Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Rhuan Henrique Alves de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Gil, Luana Carolina de Castro, Arakaki, Ana Carolina Simionato, Castro, Fabiano Ferreira de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Encontros Bibli
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822
Resumo: Objective: To propose the harmonization between the EDM, BIBFRAME, and IFLA LRM models with the purpose of analyzing the equivalence of entities to enable the interoperability between systems that use these conceptual models as a basis. Method: This research is characterized as exploratory and descriptive with a qualitative approach, in which a bibliographic survey was used to identify the studies already carried out on the topic. In addition, the analysis of entities was based on the methodology substantiated by Pierre et al. (1999), Taniguchi (2018), Arakaki (2019), and Carrasco (2019). Results: From the analysis of the models, six ontological categories of entities were identified: (i) Intellectual Content, (ii) Subject, (iii) Concrete Unit, (iv) Agent, (v) Space-time, and (vi) Reification. Consistent equivalences were observed between the entities, their functionalities, and terminology in most categories, except for the entities of the Intellectual Content category and the structuring of the Concrete Unit category. Conclusions: It was concluded that the most notable difference between the models was expressed in the Intellectual Content category, and that, because they are based on the cataloging tradition, the IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME models have functionally equivalent entities, while the EDM model, focused on the cultural heritage object itself, does not have any entity that may be mapped in this category. Likewise, a structural difference was found in the Concrete Unit category, in which the EDM model makes a distinction between the object itself and its digital representation, whereas such a distinction occurs in the Intellectual Content category for the IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME models.
id UFSC-29_b88c03bd23c063a7258e3a6a6e5cd164
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/92822
network_acronym_str UFSC-29
network_name_str Encontros Bibli
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual modelsAnálisis y correspondencia entre las entidades de los modelos conceptuales Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM y BIBFRAMEAnálise e correspondência entre as entidades dos modelos conceituais Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM e BIBFRAMEEuropeana Data ModelBIBFRAMEIFLA LRMCataloguingMetadataEuropeana Data ModelBIBFRAMEIFLA LRMCatalogaçãoMetadadosEuropeana Data ModelBIBFRAMEIFLA LRMCatalogaciónMetadatosObjective: To propose the harmonization between the EDM, BIBFRAME, and IFLA LRM models with the purpose of analyzing the equivalence of entities to enable the interoperability between systems that use these conceptual models as a basis. Method: This research is characterized as exploratory and descriptive with a qualitative approach, in which a bibliographic survey was used to identify the studies already carried out on the topic. In addition, the analysis of entities was based on the methodology substantiated by Pierre et al. (1999), Taniguchi (2018), Arakaki (2019), and Carrasco (2019). Results: From the analysis of the models, six ontological categories of entities were identified: (i) Intellectual Content, (ii) Subject, (iii) Concrete Unit, (iv) Agent, (v) Space-time, and (vi) Reification. Consistent equivalences were observed between the entities, their functionalities, and terminology in most categories, except for the entities of the Intellectual Content category and the structuring of the Concrete Unit category. Conclusions: It was concluded that the most notable difference between the models was expressed in the Intellectual Content category, and that, because they are based on the cataloging tradition, the IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME models have functionally equivalent entities, while the EDM model, focused on the cultural heritage object itself, does not have any entity that may be mapped in this category. Likewise, a structural difference was found in the Concrete Unit category, in which the EDM model makes a distinction between the object itself and its digital representation, whereas such a distinction occurs in the Intellectual Content category for the IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME models.Objetivo: proponer la armonización entre los modelos EDM, BIBFRAME e IFLA LRM, con el fin de analizar la equivalencia de entidades para permitir la interoperabilidad entre sistemas que utilizan como base estos modelos conceptuales. Método: esta investigación se caracteriza por ser de naturaleza exploratoria y descriptiva con enfoque cualitativo, en la que se utiliza un levantamiento bibliográfico para identificar estudios ya realizados sobre el tema. Además, para el análisis de entidades se basa en la metodología basada en Pierre et al. (1999), Taniguchi (2018), Arakaki (2019) y Verdugo (2019). Resultados: a partir del análisis de los modelos, se identificaron seis categorías ontológicas de entidades: (i) Contenido Intelectual; (ii) Sujeto; (iii) Unidad de Concreto; (iv) Agente; (v) Espacio-tiempo, y (vi) Cosificación. Se observaron equivalencias consistentes entre entidades, sus funcionalidades y terminología en la mayoría de las categorías, con excepción de las entidades en la categoría Contenido Intelectual y la estructuración de la categoría Unidad Concreta. Conclusiones: se concluye que la diferencia más notable entre los modelos se expresa en la categoría de Contenido Intelectual, y que el IFLA LRM y el BIBFRAME, por ser modelos basados ??en la tradición de catalogación, tienen entidades funcionalmente equivalentes, mientras que el EDM, como modelo dirigido al objeto de patrimonio cultural en sí mismo, no tiene ninguna entidad que pueda mapearse en esta categoría. Además, se encontró que existe una diferencia estructural en la categoría Unidad Concreta, donde el EDM hace una distinción entre el objeto en sí y su representación digital, mientras que en los modelos IFLA LRM y BIBFRAME, tal distinción se da en la categoría de Contenido Intelectual.Objetivo: objetiva-se propor a harmonização entre os modelos EDM, BIBFRAME e IFLA LRM, com o propósito de analisar a equivalência de entidades para possibilitar a interoperabilidade entre sistemas que utilizam como base esses modelos conceituais. Método: esta pesquisa se caracteriza como de natureza exploratória e descritiva com abordagem qualitativa, na qual utiliza-se do levantamento bibliográfico para a identificação dos estudos já realizados a respeito da temática. Além disso, para a análise de entidades, pauta-se na metodologia fundamentada por Pierre et al. (1999), Taniguchi (2018), Arakaki (2019) e Carrasco (2019). Resultados: a partir da análise dos modelos, foram identificadas seis categorias ontológicas de entidades: (i) Conteúdo Intelectual; (ii) Assunto; (iii) Unidade Concreta; (iv) Agente; (v) Espaço-tempo, e (vi) Reificação. Observou-se equivalências consistentes entre as entidades, suas funcionalidades e terminologia na maior parte das categorias, tendo como exceção as entidades da categoria Conteúdo Intelectual e a estruturação da categoria Unidade Concreta. Conclusões: conclui-se que a diferença mais notável entre os modelos se expressa na categoria Conteúdo Intelectual, e que o IFLA LRM e o BIBFRAME por serem modelos fundamentados na tradição catalográfica têm entidades funcionalmente equivalentes, ao passo que o EDM, como modelo voltado ao objeto de patrimônio cultural em si, não possui nenhuma entidade que possa ser mapeada nessa categoria, Outrossim,constatou-se há uma diferença estrutural na categoria Unidade Concreta, onde o EDM faz uma distinção entre o objeto em si e sua representação digital, ao passo que nos modelos IFLA LRM e BIBFRAME, tal distinção ocorre na categoria Conteúdo Intelectual.Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC2023-06-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/9282210.5007/1518-2924.2023.e92822Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 28 (2023): Innovation, Technology and Sustainability; 1-22Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 28 (2023): Innovación, Tecnología y Sustentabilidad; 1-22Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 28 (2023): Inovação, Tecnologia e Sustentabilidade; 1-221518-2924reponame:Encontros Bibliinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCengporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822/54068https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822/53425https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822/53418https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822/53419Copyright (c) 2023 Rhuan Henrique Alves de Oliveira, Luana Carolina de Castro Gil, Ana Carolina Simionato Arakaki, Fabiano Ferreira de Castrohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Rhuan Henrique Alves deGil, Luana Carolina de CastroArakaki, Ana Carolina SimionatoCastro, Fabiano Ferreira de2023-11-15T12:31:13Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/92822Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/oaiencontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1518-29241518-2924opendoar:2023-11-15T12:31:13Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
Análisis y correspondencia entre las entidades de los modelos conceptuales Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM y BIBFRAME
Análise e correspondência entre as entidades dos modelos conceituais Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM e BIBFRAME
title Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
spellingShingle Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
Oliveira, Rhuan Henrique Alves de
Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Cataloguing
Metadata
Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Catalogação
Metadados
Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Catalogación
Metadatos
title_short Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
title_full Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
title_fullStr Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
title_sort Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
author Oliveira, Rhuan Henrique Alves de
author_facet Oliveira, Rhuan Henrique Alves de
Gil, Luana Carolina de Castro
Arakaki, Ana Carolina Simionato
Castro, Fabiano Ferreira de
author_role author
author2 Gil, Luana Carolina de Castro
Arakaki, Ana Carolina Simionato
Castro, Fabiano Ferreira de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Rhuan Henrique Alves de
Gil, Luana Carolina de Castro
Arakaki, Ana Carolina Simionato
Castro, Fabiano Ferreira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Cataloguing
Metadata
Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Catalogação
Metadados
Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Catalogación
Metadatos
topic Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Cataloguing
Metadata
Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Catalogação
Metadados
Europeana Data Model
BIBFRAME
IFLA LRM
Catalogación
Metadatos
description Objective: To propose the harmonization between the EDM, BIBFRAME, and IFLA LRM models with the purpose of analyzing the equivalence of entities to enable the interoperability between systems that use these conceptual models as a basis. Method: This research is characterized as exploratory and descriptive with a qualitative approach, in which a bibliographic survey was used to identify the studies already carried out on the topic. In addition, the analysis of entities was based on the methodology substantiated by Pierre et al. (1999), Taniguchi (2018), Arakaki (2019), and Carrasco (2019). Results: From the analysis of the models, six ontological categories of entities were identified: (i) Intellectual Content, (ii) Subject, (iii) Concrete Unit, (iv) Agent, (v) Space-time, and (vi) Reification. Consistent equivalences were observed between the entities, their functionalities, and terminology in most categories, except for the entities of the Intellectual Content category and the structuring of the Concrete Unit category. Conclusions: It was concluded that the most notable difference between the models was expressed in the Intellectual Content category, and that, because they are based on the cataloging tradition, the IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME models have functionally equivalent entities, while the EDM model, focused on the cultural heritage object itself, does not have any entity that may be mapped in this category. Likewise, a structural difference was found in the Concrete Unit category, in which the EDM model makes a distinction between the object itself and its digital representation, whereas such a distinction occurs in the Intellectual Content category for the IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME models.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822
10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e92822
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e92822
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822/54068
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822/53425
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822/53418
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/92822/53419
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 28 (2023): Innovation, Technology and Sustainability; 1-22
Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 28 (2023): Innovación, Tecnología y Sustentabilidad; 1-22
Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 28 (2023): Inovação, Tecnologia e Sustentabilidade; 1-22
1518-2924
reponame:Encontros Bibli
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Encontros Bibli
collection Encontros Bibli
repository.name.fl_str_mv Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv encontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1797067779792175104