The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva Cristóvam, José Sérgio
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219
Resumo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219The article adresses the weight of principles theory, according to the contours drawn by the neoconstitutionalism. The weight of principles model has been suffering from solid and emphatic criticisms, since it submits the judicial discourse to a deep deficit of rationality and legitimacy, opening the way to a clear usurpation of the legislative authority by a theoretical model that allows the empire of subjective decisionism and judicial moralism. This leads to the need of establishing material and procedimental limits that are capable to ensure a rational application the system, wich is essential to legitimate and justify the decisions about the conflift of principles and interests.
id UFSC-3_895820353256083cdaa832daaaad993d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/35536
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!A teoria da ponderação de princípios na encruzilhada do decisionismo judicial: limita-me ou te devoro!http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219The article adresses the weight of principles theory, according to the contours drawn by the neoconstitutionalism. The weight of principles model has been suffering from solid and emphatic criticisms, since it submits the judicial discourse to a deep deficit of rationality and legitimacy, opening the way to a clear usurpation of the legislative authority by a theoretical model that allows the empire of subjective decisionism and judicial moralism. This leads to the need of establishing material and procedimental limits that are capable to ensure a rational application the system, wich is essential to legitimate and justify the decisions about the conflift of principles and interests.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219O artigo aborda a teoria da ponderação de princípios, com base nos contornos traçados pelo neoconstitucionalismo. O modelo ponderacionista tem sofrido críticas sólidas e abalizadas, na medida em que submete o discurso judicial a um profundo deficit de legitimidade e de racionalidade, abrindo caminho para uma clara usurpação da autoridade legislativa por um modelo teórico que permite o império do decisionismo subjetivo e do moralismo judicial. Isso conduz à necessidade de se estabelecerem limites procedimentais e materiais capazes de assegurar a racional aplicação do sistema, essencial fator de legitimação e justificação das decisões sobre conflitos entre princípios e interesses.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2017-05-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2017v38n75p21910.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 38 No. 75 (2017); 219-242Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 38 Núm. 75 (2017); 219-242Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 38 n. 75 (2017); 219-2422177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219/34028Copyright (c) 2017 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva Cristóvam, José Sérgio2017-05-24T16:12:44Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/35536Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:58.665057Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!
A teoria da ponderação de princípios na encruzilhada do decisionismo judicial: limita-me ou te devoro!
title The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!
spellingShingle The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!
da Silva Cristóvam, José Sérgio
title_short The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!
title_full The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!
title_fullStr The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!
title_full_unstemmed The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!
title_sort The weight of principles theory on the crossroads of the judicial decisionism: limit me or i’ll devore you!
author da Silva Cristóvam, José Sérgio
author_facet da Silva Cristóvam, José Sérgio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva Cristóvam, José Sérgio
description http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219The article adresses the weight of principles theory, according to the contours drawn by the neoconstitutionalism. The weight of principles model has been suffering from solid and emphatic criticisms, since it submits the judicial discourse to a deep deficit of rationality and legitimacy, opening the way to a clear usurpation of the legislative authority by a theoretical model that allows the empire of subjective decisionism and judicial moralism. This leads to the need of establishing material and procedimental limits that are capable to ensure a rational application the system, wich is essential to legitimate and justify the decisions about the conflift of principles and interests.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219
10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2017v38n75p219/34028
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 38 No. 75 (2017); 219-242
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 38 Núm. 75 (2017); 219-242
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 38 n. 75 (2017); 219-242
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434802143756288

Registros relacionados