The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Voigt, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lago, Jean Matheo Piccini
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Em Tese (Florianópolis)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83
Resumo: The article aims at mapping the contemporary debate on the problem of freedom in political theory and, in a related way, presenting a sketch of sociological critique to the discussion. In the first part of the text, the three main concepts of freedom in political theory are presented: freedom as non-interference, freedom as self-realization and freedom as nondomination. In the second part, some of the theoretical grounds underlying the debate on freedom are presented, confronting the main formulations of three traditions of the contemporary theoretical-political debate: liberalism, communitarianism and republicanism. In the third and final part, we proceed to the elaboration of a sketch of sociological critique of conceptions about freedom in political theory. The article proposes the demarcation of a fundamental distinction between the two disciplines with regard to the problem of freedom, taking into account two aspects: the theoretical and epistemological constitution of the two disciplinary fields (moral philosophy vs. objective science) and the object for reference in the analysis of the restrictions of freedom (State vs. society).
id UFSC-25_9434ac08737fecdbd9757986155f7cca
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/58364
network_acronym_str UFSC-25
network_name_str Em Tese (Florianópolis)
repository_id_str
spelling The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticismO debate da teoria política contemporânea sobre a "liberdade" e um esboço de crítica sociológicaThe article aims at mapping the contemporary debate on the problem of freedom in political theory and, in a related way, presenting a sketch of sociological critique to the discussion. In the first part of the text, the three main concepts of freedom in political theory are presented: freedom as non-interference, freedom as self-realization and freedom as nondomination. In the second part, some of the theoretical grounds underlying the debate on freedom are presented, confronting the main formulations of three traditions of the contemporary theoretical-political debate: liberalism, communitarianism and republicanism. In the third and final part, we proceed to the elaboration of a sketch of sociological critique of conceptions about freedom in political theory. The article proposes the demarcation of a fundamental distinction between the two disciplines with regard to the problem of freedom, taking into account two aspects: the theoretical and epistemological constitution of the two disciplinary fields (moral philosophy vs. objective science) and the object for reference in the analysis of the restrictions of freedom (State vs. society).O artigo tem por objetivo realizar um mapeamento do debate contemporâneo sobre o problema da liberdade na teoria política e, de modo correlato, apresentar um esboço de crítica sociológica à discussão. Na primeira parte do texto, são apresentados os três principais conceitos de liberdade na teoria política: a liberdade como não-interferência, a liberdade como autorrealização e a liberdade como não-dominação. Na segunda parte, são apresentados alguns dos fundamentos subjacentes ao debate sobre a liberdade, confrontando as principais formulações de três correntes do debate teórico-político contemporâneo: o liberalismo, o comunitarismo e o republicanismo. Na terceira e última parte, procedemos à elaboração de um esboço de crítica sociológica às concepções sobre a liberdade na teoria política. O artigo propõe a demarcação de uma distinção fundamental entre as duas disciplinas no que tange ao problema da liberdade, levando em conta dois aspectos: a constituição teórica e epistemológica dos dois campos disciplinares (filosofia moral x ciência objetiva) e o objeto de referência para a análise das restrições à liberdade (Estado x sociedade). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2019-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p8310.5007/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83Em Tese; v. 16 n. 2 (2019); 83-1141806-5023reponame:Em Tese (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83/40791Copyright (c) 2019 Lucas Voigt, Jean Matheo Piccini Lagoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVoigt, LucasLago, Jean Matheo Piccini2020-01-02T11:49:47Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/58364Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/oaiportaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br||revistaemtese@gmail.com1806-50231806-5023opendoar:2020-01-02T11:49:47Em Tese (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
O debate da teoria política contemporânea sobre a "liberdade" e um esboço de crítica sociológica
title The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
spellingShingle The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
Voigt, Lucas
title_short The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
title_full The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
title_fullStr The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
title_full_unstemmed The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
title_sort The debate of contemporary political theory on “freedom” and a sketch of sociological criticism
author Voigt, Lucas
author_facet Voigt, Lucas
Lago, Jean Matheo Piccini
author_role author
author2 Lago, Jean Matheo Piccini
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Voigt, Lucas
Lago, Jean Matheo Piccini
description The article aims at mapping the contemporary debate on the problem of freedom in political theory and, in a related way, presenting a sketch of sociological critique to the discussion. In the first part of the text, the three main concepts of freedom in political theory are presented: freedom as non-interference, freedom as self-realization and freedom as nondomination. In the second part, some of the theoretical grounds underlying the debate on freedom are presented, confronting the main formulations of three traditions of the contemporary theoretical-political debate: liberalism, communitarianism and republicanism. In the third and final part, we proceed to the elaboration of a sketch of sociological critique of conceptions about freedom in political theory. The article proposes the demarcation of a fundamental distinction between the two disciplines with regard to the problem of freedom, taking into account two aspects: the theoretical and epistemological constitution of the two disciplinary fields (moral philosophy vs. objective science) and the object for reference in the analysis of the restrictions of freedom (State vs. society).
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83
10.5007/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/emtese/article/view/1806-5023.2019v16n2p83/40791
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Lucas Voigt, Jean Matheo Piccini Lago
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Lucas Voigt, Jean Matheo Piccini Lago
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Em Tese; v. 16 n. 2 (2019); 83-114
1806-5023
reponame:Em Tese (Florianópolis)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Em Tese (Florianópolis)
collection Em Tese (Florianópolis)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Em Tese (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br||revistaemtese@gmail.com
_version_ 1797239879752482816