On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149 |
Resumo: | Since neo-republicanism included Roman thinkers and their modern readers among the relevant sources for the debate within Political Theory, there has been a renewed interest in Roman sources as elements to enrich the contemporary debate on political theory and also to re-evaluate Roman influence among moderns. If at first its authors emphasized the Roman contribution to modern political traditions, in recent years an arguably vast production focused on the political thinking of the Romans themselves, what we call the “roman turn”. This article aims to contextualize and outline the methodological characteristics of this “Roman turn”. To this end, the text is divided into two sections: the first analyses the historiography of political thought itself, after the impulse of Cambridge School contextualism; the second section is devoted to the legal history and, more specifically, to the recent directions of institutional or constitutional historiography. |
id |
UFSC-18_fb14404dde24415d0c94333f830735a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78149 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional historyEm termos romanos: Res publica, história e constituição na historiografia do pensamento político e na historiografia institucional contemporâneasSince neo-republicanism included Roman thinkers and their modern readers among the relevant sources for the debate within Political Theory, there has been a renewed interest in Roman sources as elements to enrich the contemporary debate on political theory and also to re-evaluate Roman influence among moderns. If at first its authors emphasized the Roman contribution to modern political traditions, in recent years an arguably vast production focused on the political thinking of the Romans themselves, what we call the “roman turn”. This article aims to contextualize and outline the methodological characteristics of this “Roman turn”. To this end, the text is divided into two sections: the first analyses the historiography of political thought itself, after the impulse of Cambridge School contextualism; the second section is devoted to the legal history and, more specifically, to the recent directions of institutional or constitutional historiography.Desde que o neorrepublicanismo incluiu pensadores romanos e seus leitores modernos entre as fontes relevantes para o debate da Teoria Política, nota-se um interesse renovado pelas fontes romanas como elementos para enriquecer o debate contemporâneo da teoria política e também reavaliar a influência romana entre os modernos. Se de início seus autores enfatizavam a contribuição romana às tradições políticas modernas, defende-se que em anos recentes é possível verificar uma vasta produção voltada ao pensamento político dos romanos propriamente ditos, o que chamamos de “roman turn”. Este artigo tem por objetivo contextualizar e delinear as características metodológicas dessa “virada romana”. Para tal o texto está dividido em duas seções: a primeira analisa a historiografia do pensamento político propriamente dita, após o impulso do contextualismo da Escola de Cambridge; a segunda seção se dedica à história do direito e, mais especificamente, aos rumos recentes da historiografia institucional ou constitucional.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2021-07-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/7814910.5007/2175-7984.2021.e78149Política & Sociedade; Vol. 20 No. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102Política & Sociedade; Vol. 20 Núm. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102Política & Sociedade; v. 20 n. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-1022175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149/46913http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAguiar, MárlioLosso, Tiago Bahia 2021-07-16T19:25:43Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78149Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2021-07-16T19:25:43Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history Em termos romanos: Res publica, história e constituição na historiografia do pensamento político e na historiografia institucional contemporâneas |
title |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history |
spellingShingle |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history Aguiar, Márlio |
title_short |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history |
title_full |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history |
title_fullStr |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history |
title_full_unstemmed |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history |
title_sort |
On Romans’ terms: Res publica, history and constitution in the history of political thought and contemporary institutional history |
author |
Aguiar, Márlio |
author_facet |
Aguiar, Márlio Losso, Tiago Bahia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Losso, Tiago Bahia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aguiar, Márlio Losso, Tiago Bahia |
description |
Since neo-republicanism included Roman thinkers and their modern readers among the relevant sources for the debate within Political Theory, there has been a renewed interest in Roman sources as elements to enrich the contemporary debate on political theory and also to re-evaluate Roman influence among moderns. If at first its authors emphasized the Roman contribution to modern political traditions, in recent years an arguably vast production focused on the political thinking of the Romans themselves, what we call the “roman turn”. This article aims to contextualize and outline the methodological characteristics of this “Roman turn”. To this end, the text is divided into two sections: the first analyses the historiography of political thought itself, after the impulse of Cambridge School contextualism; the second section is devoted to the legal history and, more specifically, to the recent directions of institutional or constitutional historiography. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149 10.5007/2175-7984.2021.e78149 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2021.e78149 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/78149/46913 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 20 No. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 20 Núm. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102 Política & Sociedade; v. 20 n. 47 (2021): Revista Política & Sociedade. Dossiê “Republicanismo neorromano: história e teoria política”; 69-102 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435206405455872 |