The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234 |
Resumo: | In this article we summarize a discussion about the main thesis about the pertinent of land reform in the beginning of twenty first century in Brazil. The papers starts with general contextualization of the Brazilian rural situation after a decades of structural reforms followings the discussion of thesis against and favorable the land reform. On the one side we observe that exist an expressive number of researchers that are defending the land reform because they are understanding that this policy is very important to combat the poverty and social inequalities, and the other side we saw also another group of researchers that are against the land reform because they believe that the time for the land reform is already gone. We concluded that academic debate about agrarian reform now is less important than it was in the post war period, especially in the 1960s. |
id |
UFSC-18_60c79253990942835fe07cb6c03ae5a5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/49353 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural ContextO debate sobre a reforma agrária no contexto do Brasil rural atualIn this article we summarize a discussion about the main thesis about the pertinent of land reform in the beginning of twenty first century in Brazil. The papers starts with general contextualization of the Brazilian rural situation after a decades of structural reforms followings the discussion of thesis against and favorable the land reform. On the one side we observe that exist an expressive number of researchers that are defending the land reform because they are understanding that this policy is very important to combat the poverty and social inequalities, and the other side we saw also another group of researchers that are against the land reform because they believe that the time for the land reform is already gone. We concluded that academic debate about agrarian reform now is less important than it was in the post war period, especially in the 1960s.Neste artigo, faz-se uma breve discussão sobre as principais teses em debate sobre a pertinência da reforma agrária no início do século XXI. Parte-se de uma contextualização do meio rural brasileiro atual após décadas de transformações estruturais para, posteriormente, apresentar as teses favoráveis e as teses contrárias à reforma agrária. Por um lado, observa-se que existe um grupo expressivo de pesquisadores que defende a reforma agrária por entender que este ainda é um instrumento eficaz no combate à pobreza e às desigualdades sociais e regionais e, por outro, registra-se a presença de um grupo de pesquisadores que avaliam que o tempo da reforma agrária já passou e que este não é mais um instrumento necessário no Brasil no século XXI. Concluímos que, neste cenário, o debate acadêmico é bem menos relevante comparativamente aos períodos anteriores, especialmente durante o pós-guerra.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2016-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p23410.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 234 – 260Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 234 – 260Política & Sociedade; v. 15 (2016); 234 – 2602175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234/33803Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMattei, Lauro2020-01-21T12:04:41Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/49353Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2020-01-21T12:04:41Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context O debate sobre a reforma agrária no contexto do Brasil rural atual |
title |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context |
spellingShingle |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context Mattei, Lauro |
title_short |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context |
title_full |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context |
title_fullStr |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context |
title_sort |
The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context |
author |
Mattei, Lauro |
author_facet |
Mattei, Lauro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mattei, Lauro |
description |
In this article we summarize a discussion about the main thesis about the pertinent of land reform in the beginning of twenty first century in Brazil. The papers starts with general contextualization of the Brazilian rural situation after a decades of structural reforms followings the discussion of thesis against and favorable the land reform. On the one side we observe that exist an expressive number of researchers that are defending the land reform because they are understanding that this policy is very important to combat the poverty and social inequalities, and the other side we saw also another group of researchers that are against the land reform because they believe that the time for the land reform is already gone. We concluded that academic debate about agrarian reform now is less important than it was in the post war period, especially in the 1960s. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234 10.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234/33803 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 234 – 260 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 234 – 260 Política & Sociedade; v. 15 (2016); 234 – 260 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435205407211520 |