Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocco, Héctor Oscar Di
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2009v26n1p136
Resumo: In this article is discussed a subject that generates controversies inthe teaching of Physics: why the radian must be the correct unitfor the measurements of plane angles. The answer is, in ouropinion, in the concepts of Calculus, where the analytical notionsare independent of the geometrical ones.
id UFSC-19_0ec7e18afea4dc0206ac0ae251861f35
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/10500
network_acronym_str UFSC-19
network_name_str Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?Ángulos planos: Por qué el radián debe tener una medida igual a la unidad?In this article is discussed a subject that generates controversies inthe teaching of Physics: why the radian must be the correct unitfor the measurements of plane angles. The answer is, in ouropinion, in the concepts of Calculus, where the analytical notionsare independent of the geometrical ones.En este artículo se trata de un asunto que genera polémicas en la enseñanza de la Física: por qué el radián debe tener asignada una medida igual a la unidad. El radián no es una de las tantas posibles unidades de ángulos, sino la única para la cual se cumplen las relaciones trigonométricas y del Cálculo Infinitesimal, aunque la Geometría Analítica no necesite de esta unidad. Se muestra que la respuesta debe buscarse en algunos sencillos conceptos del Cálculo Infinitesimal, donde las nociones analíticas se hacen independientes de las geométricas.Imprensa Universitária - UFSC2009-05-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2009v26n1p13610.5007/2175-7941.2009v26n1p136Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física; v. 26 n. 1 (2009); 136-1442175-79411677-2334reponame:Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2009v26n1p136/10024Rocco, Héctor Oscar Diinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-12-11T13:52:15Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/10500Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/oaicbefisica@gmail.com||fscccef@fsc.ufsc.br|| cbefisica@gmail.com2175-79411677-2334opendoar:2019-12-11T13:52:15Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?
Ángulos planos: Por qué el radián debe tener una medida igual a la unidad?
title Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?
spellingShingle Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?
Rocco, Héctor Oscar Di
title_short Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?
title_full Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?
title_fullStr Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?
title_full_unstemmed Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?
title_sort Plane Angles: why must the radian have a measure equal to the unity?
author Rocco, Héctor Oscar Di
author_facet Rocco, Héctor Oscar Di
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocco, Héctor Oscar Di
description In this article is discussed a subject that generates controversies inthe teaching of Physics: why the radian must be the correct unitfor the measurements of plane angles. The answer is, in ouropinion, in the concepts of Calculus, where the analytical notionsare independent of the geometrical ones.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-05-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2009v26n1p136
10.5007/2175-7941.2009v26n1p136
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2009v26n1p136
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7941.2009v26n1p136
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2009v26n1p136/10024
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Imprensa Universitária - UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Imprensa Universitária - UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física; v. 26 n. 1 (2009); 136-144
2175-7941
1677-2334
reponame:Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online)
collection Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cbefisica@gmail.com||fscccef@fsc.ufsc.br|| cbefisica@gmail.com
_version_ 1799940571960180736

Registros relacionados