The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Em Tese (Florianópolis) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83 |
Resumo: | The article aims at mapping the contemporary debate on the problem of freedom in political theory and, in a related way, presenting a sketch of sociological critique to the discussion. In the first part of the text, the three main concepts of freedom in political theory are presented: freedom as non-interference, freedom as self-realization and freedom as nondomination. In the second part, some of the theoretical grounds underlying the debate on freedom are presented, confronting the main formulations of three traditions of the contemporary theoretical-political debate: liberalism, communitarianism and republicanism. In the third and final part, we proceed to the elaboration of a sketch of sociological critique of conceptions about freedom in political theory. The article proposes the demarcation of a fundamental distinction between the two disciplines with regard to the problem of freedom, taking into account two aspects: the theoretical and epistemological constitution of the two disciplinary fields (moral philosophy vs. objective science) and the object for reference in the analysis of the restrictions of freedom (State vs. society). |
id |
UFSC-25_9434ac08737fecdbd9757986155f7cca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/58364 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-25 |
network_name_str |
Em Tese (Florianópolis) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticismO debate da teoria política contemporânea sobre a "liberdade" e um esboço de crítica sociológicaThe article aims at mapping the contemporary debate on the problem of freedom in political theory and, in a related way, presenting a sketch of sociological critique to the discussion. In the first part of the text, the three main concepts of freedom in political theory are presented: freedom as non-interference, freedom as self-realization and freedom as nondomination. In the second part, some of the theoretical grounds underlying the debate on freedom are presented, confronting the main formulations of three traditions of the contemporary theoretical-political debate: liberalism, communitarianism and republicanism. In the third and final part, we proceed to the elaboration of a sketch of sociological critique of conceptions about freedom in political theory. The article proposes the demarcation of a fundamental distinction between the two disciplines with regard to the problem of freedom, taking into account two aspects: the theoretical and epistemological constitution of the two disciplinary fields (moral philosophy vs. objective science) and the object for reference in the analysis of the restrictions of freedom (State vs. society).O artigo tem por objetivo realizar um mapeamento do debate contemporâneo sobre o problema da liberdade na teoria política e, de modo correlato, apresentar um esboço de crítica sociológica à discussão. Na primeira parte do texto, são apresentados os três principais conceitos de liberdade na teoria política: a liberdade como não-interferência, a liberdade como autorrealização e a liberdade como não-dominação. Na segunda parte, são apresentados alguns dos fundamentos subjacentes ao debate sobre a liberdade, confrontando as principais formulações de três correntes do debate teórico-político contemporâneo: o liberalismo, o comunitarismo e o republicanismo. Na terceira e última parte, procedemos à elaboração de um esboço de crítica sociológica às concepções sobre a liberdade na teoria política. O artigo propõe a demarcação de uma distinção fundamental entre as duas disciplinas no que tange ao problema da liberdade, levando em conta dois aspectos: a constituição teórica e epistemológica dos dois campos disciplinares (filosofia moral x ciência objetiva) e o objeto de referência para a análise das restrições à liberdade (Estado x sociedade). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2019-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p8310.5007/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83Em Tese; v. 16 n. 2 (2019); 83-1141806-5023reponame:Em Tese (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83/40791Copyright (c) 2019 Lucas Voigt, Jean Matheo Piccini Lagoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVoigt, LucasLago, Jean Matheo Piccini2020-01-02T11:49:47Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/58364Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/oaiportaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br||revistaemtese@gmail.com1806-50231806-5023opendoar:2020-01-02T11:49:47Em Tese (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism O debate da teoria política contemporânea sobre a "liberdade" e um esboço de crítica sociológica |
title |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism |
spellingShingle |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism Voigt, Lucas |
title_short |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism |
title_full |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism |
title_fullStr |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism |
title_sort |
The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism |
author |
Voigt, Lucas |
author_facet |
Voigt, Lucas Lago, Jean Matheo Piccini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lago, Jean Matheo Piccini |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Voigt, Lucas Lago, Jean Matheo Piccini |
description |
The article aims at mapping the contemporary debate on the problem of freedom in political theory and, in a related way, presenting a sketch of sociological critique to the discussion. In the first part of the text, the three main concepts of freedom in political theory are presented: freedom as non-interference, freedom as self-realization and freedom as nondomination. In the second part, some of the theoretical grounds underlying the debate on freedom are presented, confronting the main formulations of three traditions of the contemporary theoretical-political debate: liberalism, communitarianism and republicanism. In the third and final part, we proceed to the elaboration of a sketch of sociological critique of conceptions about freedom in political theory. The article proposes the demarcation of a fundamental distinction between the two disciplines with regard to the problem of freedom, taking into account two aspects: the theoretical and epistemological constitution of the two disciplinary fields (moral philosophy vs. objective science) and the object for reference in the analysis of the restrictions of freedom (State vs. society). |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83 10.5007/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83/40791 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Lucas Voigt, Jean Matheo Piccini Lago info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Lucas Voigt, Jean Matheo Piccini Lago |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Em Tese; v. 16 n. 2 (2019); 83-114 1806-5023 reponame:Em Tese (Florianópolis) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Em Tese (Florianópolis) |
collection |
Em Tese (Florianópolis) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Em Tese (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br||revistaemtese@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797239879752482816 |