Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256 |
Resumo: | Among the large array of instruments for measuring physical activity (PA), the use of questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers with older adults is frequent. This study aimed to analyze the most widely adopted protocol for each instrument that is most commonly used to assess PA in older adults, and explore possible advantages and disadvantages of the methods used for these instruments. Thereby, we performed a search in databases and cross references of the articles selected. This procedure yielded in 16 studies being included. The in-depth analyzed studies demonstrate that questionnaires are usually applied either as an interview or self-administered, assessing the domains of leisure, sports, and household chores with a recall period of a typical week in the last month. Regarding pedometers and accelerometers, the length of time considered to be sufficient for data collection is five days. The devices are frequently used on the waist or hip with a belt or attached to clothing and removed only for water activities or during sleeping time. The use of either instrument should take into account the advantages and disadvantages that influence choosing one over the other, such as the number of participants to be evaluated, the time available for assessment, among others. The use of accelerometer along with PA questionnaire may yield more reliable and accurate measurements of PA level. In addition, it is recommended that, for older adults, questionnaires should be applied employing the interview format, in order to minimize possible misinterpretation of the questions. |
id |
UFSC-16_b00048d2ba2c9e507a241d89730b9a30 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/24678 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adultsMétodos de avaliação de atividade física: uma revisão sistemática focada em idososAmong the large array of instruments for measuring physical activity (PA), the use of questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers with older adults is frequent. This study aimed to analyze the most widely adopted protocol for each instrument that is most commonly used to assess PA in older adults, and explore possible advantages and disadvantages of the methods used for these instruments. Thereby, we performed a search in databases and cross references of the articles selected. This procedure yielded in 16 studies being included. The in-depth analyzed studies demonstrate that questionnaires are usually applied either as an interview or self-administered, assessing the domains of leisure, sports, and household chores with a recall period of a typical week in the last month. Regarding pedometers and accelerometers, the length of time considered to be sufficient for data collection is five days. The devices are frequently used on the waist or hip with a belt or attached to clothing and removed only for water activities or during sleeping time. The use of either instrument should take into account the advantages and disadvantages that influence choosing one over the other, such as the number of participants to be evaluated, the time available for assessment, among others. The use of accelerometer along with PA questionnaire may yield more reliable and accurate measurements of PA level. In addition, it is recommended that, for older adults, questionnaires should be applied employing the interview format, in order to minimize possible misinterpretation of the questions.Dentre os diferentes instrumentos para medida da atividade física, o uso de questionários, pedômetros e acelerômetros na população idosa é algo bastante frequente. O objetivo do estudo foi analisar, dentre os instrumentos de medida da atividade mais utilizados em idosos, o protocolo mais adotado para cada instrumento e explorar possíveis vantagens e desvantagens dos métodos utilizados para o mesmo instrumento. Para tanto, efetuou-se uma busca em bases de dados, além de referências cruzadas dos artigos selecionados, dos quais foram selecionados 16 estudos. Os estudos analisados demonstram que questionários normalmente são aplicados em forma de entrevista ou autoadministrado, avaliando os domínios de lazer, esporte e atividades domésticas, com tempo de recordação de uma semana típica do último mês. Já em relação aos pedômetros e acelerômetros, 5 dias têm sido considerados suficientes para a coleta de dados. Os aparelhos são frequentemente utilizados na cintura ou quadril com uma cinta ou preso à roupa, e retirados apenas quando os idosos forem realizar atividades aquáticas ou dormir. A utilização de um ou outro instrumento deve levar em conta as vantagens e desvantagens que influenciarão na escolha do mesmo, como número de participantes a serem avaliados, tempo disponível para avaliação, entre outros. A utilização de acelerômetro juntamente com a aplicação de um questionário de AF pode ceder medidas mais confiáveis e precisas quanto ao nível de AF, porém recomenda-se que em idosos os questionários sejam realizados sob a forma de entrevista, a fim de minimizar possíveis erros de interpretação das questões. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado"Systematic review"Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"Revisão sistemáticaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p25610.1590/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2013); 256-265Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 15 n. 2 (2013); 256-2651980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256/24160Ueno, Deisy TerumiSebastião, ÉmersonCorazza, Danilla IcassatiGobbi, Sebastiãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:14:57Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/24678Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2022-11-21T14:14:57Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults Métodos de avaliação de atividade física: uma revisão sistemática focada em idosos |
title |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults |
spellingShingle |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults Ueno, Deisy Terumi |
title_short |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults |
title_full |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults |
title_fullStr |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults |
title_sort |
Methods for assessing physical activity: a systematic review focused on older adults |
author |
Ueno, Deisy Terumi |
author_facet |
Ueno, Deisy Terumi Sebastião, Émerson Corazza, Danilla Icassati Gobbi, Sebastião |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sebastião, Émerson Corazza, Danilla Icassati Gobbi, Sebastião |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ueno, Deisy Terumi Sebastião, Émerson Corazza, Danilla Icassati Gobbi, Sebastião |
description |
Among the large array of instruments for measuring physical activity (PA), the use of questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers with older adults is frequent. This study aimed to analyze the most widely adopted protocol for each instrument that is most commonly used to assess PA in older adults, and explore possible advantages and disadvantages of the methods used for these instruments. Thereby, we performed a search in databases and cross references of the articles selected. This procedure yielded in 16 studies being included. The in-depth analyzed studies demonstrate that questionnaires are usually applied either as an interview or self-administered, assessing the domains of leisure, sports, and household chores with a recall period of a typical week in the last month. Regarding pedometers and accelerometers, the length of time considered to be sufficient for data collection is five days. The devices are frequently used on the waist or hip with a belt or attached to clothing and removed only for water activities or during sleeping time. The use of either instrument should take into account the advantages and disadvantages that influence choosing one over the other, such as the number of participants to be evaluated, the time available for assessment, among others. The use of accelerometer along with PA questionnaire may yield more reliable and accurate measurements of PA level. In addition, it is recommended that, for older adults, questionnaires should be applied employing the interview format, in order to minimize possible misinterpretation of the questions. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado" Systematic review "Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado" Revisão sistemática |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256 10.1590/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2013v15n2p256/24160 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2013); 256-265 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 15 n. 2 (2013); 256-265 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435123011158016 |