Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Morita, Kunihisa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2020v24n1p51
Resumo: This study posits that Bohr failed to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description of physical reality against Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen’s (EPR) paper. Although there are many papers in the literature that focus on Bohr’s argument in his reply to the EPR paper, the purpose of the current paper is not to clarify Bohr’s argument. Instead, I contend that regardless of which interpretation of Bohr’s argument is correct, his defense of the quantum mechanical description of physical reality remained incomplete. For example, a recent trend in studies of Bohr’s work is to suggest he considered the wave-function description to be epistemic. However, such an interpretation cannot be used to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description.
id UFSC-5_77472b40b1cde598efdce19469b24f57
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/61743
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?Did Bohr Succeed in Defending the Completeness of Quantum Mechanics?This study posits that Bohr failed to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description of physical reality against Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen’s (EPR) paper. Although there are many papers in the literature that focus on Bohr’s argument in his reply to the EPR paper, the purpose of the current paper is not to clarify Bohr’s argument. Instead, I contend that regardless of which interpretation of Bohr’s argument is correct, his defense of the quantum mechanical description of physical reality remained incomplete. For example, a recent trend in studies of Bohr’s work is to suggest he considered the wave-function description to be epistemic. However, such an interpretation cannot be used to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description.This study posits that Bohr failed to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description of physical reality against Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen’s (EPR) paper. Although there are many papers in the literature that focus on Bohr’s argument in his reply to the EPR paper, the purpose of the current paper is not to clarify Bohr’s argument. Instead, I contend that regardless of which interpretation of Bohr’s argument is correct, his defense of the quantum mechanical description of physical reality remained incomplete. For example, a recent trend in studies of Bohr’s work is to suggest he considered the wave-function description to be epistemic. However, such an interpretation cannot be used to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2020-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2020v24n1p5110.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n1p51Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2020); 51-63Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2020); 51-63Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 51-631808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2020v24n1p51/pdfCopyright (c) 2021 Kunihisa Moritainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorita, Kunihisa2020-04-30T11:50:06Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/61743Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2020-04-30T11:50:06Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?
Did Bohr Succeed in Defending the Completeness of Quantum Mechanics?
title Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?
spellingShingle Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?
Morita, Kunihisa
title_short Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?
title_full Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?
title_fullStr Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?
title_full_unstemmed Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?
title_sort Did Bohr succeed in defending the completeness of quantum mechanics?
author Morita, Kunihisa
author_facet Morita, Kunihisa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Morita, Kunihisa
description This study posits that Bohr failed to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description of physical reality against Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen’s (EPR) paper. Although there are many papers in the literature that focus on Bohr’s argument in his reply to the EPR paper, the purpose of the current paper is not to clarify Bohr’s argument. Instead, I contend that regardless of which interpretation of Bohr’s argument is correct, his defense of the quantum mechanical description of physical reality remained incomplete. For example, a recent trend in studies of Bohr’s work is to suggest he considered the wave-function description to be epistemic. However, such an interpretation cannot be used to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2020v24n1p51
10.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n1p51
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2020v24n1p51
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n1p51
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2020v24n1p51/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Kunihisa Morita
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Kunihisa Morita
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2020); 51-63
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2020); 51-63
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 51-63
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435113816195072