Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Encontros Bibli |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917 |
Resumo: | Objective: To identify the factors and motivations that determine the behavior of students at the Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi (FACISA) with respect to immediate open access or the embargo on the final coursework. Method: Theoretically based on the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and the Belief, Norm, Attitude, and Intention constructs. Survey questionnaires were used as a data collection technique, in samples from FACISA students and professors, as well as interviews. Result: In the Belief construct, the results suggest that the community under study understands the advantages of open access for the visibility and use of scientific production, as well as the purpose of the embargo. The belief in the requirement of novelty by scientific journals was identified. As a subjective norm, students and professors realize that the coursework’s embargo can delay future studies and that the use of a very restrictive embargo policy is harmful to scientific discussion. In their attitudes, contradictions are evident, because while they are favorable to immediate open access, they are also favorable to the embargo, above all, motivated by the belief in the need to guarantee novelty. These contradictions are revealed in the uncertainty of the intention to deposit with immediate open access and in behaviors that are inclined to the embargo of the works. Conclusions: Actions are required to promote immediate open access in the light of changes in scientific communication, for example, the expanded use of preprints and to encourage informed decision-making by awareness about the policies of the scientific journals. |
id |
UFSC-29_76362dd2504757b6438f7f0f47d35d83 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/81917 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-29 |
network_name_str |
Encontros Bibli |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned ActionAcesso aberto imediato ou embargo dos trabalhos de conclusão de curso? Estudo embasado na teoria da ação racionalImmediate open accessEmbargoRepositoriesTheory of Reasoned ActionCourseworkAcesso aberto imediatoEmbargoRepositóriosTrabalho de conclusão de cursoTeoria da Ação RacionalObjective: To identify the factors and motivations that determine the behavior of students at the Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi (FACISA) with respect to immediate open access or the embargo on the final coursework. Method: Theoretically based on the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and the Belief, Norm, Attitude, and Intention constructs. Survey questionnaires were used as a data collection technique, in samples from FACISA students and professors, as well as interviews. Result: In the Belief construct, the results suggest that the community under study understands the advantages of open access for the visibility and use of scientific production, as well as the purpose of the embargo. The belief in the requirement of novelty by scientific journals was identified. As a subjective norm, students and professors realize that the coursework’s embargo can delay future studies and that the use of a very restrictive embargo policy is harmful to scientific discussion. In their attitudes, contradictions are evident, because while they are favorable to immediate open access, they are also favorable to the embargo, above all, motivated by the belief in the need to guarantee novelty. These contradictions are revealed in the uncertainty of the intention to deposit with immediate open access and in behaviors that are inclined to the embargo of the works. Conclusions: Actions are required to promote immediate open access in the light of changes in scientific communication, for example, the expanded use of preprints and to encourage informed decision-making by awareness about the policies of the scientific journals.Objetivo: Identificar os fatores e as motivações determinantes do comportamento dos discentes da Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi (FACISA) com respeito ao acesso aberto imediato ou ao embargo dos trabalhos de conclusão de curso (TCC) Método: Embasada teoricamente na Teoria da Ação Racional com os construtos Crença, Norma, Atitude e Intenção. Utilizou-se como técnica de coleta de dados o levantamento por questionários, em amostras de discentes e docentes da FACISA, assim como entrevistas. Resultado: No construto Crença, os resultados sugerem que a comunidade em estudo entende as vantagens do acesso aberto para a visibilidade e aproveitamento da produção científica, assim como a finalidade do embargo. Foi identificada a crença de que se embarga devido à exigência de ineditismo por parte dos periódicos científicos. Como Norma subjetiva alunos e professores percebem que o embargo do TCC pode gerar atraso a futuros estudos e que o uso de uma política de embargo muito restritiva é prejudicial à discussão científica. Já nas atitudes se evidenciam contradições, pois enquanto são favoráveis ao acesso aberto imediato também são favoráveis ao embargo, sobretudo, motivado pela crença de a necessidade de garantir ineditismo. Essas contradições se revelam na incerteza da intenção de depósito com acesso aberto imediato e em comportamentos que se inclinam ao embargo dos trabalhos. Conclusões: Se requerem ações para fomentar o acesso aberto imediato à luz das mudanças na comunicação científica, por exemplo, o uso ampliado dos preprints, assim como incentivar uma tomada de decisões informada por conhecimentos sobre as políticas das revistas.Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC2021-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/8191710.5007/1518-2924.2021.81917Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 26 No. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-22Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 26 Núm. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-22Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 26 n. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-221518-2924reponame:Encontros Bibliinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917/47471https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917/54025https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917/47794Copyright (c) 2021 Joyanne de Souza Medeiros, Nancy Sánchez-Tarragóhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros, Joyanne de SouzaSánchez-Tarragó, Nancy 2023-08-18T19:34:55Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/81917Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/oaiencontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1518-29241518-2924opendoar:2023-08-18T19:34:55Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action Acesso aberto imediato ou embargo dos trabalhos de conclusão de curso? Estudo embasado na teoria da ação racional |
title |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action |
spellingShingle |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza Immediate open access Embargo Repositories Theory of Reasoned Action Coursework Acesso aberto imediato Embargo Repositórios Trabalho de conclusão de curso Teoria da Ação Racional |
title_short |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action |
title_full |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action |
title_fullStr |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action |
title_full_unstemmed |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action |
title_sort |
Immediate open access or embargo of the final coursework? Study based on Theory of Reasoned Action |
author |
Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza |
author_facet |
Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza Sánchez-Tarragó, Nancy |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sánchez-Tarragó, Nancy |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza Sánchez-Tarragó, Nancy |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Immediate open access Embargo Repositories Theory of Reasoned Action Coursework Acesso aberto imediato Embargo Repositórios Trabalho de conclusão de curso Teoria da Ação Racional |
topic |
Immediate open access Embargo Repositories Theory of Reasoned Action Coursework Acesso aberto imediato Embargo Repositórios Trabalho de conclusão de curso Teoria da Ação Racional |
description |
Objective: To identify the factors and motivations that determine the behavior of students at the Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi (FACISA) with respect to immediate open access or the embargo on the final coursework. Method: Theoretically based on the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and the Belief, Norm, Attitude, and Intention constructs. Survey questionnaires were used as a data collection technique, in samples from FACISA students and professors, as well as interviews. Result: In the Belief construct, the results suggest that the community under study understands the advantages of open access for the visibility and use of scientific production, as well as the purpose of the embargo. The belief in the requirement of novelty by scientific journals was identified. As a subjective norm, students and professors realize that the coursework’s embargo can delay future studies and that the use of a very restrictive embargo policy is harmful to scientific discussion. In their attitudes, contradictions are evident, because while they are favorable to immediate open access, they are also favorable to the embargo, above all, motivated by the belief in the need to guarantee novelty. These contradictions are revealed in the uncertainty of the intention to deposit with immediate open access and in behaviors that are inclined to the embargo of the works. Conclusions: Actions are required to promote immediate open access in the light of changes in scientific communication, for example, the expanded use of preprints and to encourage informed decision-making by awareness about the policies of the scientific journals. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917 10.5007/1518-2924.2021.81917 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1518-2924.2021.81917 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917/47471 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917/54025 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/81917/47794 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Joyanne de Souza Medeiros, Nancy Sánchez-Tarragó https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Joyanne de Souza Medeiros, Nancy Sánchez-Tarragó https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 26 No. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-22 Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 26 Núm. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-22 Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 26 n. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-22 1518-2924 reponame:Encontros Bibli instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Encontros Bibli |
collection |
Encontros Bibli |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
encontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1797067779088580608 |