The idea of being is not uniquely innate

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Täljedal, Inge-Bert
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p359
Resumo: According to the Italian philosopher Antonio Rosmini (1797-1855), being is an  innate idea that is requisite for contemplating anything. He emphatically claims that it is the one and only innate idea. Rosmini makes a sharp distinction between sensations and perceptions. Perceptions are thought to arise when the undetermined idea of being (tantamount to possibility) is combined with sensations, universals when being is combined with  perceptions. It is argued here that Rosmini’s explanation of the origin of universals does  not work. If the idea of being is regarded as innate, then several others should be similarly  regarded, notably the idea of qualitative identity which is an idea necessary for deriving universals.  Although Rosmini holds that certain properties are necessarily present in real objects  and therefore implicit in the idea of being, the property of being qualitatively identical with  something else is not among those properties. Theological motives may have encouraged  Rosmini to emphasize being as a peculiarly fundamental idea. However, if the idea of being  is more fundamental than other universals, it may be regarded so in virtue of its generality,  not because it has a uniquely innate character.
id UFSC-5_50a4a9d6cc330d41eed16182f2cd737a
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/47963
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The idea of being is not uniquely innateAccording to the Italian philosopher Antonio Rosmini (1797-1855), being is an  innate idea that is requisite for contemplating anything. He emphatically claims that it is the one and only innate idea. Rosmini makes a sharp distinction between sensations and perceptions. Perceptions are thought to arise when the undetermined idea of being (tantamount to possibility) is combined with sensations, universals when being is combined with  perceptions. It is argued here that Rosmini’s explanation of the origin of universals does  not work. If the idea of being is regarded as innate, then several others should be similarly  regarded, notably the idea of qualitative identity which is an idea necessary for deriving universals.  Although Rosmini holds that certain properties are necessarily present in real objects  and therefore implicit in the idea of being, the property of being qualitatively identical with  something else is not among those properties. Theological motives may have encouraged  Rosmini to emphasize being as a peculiarly fundamental idea. However, if the idea of being  is more fundamental than other universals, it may be regarded so in virtue of its generality,  not because it has a uniquely innate character.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2016-09-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p35910.5007/808-1711.2016v20n3p359Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2016); 343-359Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 Núm. 3 (2016); 343-359Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 20 n. 3 (2016); 343-3591808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p359/33941Copyright (c) 2021 Inge-Bert Täljedalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTäljedal, Inge-Bert2019-09-13T11:08:29Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/47963Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T11:08:29Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The idea of being is not uniquely innate
title The idea of being is not uniquely innate
spellingShingle The idea of being is not uniquely innate
Täljedal, Inge-Bert
title_short The idea of being is not uniquely innate
title_full The idea of being is not uniquely innate
title_fullStr The idea of being is not uniquely innate
title_full_unstemmed The idea of being is not uniquely innate
title_sort The idea of being is not uniquely innate
author Täljedal, Inge-Bert
author_facet Täljedal, Inge-Bert
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Täljedal, Inge-Bert
description According to the Italian philosopher Antonio Rosmini (1797-1855), being is an  innate idea that is requisite for contemplating anything. He emphatically claims that it is the one and only innate idea. Rosmini makes a sharp distinction between sensations and perceptions. Perceptions are thought to arise when the undetermined idea of being (tantamount to possibility) is combined with sensations, universals when being is combined with  perceptions. It is argued here that Rosmini’s explanation of the origin of universals does  not work. If the idea of being is regarded as innate, then several others should be similarly  regarded, notably the idea of qualitative identity which is an idea necessary for deriving universals.  Although Rosmini holds that certain properties are necessarily present in real objects  and therefore implicit in the idea of being, the property of being qualitatively identical with  something else is not among those properties. Theological motives may have encouraged  Rosmini to emphasize being as a peculiarly fundamental idea. However, if the idea of being  is more fundamental than other universals, it may be regarded so in virtue of its generality,  not because it has a uniquely innate character.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p359
10.5007/808-1711.2016v20n3p359
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p359
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/808-1711.2016v20n3p359
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p359/33941
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Inge-Bert Täljedal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Inge-Bert Täljedal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2016); 343-359
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 Núm. 3 (2016); 343-359
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 20 n. 3 (2016); 343-359
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435113706094592