Crença, regra e ação
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279 |
Resumo: | In this paper I analyze the relation between ascribing knowledge to a human agent in two kinds of circumstances, namely acting according to environmental contingences and acting according to a rule. My discussion begins with the distinction I put forward between descriptive and explicative hypotheses. After relating the notions of rule and belief, I try to support the idea that modifications in overt behavior are prior to any ascriptions of knowledge to an agent, connecting this topic with processes of investigation. I discuss also if there can be beliefs which do not bring about modifications of behavior, and I argue that in certain circumstances of our investigation about the behavior of people, in order to give it unity, we are to ascribe beliefs of that kind to people. Given those points, I depict epistemology as the theory of the processes of investigation involved in human action. |
id |
UFSC-5_6f5e4daf55a0d631b7c5ad5120db290d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/19657 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Crença, regra e açãoCrença, regra e açãoIn this paper I analyze the relation between ascribing knowledge to a human agent in two kinds of circumstances, namely acting according to environmental contingences and acting according to a rule. My discussion begins with the distinction I put forward between descriptive and explicative hypotheses. After relating the notions of rule and belief, I try to support the idea that modifications in overt behavior are prior to any ascriptions of knowledge to an agent, connecting this topic with processes of investigation. I discuss also if there can be beliefs which do not bring about modifications of behavior, and I argue that in certain circumstances of our investigation about the behavior of people, in order to give it unity, we are to ascribe beliefs of that kind to people. Given those points, I depict epistemology as the theory of the processes of investigation involved in human action.Neste artigo, analisamos a relação entre a atribuição de conhecimento a um agente humano em dois tipos de situações, a saber, agir segundo as contingências ambientais e agir de acordo com uma regra. Nossa discussão parte de uma distinção que fazemos entre hipóteses descritivas e explicativas. Após estabelecer a relação entre as noções de regra e de crença, procuramos sustentar a ideia de que há precedência das modificações de comportamento manifesto sobre quaisquer atribuições de conhecimento a um agente, relacionando esse tópico com os processos de investigação. Discutimos ainda se pode haver crenças que não acarretam modificações de comportamento, defendendo que, em determinadas condições de nossa investigação sobre o comportamento das pessoas, para darmos unidade a ele, devemos atribuir a elas também crenças desse tipo. Tendo em conta tais pontos, procuramos retratar a epistemologia como uma teoria dos processos de investigação envolvidos na ação humana.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2010-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p27910.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010); 279-308Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2010); 279-308Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 14 n. 2 (2010); 279-3081808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279/17965Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de Araújo Dutrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo2020-01-22T08:51:36Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/19657Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2020-01-22T08:51:36Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Crença, regra e ação Crença, regra e ação |
title |
Crença, regra e ação |
spellingShingle |
Crença, regra e ação Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo |
title_short |
Crença, regra e ação |
title_full |
Crença, regra e ação |
title_fullStr |
Crença, regra e ação |
title_full_unstemmed |
Crença, regra e ação |
title_sort |
Crença, regra e ação |
author |
Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo |
author_facet |
Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dutra, Luiz Henrique de Araújo |
description |
In this paper I analyze the relation between ascribing knowledge to a human agent in two kinds of circumstances, namely acting according to environmental contingences and acting according to a rule. My discussion begins with the distinction I put forward between descriptive and explicative hypotheses. After relating the notions of rule and belief, I try to support the idea that modifications in overt behavior are prior to any ascriptions of knowledge to an agent, connecting this topic with processes of investigation. I discuss also if there can be beliefs which do not bring about modifications of behavior, and I argue that in certain circumstances of our investigation about the behavior of people, in order to give it unity, we are to ascribe beliefs of that kind to people. Given those points, I depict epistemology as the theory of the processes of investigation involved in human action. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-05-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279 10.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p279/17965 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de Araújo Dutra info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de Araújo Dutra |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010); 279-308 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2010); 279-308 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 14 n. 2 (2010); 279-308 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435111318487040 |