Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ueno, Deisy Terumi
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Sebastião, Émerson, Corazza, Danilla Icassati, Gobbi, Sebastião
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256
Resumo: Among the large array of instruments for measuring physical activity (PA), the use of questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers with older adults is frequent. This study aimed to analyze the most widely adopted protocol for each instrument that is most commonly used to assess PA in older adults, and explore possible advantages and disadvantages of the methods used for these instruments. Thereby, we performed a search in databases and cross references of the articles selected. This procedure yielded in 16 studies being included. The in-depth analyzed studies demonstrate that questionnaires are usually applied either as an interview or self-administered, assessing the domains of leisure, sports, and household chores with a recall period of a typical week in the last month. Regarding pedometers and accelerometers, the length of time considered to be sufficient for data collection is five days. The devices are frequently used on the waist or hip with a belt or attached to clothing and removed only for water activities or during sleeping time. The use of either instrument should take into account the advantages and disadvantages that influence choosing one over the other, such as the number of participants to be evaluated, the time available for assessment, among others. The use of accelerometer along with PA questionnaire may yield more reliable and accurate measurements of PA level. In addition, it is recommended that, for older adults, questionnaires should be applied employing the interview format, in order to minimize possible misinterpretation of the questions.
id UFSC-16_b00048d2ba2c9e507a241d89730b9a30
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/24678
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adultsMétodos de avaliação de atividade física: uma revisão sistemática focada em idososAmong the large array of instruments for measuring physical activity (PA), the use of questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers with older adults is frequent. This study aimed to analyze the most widely adopted protocol for each instrument that is most commonly used to assess PA in older adults, and explore possible advantages and disadvantages of the methods used for these instruments. Thereby, we performed a search in databases and cross references of the articles selected. This procedure yielded in 16 studies being included. The in-depth analyzed studies demonstrate that questionnaires are usually applied either as an interview or self-administered, assessing the domains of leisure, sports, and household chores with a recall period of a typical week in the last month. Regarding pedometers and accelerometers, the length of time considered to be sufficient for data collection is five days. The devices are frequently used on the waist or hip with a belt or attached to clothing and removed only for water activities or during sleeping time. The use of either instrument should take into account the advantages and disadvantages that influence choosing one over the other, such as the number of participants to be evaluated, the time available for assessment, among others. The use of accelerometer along with PA questionnaire may yield more reliable and accurate measurements of PA level. In addition, it is recommended that, for older adults, questionnaires should be applied employing the interview format, in order to minimize possible misinterpretation of the questions.Dentre os diferentes instrumentos para medida da atividade física, o uso de questionários, pedômetros e acelerômetros na população idosa é algo bastante frequente. O objetivo do estudo foi analisar, dentre os instrumentos de medida da atividade mais utilizados em idosos, o protocolo mais adotado para cada instrumento e explorar possíveis vantagens e desvantagens dos métodos utilizados para o mesmo instrumento. Para tanto, efetuou-se uma busca em bases de dados, além de referências cruzadas dos artigos selecionados, dos quais foram selecionados 16 estudos. Os estudos analisados demonstram que questionários normalmente são aplicados em forma de entrevista ou autoadministrado, avaliando os domínios de lazer, esporte e atividades domésticas, com tempo de recordação de uma semana típica do último mês. Já em relação aos pedômetros e acelerômetros, 5 dias têm sido considerados suficientes para a coleta de dados. Os aparelhos são frequentemente utilizados na cintura ou quadril com uma cinta ou preso à roupa, e retirados apenas quando os idosos forem realizar atividades aquáticas ou dormir. A utilização de um ou outro instrumento deve levar em conta as vantagens e desvantagens que influenciarão na escolha do mesmo, como número de participantes a serem avaliados, tempo disponível para avaliação, entre outros. A utilização de acelerômetro juntamente com a aplicação de um questionário de AF pode ceder medidas mais confiáveis e precisas quanto ao nível de AF, porém recomenda-se que em idosos os questionários sejam realizados sob a forma de entrevista, a fim de minimizar possíveis erros de interpretação das questões. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado"Systematic review"Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"Revisão sistemáticaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p25610.1590/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2013); 256-265Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 15 n. 2 (2013); 256-2651980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256/24160Ueno, Deisy TerumiSebastião, ÉmersonCorazza, Danilla IcassatiGobbi, Sebastiãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:14:57Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/24678Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2022-11-21T14:14:57Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
Métodos de avaliação de atividade física: uma revisão sistemática focada em idosos
title Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
spellingShingle Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
Ueno, Deisy Terumi
title_short Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
title_full Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
title_fullStr Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
title_full_unstemmed Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
title_sort Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
author Ueno, Deisy Terumi
author_facet Ueno, Deisy Terumi
Sebastião, Émerson
Corazza, Danilla Icassati
Gobbi, Sebastião
author_role author
author2 Sebastião, Émerson
Corazza, Danilla Icassati
Gobbi, Sebastião
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ueno, Deisy Terumi
Sebastião, Émerson
Corazza, Danilla Icassati
Gobbi, Sebastião
description Among the large array of instruments for measuring physical activity (PA), the use of questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers with older adults is frequent. This study aimed to analyze the most widely adopted protocol for each instrument that is most commonly used to assess PA in older adults, and explore possible advantages and disadvantages of the methods used for these instruments. Thereby, we performed a search in databases and cross references of the articles selected. This procedure yielded in 16 studies being included. The in-depth analyzed studies demonstrate that questionnaires are usually applied either as an interview or self-administered, assessing the domains of leisure, sports, and household chores with a recall period of a typical week in the last month. Regarding pedometers and accelerometers, the length of time considered to be sufficient for data collection is five days. The devices are frequently used on the waist or hip with a belt or attached to clothing and removed only for water activities or during sleeping time. The use of either instrument should take into account the advantages and disadvantages that influence choosing one over the other, such as the number of participants to be evaluated, the time available for assessment, among others. The use of accelerometer along with PA questionnaire may yield more reliable and accurate measurements of PA level. In addition, it is recommended that, for older adults, questionnaires should be applied employing the interview format, in order to minimize possible misinterpretation of the questions.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado"
Systematic review
"Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"
Revisão sistemática
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256
10.1590/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256/24160
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2013); 256-265
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 15 n. 2 (2013); 256-265
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435123011158016