Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castro, Suélen Barboza Eiras de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Scarpin, Jorge Eduardo, Mezzadri, Fernando Marinho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-80402.2020e67168
Resumo: The aim of this study was to investigate the volume and characteristics of the amendments approved in the budget of the Ministry of Sports (ME) from 2004 to 2015. This research, documentary and exploratory nature, collected data from SIGA Brazil Portal. We verified that allocation of parliamentary amendments was primarily from individual amendments (R$ 8.2 billion) and, except for the amendments of the rapporteur, the proposals favored the implementation of sports infrastructure (R$ 12.9 billion). States and municipalities were the largest beneficiaries (R$ 12.5 billion). Except for Espírito Santo, the states of the southeast region totaled the largest volume of budgetary resources. We concluded that the allocation of amendments in the budget of the ME privileged the attendance of individual demands of the parliamentarians by directing resources to small works, especially from "Esporte e Lazer da Cidade" and "Segundo Tempo" programs, in locations where they were bound.
id UFSC-2_e072cb4f2a006e8eb94f92cc0da90c6d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/67168
network_acronym_str UFSC-2
network_name_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository_id_str
spelling Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)Enmiendas parlamentarias y el presupuesto deportivo federal brasileño (2004-2015)Emendas parlamentares e o orçamento federal para o esporte brasileiro (2004-2015)The aim of this study was to investigate the volume and characteristics of the amendments approved in the budget of the Ministry of Sports (ME) from 2004 to 2015. This research, documentary and exploratory nature, collected data from SIGA Brazil Portal. We verified that allocation of parliamentary amendments was primarily from individual amendments (R$ 8.2 billion) and, except for the amendments of the rapporteur, the proposals favored the implementation of sports infrastructure (R$ 12.9 billion). States and municipalities were the largest beneficiaries (R$ 12.5 billion). Except for Espírito Santo, the states of the southeast region totaled the largest volume of budgetary resources. We concluded that the allocation of amendments in the budget of the ME privileged the attendance of individual demands of the parliamentarians by directing resources to small works, especially from "Esporte e Lazer da Cidade" and "Segundo Tempo" programs, in locations where they were bound.El objetivo de este trabajo fue investigar la magnitud y las características de las enmiendas aprobadas en el presupuesto del Ministerio de Deportes (ME) de 2004 a 2015. Esta investigación exploratoria y documental recopiló datos del Portal SIGA Brasil. Observamos que la asignación de enmiendas parlamentarias provino principalmente de enmiendas individuales (R$ 8,2 mil millones) y que, a excepción de las enmiendas del relator, las propuestas favorecieron la implementación de infraestructura deportiva (R$ 12,9 mil millones). Los estados y municipios fueron los principales beneficiarios de las enmiendas (R$ 12,5 mil millones). A excepción de Espírito Santo, los estados de la región sureste representaron la mayor cantidad de recursos. Concluimos que la asignación de enmiendas en el presupuesto del ME favoreció la satisfacción de las demandas individuales de los parlamentarios al dirigir recursos para pequeñas obras, especialmente los programas "Esporte e Lazer da Cidade" y "Segundo Tempo", en lugares donde estaban atados.O objetivo deste trabalho foi investigar magnitude e características das emendas aprovadas no orçamento do Ministério do Esporte (ME) de 2004 a 2015. Esta pesquisa, documental e de natureza exploratória, coletou dados do Portal SIGA Brasil. Verificamos que a alocação de emendas parlamentares no orçamento do ME foi prioritariamente proveniente de emendas individuais (R$ 8,2 bilhões) e que, exceto pelas emendas de relatoria, as propostas privilegiaram a implantação de infraestrutura esportiva (R$ 12,9 bilhões). Estados e municípios foram os maiores beneficiários das emendas (R$ 12,5 bilhões). Exceto por Espírito Santo, os estados da região Sudeste totalizaram o maior volume de recursos. Concluímos que a alocação de emendas no orçamento do ME privilegiou o atendimento das demandas individuais dos parlamentares por meio do direcionamento de recursos para pequenas obras, especialmente dos programas “Esporte e Lazer da Cidade” e “Segundo Tempo”, nas localidades as quais encontravam-se vinculados. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2020-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-80402.2020e6716810.5007/2175-80402.2020e67168Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 62 (2020); 01-172175-80420103-4111reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-80402.2020e67168/43444Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro, Suélen Barboza Eiras deScarpin, Jorge EduardoMezzadri, Fernando Marinho2020-06-08T15:36:41Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/67168Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/oai||giovani.pires@ufsc.br2175-80420103-4111opendoar:2020-06-08T15:36:41Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)
Enmiendas parlamentarias y el presupuesto deportivo federal brasileño (2004-2015)
Emendas parlamentares e o orçamento federal para o esporte brasileiro (2004-2015)
title Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)
spellingShingle Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)
Castro, Suélen Barboza Eiras de
title_short Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)
title_full Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)
title_fullStr Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)
title_full_unstemmed Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)
title_sort Parliamentary amendments and the federal budget for brazilian sport (2004-2015)
author Castro, Suélen Barboza Eiras de
author_facet Castro, Suélen Barboza Eiras de
Scarpin, Jorge Eduardo
Mezzadri, Fernando Marinho
author_role author
author2 Scarpin, Jorge Eduardo
Mezzadri, Fernando Marinho
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castro, Suélen Barboza Eiras de
Scarpin, Jorge Eduardo
Mezzadri, Fernando Marinho
description The aim of this study was to investigate the volume and characteristics of the amendments approved in the budget of the Ministry of Sports (ME) from 2004 to 2015. This research, documentary and exploratory nature, collected data from SIGA Brazil Portal. We verified that allocation of parliamentary amendments was primarily from individual amendments (R$ 8.2 billion) and, except for the amendments of the rapporteur, the proposals favored the implementation of sports infrastructure (R$ 12.9 billion). States and municipalities were the largest beneficiaries (R$ 12.5 billion). Except for Espírito Santo, the states of the southeast region totaled the largest volume of budgetary resources. We concluded that the allocation of amendments in the budget of the ME privileged the attendance of individual demands of the parliamentarians by directing resources to small works, especially from "Esporte e Lazer da Cidade" and "Segundo Tempo" programs, in locations where they were bound.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-80402.2020e67168
10.5007/2175-80402.2020e67168
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-80402.2020e67168
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-80402.2020e67168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-80402.2020e67168/43444
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 62 (2020); 01-17
2175-8042
0103-4111
reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
collection Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||giovani.pires@ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434864506765312