The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91 |
Resumo: | The validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart). |
id |
UFSC-3_c63ca1d370e1b5e2758ef1c2b1850f0f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55225 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-3 |
network_name_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal systemA norma hipotética fundamental de Hans Kelsen e a regra de reconhecimento de Herbert Hart: semelhanças e diferenças entre os critérios de validade do sistema jurídicoThe validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart).A validade do sistema jurídico foi pensada por jusfilósofos como Hans Kelsen e Herbert Hart, respectivamente, a norma hipotética fundamental e a regra de reconhecimento. Esse artigo enfrentará esses conceitos com o objetivo de realizar um estudo comparativo entre os dois e, então, apontar as suas semelhanças e diferenças. Para tanto, recorreu-se à abordagem dedutiva e à pesquisa de cunho bibliográfico. Ao final do artigo, será possível perceber a semelhança, construída a partir do positivismo jurídico, como um critério de validade para o ordenamento jurídico, e as diferenças pensadas a partir de pressuposto lógico-transcendental de validade (Kelsen) e do elemento de fato de validade (Hart). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2018-06-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n78p9110.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 39 No. 78 (2018); 91-118Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 39 Núm. 78 (2018); 91-118Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 39 n. 78 (2018); 91-1182177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91/36937Copyright (c) 2018 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Alex SilvaQuirino, Regio Hermilton Ribeiro2018-10-10T14:29:53Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55225Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:35:03.801876Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system A norma hipotética fundamental de Hans Kelsen e a regra de reconhecimento de Herbert Hart: semelhanças e diferenças entre os critérios de validade do sistema jurídico |
title |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
spellingShingle |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system Gonçalves, Alex Silva |
title_short |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_full |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_fullStr |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
title_sort |
The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system |
author |
Gonçalves, Alex Silva |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, Alex Silva Quirino, Regio Hermilton Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Quirino, Regio Hermilton Ribeiro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, Alex Silva Quirino, Regio Hermilton Ribeiro |
description |
The validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart). |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91 10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91/36937 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 39 No. 78 (2018); 91-118 Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 39 Núm. 78 (2018); 91-118 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 39 n. 78 (2018); 91-118 2177-7055 0101-9562 reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434803009880064 |