Open Science to the perspective of brazilian specialists: taxonomy proposal

• Autor(a) principal: Silveira, Lúcia da
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto, Santos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira, Silva, Fernanda Mirelle de Almeida, Silva, Fabiano Couto Corrêa da, Caregnato, Sônia Elisa, Oliveira, Adriana Carla Silva de, Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade, Garcia , Joana Coeli Ribeiro, Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Encontros Bibli
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/79646
• topic: Ciência Aberta -Taxonomia; Colaboração Científica; Comunicação Científica; e-Science; Acesso aberto; Dados abertos; Open Science -Taxonomy; Scientific Collaboration; Scientific Communication; e-Science; Open access; Open data; Open education; Citizen science; Digital preservation; Open innovation

Objective: This study aims to contextualize Open Science by proposing a Brazilian version of the taxonomy originally developed by the Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research (Foster) group, present in the Open Science project of the Community Research and Innovation Program, entitled Horizon 2020.  Method: Bibliographic, documental, descriptive, and deductive approach research was adopted, with procedures of the Delphi method. Bibliographic research was used to retrieve documents that could contribute to the concept of the term Open Science, in a base of documents added in the Mendeley reference manager. We recovered 158 records and chose to present the concept mentioned in 13 of them, considering the best ranks and the number of users who added them in their Mendeley libraries or observed the context of the publication and this study. The second stage of the research involved the translation and expansion of taxonomy using the Delphi method, bringing together 13 researchers specializing in the subject of Open Science in general or in some of its facets, who cooperated in the proposal to include new terms of taxonomy, as well as the validation and suggestions of new resources and concepts in the free translation initially performed. Result: For the first stage, the result of the definitions presents aspects of the Open Science ecosystem involving philosophical, scientific, social, technological, political, and economic particularities. The second result of this research presents the proposal to incorporate new terms, composing a taxonomy with 11 facets and 82 labels in taxonomy.  Conclusions: There is a transitory moment of transformation in scientific communication, involving the emergence of new movements related to science and the strengthening of an infrastructure that goes beyond the technology used, which certainly can be noted in the proposal of taxonomy built in collaboration with researchers and experts who work with Open Science or some of its facets.