Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
DOI: | 10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679 |
Resumo: | When structuring their comprehension about living beings as autopoietic machines, Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela repeatedly weave criticisms to the application of the notions of function and fitness then established in scientific theories. Such criticisms are presented in two main fronts: the authors say that functional attributions are causally inert, what reduces them to mere non-operational explanatory artifices; on the other hand, they defend that every organism, as long as it is not destroyed in its interactions with the medium, conserves its fitness, which is constitutive of living beings and, therefore, invariable. However, as Gustavo Caponi defends, we can understand that attributing functions means nothing more than highlighting causal roles they play in certain reference processes, so that the comparison between structures that perform the same function enable the measurement of different degrees of efficiency in its performance. In the field of biology, this conceptual structure is translated into the biological functions, performed by different organismic subsystems that relates to life cycle maintenance, as well as into fitness, understood as the efficiency in the operation of such functions and determinative of the evolutionary process. We argue that Caponi's proposal is immune to both attacks made by the Chilean authors, as it incorporates an operational and contextual content into functional attributions and enables the reference to fitness, whose evolutionary importance can be measured from time to time. Such an approach seems to be, moreover, a very opportune addition to the theory of autopoiesis, equipping it with a much pertinent conception of functional attributions. |
id |
UFSC-5_07a99562529356bb98615c78ecb23050 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/84679 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
spelling |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions CompatibleCompatibilizando autopoiesis y atribuciones funcionalesCompatibilizando Autopoiese e Atribuições FuncionaisAutopoiesisfunctional attributionscausal rolesfitnessadaptationAutopoiesisfunctional attributionscausal rolesfitnessadaptationWhen structuring their comprehension about living beings as autopoietic machines, Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela repeatedly weave criticisms to the application of the notions of function and fitness then established in scientific theories. Such criticisms are presented in two main fronts: the authors say that functional attributions are causally inert, what reduces them to mere non-operational explanatory artifices; on the other hand, they defend that every organism, as long as it is not destroyed in its interactions with the medium, conserves its fitness, which is constitutive of living beings and, therefore, invariable. However, as Gustavo Caponi defends, we can understand that attributing functions means nothing more than highlighting causal roles they play in certain reference processes, so that the comparison between structures that perform the same function enable the measurement of different degrees of efficiency in its performance. In the field of biology, this conceptual structure is translated into the biological functions, performed by different organismic subsystems that relates to life cycle maintenance, as well as into fitness, understood as the efficiency in the operation of such functions and determinative of the evolutionary process. We argue that Caponi's proposal is immune to both attacks made by the Chilean authors, as it incorporates an operational and contextual content into functional attributions and enables the reference to fitness, whose evolutionary importance can be measured from time to time. Such an approach seems to be, moreover, a very opportune addition to the theory of autopoiesis, equipping it with a much pertinent conception of functional attributions.Al estructurar su comprensión de los seres vivos en cuanto máquinas autopoiéticas, Humberto Maturana y Francisco Varela repetidamente tejen críticas a la aplicación de las nociones de función o aptitud en teorías biológicas, viendo las acepciones entonces establecidas de estos conceptos como causalmente inertes, incapaces de explicar fenómeno alguno en el dominio que buscaban esclarecer y, por ende, de integrar modelos explicativos científicos. Dichas críticas se presentan en dos frentes principales: por un lado, dicen que no hay contenido causal en las atribuciones funcionales que comúnmente se hacen en biología, lo que las reduce a artificios explicativos no operacionalizables; por otro lado, defienden que la atribución de diferentes grados de aptitud a los seres vivos no procede, ya que todo ser vivo mantiene su integridad frente a las perturbaciones del medio - es igualmente apto a vivir. Sin embargo, como defiende Gustavo Caponi, podemos entender que atribuir funciones a determinadas entidades no significa más que destacar los roles causales que desempeñan en determinados procesos de referencia, de modo que, dado un conjunto de estructuras que desempeñan la misma función, la comparación entre estas posibilita la determinación de diferentes grados de eficiencia en la realización de estas funciones. En el ámbito de la biología, esta estructura conceptual se traduce en las funciones biológicas que los diferentes subsistemas de los seres vivos parecen desempeñar - roles causales que tienen el ciclo de vida de los organismos como proceso de referencia -, así como en los diferentes grados de eficiencia en la operación de funciones biológicas. Así, se explicita el mecanismo que genera las distintas tasas de éxito en la supervivencia y reproducción, que configuran el perfil de las generaciones posteriores. Planteamos que la propuesta de Caponi es inmune a ambos los ataques de los autores chilenos a las atribuciones funcionales: ella atribuye un contenido operacional y contextual a las atribuciones funcionales y, por otro lado, ofrece un mecanismo para pensar en diferentes grados de eficiencia en la realización de funciones, cuya importancia evolutiva se puede evaluar en cada momento. Este enfoque parece ser, además, una adición muy oportuna a la comprensión de los seres vivos y sus procesos evolutivos a la luz de la teoría de la autopoiesis, equipándola de una concepción bastante pertinente de atribuciones funcionales.Ao estruturarem sua compreensão dos seres vivos enquanto máquinas autopoiéticas, Humberto Maturana e Francisco Varela reiteradamente tecem críticas à aplicação das noções de função e aptidão (fitness) então estabelecidas em teorias científicas. Tais críticas apresentam-se em duas frentes principais: por um lado, os autores afirmam que atribuições funcionais são causalmente inertes, o que as reduz a meros artifícios explicativos não operacionalizáveis; por outro, defendem que todo organismo, enquanto não for destruído em suas interações com o meio, conserva sua aptidão, sendo esta constitutiva dos seres vivos e, portanto, invariável. Contudo, como defende Gustavo Caponi, podemos compreender que atribuir funções significa nada mais do que destacar papeis causais desempenhados em determinados processos de referência, de modo que a comparação entre estruturas que desempenhem a mesma função possibilita a medição dos diferentes graus de eficiência em sua realização. No âmbito da biologia, esta estrutura conceitual traduz-se nas funções biológicas, operadas por diferentes subsistemas dos organismos e referentes à manutenção do ciclo vital, assim como na aptidão biológica, tomada como a eficiência na operação destas funções e determinante no processo evolutivo. Defendemos que a proposta de Caponi é imune a ambos os ataques dos autores chilenos, ao incorporar um conteúdo operacional e contextual para as atribuições funcionais e ao possibilitar a referência a aptidão biológica, cuja importância evolutiva pode ser aferida momento a momento. Tal abordagem mostra-se, ademais, como uma adição muito oportuna à chamada teoria da autopoiese, aparelhando-a com uma concepção bastante pertinente de atribuições funcionais.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2022-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/8467910.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 26 n. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-1111808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679/51095Copyright (c) 2022 João Willian Stakonskihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStakonski, João Willian2022-06-07T23:51:27Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/84679Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2022-06-07T23:51:27Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible Compatibilizando autopoiesis y atribuciones funcionales Compatibilizando Autopoiese e Atribuições Funcionais |
title |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible |
spellingShingle |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible Stakonski, João Willian Autopoiesis functional attributions causal roles fitness adaptation Autopoiesis functional attributions causal roles fitness adaptation Stakonski, João Willian Autopoiesis functional attributions causal roles fitness adaptation Autopoiesis functional attributions causal roles fitness adaptation |
title_short |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible |
title_full |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible |
title_fullStr |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible |
title_full_unstemmed |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible |
title_sort |
Making Autopoiesis and Functional Attributions Compatible |
author |
Stakonski, João Willian |
author_facet |
Stakonski, João Willian Stakonski, João Willian |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Stakonski, João Willian |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autopoiesis functional attributions causal roles fitness adaptation Autopoiesis functional attributions causal roles fitness adaptation |
topic |
Autopoiesis functional attributions causal roles fitness adaptation Autopoiesis functional attributions causal roles fitness adaptation |
description |
When structuring their comprehension about living beings as autopoietic machines, Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela repeatedly weave criticisms to the application of the notions of function and fitness then established in scientific theories. Such criticisms are presented in two main fronts: the authors say that functional attributions are causally inert, what reduces them to mere non-operational explanatory artifices; on the other hand, they defend that every organism, as long as it is not destroyed in its interactions with the medium, conserves its fitness, which is constitutive of living beings and, therefore, invariable. However, as Gustavo Caponi defends, we can understand that attributing functions means nothing more than highlighting causal roles they play in certain reference processes, so that the comparison between structures that perform the same function enable the measurement of different degrees of efficiency in its performance. In the field of biology, this conceptual structure is translated into the biological functions, performed by different organismic subsystems that relates to life cycle maintenance, as well as into fitness, understood as the efficiency in the operation of such functions and determinative of the evolutionary process. We argue that Caponi's proposal is immune to both attacks made by the Chilean authors, as it incorporates an operational and contextual content into functional attributions and enables the reference to fitness, whose evolutionary importance can be measured from time to time. Such an approach seems to be, moreover, a very opportune addition to the theory of autopoiesis, equipping it with a much pertinent conception of functional attributions. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679 10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84679/51095 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 João Willian Stakonski http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 João Willian Stakonski http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 26 n. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 95-111 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1822181383260340224 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84679 |