Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stakonski, João Willian
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
DOI: 10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679
Resumo: When structuring their comprehension about living beings as autopoietic machines, Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela repeatedly weave criticisms to the application of the notions of function and fitness then established in scientific theories. Such criticisms are presented in two main fronts: the authors say that functional attributions are causally inert, what reduces them to mere non-operational explanatory artifices; on the other hand, they defend that every organism, as long as it is not destroyed in its interactions with the medium, conserves its fitness, which is constitutive of living beings and, therefore, invariable. However, as Gustavo Caponi defends, we can understand that attributing functions means nothing more than highlighting causal roles they play in certain reference processes, so that the comparison between structures that perform the same function enable the measurement of different degrees of efficiency in its performance. In the field of biology, this conceptual structure is translated into the biological functions, performed by different organismic subsystems that relates to life cycle maintenance, as well as into fitness, understood as the efficiency in the operation of such functions and determinative of the evolutionary process. We argue that Caponi's proposal is immune to both attacks made by the Chilean authors, as it incorporates an operational and contextual content into functional attributions and enables the reference to fitness, whose evolutionary importance can be measured from time to time. Such an approach seems to be, moreover, a very opportune addition to the theory of autopoiesis, equipping it with a much pertinent conception of functional attributions.
id UFSC-5_07a99562529356bb98615c78ecb23050
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/84679
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
spelling Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions CompatibleCompatibilizando autopoiesis y atribuciones funcionalesCompatibilizando Autopoiese e Atribuições FuncionaisAutopoiesisfunctional attributionscausal rolesfitnessadaptationAutopoiesisfunctional attributionscausal rolesfitnessadaptationWhen structuring their comprehension about living beings as autopoietic machines, Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela repeatedly weave criticisms to the application of the notions of function and fitness then established in scientific theories. Such criticisms are presented in two main fronts: the authors say that functional attributions are causally inert, what reduces them to mere non-operational explanatory artifices; on the other hand, they defend that every organism, as long as it is not destroyed in its interactions with the medium, conserves its fitness, which is constitutive of living beings and, therefore, invariable. However, as Gustavo Caponi defends, we can understand that attributing functions means nothing more than highlighting causal roles they play in certain reference processes, so that the comparison between structures that perform the same function enable the measurement of different degrees of efficiency in its performance. In the field of biology, this conceptual structure is translated into the biological functions, performed by different organismic subsystems that relates to life cycle maintenance, as well as into fitness, understood as the efficiency in the operation of such functions and determinative of the evolutionary process. We argue that Caponi's proposal is immune to both attacks made by the Chilean authors, as it incorporates an operational and contextual content into functional attributions and enables the reference to fitness, whose evolutionary importance can be measured from time to time. Such an approach seems to be, moreover, a very opportune addition to the theory of autopoiesis, equipping it with a much pertinent conception of functional attributions.Al estructurar su comprensión de los seres vivos en cuanto máquinas autopoiéticas, Humberto Maturana y Francisco Varela repetidamente tejen críticas a la aplicación de las nociones de función o aptitud en teorías biológicas, viendo las acepciones entonces establecidas de estos conceptos como causalmente inertes, incapaces de explicar fenómeno alguno en el dominio que buscaban esclarecer y, por ende, de integrar modelos explicativos científicos. Dichas críticas se presentan en dos frentes principales: por un lado, dicen que no hay contenido causal en las atribuciones funcionales que comúnmente se hacen en biología, lo que las reduce a artificios explicativos no operacionalizables; por otro lado, defienden que la atribución de diferentes grados de aptitud a los seres vivos no procede, ya que todo ser vivo mantiene su integridad frente a las perturbaciones del medio - es igualmente apto a vivir. Sin embargo, como defiende Gustavo Caponi, podemos entender que atribuir funciones a determinadas entidades no significa más que destacar los roles causales que desempeñan en determinados procesos de referencia, de modo que, dado un conjunto de estructuras que desempeñan la misma función, la comparación entre estas posibilita la determinación de diferentes grados de eficiencia en la realización de estas funciones. En el ámbito de la biología, esta estructura conceptual se traduce en las funciones biológicas que los diferentes subsistemas de los seres vivos parecen desempeñar - roles causales que tienen el ciclo de vida de los organismos como proceso de referencia -, así como en los diferentes grados de eficiencia en la operación de funciones biológicas. Así, se explicita el mecanismo que genera las distintas tasas de éxito en la supervivencia y reproducción, que configuran el perfil de las generaciones posteriores. Planteamos que la propuesta de Caponi es inmune a ambos los ataques de los autores chilenos a las atribuciones funcionales: ella atribuye un contenido operacional y contextual a las atribuciones funcionales y, por otro lado, ofrece un mecanismo para pensar en diferentes grados de eficiencia en la realización de funciones, cuya importancia evolutiva se puede evaluar en cada momento. Este enfoque parece ser, además, una adición muy oportuna a la comprensión de los seres vivos y sus procesos evolutivos a la luz de la teoría de la autopoiesis, equipándola de una concepción bastante pertinente de atribuciones funcionales.Ao estruturarem sua compreensão dos seres vivos enquanto máquinas autopoiéticas, Humberto Maturana e Francisco Varela reiteradamente tecem críticas à aplicação das noções de função e aptidão (fitness) então estabelecidas em teorias científicas. Tais críticas apresentam-se em duas frentes principais: por um lado, os autores afirmam que atribuições funcionais são causalmente inertes, o que as reduz a meros artifícios explicativos não operacionalizáveis; por outro, defendem que todo organismo, enquanto não for destruído em suas interações com o meio, conserva sua aptidão, sendo esta constitutiva dos seres vivos e, portanto, invariável. Contudo, como defende Gustavo Caponi, podemos compreender que atribuir funções significa nada mais do que destacar papeis causais desempenhados em determinados processos de referência, de modo que a comparação entre estruturas que desempenhem a mesma função possibilita a medição dos diferentes graus de eficiência em sua realização. No âmbito da biologia, esta estrutura conceitual traduz-se nas funções biológicas, operadas por diferentes subsistemas dos organismos e referentes à manutenção do ciclo vital, assim como na aptidão biológica, tomada como a eficiência na operação destas funções e determinante no processo evolutivo. Defendemos que a proposta de Caponi é imune a ambos os ataques dos autores chilenos, ao incorporar um conteúdo operacional e contextual para as atribuições funcionais e ao possibilitar a referência a aptidão biológica, cuja importância evolutiva pode ser aferida momento a momento. Tal abordagem mostra-se, ademais, como uma adição muito oportuna à chamada teoria da autopoiese, aparelhando-a com uma concepção bastante pertinente de atribuições funcionais.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2022-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/8467910.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 26 n. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-1111808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679/51095Copyright (c) 2022 João Willian Stakonskihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStakonski, João Willian2022-06-07T23:51:27Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/84679Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2022-06-07T23:51:27Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
Compatibilizando autopoiesis y atribuciones funcionales
Compatibilizando Autopoiese e Atribuições Funcionais
title Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
spellingShingle Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
Stakonski, João Willian
Autopoiesis
functional attributions
causal roles
fitness
adaptation
Autopoiesis
functional attributions
causal roles
fitness
adaptation
Stakonski, João Willian
Autopoiesis
functional attributions
causal roles
fitness
adaptation
Autopoiesis
functional attributions
causal roles
fitness
adaptation
title_short Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
title_full Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
title_fullStr Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
title_full_unstemmed Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
title_sort Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
author Stakonski, João Willian
author_facet Stakonski, João Willian
Stakonski, João Willian
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stakonski, João Willian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Autopoiesis
functional attributions
causal roles
fitness
adaptation
Autopoiesis
functional attributions
causal roles
fitness
adaptation
topic Autopoiesis
functional attributions
causal roles
fitness
adaptation
Autopoiesis
functional attributions
causal roles
fitness
adaptation
description When structuring their comprehension about living beings as autopoietic machines, Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela repeatedly weave criticisms to the application of the notions of function and fitness then established in scientific theories. Such criticisms are presented in two main fronts: the authors say that functional attributions are causally inert, what reduces them to mere non-operational explanatory artifices; on the other hand, they defend that every organism, as long as it is not destroyed in its interactions with the medium, conserves its fitness, which is constitutive of living beings and, therefore, invariable. However, as Gustavo Caponi defends, we can understand that attributing functions means nothing more than highlighting causal roles they play in certain reference processes, so that the comparison between structures that perform the same function enable the measurement of different degrees of efficiency in its performance. In the field of biology, this conceptual structure is translated into the biological functions, performed by different organismic subsystems that relates to life cycle maintenance, as well as into fitness, understood as the efficiency in the operation of such functions and determinative of the evolutionary process. We argue that Caponi's proposal is immune to both attacks made by the Chilean authors, as it incorporates an operational and contextual content into functional attributions and enables the reference to fitness, whose evolutionary importance can be measured from time to time. Such an approach seems to be, moreover, a very opportune addition to the theory of autopoiesis, equipping it with a much pertinent conception of functional attributions.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679
10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679/51095
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 João Willian Stakonski
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 João Willian Stakonski
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 26 n. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1822181383260340224
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679