Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Rochelle Rocha
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Backes, Othavio Porto, Figueiredo, Pedro, Castro, Flávio Antônio de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178
Resumo: Quantitative monographic studies systematically use inferential statistical procedures to test hypotheses. For this purpose, sampling procedures and sample sizes need to be adequate for the proposed procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the sample selection methods, as well as the performance and types of calculation to determine the sample size adopted in theses and dissertations developed in a graduate program in the field of Physical Education. Theses and dissertations defended between 2003 and 2013 were obtained through digital repository. Only quantitative studies were included, in which the following issues were analyzed: (1) sample selection criteria; (2) presence of sample calculation; (3) calculation type to estimate sample size. A total of 199 studies were included. Of these, 6% (n=11) used probabilistic methods for sample selection and 3% (n=6) used animal models. As for the accomplishment of sample calculations, 36% (n=72) studies reported having adopted this procedure. Of studies that performed sample calculations, 25% (n=18) used predictive equations, 67% (n=48) considered methods with statistical power as their base, 3% (n=2) used confidence interval, 4% (n=3) did not mention the method and 1% (n=1) was based on the type of statistical test to be used later. Nonprobabilistic sampling methods predominate for the selection of subjects; most studies do not report adopting calculations to estimate sample size and, among those that reported the use, the models that consider statistical power as the main criterion are predominant. 
id UFSC-16_ba61602ae06a64715dbbc3089905de75
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51178
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive studyProcessos de amostragem e cálculo para determinação do tamanho da amostra: critérios e métodos adotados em teses e dissertações em Ciências do Movimento Humano - um estudo descritivoQuantitative monographic studies systematically use inferential statistical procedures to test hypotheses. For this purpose, sampling procedures and sample sizes need to be adequate for the proposed procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the sample selection methods, as well as the performance and types of calculation to determine the sample size adopted in theses and dissertations developed in a graduate program in the field of Physical Education. Theses and dissertations defended between 2003 and 2013 were obtained through digital repository. Only quantitative studies were included, in which the following issues were analyzed: (1) sample selection criteria; (2) presence of sample calculation; (3) calculation type to estimate sample size. A total of 199 studies were included. Of these, 6% (n=11) used probabilistic methods for sample selection and 3% (n=6) used animal models. As for the accomplishment of sample calculations, 36% (n=72) studies reported having adopted this procedure. Of studies that performed sample calculations, 25% (n=18) used predictive equations, 67% (n=48) considered methods with statistical power as their base, 3% (n=2) used confidence interval, 4% (n=3) did not mention the method and 1% (n=1) was based on the type of statistical test to be used later. Nonprobabilistic sampling methods predominate for the selection of subjects; most studies do not report adopting calculations to estimate sample size and, among those that reported the use, the models that consider statistical power as the main criterion are predominant. Trabalhos monográficos quantitativos utilizam, sistematicamente, procedimentos estatísticos inferenciais para testar hipóteses. Para tanto, é necessário que os procedimentos de amostragem e os tamanhos amostrais estejam adequados aos procedimentos propostos. Objetivou-se identificar os métodos de seleção amostral, bem como a realização e os tipos de cálculo para determinação do tamanho amostral adotados em teses e dissertações desenvolvidas em um programa de pós-graduação no campo da Educação Física. As teses e dissertações, defendidas entre 2003 e 2013, foram obtidas via repositório digital. Foram incluídos apenas estudos de caráter quantitativo, nos quais analisou-se: (1) critério para seleção amostral; (2) presença de cálculo amostral; (3) tipo de cálculo para estimativa do tamanho amostral. Foram incluídos 199 trabalhos. Dentre estes, 6% (n=11) usaram métodos probabilísticos para seleção amostral e 3% (n=6) usaram amostra animal. Quanto à realização de cálculo amostral 36% (n=72) dos trabalhos relatam ter adotado. Dos estudos que citam ter realizado cálculos, 25% (n=18) usaram equações preditivas, 67% (n=48) consideraram métodos com o poder estatístico como base, 3% (n=2) usaram o intervalo de confiança, 4% (n=3) não citam o método e 1% (n=1) baseou-se no tipo de teste estatístico a ser usado posteriormente. Os métodos de amostragem não-probabilísticos predominam para a seleção dos sujeitos; grande parte dos estudos não relata adotar cálculos para a estimativa do tamanho amostral e dentre aqueles que citam utilizar, os modelos que consideram o poder estatístico como principal critério são predominantes.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2018-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado""Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"Artigo de revisãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/5117810.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n5p480Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 20 No. 5 (2018); 480-490Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 20 n. 5 (2018); 480-4901980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178/38318Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Rochelle RochaBackes, Othavio PortoFigueiredo, PedroCastro, Flávio Antônio de Souza2019-02-06T09:16:59Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51178Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2019-02-06T09:16:59Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
Processos de amostragem e cálculo para determinação do tamanho da amostra: critérios e métodos adotados em teses e dissertações em Ciências do Movimento Humano - um estudo descritivo
title Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
spellingShingle Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
Costa, Rochelle Rocha
title_short Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
title_full Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
title_fullStr Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
title_sort Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
author Costa, Rochelle Rocha
author_facet Costa, Rochelle Rocha
Backes, Othavio Porto
Figueiredo, Pedro
Castro, Flávio Antônio de Souza
author_role author
author2 Backes, Othavio Porto
Figueiredo, Pedro
Castro, Flávio Antônio de Souza
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Rochelle Rocha
Backes, Othavio Porto
Figueiredo, Pedro
Castro, Flávio Antônio de Souza
description Quantitative monographic studies systematically use inferential statistical procedures to test hypotheses. For this purpose, sampling procedures and sample sizes need to be adequate for the proposed procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the sample selection methods, as well as the performance and types of calculation to determine the sample size adopted in theses and dissertations developed in a graduate program in the field of Physical Education. Theses and dissertations defended between 2003 and 2013 were obtained through digital repository. Only quantitative studies were included, in which the following issues were analyzed: (1) sample selection criteria; (2) presence of sample calculation; (3) calculation type to estimate sample size. A total of 199 studies were included. Of these, 6% (n=11) used probabilistic methods for sample selection and 3% (n=6) used animal models. As for the accomplishment of sample calculations, 36% (n=72) studies reported having adopted this procedure. Of studies that performed sample calculations, 25% (n=18) used predictive equations, 67% (n=48) considered methods with statistical power as their base, 3% (n=2) used confidence interval, 4% (n=3) did not mention the method and 1% (n=1) was based on the type of statistical test to be used later. Nonprobabilistic sampling methods predominate for the selection of subjects; most studies do not report adopting calculations to estimate sample size and, among those that reported the use, the models that consider statistical power as the main criterion are predominant. 
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado"
"Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"
Artigo de revisão
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178
10.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n5p480
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n5p480
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178/38318
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 20 No. 5 (2018); 480-490
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 20 n. 5 (2018); 480-490
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435125031763968