Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wampler, Brian
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2014v13n28p199
Resumo: Contentious politics helps individuals and groups with limited political voice to place their ideas and interests on the political agenda. Contentious politics were long thought to occur when politically marginalized group had no other means to advance their political agenda. The June 2013 social mobilization in Brazil caught most political observers by surprise, especially given the creation of a large, wide-spread participatory architecture (national conferences, councils, participatory budgeting). The innovative institutions emerging in Brazil created a policy environment in which millions of citizens have regular access to state policymaking bodies. How does the institutionalization of a broader network of participatory institutions make it easier for citizens to engage in contentious politics? In what ways does this institutionalization make it more difficult for some citizens to engage in contentious politics? In what ways has the vast network of participatory institutions been largely irrelevant to how citizens use contentious politics? This article explore how the institutionalization of an extensive participatory democracy system in Brazil alters the incentive structures that encourage citizens to engage in contentious collective action.
id UFSC-18_0f5736bdc6e4eba476af17996e0a12cd
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/37845
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in BrazilContentious politics helps individuals and groups with limited political voice to place their ideas and interests on the political agenda. Contentious politics were long thought to occur when politically marginalized group had no other means to advance their political agenda. The June 2013 social mobilization in Brazil caught most political observers by surprise, especially given the creation of a large, wide-spread participatory architecture (national conferences, councils, participatory budgeting). The innovative institutions emerging in Brazil created a policy environment in which millions of citizens have regular access to state policymaking bodies. How does the institutionalization of a broader network of participatory institutions make it easier for citizens to engage in contentious politics? In what ways does this institutionalization make it more difficult for some citizens to engage in contentious politics? In what ways has the vast network of participatory institutions been largely irrelevant to how citizens use contentious politics? This article explore how the institutionalization of an extensive participatory democracy system in Brazil alters the incentive structures that encourage citizens to engage in contentious collective action.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2014-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2014v13n28p19910.5007/2175-7984.2014v13n28p199Política & Sociedade; Vol. 13 No. 28 (2014); 199-224Política & Sociedade; Vol. 13 Núm. 28 (2014); 199-224Política & Sociedade; v. 13 n. 28 (2014); 199-2242175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2014v13n28p199/28929Copyright (c) 2014 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWampler, Brian2019-09-11T15:24:54Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/37845Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2019-09-11T15:24:54Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil
title Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil
spellingShingle Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil
Wampler, Brian
title_short Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil
title_full Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil
title_fullStr Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil
title_sort Contentious Politics and Participatory Democracy in Brazil
author Wampler, Brian
author_facet Wampler, Brian
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wampler, Brian
description Contentious politics helps individuals and groups with limited political voice to place their ideas and interests on the political agenda. Contentious politics were long thought to occur when politically marginalized group had no other means to advance their political agenda. The June 2013 social mobilization in Brazil caught most political observers by surprise, especially given the creation of a large, wide-spread participatory architecture (national conferences, councils, participatory budgeting). The innovative institutions emerging in Brazil created a policy environment in which millions of citizens have regular access to state policymaking bodies. How does the institutionalization of a broader network of participatory institutions make it easier for citizens to engage in contentious politics? In what ways does this institutionalization make it more difficult for some citizens to engage in contentious politics? In what ways has the vast network of participatory institutions been largely irrelevant to how citizens use contentious politics? This article explore how the institutionalization of an extensive participatory democracy system in Brazil alters the incentive structures that encourage citizens to engage in contentious collective action.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2014v13n28p199
10.5007/2175-7984.2014v13n28p199
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2014v13n28p199
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2014v13n28p199
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2014v13n28p199/28929
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 13 No. 28 (2014); 199-224
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 13 Núm. 28 (2014); 199-224
Política & Sociedade; v. 13 n. 28 (2014); 199-224
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205029724160