Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/59842 |
Resumo: | The contemporary debate on alternative experiences of work organization and production isin Brazil dominated by the so-called “solidarity economy”. Also known as “cooperatives” or“recovered factories and enterprises”, many of these experiences are evidently not new, goingback to the first practices of resistance and social self-organization carried out by the workingclass. At the same time, their condition and potential as a societal “alternative” in a varietyof circumstances are minimized and even challenged by the way in which they fall withinthe framework of relations of subordination and dependence on agencies, mechanisms andactors of the state and the capitalist market. The article in question aims to present a briefcritical review of the theoretical repertoire mobilized by exponents of the solidarity economyin the perspectives from the anarchist and heterodox marxist, relating it to the proposal of the“participatory economy” (PARECON). Thus, it is hoped to contribute with a critique of thistheoretical framework through the recovery of the antisystemic sense of the concept of self-management, subsidizing the reflection and analysis related to such experiences. |
id |
UFSC-18_35c95f28a81aec404d785b0f51807510 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/59842 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economyAuto-organização social no mundo do trabalho e produção: notas para uma crítica à economia solidáriaThe contemporary debate on alternative experiences of work organization and production isin Brazil dominated by the so-called “solidarity economy”. Also known as “cooperatives” or“recovered factories and enterprises”, many of these experiences are evidently not new, goingback to the first practices of resistance and social self-organization carried out by the workingclass. At the same time, their condition and potential as a societal “alternative” in a varietyof circumstances are minimized and even challenged by the way in which they fall withinthe framework of relations of subordination and dependence on agencies, mechanisms andactors of the state and the capitalist market. The article in question aims to present a briefcritical review of the theoretical repertoire mobilized by exponents of the solidarity economyin the perspectives from the anarchist and heterodox marxist, relating it to the proposal of the“participatory economy” (PARECON). Thus, it is hoped to contribute with a critique of thistheoretical framework through the recovery of the antisystemic sense of the concept of self-management, subsidizing the reflection and analysis related to such experiences. O debate contemporâneo sobre experiências alternativas de organização do trabalho e da produção se encontra no Brasil dominado pela chamada “economia solidária”. Disseminadamente conhecidas como “cooperativas” ou “fábricas e empresas recuperadas”, muitas dessas experiências evidentemente não são novas, remontando às primeiras práticas de resistência e de auto-organização social protagonizadas pela classe trabalhadora. Ao mesmo tempo, sua condição e potencial de “alternativa” societária em variadas circunstâncias são minimizados e mesmo colocados em xeque pelo modo como estas se inserem no âmbito de relações de subordinação e dependência com agências, mecanismos e operadores do Estado e do mercado capitalista. O artigo em questão pretende apresentar um suscinto balanço crítico do repertório teórico mobilizado por expoentes da economia solidária à luz de perspectivas oriundas do campo anarquista e marxista heterodoxo, relacionando-o com a proposta da “economia participativa” (PARECON). Dessa forma, espera-se contribuir com uma crítica a este marco teórico através da recuperação do sentido antissistêmico do conceito de autogestão, subsidiando a reflexão e análise relativas a tais experiênciasUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2020-11-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/5984210.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p301Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 45 (2020); 301-336Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 45 (2020); 301-336Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 45 (2020); 301-3362175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/59842/44724Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedadehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrancaleone, Cassio2020-11-19T18:33:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/59842Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2020-11-19T18:33:42Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy Auto-organização social no mundo do trabalho e produção: notas para uma crítica à economia solidária |
title |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy |
spellingShingle |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy Brancaleone, Cassio |
title_short |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy |
title_full |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy |
title_fullStr |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy |
title_sort |
Social self-organization in the field of work and production: notes for a critique of the solidarity economy |
author |
Brancaleone, Cassio |
author_facet |
Brancaleone, Cassio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brancaleone, Cassio |
description |
The contemporary debate on alternative experiences of work organization and production isin Brazil dominated by the so-called “solidarity economy”. Also known as “cooperatives” or“recovered factories and enterprises”, many of these experiences are evidently not new, goingback to the first practices of resistance and social self-organization carried out by the workingclass. At the same time, their condition and potential as a societal “alternative” in a varietyof circumstances are minimized and even challenged by the way in which they fall withinthe framework of relations of subordination and dependence on agencies, mechanisms andactors of the state and the capitalist market. The article in question aims to present a briefcritical review of the theoretical repertoire mobilized by exponents of the solidarity economyin the perspectives from the anarchist and heterodox marxist, relating it to the proposal of the“participatory economy” (PARECON). Thus, it is hoped to contribute with a critique of thistheoretical framework through the recovery of the antisystemic sense of the concept of self-management, subsidizing the reflection and analysis related to such experiences. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/59842 10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p301 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/59842 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p301 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/59842/44724 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 45 (2020); 301-336 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 45 (2020); 301-336 Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 45 (2020); 301-336 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435205856002048 |