Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreirinha, José Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Silva, António José, Marques, António Teixeira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386
Resumo: As a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight body position more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar” elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational methodology was used to construct and validate two observation categories comprising eleven variables considered as indicators of the external load in uneven bars. 83 uneven bars routines were analyzed from world championship and Olympic Games finals between 1989 and 2004. The principal results we observed were significant increases in the execution of “in bar” elements, with and without longitudinal rotations, as well as in respective difficulty. Straight body position elements increased from 6.45 to 9.71 up to 2001 and decreased to 7.88 by 2004.Close body position elements ranged from 8.15 to 8.21 until 2001 and then increased to 10.94 by 2004. We may conclude that compulsory use of “in bar” elements and their execution beyond Code requirements contradicted the trends towards increased use of straight body positions.
id UFSC-16_9789790c5fa807694905739bd0ebd415
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/6187
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elementsEvolução da Posição do Corpo em Paralelas Assimétricas – Influência dos Elementos “in bar”As a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight body position more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar” elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational methodology was used to construct and validate two observation categories comprising eleven variables considered as indicators of the external load in uneven bars. 83 uneven bars routines were analyzed from world championship and Olympic Games finals between 1989 and 2004. The principal results we observed were significant increases in the execution of “in bar” elements, with and without longitudinal rotations, as well as in respective difficulty. Straight body position elements increased from 6.45 to 9.71 up to 2001 and decreased to 7.88 by 2004.Close body position elements ranged from 8.15 to 8.21 until 2001 and then increased to 10.94 by 2004. We may conclude that compulsory use of “in bar” elements and their execution beyond Code requirements contradicted the trends towards increased use of straight body positions.As diversas e contínuas alterações na estrutura do aparelho e no Código de Pontuação (CP) têm levado a uma tendência para uma maior utilização da postura alongada do corpo em Paralelas Assimétricas (PA). Com este estudo procurou-se observar a influência da execução obrigatória de elementos “in bar” na posição do corpo utilizada em exercícios de competição de PA. Recorrendo às técnicas da metodologia observacional, foram elaboradas e validadas duas categorias de observação constituídas por onze variáveis relativas à posição do corpo e elementos “in bar”. Analisaram-se 83 exercícios das ginastas finalistas de PA, em campeonatos do mundo e jogos olímpicos entre 1989 e 2004. Como principais resultados observaram-se aumentos significativos na utilização de elementos “in bar”, com e sem rotação longitudinal, assim como na respectiva dificuldade. Até 2001, os elementos em posição alongada do corpo evoluíram de 6.45 para 9.71 e regrediram para 7.88 até 2004. O número de elementos em posição fechada do corpo manteve-se entre 8.15 e 8.21 até 2001 e evoluiu para 10.94 até 2004. Com base nos resultados concluímos que a execução obrigatória de elementos “in bar” e a sua utilização para além dos requisitos obrigatórios contrariaram as tendências para maior utilização da postura alongada do corpo.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2008-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Avaliado por ParesObservaçãoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p38610.1590/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 10 No. 4 (2008); 386-392Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 10 n. 4 (2008); 386-3921980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386/5749https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386/16539Ferreirinha, José EduardoSilva, António JoséMarques, António Teixeirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:14:20Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/6187Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2022-11-21T14:14:20Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
Evolução da Posição do Corpo em Paralelas Assimétricas – Influência dos Elementos “in bar”
title Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
spellingShingle Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
Ferreirinha, José Eduardo
title_short Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
title_full Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
title_fullStr Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
title_sort Evolution of Body Position in Uneven Bars Routines - Influence of “in bar” elements
author Ferreirinha, José Eduardo
author_facet Ferreirinha, José Eduardo
Silva, António José
Marques, António Teixeira
author_role author
author2 Silva, António José
Marques, António Teixeira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreirinha, José Eduardo
Silva, António José
Marques, António Teixeira
description As a consequence of changes in apparatus structure and Code of Points, gymnasts are using the straight body position more and more in Uneven Bars routines. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of “in bar” elements on body position during Uneven Bars routines. Observational methodology was used to construct and validate two observation categories comprising eleven variables considered as indicators of the external load in uneven bars. 83 uneven bars routines were analyzed from world championship and Olympic Games finals between 1989 and 2004. The principal results we observed were significant increases in the execution of “in bar” elements, with and without longitudinal rotations, as well as in respective difficulty. Straight body position elements increased from 6.45 to 9.71 up to 2001 and decreased to 7.88 by 2004.Close body position elements ranged from 8.15 to 8.21 until 2001 and then increased to 10.94 by 2004. We may conclude that compulsory use of “in bar” elements and their execution beyond Code requirements contradicted the trends towards increased use of straight body positions.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares",
Avaliado por Pares
Observação
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386
10.1590/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386/5749
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2008v10n4p386/16539
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 10 No. 4 (2008); 386-392
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 10 n. 4 (2008); 386-392
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435121271570432