Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moura Prass, Rochele
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Mügge, Ernani, Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Texto digital
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937
Resumo: The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems, notably ChatGPT, raises tensions regarding cultural practices developed in a context where devices take on human tasks. Faced with the possibility of a tool creating fictional texts, our objective is to problematize the attribution of authorship to narrative texts produced by IAGs. The research has an exploratory and descriptive character, employing techniques of bibliographic and documentary research, as we conceptualize authorship from the perspective of literary studies and compare it with copyright legislation in Brazil. The results indicate that there are no provisions within the Brazilian legislative framework that address this issue. The Bill No. 2,338/2023, which concerns the use of IAG systems, given its nature, also does not delve into this specific case. Despite the literary quality of the textual productions by IAGs and the reader's sovereignty in assigning value to a work, we emphasize that these technologies introduce new challenges in defining authorship. This new context is complex and lacks focused attention on the relationship between such systems and cultural production. On one hand, it is necessary to consider the authorship of literary texts, whether canonical or not, used for machine training; on the other, it is not possible to attribute full authorship to individuals who produce and publish fictional texts through such tools. We conclude that narratives generated by IAGs may be considered of hybrid authorship, and this condition should be communicated to readers and other stakeholders in the literary scene.
id UFSC-27_678e1d18ea2132ff8fa5b64468d31f33
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/96937
network_acronym_str UFSC-27
network_name_str Texto digital
repository_id_str
spelling Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in BrazilAutoria em tempos de inteligência artificial generativa: um olhar para a produção ficcional contemporânea no BrasilAuthorshipLiteratureLaw ChatGPTDireitoChatGPTAutoriaLiteraturaDireitoChatGPTThe emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems, notably ChatGPT, raises tensions regarding cultural practices developed in a context where devices take on human tasks. Faced with the possibility of a tool creating fictional texts, our objective is to problematize the attribution of authorship to narrative texts produced by IAGs. The research has an exploratory and descriptive character, employing techniques of bibliographic and documentary research, as we conceptualize authorship from the perspective of literary studies and compare it with copyright legislation in Brazil. The results indicate that there are no provisions within the Brazilian legislative framework that address this issue. The Bill No. 2,338/2023, which concerns the use of IAG systems, given its nature, also does not delve into this specific case. Despite the literary quality of the textual productions by IAGs and the reader's sovereignty in assigning value to a work, we emphasize that these technologies introduce new challenges in defining authorship. This new context is complex and lacks focused attention on the relationship between such systems and cultural production. On one hand, it is necessary to consider the authorship of literary texts, whether canonical or not, used for machine training; on the other, it is not possible to attribute full authorship to individuals who produce and publish fictional texts through such tools. We conclude that narratives generated by IAGs may be considered of hybrid authorship, and this condition should be communicated to readers and other stakeholders in the literary scene.A eclosão de sistemas de Inteligência Artificial Generativa, notadamente o ChatGPT, suscita tensionamentos sobre práticas culturais desenvolvidas em um contexto no qual dispositivos assumem tarefas de seres humanos. Face à possibilidade de uma ferramenta criar textos ficcionais, instituímos como objetivo problematizar a atribuição de autoria a textos narrativos produzidos por IAGs. A investigação tem caráter exploratório e descritivo, com técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, uma vez que conceituamos autoria pelo viés dos estudos literários e os cotejamos com a legislação sobre direito autoral no Brasil. Os resultados apontam que, no arcabouço legislativo brasileiro, inexistem dispositivos que contemplem o tema. O Projeto de Lei n. 2.338/2023, que versa sobre o emprego de sistemas de IAG, dada sua natureza, tampouco adentra este caso específico. A despeito da literariedade das produções textuais de IAGs e da soberania do leitor quanto ao valor que atribui a uma obra, ressaltamos que essas tecnologias instalam novos desafios no que tange à definição de autoria. Esse novo contexto se apresenta complexo e carente de olhares direcionados à relação entre tais sistemas e produção cultural. De um lado, é necessário considerar a autoria de textos literários, canônicos ou não, que serviram para o treinamento de máquina; de outro, não é possível é possível atribuir plena autoria a sujeitos que produzem e publicam textos ficcionais via tais ferramentas. Concluímos que narrativas oriundas por IAGs podem ser consideradas de autoria híbrida e que essa condição deve ser comunicada a leitores e a outros atores da cena literária.Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL)2023-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/9693710.5007/1807-9288.2023.e96937Texto Digital; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023); 75-106Texto Digital; Vol. 19 No 2 (2023); 75-106Texto Digital; v. 19 n. 2 (2023); 75-1061807-9288reponame:Texto digitalinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937/55050Copyright (c) 2023 Rochele Moura Prass, Ernani Mügge, Helen Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiukhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura Prass, RocheleMügge, ErnaniLentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen2023-12-20T15:35:51Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/96937Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigitalPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/oaitextodigital@cce.ufsc.br1807-92881807-9288opendoar:2023-12-20T15:35:51Texto digital - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
Autoria em tempos de inteligência artificial generativa: um olhar para a produção ficcional contemporânea no Brasil
title Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
spellingShingle Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
Moura Prass, Rochele
Authorship
Literature
Law
ChatGPT
Direito
ChatGPT
Autoria
Literatura
Direito
ChatGPT
title_short Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
title_full Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
title_fullStr Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
title_sort Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
author Moura Prass, Rochele
author_facet Moura Prass, Rochele
Mügge, Ernani
Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen
author_role author
author2 Mügge, Ernani
Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moura Prass, Rochele
Mügge, Ernani
Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Authorship
Literature
Law
ChatGPT
Direito
ChatGPT
Autoria
Literatura
Direito
ChatGPT
topic Authorship
Literature
Law
ChatGPT
Direito
ChatGPT
Autoria
Literatura
Direito
ChatGPT
description The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems, notably ChatGPT, raises tensions regarding cultural practices developed in a context where devices take on human tasks. Faced with the possibility of a tool creating fictional texts, our objective is to problematize the attribution of authorship to narrative texts produced by IAGs. The research has an exploratory and descriptive character, employing techniques of bibliographic and documentary research, as we conceptualize authorship from the perspective of literary studies and compare it with copyright legislation in Brazil. The results indicate that there are no provisions within the Brazilian legislative framework that address this issue. The Bill No. 2,338/2023, which concerns the use of IAG systems, given its nature, also does not delve into this specific case. Despite the literary quality of the textual productions by IAGs and the reader's sovereignty in assigning value to a work, we emphasize that these technologies introduce new challenges in defining authorship. This new context is complex and lacks focused attention on the relationship between such systems and cultural production. On one hand, it is necessary to consider the authorship of literary texts, whether canonical or not, used for machine training; on the other, it is not possible to attribute full authorship to individuals who produce and publish fictional texts through such tools. We conclude that narratives generated by IAGs may be considered of hybrid authorship, and this condition should be communicated to readers and other stakeholders in the literary scene.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937
10.5007/1807-9288.2023.e96937
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1807-9288.2023.e96937
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937/55050
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rochele Moura Prass, Ernani Mügge, Helen Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rochele Moura Prass, Ernani Mügge, Helen Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Texto Digital; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023); 75-106
Texto Digital; Vol. 19 No 2 (2023); 75-106
Texto Digital; v. 19 n. 2 (2023); 75-106
1807-9288
reponame:Texto digital
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Texto digital
collection Texto digital
repository.name.fl_str_mv Texto digital - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv textodigital@cce.ufsc.br
_version_ 1797174792990752768