PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Echevarría-Guanilo,Maria Elena
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Gonçalves,Natália, Romanoski,Priscila Juceli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072019000100401
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: to present and discuss conceptual bases and methods for evaluating the content, construct and criterion validity of self-reported measuring instruments. Method: theoretical study based on the concepts of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments and those evaluated in the Evaluating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes, which includes concepts of instrument assessment to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results: validity is significant for the methodological quality of an instrument; however, it is a relative criterion, since it depends on the adequacy of the instrument to be measured. There are three different validity measurement properties described in the literature: content, construct and criterion validity. Conclusions: as validity is an important property, it is recommended that it be verified in studies that aimed to develop new scales and in those that adapted and validated for another culture or population.
id UFSC-17_dd2097f8a79e3dd500a8e02fbc7b4b4f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-07072019000100401
network_acronym_str UFSC-17
network_name_str Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART IIPsychometricsValidation studiesSurveys and questionnairesReproducibility of resultsABSTRACT Objective: to present and discuss conceptual bases and methods for evaluating the content, construct and criterion validity of self-reported measuring instruments. Method: theoretical study based on the concepts of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments and those evaluated in the Evaluating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes, which includes concepts of instrument assessment to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results: validity is significant for the methodological quality of an instrument; however, it is a relative criterion, since it depends on the adequacy of the instrument to be measured. There are three different validity measurement properties described in the literature: content, construct and criterion validity. Conclusions: as validity is an important property, it is recommended that it be verified in studies that aimed to develop new scales and in those that adapted and validated for another culture or population.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072019000100401Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem v.28 2019reponame:Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSC10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2017-0311info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEchevarría-Guanilo,Maria ElenaGonçalves,NatáliaRomanoski,Priscila Jucelieng2019-12-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-07072019000100401Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/tcePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptextoecontexto@nfr.ufsc.br1980-265X0104-0707opendoar:2019-12-05T00:00Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II
title PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II
spellingShingle PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II
Echevarría-Guanilo,Maria Elena
Psychometrics
Validation studies
Surveys and questionnaires
Reproducibility of results
title_short PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II
title_full PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II
title_fullStr PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II
title_full_unstemmed PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II
title_sort PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II
author Echevarría-Guanilo,Maria Elena
author_facet Echevarría-Guanilo,Maria Elena
Gonçalves,Natália
Romanoski,Priscila Juceli
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves,Natália
Romanoski,Priscila Juceli
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Echevarría-Guanilo,Maria Elena
Gonçalves,Natália
Romanoski,Priscila Juceli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psychometrics
Validation studies
Surveys and questionnaires
Reproducibility of results
topic Psychometrics
Validation studies
Surveys and questionnaires
Reproducibility of results
description ABSTRACT Objective: to present and discuss conceptual bases and methods for evaluating the content, construct and criterion validity of self-reported measuring instruments. Method: theoretical study based on the concepts of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments and those evaluated in the Evaluating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes, which includes concepts of instrument assessment to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results: validity is significant for the methodological quality of an instrument; however, it is a relative criterion, since it depends on the adequacy of the instrument to be measured. There are three different validity measurement properties described in the literature: content, construct and criterion validity. Conclusions: as validity is an important property, it is recommended that it be verified in studies that aimed to develop new scales and in those that adapted and validated for another culture or population.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072019000100401
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072019000100401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2017-0311
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem v.28 2019
reponame:Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online)
collection Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Texto & contexto enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv textoecontexto@nfr.ufsc.br
_version_ 1750118395377876992

Registros relacionados