The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Perdona Gregório, Luis Paulo, de Medeiros, Paulo Adão, Mazo, Giovana Zarpellon
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381
Resumo: The classic and cognitive “Timed Up and Go” tests (TUG) are used to identify old people prone to falls, but we were unable to find studies that prove their association in old people practicing physical exercise. The objective of this study was to analyze the classic and cognitive versions of TUG in forecasting and explaining the occurrence of falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Participants included 82 physically active old people. Data were collected on the occurrence of falls in the past 12 months among those who performed the classic and the cognitive TUG tests through the pronunciation of animals while performing the test. We used descriptive and inferential statistics with a significance level of 5%. A binary logistic regression was performed to associate the outcome (falls) and the performance in the tests. To identify the predictive values, the ROC Curve was used. The occurrence of falls in the sample was 19.5%. There was a significant difference between the values obtained in the TUG classic and cognitive tests (9.0 ± 1.9 and 10.0 ± 2.2 seconds, respectively). There was no difference between the old people with and without a history of falls in both tests, despite the averages being higher in old people with a history. In the logistic regression analysis, the performance of both versions did not explain the occurrence of falls. In the ROC curve, the TUG classic test showed an accuracy of 65.3% (p= 0.058) and the TUG cognitive test of 58.1% (p= 0.324). The TUG classic and cognitive tests did not correlate with the occurrence of falls and should be used with caution for predicting falls in old people practicing physical exercise.
id UFSC-16_8ff4bea300d64c2001c74f24960d1386
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/29156
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old peopleO “Timed Up and Go” na previsão e explicação de quedas em idosos praticantes de exercícios físicosThe classic and cognitive “Timed Up and Go” tests (TUG) are used to identify old people prone to falls, but we were unable to find studies that prove their association in old people practicing physical exercise. The objective of this study was to analyze the classic and cognitive versions of TUG in forecasting and explaining the occurrence of falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Participants included 82 physically active old people. Data were collected on the occurrence of falls in the past 12 months among those who performed the classic and the cognitive TUG tests through the pronunciation of animals while performing the test. We used descriptive and inferential statistics with a significance level of 5%. A binary logistic regression was performed to associate the outcome (falls) and the performance in the tests. To identify the predictive values, the ROC Curve was used. The occurrence of falls in the sample was 19.5%. There was a significant difference between the values obtained in the TUG classic and cognitive tests (9.0 ± 1.9 and 10.0 ± 2.2 seconds, respectively). There was no difference between the old people with and without a history of falls in both tests, despite the averages being higher in old people with a history. In the logistic regression analysis, the performance of both versions did not explain the occurrence of falls. In the ROC curve, the TUG classic test showed an accuracy of 65.3% (p= 0.058) and the TUG cognitive test of 58.1% (p= 0.324). The TUG classic and cognitive tests did not correlate with the occurrence of falls and should be used with caution for predicting falls in old people practicing physical exercise.The classic and cognitive “Timed Up and Go” tests (TUG) are used to identify old people prone to falls, but we were unable to find studies that prove their association in old people practicing physical exercise. The objective of this study was to analyze the classic and cognitive versions of TUG in forecasting and explaining the occurrence of falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Participants included 82 physically active old people. Data were collected on the occurrence of falls in the past 12 months among those who performed the classic and the cognitive TUG tests through the pronunciation of animals while performing the test. We used descriptive and inferential statistics with a significance level of 5%. A binary logistic regression was performed to associate the outcome (falls) and the performance in the tests. To identify the predictive values, the ROC Curve was used. The occurrence of falls in the sample was 19.5%. There was a significant difference between the values obtained in the TUG classic and cognitive tests (9.0 ± 1.9 and 10.0 ± 2.2 seconds, respectively). There was no difference between the old people with and without a history of falls in both tests, despite the averages being higher in old people with a history. In the logistic regression analysis, the performance of both versions did not explain the occurrence of falls. In the ROC curve, the TUG classic test showed an accuracy of 65.3% (p= 0.058) and the TUG cognitive test of 58.1% (p= 0.324). The TUG classic and cognitive tests did not correlate with the occurrence of falls and should be used with caution for predicting falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2014-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",DescriptiveAvaliado por ParesDescritivaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p38110.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2014); 381-389Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 16 n. 4 (2014); 381-3891980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381/26767Virtuoso, Janeisa FranckPerdona Gregório, Luis Paulode Medeiros, Paulo AdãoMazo, Giovana Zarpelloninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-05T08:16:33Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/29156Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2018-12-05T08:16:33Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
O “Timed Up and Go” na previsão e explicação de quedas em idosos praticantes de exercícios físicos
title The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
spellingShingle The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck
title_short The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
title_full The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
title_fullStr The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
title_full_unstemmed The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
title_sort The “Timed Up and Go” in the prediction and explanation of falls in old people
author Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck
author_facet Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck
Perdona Gregório, Luis Paulo
de Medeiros, Paulo Adão
Mazo, Giovana Zarpellon
author_role author
author2 Perdona Gregório, Luis Paulo
de Medeiros, Paulo Adão
Mazo, Giovana Zarpellon
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Virtuoso, Janeisa Franck
Perdona Gregório, Luis Paulo
de Medeiros, Paulo Adão
Mazo, Giovana Zarpellon
description The classic and cognitive “Timed Up and Go” tests (TUG) are used to identify old people prone to falls, but we were unable to find studies that prove their association in old people practicing physical exercise. The objective of this study was to analyze the classic and cognitive versions of TUG in forecasting and explaining the occurrence of falls in old people practicing physical exercise. Participants included 82 physically active old people. Data were collected on the occurrence of falls in the past 12 months among those who performed the classic and the cognitive TUG tests through the pronunciation of animals while performing the test. We used descriptive and inferential statistics with a significance level of 5%. A binary logistic regression was performed to associate the outcome (falls) and the performance in the tests. To identify the predictive values, the ROC Curve was used. The occurrence of falls in the sample was 19.5%. There was a significant difference between the values obtained in the TUG classic and cognitive tests (9.0 ± 1.9 and 10.0 ± 2.2 seconds, respectively). There was no difference between the old people with and without a history of falls in both tests, despite the averages being higher in old people with a history. In the logistic regression analysis, the performance of both versions did not explain the occurrence of falls. In the ROC curve, the TUG classic test showed an accuracy of 65.3% (p= 0.058) and the TUG cognitive test of 58.1% (p= 0.324). The TUG classic and cognitive tests did not correlate with the occurrence of falls and should be used with caution for predicting falls in old people practicing physical exercise.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-05-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares",
Descriptive
Avaliado por Pares
Descritiva
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381
10.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n4p381/26767
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2014); 381-389
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 16 n. 4 (2014); 381-389
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435123497697280