BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072019000100393 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: to identify the opinions of professors about the relationship between theory and practice in nursing. Method: descriptive analytical, qualitative study. Eighteen professors from two universities (one federal and one private) from the southern region of the country participated. Data collection took place between July and September 2014, through semi-structured interviews. Open and axial coding as proposed by Strauss and Corbin, with the help of Atlas ti® 7 software was used for data collection. Results: the following categories emerged: The centrality of the practice for teaching and The specialist x generalist dichotomy: contrasting discourses. Conclusion: the opinions of professors about theory and practice in nursing are widely conflicting. In areas considered of greater complexity, mastery of content is prefered and considered advantageous. The relationships that nurses and nursing professors maintain with knowledge influence the disconnection between theory and practice. |
id |
UFSC-17_4c437b91091676f10f4eb495f9de9e6f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-07072019000100393 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-17 |
network_name_str |
Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHINGNursing professorsThird-level educationNursing professor practiceProfessional practiceIdentification (Psychology)NursingABSTRACT Objective: to identify the opinions of professors about the relationship between theory and practice in nursing. Method: descriptive analytical, qualitative study. Eighteen professors from two universities (one federal and one private) from the southern region of the country participated. Data collection took place between July and September 2014, through semi-structured interviews. Open and axial coding as proposed by Strauss and Corbin, with the help of Atlas ti® 7 software was used for data collection. Results: the following categories emerged: The centrality of the practice for teaching and The specialist x generalist dichotomy: contrasting discourses. Conclusion: the opinions of professors about theory and practice in nursing are widely conflicting. In areas considered of greater complexity, mastery of content is prefered and considered advantageous. The relationships that nurses and nursing professors maintain with knowledge influence the disconnection between theory and practice.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072019000100393Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem v.28 2019reponame:Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSC10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2017-0459info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLazzari,Daniele DelacanalMartini,Jussara GuePrado,Marta Lenise doBackes,Vânia Marli SchubertRodrigues,JefersonTestoni,Ana Karolinyeng2019-12-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-07072019000100393Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/tcePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptextoecontexto@nfr.ufsc.br1980-265X0104-0707opendoar:2019-12-04T00:00Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING |
title |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING |
spellingShingle |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING Lazzari,Daniele Delacanal Nursing professors Third-level education Nursing professor practice Professional practice Identification (Psychology) Nursing |
title_short |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING |
title_full |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING |
title_fullStr |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING |
title_full_unstemmed |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING |
title_sort |
BETWEEN THOSE WHO THINK AND THOSE WHO DO: PRACTICE AND THEORY IN NURSE TEACHING |
author |
Lazzari,Daniele Delacanal |
author_facet |
Lazzari,Daniele Delacanal Martini,Jussara Gue Prado,Marta Lenise do Backes,Vânia Marli Schubert Rodrigues,Jeferson Testoni,Ana Karoliny |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martini,Jussara Gue Prado,Marta Lenise do Backes,Vânia Marli Schubert Rodrigues,Jeferson Testoni,Ana Karoliny |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lazzari,Daniele Delacanal Martini,Jussara Gue Prado,Marta Lenise do Backes,Vânia Marli Schubert Rodrigues,Jeferson Testoni,Ana Karoliny |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nursing professors Third-level education Nursing professor practice Professional practice Identification (Psychology) Nursing |
topic |
Nursing professors Third-level education Nursing professor practice Professional practice Identification (Psychology) Nursing |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: to identify the opinions of professors about the relationship between theory and practice in nursing. Method: descriptive analytical, qualitative study. Eighteen professors from two universities (one federal and one private) from the southern region of the country participated. Data collection took place between July and September 2014, through semi-structured interviews. Open and axial coding as proposed by Strauss and Corbin, with the help of Atlas ti® 7 software was used for data collection. Results: the following categories emerged: The centrality of the practice for teaching and The specialist x generalist dichotomy: contrasting discourses. Conclusion: the opinions of professors about theory and practice in nursing are widely conflicting. In areas considered of greater complexity, mastery of content is prefered and considered advantageous. The relationships that nurses and nursing professors maintain with knowledge influence the disconnection between theory and practice. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072019000100393 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072019000100393 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2017-0459 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem v.28 2019 reponame:Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
textoecontexto@nfr.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1750118395363196928 |