On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Aguiar, Márlio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Losso, Tiago Bahia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149
Resumo: Since neo-republicanism included Roman thinkers and their modern readers among the relevant sources for the debate within Political Theory, there has been a renewed interest in Roman sources as elements to enrich the contemporary debate on political theory and also to re-evaluate Roman influence among moderns. If at first its authors emphasized the Roman contribution to modern political traditions, in recent years an arguably vast production focused on the political thinking of the Romans themselves, what we call the “roman turn”. This article aims to contextualize and outline the methodological characteristics of this “Roman turn”. To this end, the text is divided into two sections: the first analyses the historiography of political thought itself, after the impulse of Cambridge School contextualism; the second section is devoted to the legal history and, more specifically, to the recent directions of institutional or constitutional historiography.
id UFSC-18_fb14404dde24415d0c94333f830735a1
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78149
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional historyEm termos romanos: Res publica, história e constituição na historiografia do pensamento político e na historiografia institucional contemporâneasSince neo-republicanism included Roman thinkers and their modern readers among the relevant sources for the debate within Political Theory, there has been a renewed interest in Roman sources as elements to enrich the contemporary debate on political theory and also to re-evaluate Roman influence among moderns. If at first its authors emphasized the Roman contribution to modern political traditions, in recent years an arguably vast production focused on the political thinking of the Romans themselves, what we call the “roman turn”. This article aims to contextualize and outline the methodological characteristics of this “Roman turn”. To this end, the text is divided into two sections: the first analyses the historiography of political thought itself, after the impulse of Cambridge School contextualism; the second section is devoted to the legal history and, more specifically, to the recent directions of institutional or constitutional historiography.Desde que o neorrepublicanismo incluiu pensadores romanos e seus leitores modernos entre as fontes relevantes para o debate da Teoria Política, nota-se um interesse renovado pelas fontes romanas como elementos para enriquecer o debate contemporâneo da teoria política e também reavaliar a influência romana entre os modernos. Se de início seus autores enfatizavam a contribuição romana às tradições políticas modernas, defende-se que em anos recentes é possível verificar uma vasta produção voltada ao pensamento político dos romanos propriamente ditos, o que chamamos de “roman turn”. Este artigo tem por objetivo contextualizar e delinear as características metodológicas dessa “virada romana”. Para tal o texto está dividido em duas seções: a primeira analisa a historiografia do pensamento político propriamente dita, após o impulso do contextualismo da Escola de Cambridge; a segunda seção se dedica à história do direito e, mais especificamente, aos rumos recentes da historiografia institucional ou constitucional.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2021-07-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/7814910.5007/2175-7984.2021.e78149Política & Sociedade; Vol. 20 No. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102Política & Sociedade; Vol. 20 Núm. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102Política & Sociedade; v. 20 n. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-1022175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149/46913http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAguiar, MárlioLosso, Tiago Bahia 2021-07-16T19:25:43Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78149Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2021-07-16T19:25:43Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
Em termos romanos: Res publica, história e constituição na historiografia do pensamento político e na historiografia institucional contemporâneas
title On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
spellingShingle On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
Aguiar, Márlio
title_short On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
title_full On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
title_fullStr On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
title_full_unstemmed On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
title_sort On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
author Aguiar, Márlio
author_facet Aguiar, Márlio
Losso, Tiago Bahia
author_role author
author2 Losso, Tiago Bahia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Aguiar, Márlio
Losso, Tiago Bahia
description Since neo-republicanism included Roman thinkers and their modern readers among the relevant sources for the debate within Political Theory, there has been a renewed interest in Roman sources as elements to enrich the contemporary debate on political theory and also to re-evaluate Roman influence among moderns. If at first its authors emphasized the Roman contribution to modern political traditions, in recent years an arguably vast production focused on the political thinking of the Romans themselves, what we call the “roman turn”. This article aims to contextualize and outline the methodological characteristics of this “Roman turn”. To this end, the text is divided into two sections: the first analyses the historiography of political thought itself, after the impulse of Cambridge School contextualism; the second section is devoted to the legal history and, more specifically, to the recent directions of institutional or constitutional historiography.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149
10.5007/2175-7984.2021.e78149
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2021.e78149
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149/46913
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 20 No. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 20 Núm. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102
Política & Sociedade; v. 20 n. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435206405455872