Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schluchter, Wolfgang
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20
Resumo: The proposition of an axial age, lasting roughly from 800 to 200 B.C. and occurring in major civilizations (China, India, Near East) independent of each other, first introduced by Alfred Weber and Karl Jaspers, then further developed by Robert Bellah and S. N. Eisenstadt among others, implied from the outset the question whether there has been a second axial age, leading to modernity, and if so, whether this second axial age consists in a secularization of the achievements of the first axial age. In this article it is argued that the notion of a second axial age is meaningful, but that the emergence of modernity can›t be accounted for in terms of secularization of the achievements of the first axial age. Rather, a new axial principle was institutionalized which separates the modern from the premodern world. This new principle is spelled out with reference to Hans Blumenberg, Charles Taylor and especially Max Weber. The emphasis is on the dialectics of disenchantment and the place of religion in a secular age
id UFSC-18_d3dc1e9a4b38e0c6b8c26e7eadb3dc63
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/53255
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?A modernidade: uma nova (era) cultura axial?The proposition of an axial age, lasting roughly from 800 to 200 B.C. and occurring in major civilizations (China, India, Near East) independent of each other, first introduced by Alfred Weber and Karl Jaspers, then further developed by Robert Bellah and S. N. Eisenstadt among others, implied from the outset the question whether there has been a second axial age, leading to modernity, and if so, whether this second axial age consists in a secularization of the achievements of the first axial age. In this article it is argued that the notion of a second axial age is meaningful, but that the emergence of modernity can›t be accounted for in terms of secularization of the achievements of the first axial age. Rather, a new axial principle was institutionalized which separates the modern from the premodern world. This new principle is spelled out with reference to Hans Blumenberg, Charles Taylor and especially Max Weber. The emphasis is on the dialectics of disenchantment and the place of religion in a secular ageA proposição de uma era axial, durando aproximadamente entre 800 e 200 a.C. e ocorrendo nas principais civilizações do mundo antigo (China, Índia e Oriente Próximo), independentes umas das outras, foi primeiramente introduzida por Alfred Weber e Karl Jaspers.  Posteriormente ela foi desenvolvida por Robert Bellah e Shmuel Eisenstadt, entre outros, e procurava entender desde o início se teria havido uma segunda era axial que nos conduziu à modernidade e, em caso afirmativo, se ela consiste em uma secularização das conquistas da primeira era axial. Neste artigo argumenta-se que a noção de segunda era axial é significativa, mas que a emergência da modernidade não pode ser explicada em termos de secularização das realizações da primeira era axial. Ao invés, institucionalizou-se um novo princípio axial que separa o mundo moderno do pré-moderno. Esse novo princípio é enunciado com referência a Hans Blumenberg, Charles Taylor e, sobretudo, Max Weber. A ênfase encontra-se na dialética do desencantamento e no lugar da religião em uma era secular.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2017-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p2010.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 36 (2017); 20-43Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 36 (2017); 20-43Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 36 (2017); 20-432175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20/35095Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchluchter, Wolfgang2017-10-17T18:13:45Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/53255Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2017-10-17T18:13:45Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
A modernidade: uma nova (era) cultura axial?
title Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
spellingShingle Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
Schluchter, Wolfgang
title_short Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
title_full Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
title_fullStr Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
title_full_unstemmed Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
title_sort Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
author Schluchter, Wolfgang
author_facet Schluchter, Wolfgang
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schluchter, Wolfgang
description The proposition of an axial age, lasting roughly from 800 to 200 B.C. and occurring in major civilizations (China, India, Near East) independent of each other, first introduced by Alfred Weber and Karl Jaspers, then further developed by Robert Bellah and S. N. Eisenstadt among others, implied from the outset the question whether there has been a second axial age, leading to modernity, and if so, whether this second axial age consists in a secularization of the achievements of the first axial age. In this article it is argued that the notion of a second axial age is meaningful, but that the emergence of modernity can›t be accounted for in terms of secularization of the achievements of the first axial age. Rather, a new axial principle was institutionalized which separates the modern from the premodern world. This new principle is spelled out with reference to Hans Blumenberg, Charles Taylor and especially Max Weber. The emphasis is on the dialectics of disenchantment and the place of religion in a secular age
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20
10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20/35095
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 36 (2017); 20-43
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 36 (2017); 20-43
Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 36 (2017); 20-43
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205466980352