medeiros, Paulo Adão Mazo, Giovana Zarpellon |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck Perdona Gregório, Luis Paulo de Medeiros, Paulo Adão Mazo, Giovana Zarpellon |
description |
The classic and cognitive “Timed Up and Go” tests (TUG) are used to identify old people prone to falls, but we were unable to find studies that prove their association in old people practicing physical exercise. The objective of this study was to analyze the classic and cognitive versions of TUG in forecasting and explaining the occurrence of falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Participants included 82 physically active old people. Data were collected on the occurrence of falls in the past 12 months among those who performed the classic and the cognitive TUG tests through the pronunciation of animals while performing the test. We used descriptive and inferential statistics with a significance level of 5%. A binary logistic regression was performed to associate the outcome (falls) and the performance in the tests. To identify the predictive values, the ROC Curve was used. The occurrence of falls in the sample was 19.5%. There was a significant difference between the values obtained in the TUG classic and cognitive tests (9.0 ± 1.9 and 10.0 ± 2.2 seconds, respectively). There was no difference between the old people with and without a history of falls in both tests, despite the averages being higher in old people with a history. In the logistic regression analysis, the performance of both versions did not explain the occurrence of falls. In the ROC curve, the TUG classic test showed an accuracy of 65.3% (p= 0.058) and the TUG cognitive test of 58.1% (p= 0.324). The TUG classic and cognitive tests did not correlate with the occurrence of falls and should be used with caution for predicting falls in old people practicing physical exercise. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-05-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares", Descriptive Avaliado por Pares Descritiva |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381 10.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381/26767 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2014); 381-389 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 16 n. 4 (2014); 381-389 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435123497697280 |