Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Horácio Wanderlei
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Heinen, Luana Renostro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193
Resumo: Legal positivism positions the law in the formal validity. However, the law theory also focuses on other aspects of empirical to understand the legal phenomenon, we seek such elements in the works of Herbert Hart and Alf Ross. To Hart the rule of recognition’s content, that we can use to meet the validity of the right, should be measured empirically in each legal system and may also (but not necessarily) incorporate moral elements. Differently, the realistic Ross theory is independent of the validity criterion and he argues that the effectiveness is verifiable by the effective application of the law by legal authorities.
id UFSC-3_7f0a19c5c81f31567ab15419947e1146
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39979
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert HartEmpiria como Critério de Vigência do Direito: entre Alf Ross e Herbert HartLegal positivism positions the law in the formal validity. However, the law theory also focuses on other aspects of empirical to understand the legal phenomenon, we seek such elements in the works of Herbert Hart and Alf Ross. To Hart the rule of recognition’s content, that we can use to meet the validity of the right, should be measured empirically in each legal system and may also (but not necessarily) incorporate moral elements. Differently, the realistic Ross theory is independent of the validity criterion and he argues that the effectiveness is verifiable by the effective application of the law by legal authorities.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193O positivismo jurídico pauta o Direito na validade formal. No entanto, a teoria do Direito também se debruça sobre outros aspectos mais próximos da empiria para compreender o fenômeno jurídico, busca-se tais elementos nas obras de Herbert Hart e Alf Ross. Para Hart, o conteúdo da regra de reconhecimento, usada para se encontrar a validade de uma norma, deve ser aferido empiricamente em cada sistema jurídico, podendo inclusive (mas não necessariamente) incorporar elementos morais. De maneira distinta, a teoria do realista Ross independe do critério de validade e defende que a vigência é verificável pela aplicação efetiva da norma pelas autoridades jurídicas.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n72p19310.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 37 No. 72 (2016); 193-216Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 37 Núm. 72 (2016); 193-216Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 37 n. 72 (2016); 193-2162177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193/31580Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Horácio WanderleiHeinen, Luana Renostro2016-04-26T17:19:43Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39979Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:35:00.066819Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart
Empiria como Critério de Vigência do Direito: entre Alf Ross e Herbert Hart
title Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart
spellingShingle Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart
Rodrigues, Horácio Wanderlei
title_short Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart
title_full Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart
title_fullStr Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart
title_full_unstemmed Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart
title_sort Empirical as Criterion of law Effectiveness: between Alf Ros and Hebert Hart
author Rodrigues, Horácio Wanderlei
author_facet Rodrigues, Horácio Wanderlei
Heinen, Luana Renostro
author_role author
author2 Heinen, Luana Renostro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Horácio Wanderlei
Heinen, Luana Renostro
description Legal positivism positions the law in the formal validity. However, the law theory also focuses on other aspects of empirical to understand the legal phenomenon, we seek such elements in the works of Herbert Hart and Alf Ross. To Hart the rule of recognition’s content, that we can use to meet the validity of the right, should be measured empirically in each legal system and may also (but not necessarily) incorporate moral elements. Differently, the realistic Ross theory is independent of the validity criterion and he argues that the effectiveness is verifiable by the effective application of the law by legal authorities.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193
10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n72p193/31580
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 37 No. 72 (2016); 193-216
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 37 Núm. 72 (2016); 193-216
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 37 n. 72 (2016); 193-216
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434802195136512

Registros relacionados