Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Helfer, Inácio
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Stein, Leandro Konzen
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47
Resumo: The Hans Kelsen’s thought is one of the most important contributions to the contemporary legal science, especially with the upcoming of his main work,  Pure Theory of Law, in which he launches the groundings of a theoretical building that will be quickly recognized as one of the most important epistemological and methodological construction about Law. However, since the new epistemological paradigms connected with anti-metaphysical and anti-positivist positions, incoherencies are showed, making necessary some critics. In this point, connected with the work “Treatise on critical reason”, by Hans Albert, we intend to analyze the Kelsen’s grounding about State Law’s validity, especially with the prism of Munchausen’s trilemma enounced by Albert, to judge its pertinence.
id UFSC-3_3df7e246449fd045254e7d6f8814d1df
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14875
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemmaKelsen e o trilema de MünchhausenThe Hans Kelsen’s thought is one of the most important contributions to the contemporary legal science, especially with the upcoming of his main work,  Pure Theory of Law, in which he launches the groundings of a theoretical building that will be quickly recognized as one of the most important epistemological and methodological construction about Law. However, since the new epistemological paradigms connected with anti-metaphysical and anti-positivist positions, incoherencies are showed, making necessary some critics. In this point, connected with the work “Treatise on critical reason”, by Hans Albert, we intend to analyze the Kelsen’s grounding about State Law’s validity, especially with the prism of Munchausen’s trilemma enounced by Albert, to judge its pertinence.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47O pensamento de Hans Kelsen é um contributo dos mais importantes para a ciência jurídica contemporânea, mormente com advento de sua obra primordial, Teoria pura do direito, na qual lança as bases de um edifício teórico que irá ser rapidamente reconhecido como uma das maiores construções epistemológicas e metodológicas acerca do Direito. Contudo, com o surgimento de novos paradigmas epistemológicos ancorados em posições antimetafísicas e antipositivistas, incoerências se apresentam, fazendo-se necessárias as críticas. É nesse ponto que, tendo por base a obra  Tratado da razão crítica de Hans Albert, pretendemos analisar a fundamentação kelseniana sobre a validade do direito positivo estatal, em especial sob o prisma do trilema de Münchhausen enunciado por Albert, para avaliar sua pertinência.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2010-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2009v30n58p4710.5007/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 30 n. 58 (2009); 47-72Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 30 n. 58 (2009); 47-72Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 30 n. 58 (2009); 47-722177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47/13607Helfer, InácioStein, Leandro Konzeninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:15:53Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14875Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:19.631565Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma
Kelsen e o trilema de Münchhausen
title Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma
spellingShingle Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma
Helfer, Inácio
title_short Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma
title_full Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma
title_fullStr Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma
title_full_unstemmed Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma
title_sort Kelsen and the Münchhausen's trilemma
author Helfer, Inácio
author_facet Helfer, Inácio
Stein, Leandro Konzen
author_role author
author2 Stein, Leandro Konzen
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Helfer, Inácio
Stein, Leandro Konzen
description The Hans Kelsen’s thought is one of the most important contributions to the contemporary legal science, especially with the upcoming of his main work,  Pure Theory of Law, in which he launches the groundings of a theoretical building that will be quickly recognized as one of the most important epistemological and methodological construction about Law. However, since the new epistemological paradigms connected with anti-metaphysical and anti-positivist positions, incoherencies are showed, making necessary some critics. In this point, connected with the work “Treatise on critical reason”, by Hans Albert, we intend to analyze the Kelsen’s grounding about State Law’s validity, especially with the prism of Munchausen’s trilemma enounced by Albert, to judge its pertinence.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-09-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47
10.5007/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2009v30n58p47/13607
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 30 n. 58 (2009); 47-72
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 30 n. 58 (2009); 47-72
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 30 n. 58 (2009); 47-72
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434794880270336

Registros relacionados