FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211 |
Resumo: | The article’s starting point is thestatement made by FIFA’s chairmen during pro-tests in Brazilian cities, in June 2013, accord-ing to which democracy is an obstacle to theorganization of the World Cup. Secondo of all,an analysis of a supposed “FIFA territory” in-troduced by the “World Cup General Statute” ismade. The aim is to think of these two aspectsthrough the tensions of Modernity, between theeffectiveness of sovereignty and democracy un-derstood as promises and the pressures of themarket forces notably volatile and unpredict-able. Thus, the political protests can be under-stood as the reaction to the privatization of pub-lic sphere and as a remainder that the fixationof “territories” can also be an opportunity toencounter and to exercise dissent. |
id |
UFSC-3_96894341dede542a1658c6857a153226 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/30609 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-3 |
network_name_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxesA Fifa, a democracia e a soberania: tensões e paradoxosThe article’s starting point is thestatement made by FIFA’s chairmen during pro-tests in Brazilian cities, in June 2013, accord-ing to which democracy is an obstacle to theorganization of the World Cup. Secondo of all,an analysis of a supposed “FIFA territory” in-troduced by the “World Cup General Statute” ismade. The aim is to think of these two aspectsthrough the tensions of Modernity, between theeffectiveness of sovereignty and democracy un-derstood as promises and the pressures of themarket forces notably volatile and unpredict-able. Thus, the political protests can be under-stood as the reaction to the privatization of pub-lic sphere and as a remainder that the fixationof “territories” can also be an opportunity toencounter and to exercise dissent.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211O artigo parte das declarações de dirigentes da FIFA no contexto das manifestações de junho de 2013, segundo as quais a democracia representaria obstáculo para a realização da Copa do Mundo. Busca-se analisar ainda o suposto “território FIFA” na Lei Geral da Copa. O objetivo é refletir sobre esses dois aspectos a partir das tensões geradas na modernidade entre a realização das promessas de soberania e de democracia e as pressões advindas das forças de mercado notadamente volúveis e imprevisíveis. As manifestações políticas podem ser entendidas como reação à privatização da esfera pública e a lembrança de que a fixação de “territórios” pode também ser oportunidade de encontro e de exercício do dissenso. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2015-06-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2015v36n70p21110.5007/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 36 No. 70 (2015); 211-233Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 36 Núm. 70 (2015); 211-233Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 36 n. 70 (2015); 211-2332177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211/29447Salcedo Repoles, Maria Fernandade Castilho Prates, Franciscoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-06-22T13:23:39Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/30609Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:57.429365Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes A Fifa, a democracia e a soberania: tensões e paradoxos |
title |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes |
spellingShingle |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes Salcedo Repoles, Maria Fernanda |
title_short |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes |
title_full |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes |
title_fullStr |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes |
title_full_unstemmed |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes |
title_sort |
FIFA, Democracy and Sovereignty: tensions and paradoxes |
author |
Salcedo Repoles, Maria Fernanda |
author_facet |
Salcedo Repoles, Maria Fernanda de Castilho Prates, Francisco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Castilho Prates, Francisco |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salcedo Repoles, Maria Fernanda de Castilho Prates, Francisco |
description |
The article’s starting point is thestatement made by FIFA’s chairmen during pro-tests in Brazilian cities, in June 2013, accord-ing to which democracy is an obstacle to theorganization of the World Cup. Secondo of all,an analysis of a supposed “FIFA territory” in-troduced by the “World Cup General Statute” ismade. The aim is to think of these two aspectsthrough the tensions of Modernity, between theeffectiveness of sovereignty and democracy un-derstood as promises and the pressures of themarket forces notably volatile and unpredict-able. Thus, the political protests can be under-stood as the reaction to the privatization of pub-lic sphere and as a remainder that the fixationof “territories” can also be an opportunity toencounter and to exercise dissent. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211 10.5007/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2015v36n70p211/29447 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 36 No. 70 (2015); 211-233 Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 36 Núm. 70 (2015); 211-233 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 36 n. 70 (2015); 211-233 2177-7055 0101-9562 reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434802053578752 |