Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386 |
Resumo: | As a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight body position more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar” elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational methodology was used to construct and validate two observation categories comprising eleven variables considered as indicators of the external load in uneven bars. 83 uneven bars routines were analyzed from world championship and Olympic Games finals between 1989 and 2004. The principal results we observed were significant increases in the execution of “in bar” elements, with and without longitudinal rotations, as well as in respective difficulty. Straight body position elements increased from 6.45 to 9.71 up to 2001 and decreased to 7.88 by 2004.Close body position elements ranged from 8.15 to 8.21 until 2001 and then increased to 10.94 by 2004. We may conclude that compulsory use of “in bar” elements and their execution beyond Code requirements contradicted the trends towards increased use of straight body positions. |
id |
UFSC-16_9789790c5fa807694905739bd0ebd415 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/6187 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elementsEvolução da Posição do Corpo em Paralelas Assimétricas – Influência dos Elementos “in bar”As a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight body position more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar” elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational methodology was used to construct and validate two observation categories comprising eleven variables considered as indicators of the external load in uneven bars. 83 uneven bars routines were analyzed from world championship and Olympic Games finals between 1989 and 2004. The principal results we observed were significant increases in the execution of “in bar” elements, with and without longitudinal rotations, as well as in respective difficulty. Straight body position elements increased from 6.45 to 9.71 up to 2001 and decreased to 7.88 by 2004.Close body position elements ranged from 8.15 to 8.21 until 2001 and then increased to 10.94 by 2004. We may conclude that compulsory use of “in bar” elements and their execution beyond Code requirements contradicted the trends towards increased use of straight body positions.As diversas e contínuas alterações na estrutura do aparelho e no Código de Pontuação (CP) têm levado a uma tendência para uma maior utilização da postura alongada do corpo em Paralelas Assimétricas (PA). Com este estudo procurou-se observar a influência da execução obrigatória de elementos “in bar” na posição do corpo utilizada em exercícios de competição de PA. Recorrendo às técnicas da metodologia observacional, foram elaboradas e validadas duas categorias de observação constituídas por onze variáveis relativas à posição do corpo e elementos “in bar”. Analisaram-se 83 exercícios das ginastas finalistas de PA, em campeonatos do mundo e jogos olímpicos entre 1989 e 2004. Como principais resultados observaram-se aumentos significativos na utilização de elementos “in bar”, com e sem rotação longitudinal, assim como na respectiva dificuldade. Até 2001, os elementos em posição alongada do corpo evoluíram de 6.45 para 9.71 e regrediram para 7.88 até 2004. O número de elementos em posição fechada do corpo manteve-se entre 8.15 e 8.21 até 2001 e evoluiu para 10.94 até 2004. Com base nos resultados concluímos que a execução obrigatória de elementos “in bar” e a sua utilização para além dos requisitos obrigatórios contrariaram as tendências para maior utilização da postura alongada do corpo.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2008-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Avaliado por ParesObservaçãoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p38610.1590/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 10 No. 4 (2008); 386-392Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 10 n. 4 (2008); 386-3921980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386/5749https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386/16539Ferreirinha, José EduardoSilva, António JoséMarques, António Teixeirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:14:20Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/6187Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2022-11-21T14:14:20Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements Evolução da Posição do Corpo em Paralelas Assimétricas – Influência dos Elementos “in bar” |
title |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements |
spellingShingle |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements Ferreirinha, José Eduardo |
title_short |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements |
title_full |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements |
title_fullStr |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements |
title_sort |
Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements |
author |
Ferreirinha, José Eduardo |
author_facet |
Ferreirinha, José Eduardo Silva, António José Marques, António Teixeira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, António José Marques, António Teixeira |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreirinha, José Eduardo Silva, António José Marques, António Teixeira |
description |
As a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight body position more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar” elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational methodology was used to construct and validate two observation categories comprising eleven variables considered as indicators of the external load in uneven bars. 83 uneven bars routines were analyzed from world championship and Olympic Games finals between 1989 and 2004. The principal results we observed were significant increases in the execution of “in bar” elements, with and without longitudinal rotations, as well as in respective difficulty. Straight body position elements increased from 6.45 to 9.71 up to 2001 and decreased to 7.88 by 2004.Close body position elements ranged from 8.15 to 8.21 until 2001 and then increased to 10.94 by 2004. We may conclude that compulsory use of “in bar” elements and their execution beyond Code requirements contradicted the trends towards increased use of straight body positions. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares", Avaliado por Pares Observação |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386 10.1590/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386/5749 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386/16539 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 10 No. 4 (2008); 386-392 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 10 n. 4 (2008); 386-392 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435121271570432 |