On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80109 |
Resumo: | A recent logical anti-exceptionalist trend proposes that logical theories are revisable in the same manner as scientific theories, either on grounds of the method of theory selection or on what counts as evidence for this revision. Given this approximation of logic and science, the present essay analyzes the commitments of both these varieties and argues that, as it currently stands, this kind of anti-exceptionalism is committed to scientific realism, that is, to realism about some unobservable entities evoked in logical theories. The essay argues that anti-exceptionalism cannot be separated into metaphysical and epistemological varieties, and proposed rather to label anti-exceptionalists views either broadly in terms of theory revision, or narrowly in terms of logic’s affinity with science. |
id |
UFSC-5_0d6e3e26a576c0b89987c2eceeb37ac4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/80109 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalismOn the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalismOn the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalismA recent logical anti-exceptionalist trend proposes that logical theories are revisable in the same manner as scientific theories, either on grounds of the method of theory selection or on what counts as evidence for this revision. Given this approximation of logic and science, the present essay analyzes the commitments of both these varieties and argues that, as it currently stands, this kind of anti-exceptionalism is committed to scientific realism, that is, to realism about some unobservable entities evoked in logical theories. The essay argues that anti-exceptionalism cannot be separated into metaphysical and epistemological varieties, and proposed rather to label anti-exceptionalists views either broadly in terms of theory revision, or narrowly in terms of logic’s affinity with science.A recent logical anti-exceptionalist trend proposes that logical theories are revisable in the same manner as scientific theories, either on grounds of the method of theory selection or on what counts as evidence for this revision. Given this approximation of logic and science, the present essay analyzes the commitments of both these varieties and argues that, as it currently stands, this kind of anti-exceptionalism is committed to scientific realism, that is, to realism about some unobservable entities evoked in logical theories. The essay argues that anti-exceptionalism cannot be separated into metaphysical and epistemological varieties, and proposed rather to label anti-exceptionalists views either broadly in terms of theory revision, or narrowly in terms of logic’s affinity with science.A recent logical anti-exceptionalist trend proposes that logical theories are revisable in the same manner as scientific theories, either on grounds of the method of theory selection or on what counts as evidence for this revision. Given this approximation of logic and science, the present essay analyzes the commitments of both these varieties and argues that, as it currently stands, this kind of anti-exceptionalism is committed to scientific realism, that is, to realism about some unobservable entities evoked in logical theories. The essay argues that anti-exceptionalism cannot be separated into metaphysical and epistemological varieties, and proposed rather to label anti-exceptionalists views either broadly in terms of theory revision, or narrowly in terms of logic’s affinity with science.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2021-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/8010910.5007/1808-1711.2021.e80109Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2021); 59–71Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2021); 59–71Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 25 n. 1 (2021); 59–711808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80109/46899Copyright (c) 2021 Evelyn Fernandes Ericksonhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessErickson, Evelyn Fernandes2021-09-17T17:24:36Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/80109Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2021-09-17T17:24:36Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism |
title |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism |
spellingShingle |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism Erickson, Evelyn Fernandes |
title_short |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism |
title_full |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism |
title_fullStr |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism |
title_sort |
On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism |
author |
Erickson, Evelyn Fernandes |
author_facet |
Erickson, Evelyn Fernandes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Erickson, Evelyn Fernandes |
description |
A recent logical anti-exceptionalist trend proposes that logical theories are revisable in the same manner as scientific theories, either on grounds of the method of theory selection or on what counts as evidence for this revision. Given this approximation of logic and science, the present essay analyzes the commitments of both these varieties and argues that, as it currently stands, this kind of anti-exceptionalism is committed to scientific realism, that is, to realism about some unobservable entities evoked in logical theories. The essay argues that anti-exceptionalism cannot be separated into metaphysical and epistemological varieties, and proposed rather to label anti-exceptionalists views either broadly in terms of theory revision, or narrowly in terms of logic’s affinity with science. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80109 10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e80109 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80109 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e80109 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80109/46899 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Evelyn Fernandes Erickson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Evelyn Fernandes Erickson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2021); 59–71 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2021); 59–71 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 25 n. 1 (2021); 59–71 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435108878450688 |