The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes Dias, Rebeca
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2020v43n84p129
Resumo: The present article analyzes how a famous clash of Criminal Science (late nineteenth and first half of XX), the dispute between Classical School and Positive School, will be reproduced in the brasilian scenario, from two great jurists, references in the period and Criminal Law professors at Law Schools in that period: Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos. The first, promoter and confessed adept of the Positive School, while the second will defend and assume the Classical School postulates. From opposite sides in this Criminal Science “dispute”, both, however, declared themselves liberal. Contradiction? The methodology chosen is the theoretical-exploratory of the available and raised literature.
id UFSC-3_39f6331c46824ff942ca35c4821cbf6d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/54009
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto BastosA Recepção da Escola Positiva e da Escola Clássica no Pensamento Criminológico Brasileiro pela Ótica de Moniz Sodré e Filinto BastosThe present article analyzes how a famous clash of Criminal Science (late nineteenth and first half of XX), the dispute between Classical School and Positive School, will be reproduced in the brasilian scenario, from two great jurists, references in the period and Criminal Law professors at Law Schools in that period: Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos. The first, promoter and confessed adept of the Positive School, while the second will defend and assume the Classical School postulates. From opposite sides in this Criminal Science “dispute”, both, however, declared themselves liberal. Contradiction? The methodology chosen is the theoretical-exploratory of the available and raised literature.O presente artigo analisa como um célebre embate da Ciência Criminal (final do século XIX e primeira metade do XX), a disputa entre Escola Clássica e Escola Positiva, vai se reproduzir no cenário brasileiro a partir de dois grandes juristas, referências no período e professores de Direito Criminal de Faculdades de Direito da época: Moniz Sodré e Filinto Bastos. O primeiro é divulgador e adepto confesso da Escola Positiva, enquanto o segundo defen- de os postulados da Escola Clássica. De lados opostos nessa “disputa” da Ciência Criminal, ambos, todavia, declaravam-se liberais. Contradição? A metodologia escolhida é a de caráter teórico-exploratória da literatura disponível e levantada.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2020-04-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2020v43n84p12910.5007/2177-7055.2020v43n84p129Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 41 No. 84 (2020); 129-154Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 41 Núm. 84 (2020); 129-154Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 41 n. 84 (2020); 129-1542177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2020v43n84p129/43639Copyright (c) 2020 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes Dias, Rebeca2020-08-27T15:37:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/54009Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:35:03.235638Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos
A Recepção da Escola Positiva e da Escola Clássica no Pensamento Criminológico Brasileiro pela Ótica de Moniz Sodré e Filinto Bastos
title The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos
spellingShingle The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos
Fernandes Dias, Rebeca
title_short The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos
title_full The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos
title_fullStr The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos
title_full_unstemmed The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos
title_sort The Reception of Positive School and Classical School in Brazilian Criminological Thinking by the Optic of Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos
author Fernandes Dias, Rebeca
author_facet Fernandes Dias, Rebeca
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes Dias, Rebeca
description The present article analyzes how a famous clash of Criminal Science (late nineteenth and first half of XX), the dispute between Classical School and Positive School, will be reproduced in the brasilian scenario, from two great jurists, references in the period and Criminal Law professors at Law Schools in that period: Moniz Sodré and Filinto Bastos. The first, promoter and confessed adept of the Positive School, while the second will defend and assume the Classical School postulates. From opposite sides in this Criminal Science “dispute”, both, however, declared themselves liberal. Contradiction? The methodology chosen is the theoretical-exploratory of the available and raised literature.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2020v43n84p129
10.5007/2177-7055.2020v43n84p129
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2020v43n84p129
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2020v43n84p129
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2020v43n84p129/43639
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 41 No. 84 (2020); 129-154
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 41 Núm. 84 (2020); 129-154
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 41 n. 84 (2020); 129-154
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434802987859968

Registros relacionados