Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bispo, Lucas Jairo Cervantes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84745
Resumo: In this paper I discuss the nature and structure of analysis of propositional ignorance. First, I will argue that unlike as at least two of the main conceptions of the epistemology of ignorance have assumed, the analysis of propositional ignorance is not reduced to the structure “S is ignorant that P” or similar variants of this structure. In reading propositional ignorance reduced in terms of "S is ignorant that P," these views do not make a good analysis of propositional ignorance. This is because, on the one hand, they generate a problem that refers to a possibility that has been little worked on. It is about the possibility of ignorance about false propositions and the problem, as will be shown, is that in this reduction there are good reasons both to affirm and to deny this possibility. This constitutes, at least, as a relevant theoretical tension that can compromise these conceptions and the analyzes carried out based on them. On the other hand, this reduction excludes at least a general and not necessarily factual sense of propositional ignorance, which deprives us of a more adequate analysis of ignorance and other related issues. Having this problem and its consequences in view, I will argue, secondly, for a hypothesis that has the potential to dissolve it by reformulating how we understand propositional ignorance, inheriting the advantages of reasons in favor and of reasons against the possibility of ignorance about false propositions and overcoming the objections raised against them.  
id UFSC-5_9c75363470972b6bd905ac306e53673f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/84745
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Propositional Ignorance and False PropositionsIgnorância Proposicional e Proposições FalsasEpistemologypropositional ignorancestandard viewnew viewfalse propositionsreformulationIn this paper I discuss the nature and structure of analysis of propositional ignorance. First, I will argue that unlike as at least two of the main conceptions of the epistemology of ignorance have assumed, the analysis of propositional ignorance is not reduced to the structure “S is ignorant that P” or similar variants of this structure. In reading propositional ignorance reduced in terms of "S is ignorant that P," these views do not make a good analysis of propositional ignorance. This is because, on the one hand, they generate a problem that refers to a possibility that has been little worked on. It is about the possibility of ignorance about false propositions and the problem, as will be shown, is that in this reduction there are good reasons both to affirm and to deny this possibility. This constitutes, at least, as a relevant theoretical tension that can compromise these conceptions and the analyzes carried out based on them. On the other hand, this reduction excludes at least a general and not necessarily factual sense of propositional ignorance, which deprives us of a more adequate analysis of ignorance and other related issues. Having this problem and its consequences in view, I will argue, secondly, for a hypothesis that has the potential to dissolve it by reformulating how we understand propositional ignorance, inheriting the advantages of reasons in favor and of reasons against the possibility of ignorance about false propositions and overcoming the objections raised against them.  Neste trabalho discuto a natureza e a estrutura de análise da ignorância proposicional. Meu objetivo é de apontar que, em primeiro lugar, diferentemente de como ao menos duas das principais concepções da epistemologia da ignorância têm pressuposto, a análise da ignorância proposicional não se reduz a estrutura “S é ignorante que P” ou variantes semelhantes a esta estrutura. Ao lerem a ignorância proposicional reduzida em termos de “S é ignorante que P”, essas concepções não fazem a melhor análise da ignorância proposicional. Isto porque, por um lado, geram um problema que se refere a uma possibilidade pouco trabalhada. Trata-se da possibilidade da ignorância sobre proposições falsas e o problema, como será mostrado, é que nessa redução há boas razões tanto para afirmar como para negar essa possibilidade. Isso se constitui, no mínimo, como uma tensão teórica relevante que pode comprometer essas concepções e as análises realizadas a partir delas. Por outro lado, essa redução exclui ao menos um sentido geral e não necessariamente factivo de ignorância proposicional, o que nos priva de uma análise mais adequada da ignorância e de outros temas relacionados. Tendo esse problema e os seus desdobramentos em vista, apontarei, em segundo lugar, para uma hipótese que tem o potencial de dissolvê-lo a partir da reformulação de como compreendemos a ignorância proposicional, herdando as vantagens das razões a favor e das razões contra a possibilidade da ignorância sobre proposições falsas e superando as objeções levantadas contra elas.  Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2022-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/8474510.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84745Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 113-133Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 113-133Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 26 n. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 113-1331808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84745/51096Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Jairo Cervantes Bispohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBispo, Lucas Jairo Cervantes2022-06-07T23:51:27Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/84745Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2022-06-07T23:51:27Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions
Ignorância Proposicional e Proposições Falsas
title Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions
spellingShingle Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions
Bispo, Lucas Jairo Cervantes
Epistemology
propositional ignorance
standard view
new view
false propositions
reformulation
title_short Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions
title_full Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions
title_fullStr Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions
title_full_unstemmed Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions
title_sort Propositional Ignorance and False Propositions
author Bispo, Lucas Jairo Cervantes
author_facet Bispo, Lucas Jairo Cervantes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bispo, Lucas Jairo Cervantes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epistemology
propositional ignorance
standard view
new view
false propositions
reformulation
topic Epistemology
propositional ignorance
standard view
new view
false propositions
reformulation
description In this paper I discuss the nature and structure of analysis of propositional ignorance. First, I will argue that unlike as at least two of the main conceptions of the epistemology of ignorance have assumed, the analysis of propositional ignorance is not reduced to the structure “S is ignorant that P” or similar variants of this structure. In reading propositional ignorance reduced in terms of "S is ignorant that P," these views do not make a good analysis of propositional ignorance. This is because, on the one hand, they generate a problem that refers to a possibility that has been little worked on. It is about the possibility of ignorance about false propositions and the problem, as will be shown, is that in this reduction there are good reasons both to affirm and to deny this possibility. This constitutes, at least, as a relevant theoretical tension that can compromise these conceptions and the analyzes carried out based on them. On the other hand, this reduction excludes at least a general and not necessarily factual sense of propositional ignorance, which deprives us of a more adequate analysis of ignorance and other related issues. Having this problem and its consequences in view, I will argue, secondly, for a hypothesis that has the potential to dissolve it by reformulating how we understand propositional ignorance, inheriting the advantages of reasons in favor and of reasons against the possibility of ignorance about false propositions and overcoming the objections raised against them.  
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84745
10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84745
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84745
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e84745
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/84745/51096
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Jairo Cervantes Bispo
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Jairo Cervantes Bispo
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 113-133
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 113-133
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 26 n. 1 (2022): Special Issue: Models and Modeling in the Sciences; 113-133
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435114038493184