Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p286 |
Resumo: | The production of juridical doctrines is one of the central elements in the construction of the State performative’s discourse. The emergence of an intellectual production space on “administrative law” is closely linked to the conjunctural political battles. This space also correspond to different demands of legal legitimacy of the political regimes. In this sense, this paper aims to provide elements that allow mapping the institutional places of producers of doctrine. The goal is also colaborate for the understand how the discourses function as a euphemised political struggle. We try to demonstrate how the social and the professional issues interfere in the accumulation of legal capital and define the legitimacy of the actors. |
id |
UFSC-18_c0a479d94109b86e8aab03e4f3b64ea4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55333 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in BrazilDoutrinadores, políticos e “Direito Administrativo” no BrasilThe production of juridical doctrines is one of the central elements in the construction of the State performative’s discourse. The emergence of an intellectual production space on “administrative law” is closely linked to the conjunctural political battles. This space also correspond to different demands of legal legitimacy of the political regimes. In this sense, this paper aims to provide elements that allow mapping the institutional places of producers of doctrine. The goal is also colaborate for the understand how the discourses function as a euphemised political struggle. We try to demonstrate how the social and the professional issues interfere in the accumulation of legal capital and define the legitimacy of the actors.A produção de doutrinas jurídicas é um dos elementos centrais na construção de um discurso performativo sobre o Estado. A emergência de um espaço de produção intelectual sobre o “Direito Administrativo” ocorre estreitamente vinculado às batalhas políticas conjunturais que correspondem a diferentes demandas de legitimidade jurídica de regimes políticos. Este texto tem por objetivo fornecer elementos que permitam mapear os lugares institucionais dos produtores de doutrina colaborando para se perceber como os discursos funcionam como luta política eufemizada. O objetivo é demonstrar como questões sociais e profissionais interferem no acúmulo de capital jurídico e definem a legitimidade dos atores.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2017-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p28610.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p286Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 37 (2017); 286-314Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 37 (2017); 286-314Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 37 (2017); 286-3142175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p286/35978Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBento, Juliane Sant’AnaEngelmann, FabianoPenna, Luciana Rodrigues2018-03-02T14:57:59Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55333Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2018-03-02T14:57:59Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil Doutrinadores, políticos e “Direito Administrativo” no Brasil |
title |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil Bento, Juliane Sant’Ana |
title_short |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil |
title_full |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil |
title_sort |
Doctrinators, politicians and “administrative law” in Brazil |
author |
Bento, Juliane Sant’Ana |
author_facet |
Bento, Juliane Sant’Ana Engelmann, Fabiano Penna, Luciana Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Engelmann, Fabiano Penna, Luciana Rodrigues |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bento, Juliane Sant’Ana Engelmann, Fabiano Penna, Luciana Rodrigues |
description |
The production of juridical doctrines is one of the central elements in the construction of the State performative’s discourse. The emergence of an intellectual production space on “administrative law” is closely linked to the conjunctural political battles. This space also correspond to different demands of legal legitimacy of the political regimes. In this sense, this paper aims to provide elements that allow mapping the institutional places of producers of doctrine. The goal is also colaborate for the understand how the discourses function as a euphemised political struggle. We try to demonstrate how the social and the professional issues interfere in the accumulation of legal capital and define the legitimacy of the actors. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p286 10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p286 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p286 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p286 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p286/35978 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 37 (2017); 286-314 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 37 (2017); 286-314 Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 37 (2017); 286-314 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435205778407424 |