A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Rocha, Júlio César de Sá
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Rotondano, Ricardo Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
Resumo: This writing reflects the necessity to limit the administrative discretionarity. This article preaches the precepts of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory. Also brings the newest theory of separation of powers, framing the politic judicialization as a necessary proccess to the attainment of fundamental rights. So, this script concludes that, not being adopted the more profitable decision, the Efficiency and Legality Principles will be injured, even as the Fundamental Rights to Good Administration, having the Judiciary authorization to control the emanated administrative act. In conclusion, the article deals with the Theory of the Minimum Discretionarity in environmental law.
id UFSC-3_61503ee0fb4ca6629ab501b879609031
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/18864
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101Uma Necessária Limitação ao Atual Conceito de Discricionariedade Administrativa: Fundamentos da Teoria da Discricionariedade Mínima doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101This writing reflects the necessity to limit the administrative discretionarity. This article preaches the precepts of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory. Also brings the newest theory of separation of powers, framing the politic judicialization as a necessary proccess to the attainment of fundamental rights. So, this script concludes that, not being adopted the more profitable decision, the Efficiency and Legality Principles will be injured, even as the Fundamental Rights to Good Administration, having the Judiciary authorization to control the emanated administrative act. In conclusion, the article deals with the Theory of the Minimum Discretionarity in environmental law.RESUMO: O presente escrito realiza uma reflexão sobre a necessidade de limitação da discricionariedade administrativa, visto que não é aceitável a manutenção de ato administrativo que viole o princípio da eficiência e, dessa forma, o princípio da legalidade em sentido material. O artigo prega os preceitos da Teoria da Discricionariedade Mínima, segundo o qual apenas fugiria à apreciação do Judiciário os atos emanados em situações onde não é possível distinguir uma "melhor solução". Traz também a mais nova teoria de separação dos poderes, enquadrando a judicialização da política como processo necessário à consecução dos direitos fundamentais. Desse modo, o presente trabalho conclui que, não sendo adotada a decisão mais proveitosa, restariam feridos os Princípios da Eficiência e da Legalidade, estando o Judiciário autorizado a realizar o controle do ato administrativo emanado.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2011-12-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p10110.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 101-132Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 101-132Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 101-1322177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101/21057da Rocha, Júlio César de SáRotondano, Ricardo Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:16:08Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/18864Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:54.015055Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
Uma Necessária Limitação ao Atual Conceito de Discricionariedade Administrativa: Fundamentos da Teoria da Discricionariedade Mínima doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
title A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
spellingShingle A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
da Rocha, Júlio César de Sá
title_short A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
title_full A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
title_fullStr A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
title_full_unstemmed A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
title_sort A Necessary Limitation to the Actual Concept of Administrative Discretionarity: reasons of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory and application in Environmental Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
author da Rocha, Júlio César de Sá
author_facet da Rocha, Júlio César de Sá
Rotondano, Ricardo Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Rotondano, Ricardo Oliveira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Rocha, Júlio César de Sá
Rotondano, Ricardo Oliveira
description This writing reflects the necessity to limit the administrative discretionarity. This article preaches the precepts of the Minimum Discretionarity Theory. Also brings the newest theory of separation of powers, framing the politic judicialization as a necessary proccess to the attainment of fundamental rights. So, this script concludes that, not being adopted the more profitable decision, the Efficiency and Legality Principles will be injured, even as the Fundamental Rights to Good Administration, having the Judiciary authorization to control the emanated administrative act. In conclusion, the article deals with the Theory of the Minimum Discretionarity in environmental law.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p101/21057
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 101-132
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 101-132
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 101-132
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434801190600704

Registros relacionados