The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mattei, Lauro
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234
Resumo: In this article we summarize a discussion about the main thesis about the pertinent of land reform in the beginning of twenty first century in Brazil. The papers starts with general contextualization of the Brazilian rural situation after a decades of structural reforms followings the discussion of thesis against and favorable the land reform. On the one side we observe that exist an expressive number of researchers that are defending the land reform because they are understanding that this policy is very important to combat the poverty and social inequalities, and the other side we saw also another group of researchers that are against the land reform because they believe that the time for the land reform is already gone. We concluded that academic debate about agrarian reform now is less important than it was in the post war period, especially in the 1960s.
id UFSC-18_60c79253990942835fe07cb6c03ae5a5
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/49353
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural ContextO debate sobre a reforma agrária no contexto do Brasil rural atualIn this article we summarize a discussion about the main thesis about the pertinent of land reform in the beginning of twenty first century in Brazil. The papers starts with general contextualization of the Brazilian rural situation after a decades of structural reforms followings the discussion of thesis against and favorable the land reform. On the one side we observe that exist an expressive number of researchers that are defending the land reform because they are understanding that this policy is very important to combat the poverty and social inequalities, and the other side we saw also another group of researchers that are against the land reform because they believe that the time for the land reform is already gone. We concluded that academic debate about agrarian reform now is less important than it was in the post war period, especially in the 1960s.Neste artigo, faz-se uma breve discussão sobre as principais teses em debate sobre a pertinência da reforma agrária no início do século XXI. Parte-se de uma contextualização do meio rural brasileiro atual após décadas de transformações estruturais para, posteriormente, apresentar as teses favoráveis e as teses contrárias à reforma agrária. Por um lado, observa-se que existe um grupo expressivo de pesquisadores que defende a reforma agrária por entender que este ainda é um instrumento eficaz no combate à pobreza e às desigualdades sociais e regionais e, por outro, registra-se a presença de um grupo de pesquisadores que avaliam que o tempo da reforma agrária já passou e que este não é mais um instrumento necessário no Brasil no século XXI. Concluímos que, neste cenário, o debate acadêmico é bem menos relevante comparativamente aos períodos anteriores, especialmente durante o pós-guerra.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2016-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p23410.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 234 – 260Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 234 – 260Política & Sociedade; v. 15 (2016); 234 – 2602175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234/33803Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMattei, Lauro2020-01-21T12:04:41Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/49353Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2020-01-21T12:04:41Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
O debate sobre a reforma agrária no contexto do Brasil rural atual
title The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
spellingShingle The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
Mattei, Lauro
title_short The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
title_full The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
title_fullStr The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
title_full_unstemmed The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
title_sort The Land Reform Debate in Brazil Under the Current Rural Context
author Mattei, Lauro
author_facet Mattei, Lauro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mattei, Lauro
description In this article we summarize a discussion about the main thesis about the pertinent of land reform in the beginning of twenty first century in Brazil. The papers starts with general contextualization of the Brazilian rural situation after a decades of structural reforms followings the discussion of thesis against and favorable the land reform. On the one side we observe that exist an expressive number of researchers that are defending the land reform because they are understanding that this policy is very important to combat the poverty and social inequalities, and the other side we saw also another group of researchers that are against the land reform because they believe that the time for the land reform is already gone. We concluded that academic debate about agrarian reform now is less important than it was in the post war period, especially in the 1960s.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234
10.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p234/33803
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 234 – 260
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 234 – 260
Política & Sociedade; v. 15 (2016); 234 – 260
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205407211520