Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Texto digital |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937 |
Resumo: | The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems, notably ChatGPT, raises tensions regarding cultural practices developed in a context where devices take on human tasks. Faced with the possibility of a tool creating fictional texts, our objective is to problematize the attribution of authorship to narrative texts produced by IAGs. The research has an exploratory and descriptive character, employing techniques of bibliographic and documentary research, as we conceptualize authorship from the perspective of literary studies and compare it with copyright legislation in Brazil. The results indicate that there are no provisions within the Brazilian legislative framework that address this issue. The Bill No. 2,338/2023, which concerns the use of IAG systems, given its nature, also does not delve into this specific case. Despite the literary quality of the textual productions by IAGs and the reader's sovereignty in assigning value to a work, we emphasize that these technologies introduce new challenges in defining authorship. This new context is complex and lacks focused attention on the relationship between such systems and cultural production. On one hand, it is necessary to consider the authorship of literary texts, whether canonical or not, used for machine training; on the other, it is not possible to attribute full authorship to individuals who produce and publish fictional texts through such tools. We conclude that narratives generated by IAGs may be considered of hybrid authorship, and this condition should be communicated to readers and other stakeholders in the literary scene. |
id |
UFSC-27_678e1d18ea2132ff8fa5b64468d31f33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/96937 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-27 |
network_name_str |
Texto digital |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in BrazilAutoria em tempos de inteligência artificial generativa: um olhar para a produção ficcional contemporânea no BrasilAuthorshipLiteratureLaw ChatGPTDireitoChatGPTAutoriaLiteraturaDireitoChatGPTThe emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems, notably ChatGPT, raises tensions regarding cultural practices developed in a context where devices take on human tasks. Faced with the possibility of a tool creating fictional texts, our objective is to problematize the attribution of authorship to narrative texts produced by IAGs. The research has an exploratory and descriptive character, employing techniques of bibliographic and documentary research, as we conceptualize authorship from the perspective of literary studies and compare it with copyright legislation in Brazil. The results indicate that there are no provisions within the Brazilian legislative framework that address this issue. The Bill No. 2,338/2023, which concerns the use of IAG systems, given its nature, also does not delve into this specific case. Despite the literary quality of the textual productions by IAGs and the reader's sovereignty in assigning value to a work, we emphasize that these technologies introduce new challenges in defining authorship. This new context is complex and lacks focused attention on the relationship between such systems and cultural production. On one hand, it is necessary to consider the authorship of literary texts, whether canonical or not, used for machine training; on the other, it is not possible to attribute full authorship to individuals who produce and publish fictional texts through such tools. We conclude that narratives generated by IAGs may be considered of hybrid authorship, and this condition should be communicated to readers and other stakeholders in the literary scene.A eclosão de sistemas de Inteligência Artificial Generativa, notadamente o ChatGPT, suscita tensionamentos sobre práticas culturais desenvolvidas em um contexto no qual dispositivos assumem tarefas de seres humanos. Face à possibilidade de uma ferramenta criar textos ficcionais, instituímos como objetivo problematizar a atribuição de autoria a textos narrativos produzidos por IAGs. A investigação tem caráter exploratório e descritivo, com técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, uma vez que conceituamos autoria pelo viés dos estudos literários e os cotejamos com a legislação sobre direito autoral no Brasil. Os resultados apontam que, no arcabouço legislativo brasileiro, inexistem dispositivos que contemplem o tema. O Projeto de Lei n. 2.338/2023, que versa sobre o emprego de sistemas de IAG, dada sua natureza, tampouco adentra este caso específico. A despeito da literariedade das produções textuais de IAGs e da soberania do leitor quanto ao valor que atribui a uma obra, ressaltamos que essas tecnologias instalam novos desafios no que tange à definição de autoria. Esse novo contexto se apresenta complexo e carente de olhares direcionados à relação entre tais sistemas e produção cultural. De um lado, é necessário considerar a autoria de textos literários, canônicos ou não, que serviram para o treinamento de máquina; de outro, não é possível é possível atribuir plena autoria a sujeitos que produzem e publicam textos ficcionais via tais ferramentas. Concluímos que narrativas oriundas por IAGs podem ser consideradas de autoria híbrida e que essa condição deve ser comunicada a leitores e a outros atores da cena literária.Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL)2023-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/9693710.5007/1807-9288.2023.e96937Texto Digital; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023); 75-106Texto Digital; Vol. 19 No 2 (2023); 75-106Texto Digital; v. 19 n. 2 (2023); 75-1061807-9288reponame:Texto digitalinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937/55050Copyright (c) 2023 Rochele Moura Prass, Ernani Mügge, Helen Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiukhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura Prass, RocheleMügge, ErnaniLentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen2023-12-20T15:35:51Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/96937Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigitalPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/oaitextodigital@cce.ufsc.br1807-92881807-9288opendoar:2023-12-20T15:35:51Texto digital - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil Autoria em tempos de inteligência artificial generativa: um olhar para a produção ficcional contemporânea no Brasil |
title |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil Moura Prass, Rochele Authorship Literature Law ChatGPT Direito ChatGPT Autoria Literatura Direito ChatGPT |
title_short |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil |
title_full |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil |
title_sort |
Authorship in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a look at contemporary fictional production in Brazil |
author |
Moura Prass, Rochele |
author_facet |
Moura Prass, Rochele Mügge, Ernani Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mügge, Ernani Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moura Prass, Rochele Mügge, Ernani Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk, Helen |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Authorship Literature Law ChatGPT Direito ChatGPT Autoria Literatura Direito ChatGPT |
topic |
Authorship Literature Law ChatGPT Direito ChatGPT Autoria Literatura Direito ChatGPT |
description |
The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems, notably ChatGPT, raises tensions regarding cultural practices developed in a context where devices take on human tasks. Faced with the possibility of a tool creating fictional texts, our objective is to problematize the attribution of authorship to narrative texts produced by IAGs. The research has an exploratory and descriptive character, employing techniques of bibliographic and documentary research, as we conceptualize authorship from the perspective of literary studies and compare it with copyright legislation in Brazil. The results indicate that there are no provisions within the Brazilian legislative framework that address this issue. The Bill No. 2,338/2023, which concerns the use of IAG systems, given its nature, also does not delve into this specific case. Despite the literary quality of the textual productions by IAGs and the reader's sovereignty in assigning value to a work, we emphasize that these technologies introduce new challenges in defining authorship. This new context is complex and lacks focused attention on the relationship between such systems and cultural production. On one hand, it is necessary to consider the authorship of literary texts, whether canonical or not, used for machine training; on the other, it is not possible to attribute full authorship to individuals who produce and publish fictional texts through such tools. We conclude that narratives generated by IAGs may be considered of hybrid authorship, and this condition should be communicated to readers and other stakeholders in the literary scene. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937 10.5007/1807-9288.2023.e96937 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1807-9288.2023.e96937 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/96937/55050 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Rochele Moura Prass, Ernani Mügge, Helen Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Rochele Moura Prass, Ernani Mügge, Helen Lentz Ribeiro Bernasiuk http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Texto Digital; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023); 75-106 Texto Digital; Vol. 19 No 2 (2023); 75-106 Texto Digital; v. 19 n. 2 (2023); 75-106 1807-9288 reponame:Texto digital instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Texto digital |
collection |
Texto digital |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Texto digital - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
textodigital@cce.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1797174792990752768 |