Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178 |
Resumo: | Quantitative monographic studies systematically use inferential statistical procedures to test hypotheses. For this purpose, sampling procedures and sample sizes need to be adequate for the proposed procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the sample selection methods, as well as the performance and types of calculation to determine the sample size adopted in theses and dissertations developed in a graduate program in the field of Physical Education. Theses and dissertations defended between 2003 and 2013 were obtained through digital repository. Only quantitative studies were included, in which the following issues were analyzed: (1) sample selection criteria; (2) presence of sample calculation; (3) calculation type to estimate sample size. A total of 199 studies were included. Of these, 6% (n=11) used probabilistic methods for sample selection and 3% (n=6) used animal models. As for the accomplishment of sample calculations, 36% (n=72) studies reported having adopted this procedure. Of studies that performed sample calculations, 25% (n=18) used predictive equations, 67% (n=48) considered methods with statistical power as their base, 3% (n=2) used confidence interval, 4% (n=3) did not mention the method and 1% (n=1) was based on the type of statistical test to be used later. Nonprobabilistic sampling methods predominate for the selection of subjects; most studies do not report adopting calculations to estimate sample size and, among those that reported the use, the models that consider statistical power as the main criterion are predominant. |
id |
UFSC-16_ba61602ae06a64715dbbc3089905de75 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51178 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive studyProcessos de amostragem e cálculo para determinação do tamanho da amostra: critérios e métodos adotados em teses e dissertações em Ciências do Movimento Humano - um estudo descritivoQuantitative monographic studies systematically use inferential statistical procedures to test hypotheses. For this purpose, sampling procedures and sample sizes need to be adequate for the proposed procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the sample selection methods, as well as the performance and types of calculation to determine the sample size adopted in theses and dissertations developed in a graduate program in the field of Physical Education. Theses and dissertations defended between 2003 and 2013 were obtained through digital repository. Only quantitative studies were included, in which the following issues were analyzed: (1) sample selection criteria; (2) presence of sample calculation; (3) calculation type to estimate sample size. A total of 199 studies were included. Of these, 6% (n=11) used probabilistic methods for sample selection and 3% (n=6) used animal models. As for the accomplishment of sample calculations, 36% (n=72) studies reported having adopted this procedure. Of studies that performed sample calculations, 25% (n=18) used predictive equations, 67% (n=48) considered methods with statistical power as their base, 3% (n=2) used confidence interval, 4% (n=3) did not mention the method and 1% (n=1) was based on the type of statistical test to be used later. Nonprobabilistic sampling methods predominate for the selection of subjects; most studies do not report adopting calculations to estimate sample size and, among those that reported the use, the models that consider statistical power as the main criterion are predominant. Trabalhos monográficos quantitativos utilizam, sistematicamente, procedimentos estatísticos inferenciais para testar hipóteses. Para tanto, é necessário que os procedimentos de amostragem e os tamanhos amostrais estejam adequados aos procedimentos propostos. Objetivou-se identificar os métodos de seleção amostral, bem como a realização e os tipos de cálculo para determinação do tamanho amostral adotados em teses e dissertações desenvolvidas em um programa de pós-graduação no campo da Educação Física. As teses e dissertações, defendidas entre 2003 e 2013, foram obtidas via repositório digital. Foram incluídos apenas estudos de caráter quantitativo, nos quais analisou-se: (1) critério para seleção amostral; (2) presença de cálculo amostral; (3) tipo de cálculo para estimativa do tamanho amostral. Foram incluídos 199 trabalhos. Dentre estes, 6% (n=11) usaram métodos probabilísticos para seleção amostral e 3% (n=6) usaram amostra animal. Quanto à realização de cálculo amostral 36% (n=72) dos trabalhos relatam ter adotado. Dos estudos que citam ter realizado cálculos, 25% (n=18) usaram equações preditivas, 67% (n=48) consideraram métodos com o poder estatístico como base, 3% (n=2) usaram o intervalo de confiança, 4% (n=3) não citam o método e 1% (n=1) baseou-se no tipo de teste estatístico a ser usado posteriormente. Os métodos de amostragem não-probabilísticos predominam para a seleção dos sujeitos; grande parte dos estudos não relata adotar cálculos para a estimativa do tamanho amostral e dentre aqueles que citam utilizar, os modelos que consideram o poder estatístico como principal critério são predominantes.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2018-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado""Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"Artigo de revisãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/5117810.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n5p480Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 20 No. 5 (2018); 480-490Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 20 n. 5 (2018); 480-4901980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178/38318Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Rochelle RochaBackes, Othavio PortoFigueiredo, PedroCastro, Flávio Antônio de Souza2019-02-06T09:16:59Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51178Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2019-02-06T09:16:59Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study Processos de amostragem e cálculo para determinação do tamanho da amostra: critérios e métodos adotados em teses e dissertações em Ciências do Movimento Humano - um estudo descritivo |
title |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study |
spellingShingle |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study Costa, Rochelle Rocha |
title_short |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study |
title_full |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study |
title_fullStr |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study |
title_sort |
Sampling procedures and calculation for sample size determination: criteria and methods adopted in theses and dissertations in Human Movement Sciences - a descriptive study |
author |
Costa, Rochelle Rocha |
author_facet |
Costa, Rochelle Rocha Backes, Othavio Porto Figueiredo, Pedro Castro, Flávio Antônio de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Backes, Othavio Porto Figueiredo, Pedro Castro, Flávio Antônio de Souza |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Rochelle Rocha Backes, Othavio Porto Figueiredo, Pedro Castro, Flávio Antônio de Souza |
description |
Quantitative monographic studies systematically use inferential statistical procedures to test hypotheses. For this purpose, sampling procedures and sample sizes need to be adequate for the proposed procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the sample selection methods, as well as the performance and types of calculation to determine the sample size adopted in theses and dissertations developed in a graduate program in the field of Physical Education. Theses and dissertations defended between 2003 and 2013 were obtained through digital repository. Only quantitative studies were included, in which the following issues were analyzed: (1) sample selection criteria; (2) presence of sample calculation; (3) calculation type to estimate sample size. A total of 199 studies were included. Of these, 6% (n=11) used probabilistic methods for sample selection and 3% (n=6) used animal models. As for the accomplishment of sample calculations, 36% (n=72) studies reported having adopted this procedure. Of studies that performed sample calculations, 25% (n=18) used predictive equations, 67% (n=48) considered methods with statistical power as their base, 3% (n=2) used confidence interval, 4% (n=3) did not mention the method and 1% (n=1) was based on the type of statistical test to be used later. Nonprobabilistic sampling methods predominate for the selection of subjects; most studies do not report adopting calculations to estimate sample size and, among those that reported the use, the models that consider statistical power as the main criterion are predominant. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado" "Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado" Artigo de revisão info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178 10.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n5p480 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n5p480 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51178/38318 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 20 No. 5 (2018); 480-490 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 20 n. 5 (2018); 480-490 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435125031763968 |