Crença, regra e ação

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279
Resumo: In this paper I analyze the relation between ascribing knowledge to a human agent in two kinds of circumstances, namely acting according to environmental contingences and acting according to a rule. My discussion begins with the distinction I put forward between descriptive and explicative hypotheses. After relating the notions of rule and belief, I try to support the idea that modifications in overt behavior are prior to any ascriptions of knowledge to an agent, connecting this topic with processes of investigation. I discuss also if there can be beliefs which do not bring about modifications of behavior, and I argue that in certain circumstances of our investigation about the behavior of people, in order to give it unity, we are to ascribe beliefs of that kind to people. Given those points, I depict epistemology as the theory of the processes of investigation involved in human action.
id UFSC-5_6f5e4daf55a0d631b7c5ad5120db290d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/19657
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Crença, regra e açãoCrença, regra e açãoIn this paper I analyze the relation between ascribing knowledge to a human agent in two kinds of circumstances, namely acting according to environmental contingences and acting according to a rule. My discussion begins with the distinction I put forward between descriptive and explicative hypotheses. After relating the notions of rule and belief, I try to support the idea that modifications in overt behavior are prior to any ascriptions of knowledge to an agent, connecting this topic with processes of investigation. I discuss also if there can be beliefs which do not bring about modifications of behavior, and I argue that in certain circumstances of our investigation about the behavior of people, in order to give it unity, we are to ascribe beliefs of that kind to people. Given those points, I depict epistemology as the theory of the processes of investigation involved in human action.Neste artigo, analisamos a relação entre a atribuição de conhecimento a um agente humano em dois tipos de situações, a saber, agir segundo as contingências ambientais e agir de acordo com uma regra. Nossa discussão parte de uma distinção que fazemos entre hipóteses descritivas e explicativas. Após estabelecer a relação entre as noções de regra e de crença, procuramos sustentar a ideia de que há precedência das modificações de comportamento manifesto sobre quaisquer atribuições de conhecimento a um agente, relacionando esse tópico com os processos de investigação. Discutimos ainda se pode haver crenças que não acarretam modificações de comportamento, defendendo que, em determinadas condições de nossa investigação sobre o comportamento das pessoas, para darmos unidade a ele, devemos atribuir a elas também crenças desse tipo. Tendo em conta tais pontos, procuramos retratar a epistemologia como uma teoria dos processos de investigação envolvidos na ação humana.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2010-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p27910.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010); 279-308Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2010); 279-308Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 14 n. 2 (2010); 279-3081808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279/17965Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de Araújo Dutrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo2020-01-22T08:51:36Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/19657Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2020-01-22T08:51:36Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crença, regra e ação
Crença, regra e ação
title Crença, regra e ação
spellingShingle Crença, regra e ação
Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo
title_short Crença, regra e ação
title_full Crença, regra e ação
title_fullStr Crença, regra e ação
title_full_unstemmed Crença, regra e ação
title_sort Crença, regra e ação
author Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo
author_facet Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo
description In this paper I analyze the relation between ascribing knowledge to a human agent in two kinds of circumstances, namely acting according to environmental contingences and acting according to a rule. My discussion begins with the distinction I put forward between descriptive and explicative hypotheses. After relating the notions of rule and belief, I try to support the idea that modifications in overt behavior are prior to any ascriptions of knowledge to an agent, connecting this topic with processes of investigation. I discuss also if there can be beliefs which do not bring about modifications of behavior, and I argue that in certain circumstances of our investigation about the behavior of people, in order to give it unity, we are to ascribe beliefs of that kind to people. Given those points, I depict epistemology as the theory of the processes of investigation involved in human action.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-05-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279
10.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279/17965
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de Araújo Dutra
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de Araújo Dutra
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010); 279-308
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2010); 279-308
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 14 n. 2 (2010); 279-308
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435111318487040